RPGnet's decay (TBP madness)

[HappyDaze]

Yeah, the problem at this point is that the left has reframed all disagreement as violence.  Don't want to defund the cops?  You want to genocide all black people.  Don't feel comfortable with a transwoman getting naked next to your daughter in the gym locker?  You literally want that person to DIE, you monster.  So of course they have to throw these violent insane people off of their forum, or next thing you know they'll say there's only two sexes, KILLING the other forty-nine genders.  They must be stopped before they can enact their terrible genocide.

That's not to say that the right won't also engage in hyperbole, relatively milquetoast positions on here have gotten our lefty population accused of arguing in bad faith or outright lying, but they aren't being banned as Bolsheviks who want to murder all cis white people.  That distinction is important, I believe.

  In fairness to lefties, if a dude confused about being a girl is allowed to shower with my daughter there is going to be a bit of violence.

By the time she hits her college years (maybe sooner), your daughter may do it just to piss you off.

   Thanks for the advice, I will put it in the "Advice from childless lonely men" folder.

You're misfiling it, but it's yours to do with what you wish.

I don't think so, HippyDirt. Having kids changes your outlook. Hell, having pets changes your outlook.

I can say from experience that kids will get rebellious and do some stupid shit sometimes just to piss off their parents. If that's somehow difficult for you to imagine, I can't help you.

[Mistwell]

Yeah, the problem at this point is that the left has reframed all disagreement as violence.  Don't want to defund the cops?  You want to genocide all black people.  Don't feel comfortable with a transwoman getting naked next to your daughter in the gym locker?  You literally want that person to DIE, you monster.  So of course they have to throw these violent insane people off of their forum, or next thing you know they'll say there's only two sexes, KILLING the other forty-nine genders.  They must be stopped before they can enact their terrible genocide.

That's not to say that the right won't also engage in hyperbole, relatively milquetoast positions on here have gotten our lefty population accused of arguing in bad faith or outright lying, but they aren't being banned as Bolsheviks who want to murder all cis white people.  That distinction is important, I believe.

  In fairness to lefties, if a dude confused about being a girl is allowed to shower with my daughter there is going to be a bit of violence.

Do schools even do the shared shower thing anymore? I thought that went out of style?

[Wntrlnd]

Yeah, the problem at this point is that the left has reframed all disagreement as violence.  Don't want to defund the cops?  You want to genocide all black people.  Don't feel comfortable with a transwoman getting naked next to your daughter in the gym locker?  You literally want that person to DIE, you monster.  So of course they have to throw these violent insane people off of their forum, or next thing you know they'll say there's only two sexes, KILLING the other forty-nine genders.  They must be stopped before they can enact their terrible genocide.

That's not to say that the right won't also engage in hyperbole, relatively milquetoast positions on here have gotten our lefty population accused of arguing in bad faith or outright lying, but they aren't being banned as Bolsheviks who want to murder all cis white people.  That distinction is important, I believe.

  In fairness to lefties, if a dude confused about being a girl is allowed to shower with my daughter there is going to be a bit of violence.

What if the guy has long hair, high pitched voice, tits, no dick but a artificial vagina without a uterus?
What if, unless someone told you, there was no way you could tell?

  Then his parents are the worst child abusers known to allow a transistion before adulthood.  ANY of the bathroom/locker room discussion regards school age kids, so not seeing your point.

So you would beat up a prepubescent child? Or a teenager? That's what you saying? So brave.

[HappyDaze]

Yeah, the problem at this point is that the left has reframed all disagreement as violence.  Don't want to defund the cops?  You want to genocide all black people.  Don't feel comfortable with a transwoman getting naked next to your daughter in the gym locker?  You literally want that person to DIE, you monster.  So of course they have to throw these violent insane people off of their forum, or next thing you know they'll say there's only two sexes, KILLING the other forty-nine genders.  They must be stopped before they can enact their terrible genocide.

That's not to say that the right won't also engage in hyperbole, relatively milquetoast positions on here have gotten our lefty population accused of arguing in bad faith or outright lying, but they aren't being banned as Bolsheviks who want to murder all cis white people.  That distinction is important, I believe.

  In fairness to lefties, if a dude confused about being a girl is allowed to shower with my daughter there is going to be a bit of violence.

What if the guy has long hair, high pitched voice, tits, no dick but a artificial vagina without a uterus?
What if, unless someone told you, there was no way you could tell?

  Then his parents are the worst child abusers known to allow a transistion before adulthood.  ANY of the bathroom/locker room discussion regards school age kids, so not seeing your point.

So you would beat up a prepubescent child? Or a teenager? That's what you saying? So brave.

You forgot stunning. Stunning and brave.

[GeekyBugle]

Yeah, the problem at this point is that the left has reframed all disagreement as violence.  Don't want to defund the cops?  You want to genocide all black people.  Don't feel comfortable with a transwoman getting naked next to your daughter in the gym locker?  You literally want that person to DIE, you monster.  So of course they have to throw these violent insane people off of their forum, or next thing you know they'll say there's only two sexes, KILLING the other forty-nine genders.  They must be stopped before they can enact their terrible genocide.

That's not to say that the right won't also engage in hyperbole, relatively milquetoast positions on here have gotten our lefty population accused of arguing in bad faith or outright lying, but they aren't being banned as Bolsheviks who want to murder all cis white people.  That distinction is important, I believe.

  In fairness to lefties, if a dude confused about being a girl is allowed to shower with my daughter there is going to be a bit of violence.

What if the guy has long hair, high pitched voice, tits, no dick but a artificial vagina without a uterus?
What if, unless someone told you, there was no way you could tell?

  Then his parents are the worst child abusers known to allow a transistion before adulthood.  ANY of the bathroom/locker room discussion regards school age kids, so not seeing your point.

So you would beat up a prepubescent child? Or a teenager? That's what you saying? So brave.

Are you always this dishonest? Quote exactly where oggsmash says ANYTHING about beating the dude allowed to enter the girls showers?

Fucking leftoids can't argue in good faith EVER.

[jeff37923]

Yeah, the problem at this point is that the left has reframed all disagreement as violence.  Don't want to defund the cops?  You want to genocide all black people.  Don't feel comfortable with a transwoman getting naked next to your daughter in the gym locker?  You literally want that person to DIE, you monster.  So of course they have to throw these violent insane people off of their forum, or next thing you know they'll say there's only two sexes, KILLING the other forty-nine genders.  They must be stopped before they can enact their terrible genocide.

That's not to say that the right won't also engage in hyperbole, relatively milquetoast positions on here have gotten our lefty population accused of arguing in bad faith or outright lying, but they aren't being banned as Bolsheviks who want to murder all cis white people.  That distinction is important, I believe.

  In fairness to lefties, if a dude confused about being a girl is allowed to shower with my daughter there is going to be a bit of violence.

By the time she hits her college years (maybe sooner), your daughter may do it just to piss you off.

   Thanks for the advice, I will put it in the "Advice from childless lonely men" folder.

You're misfiling it, but it's yours to do with what you wish.

I don't think so, HippyDirt. Having kids changes your outlook. Hell, having pets changes your outlook.

I can say from experience that kids will get rebellious and do some stupid shit sometimes just to piss off their parents. If that's somehow difficult for you to imagine, I can't help you.

Your experience of watching sitcoms doesn't count for much. There are even some things done to piss off ma and pa that are too far for kids these days.

[Wntrlnd]

Are you always this dishonest? Quote exactly where oggsmash says ANYTHING about beating the dude allowed to enter the girls showers?

Fucking leftoids can't argue in good faith EVER.

Well, he did say

In fairness to lefties, if a dude confused about being a girl is allowed to shower with my daughter there is going to be a bit of violence.

How else am I going to interpret "violence?"

Stern talking to?

Writing a angry letter?

Complain to his congressman?

Please, tell me. How else am I supposed to read what he said?

[DocJones]

Well, he did say

In fairness to lefties, if a dude confused about being a girl is allowed to shower with my daughter there is going to be a bit of violence.

How else am I going to interpret "violence?"

Maybe his daughter is going to kick the dude's ass. ;-)

Stern talking to?

Speech can be violence.
Also silence is violence.

[GeekyBugle]

Are you always this dishonest? Quote exactly where oggsmash says ANYTHING about beating the dude allowed to enter the girls showers?

Fucking leftoids can't argue in good faith EVER.

Well, he did say

In fairness to lefties, if a dude confused about being a girl is allowed to shower with my daughter there is going to be a bit of violence.

How else am I going to interpret "violence?"

Stern talking to?

Writing a angry letter?

Complain to his congressman?

Please, tell me. How else am I supposed to read what he said?

To whom was the violence going to be exerted to?

Once more can you quote him saying he's going to beat, etc the dude?

No, you can't, and you choose the least charitable interpretation because you're a dishonest leftoid twat.

[GeekyBugle]

Well, he did say

In fairness to lefties, if a dude confused about being a girl is allowed to shower with my daughter there is going to be a bit of violence.

How else am I going to interpret "violence?"

Maybe his daughter is going to kick the dude's ass. ;-)

Stern talking to?

Speech can be violence.
Also silence is violence.

Or maybe the violence is directed at who allowed it to happen?

Isn't that also a possibility?

Or is it mandatory to jump to accusations of istophobia?

[Stephen Tannhauser]

Two people are banned for two weeks for calling themselves "dirty old men" in what is clearly a self-deprecating joke:

https://forum.rpg.net/index.php?threads/coyotes-own-receives-a-%F0%9F%9A%AB-fourteen-day-ban.900003/

https://forum.rpg.net/index.php?threads/pieta-receives-a-%F0%9F%9A%AB-fourteen-day-ban.900005/

It is clear that there is no room for humour in an SJ safe space.

[oggsmash]

Yeah, the problem at this point is that the left has reframed all disagreement as violence.  Don't want to defund the cops?  You want to genocide all black people.  Don't feel comfortable with a transwoman getting naked next to your daughter in the gym locker?  You literally want that person to DIE, you monster.  So of course they have to throw these violent insane people off of their forum, or next thing you know they'll say there's only two sexes, KILLING the other forty-nine genders.  They must be stopped before they can enact their terrible genocide.

That's not to say that the right won't also engage in hyperbole, relatively milquetoast positions on here have gotten our lefty population accused of arguing in bad faith or outright lying, but they aren't being banned as Bolsheviks who want to murder all cis white people.  That distinction is important, I believe.

  In fairness to lefties, if a dude confused about being a girl is allowed to shower with my daughter there is going to be a bit of violence.

What if the guy has long hair, high pitched voice, tits, no dick but a artificial vagina without a uterus?
What if, unless someone told you, there was no way you could tell?

  Then his parents are the worst child abusers known to allow a transistion before adulthood.  ANY of the bathroom/locker room discussion regards school age kids, so not seeing your point.

So you would beat up a prepubescent child? Or a teenager? That's what you saying? So brave.

  Why would I do anything to a kid?  Is it that hard for you to read what I wrote in black and white and understand who I consider at fault? 

[oggsmash]

Yeah, the problem at this point is that the left has reframed all disagreement as violence.  Don't want to defund the cops?  You want to genocide all black people.  Don't feel comfortable with a transwoman getting naked next to your daughter in the gym locker?  You literally want that person to DIE, you monster.  So of course they have to throw these violent insane people off of their forum, or next thing you know they'll say there's only two sexes, KILLING the other forty-nine genders.  They must be stopped before they can enact their terrible genocide.

That's not to say that the right won't also engage in hyperbole, relatively milquetoast positions on here have gotten our lefty population accused of arguing in bad faith or outright lying, but they aren't being banned as Bolsheviks who want to murder all cis white people.  That distinction is important, I believe.

  In fairness to lefties, if a dude confused about being a girl is allowed to shower with my daughter there is going to be a bit of violence.

By the time she hits her college years (maybe sooner), your daughter may do it just to piss you off.

   Thanks for the advice, I will put it in the "Advice from childless lonely men" folder.

You're misfiling it, but it's yours to do with what you wish.

  No. I am not. 

[Reckall]

Speech can be violence.
Also silence is violence.

Sorry, but no. This is as woke as it gets. Using violence against speech is fascist - and yet this is what is happening all over the English speaking world (for now) starting with university campuses. Check Berkley 2017 for the unbelievable level of violence against a speaker from the alt-right.

The argument that words can be violence is based on a false syllogism. "If words can cause stress, and if prolonged stress can cause physical harm, then speech can be a form of violence." I'm tired of hearing this. True, if A can cause B and B can cause C, then A can cause C. Therefore, if words can cause stress and stress can cause harm, then words can cause harm, but that does not establish that words are violence. It only establishes that words can result in harm. Just rerun the syllogism by swapping in "breaking up with your girlfriend". This can provoke stress in her, and stress can cause harm. That doesn't mean that it is a violent act. Beating up your girlfriend, OTOH...

If you think that words are violence, and react accordingly, then you are only a puppet in the hands of the first stray troll - or, even worse, a woke.

[Ghostmaker]

Speech can be violence.
Also silence is violence.

Sorry, but no. This is as woke as it gets. Using violence against speech is fascist - and yet this is what is happening all over the English speaking world (for now) starting with university campuses. Check Berkley 2017 for the unbelievable level of violence against a speaker from the alt-right.

The argument that words can be violence is based on a false syllogism. "If words can cause stress, and if prolonged stress can cause physical harm, then speech can be a form of violence." I'm tired of hearing this. True, if A can cause B and B can cause C, then A can cause C. Therefore, if words can cause stress and stress can cause harm, then words can cause harm, but that does not establish that words are violence. It only establishes that words can result in harm. Just rerun the syllogism by swapping in "breaking up with your girlfriend". This can provoke stress in her, and stress can cause harm. That doesn't mean that it is a violent act. Beating up your girlfriend, OTOH...

If you think that words are violence, and react accordingly, then you are only a puppet in the hands of the first stray troll - or, even worse, a woke.

And don't forget, Reckall, their violence is just 'free speech'. Contradicting speech to them is 'literal genocide'.