Imprison anyone who refuses the vax!

[Ghostmaker]

Recently, Sleepy Joe admitted that 'managing Covid is a state issue'. Which looks to be a preemptive surrender in advance of what may be an absolutely brutal SCOTUS ruling against the mandates.

So I guess federal mandates are probably going to go out the window.

The upshot is that this may be the Hair-Sniffer's 'Mission Accomplished'.  The current situation is entirely untenable and even the true believers in the regime know it.

[Zelen]

Recently, Sleepy Joe admitted that 'managing Covid is a state issue'. Which looks to be a preemptive surrender in advance of what may be an absolutely brutal SCOTUS ruling against the mandates.

I would never expect an absolutely brutal ruling from the current crop of pedophiles and villains posing as SC justices.

Also it's pretty ironic to nail Kiero for only "finding sources that agree" when this is exactly and precisely the modus operandi of the regime's Covid narrative for the past 2 years. (Despite countless instances of illogical / irrational / demonstrably false statements & actions.)

[KingCheops]

Recently, Sleepy Joe admitted that 'managing Covid is a state issue'. Which looks to be a preemptive surrender in advance of what may be an absolutely brutal SCOTUS ruling against the mandates.

I would never expect an absolutely brutal ruling from the current crop of pedophiles and villains posing as SC justices.

Also it's pretty ironic to nail Kiero for only "finding sources that agree" when this is exactly and precisely the modus operandi of the regime's Covid narrative for the past 2 years. (Despite countless instances of illogical / irrational / demonstrably false statements & actions.)

It's a scientific fact that only a consensus opinion of scientists is science.  Anything that questions that consensus is witchcraft and conspiracy theories and anyone spouting it must be burnt at the stake as a heretic.

[Mistwell]

I believe the current NZ record is 10 times in the same day.

That's impressive commitment to the cause!

Also worth noting Nadim Zahawi, pictured above, owns the polling company YouGov, which mysteriously gives results that always support the government line on whatever questions it asks.

He hasn't owned any part of YouGov for over a decade, but you're dumb as a rock so that fact is irrelevant to you.

[Mistwell]

But the same source that you cited for mRNA being dangerous also claims that other vaccines are dangerous as well. If you believe childrenshealthdefense.org about mRNA vaccines, why did you disregard their warnings about other standard UK vaccines like MMR? This is from years before the covid pandemic, for example:

JCVI Historic Recklessness for Child Health Safety

The JCVI has a legal obligation under English and EU law to apply the precautionary principle in its deliberations. An account of how the JCVI has historically brought about widespread national harm to British children from a reckless approach to child health safety can be seen here: British Government's Reckless Disregard for Child Health Safety

The latest information shows nothing has changed.

There is a considerable and growing body of research either showing how vaccinations are causally involved in or implicated as the only realistic causal explanation for the pandemic increases in autism, asthma, allergies, diabetes and many other new emerging conditions in modern western economies.

https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/pharma-decide-uk-vaccination/
https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/secret-british-mmr-vaccine-files-forced-open-by-legal-action/

What a bizarre question. I don't regularly read that site and more to the point I don't treat any site as gospel. Each article, and even elements of any article are evaluated on their merits, not simply treated as something I should accept wholecloth because of where it came from.

IE if an article from a source with zero credibility agrees with your view you will quote it here and otherwise you will ignore that source. Gotcha. The credibility of a source is meaningless to you, as long as it agrees with your preconceived notions about reality.

[Ghostmaker]

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/397145.php is an assemblage of some of the profound hypocrisy displayed by the craven Covidians.

Every decision made has been a political one, not a health or science-based one.

But by all means, keep trying to wave 'but the SCIENCE!' around.

[Garry G]

Your tinfoil hat is on way too tight. You're seeing conspiracies in everything.

Incredible someone as blinkered as you is trusted with other people's safety. Evidently you can't see anything further than what's right in front of you. Nor do you seem to know a great deal about the British government and their advisers. So pardon me if I give your ignorant wittering little credence.

Except that you have no idea on how the NHS and local councils worksl. Healthcare workers turn up at people's doors on a daily basis within ethical guidelines and with no breach of confidentiality. It's how social care, OT and PT at home work. To be fair you not noticing all this happening around you every day may a sign of how well it works.

Or you're an idiot but I don't like to assume that.

[Eirikrautha]

But the same source that you cited for mRNA being dangerous also claims that other vaccines are dangerous as well. If you believe childrenshealthdefense.org about mRNA vaccines, why did you disregard their warnings about other standard UK vaccines like MMR? This is from years before the covid pandemic, for example:

JCVI Historic Recklessness for Child Health Safety

The JCVI has a legal obligation under English and EU law to apply the precautionary principle in its deliberations. An account of how the JCVI has historically brought about widespread national harm to British children from a reckless approach to child health safety can be seen here: British Government's Reckless Disregard for Child Health Safety

The latest information shows nothing has changed.

There is a considerable and growing body of research either showing how vaccinations are causally involved in or implicated as the only realistic causal explanation for the pandemic increases in autism, asthma, allergies, diabetes and many other new emerging conditions in modern western economies.

https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/pharma-decide-uk-vaccination/
https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/secret-british-mmr-vaccine-files-forced-open-by-legal-action/

What a bizarre question. I don't regularly read that site and more to the point I don't treat any site as gospel. Each article, and even elements of any article are evaluated on their merits, not simply treated as something I should accept wholecloth because of where it came from.

IE if an article from a source with zero credibility agrees with your view you will quote it here and otherwise you will ignore that source. Gotcha. The credibility of a source is meaningless to you, as long as it agrees with your preconceived notions about reality.

Pot, meet kettle.  The staggering lack of self-awareness it took for you to post that...

[Mistwell]

But the same source that you cited for mRNA being dangerous also claims that other vaccines are dangerous as well. If you believe childrenshealthdefense.org about mRNA vaccines, why did you disregard their warnings about other standard UK vaccines like MMR? This is from years before the covid pandemic, for example:

JCVI Historic Recklessness for Child Health Safety

The JCVI has a legal obligation under English and EU law to apply the precautionary principle in its deliberations. An account of how the JCVI has historically brought about widespread national harm to British children from a reckless approach to child health safety can be seen here: British Government's Reckless Disregard for Child Health Safety

The latest information shows nothing has changed.

There is a considerable and growing body of research either showing how vaccinations are causally involved in or implicated as the only realistic causal explanation for the pandemic increases in autism, asthma, allergies, diabetes and many other new emerging conditions in modern western economies.

https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/pharma-decide-uk-vaccination/
https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/secret-british-mmr-vaccine-files-forced-open-by-legal-action/

What a bizarre question. I don't regularly read that site and more to the point I don't treat any site as gospel. Each article, and even elements of any article are evaluated on their merits, not simply treated as something I should accept wholecloth because of where it came from.

IE if an article from a source with zero credibility agrees with your view you will quote it here and otherwise you will ignore that source. Gotcha. The credibility of a source is meaningless to you, as long as it agrees with your preconceived notions about reality.

Pot, meet kettle.  The staggering lack of self-awareness it took for you to post that...

Exactly which source have I cited which lacked credibility? This should be good. You continue to defend a creep who cited from an antisemitic whack job conspiracy theory website multiple times, who just posted an international court filing alleging worldwide conspiracy theory, and instead of ever taking him to task for anything you blurt out these vague accusations at me with no backing at all. Why do you feel like you need to defend Keiro after all the stupid shit he continues to pull with this stupid whataboutism?

[Kiero]

Exactly which source have I cited which lacked credibility?

How about every single time you've used a "fact check" as "evidence" to support your point?

[Kiero]

What I find most hilarious about all of this is that there are many of you who've been taken in for the last two years by the most incredible scam.

You've allowed yourself to be convinced there's a deadly pandemic (there isn't; never was) which has merited sweeping away your rights and freedoms and necessitated changing the way you live day to day. Including allowing yourself to be injected with an experimental gene therapy that doesn't even work, to treat a virus which is of almost no risk to you at all.

Meanwhile, I've done none of this, accepted no change to the way I live and remain inviolate in body (and have suffered little impact at all from the so-called deadly virus, despite having been infected several times). Yet I'm the one who's "crazy".

Rock on you nutbars, I'm sure those of you still alive 5 years from now will deny ever believing there was a pandemic in 2020-2023.

[HappyDaze]

Exactly which source have I cited which lacked credibility?

How about every single time you've used a "fact check" as "evidence" to support your point?

It's really geting to you that none of your bullshit can pass even that simple hurdle, isn't it?

[HappyDaze]

What I find most hilarious about all of this is that there are many of you who've been taken in for the last two years by the most incredible scam.

You've allowed yourself to be convinced there's a deadly pandemic (there isn't; never was) which has merited sweeping away your rights and freedoms and necessitated changing the way you live day to day. Including allowing yourself to be injected with an experimental gene therapy that doesn't even work, to treat a virus which is of almost no risk to you at all.

Meanwhile, I've done none of this, accepted no change to the way I live and remain inviolate in body (and have suffered little impact at all from the so-called deadly virus, despite having been infected several times). Yet I'm the one who's "crazy".

Rock on you nutbars, I'm sure those of you still alive 5 years from now will deny ever believing there was a pandemic in 2020-2023.

You've been infected several times...huh, what happened to the natural immunity that supposedly is so much better than the vaccines?

[Kiero]

You've been infected several times...huh, what happened to the natural immunity that supposedly is so much better than the vaccines?

Natural immunity doesn't prevent infection from coronaviruses, much as it doesn't from influenza. It does provide much better protection than the jabs, though, as repeated studies have shown.

Fortunately, my immunity derived from infection has zero risk of adverse reactions.

[Eirikrautha]

But the same source that you cited for mRNA being dangerous also claims that other vaccines are dangerous as well. If you believe childrenshealthdefense.org about mRNA vaccines, why did you disregard their warnings about other standard UK vaccines like MMR? This is from years before the covid pandemic, for example:

JCVI Historic Recklessness for Child Health Safety

The JCVI has a legal obligation under English and EU law to apply the precautionary principle in its deliberations. An account of how the JCVI has historically brought about widespread national harm to British children from a reckless approach to child health safety can be seen here: British Government's Reckless Disregard for Child Health Safety

The latest information shows nothing has changed.

There is a considerable and growing body of research either showing how vaccinations are causally involved in or implicated as the only realistic causal explanation for the pandemic increases in autism, asthma, allergies, diabetes and many other new emerging conditions in modern western economies.

https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/pharma-decide-uk-vaccination/
https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/secret-british-mmr-vaccine-files-forced-open-by-legal-action/

What a bizarre question. I don't regularly read that site and more to the point I don't treat any site as gospel. Each article, and even elements of any article are evaluated on their merits, not simply treated as something I should accept wholecloth because of where it came from.

IE if an article from a source with zero credibility agrees with your view you will quote it here and otherwise you will ignore that source. Gotcha. The credibility of a source is meaningless to you, as long as it agrees with your preconceived notions about reality.

Pot, meet kettle.  The staggering lack of self-awareness it took for you to post that...

Exactly which source have I cited which lacked credibility? This should be good. You continue to defend a creep who cited from an antisemitic whack job conspiracy theory website multiple times, who just posted an international court filing alleging worldwide conspiracy theory, and instead of ever taking him to task for anything you blurt out these vague accusations at me with no backing at all. Why do you feel like you need to defend Keiro after all the stupid shit he continues to pull with this stupid whataboutism?

Easy.  Post one example where you have cited a highly credible source that disagrees with your point of view on Covid (they exist; there are many doctors and epidemiologists that have criticized the response to the pandemic, masks, alternative to the vaccines, etc.).  But your test for "credible" is "agrees with the narrative for this disease that I already believe."  Doctors with decades of experience at major research hospitals are not "credible" because they contradict the narrative.