Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:09:44 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:05:32 PM

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on July 16, 2023, 11:12:52 AM
Anime is full of sexual degeneracy. Female characters are routinely given blowup doll proportions and constantly groped and molested by the male characters but it's treated as harmless fun. Yet it's always the woke who criticize it and non-woke who defend it. We should be critical of all sexual degeneracy, even if it's heterosexual. The slippery slope is everywhere.

Japan is hugely sexually repressed, which results in their media treating rape as acceptable, depicting women as blowup dolls, and sexualizing children. America is sexually open, which results in our media sexualizing children, animals, corpses, inanimate objects, etc... but at least women have more realistic proportions and groping women is seen as evil? Both seem pretty fucked up to me.

We need to express our sexuality in healthy ways that respect the human rights of women and children, as opposed to dehumanizing them into sex toys.

No. Art is above morality. To think it isn't paves the way for censorship of media. I'm willing to use any means to prevent that, because it is inherently evil.

That's fine and dandy, now... Who defines WHAT is art?

We ALREADY censor media: No Snuff or CP for instance, certain themes aren't fit to be shown on stuff aimed at kids.

I was speaking in reference to media centering around fictional characters- either played by humans in live action, or drawn. REAL LIFE MEDIA performed by REAL LIFE PEOPLE that AREN'T ACTING should be censored if it harms the people involved.

I also should say that drawn art (as long as it doesn't sexualize a real life person without their permission (and children cannot give permission)) should be known. Also, I have no problem with certain television or comic books or novels not being shown to children, I have a problem when it's deemed as inferior or morally dubious due to child-unfriendly content. I have a problem when it is not only limited to certain audiences, but banned outright, like in the Hays Code.


[/quote]

Good to hear you're a violent extremist. But it's okay, because your violence is for the good cause and only aimed against the bad guys...

[/quote]

I'll only respond with violence when the censors get violent. Otherwise, I'll just attack the basis of their argument.

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:13:30 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:10:01 PM

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on July 17, 2023, 03:37:20 PM
People who like to be strangled, because it's strangulation not choking (choking is when there's a object inside the windpipe), are fucked in the head. If that's considered normal now because of all the rampant violent porn addiction, then civilization is well and truly fucked.

'NOO!!!!!! YOU CAN'T JUST PRACTICE YOUR FETISH CONSENSUALLY!!!!!!! REEEEE YOU MUST BOW DOWN TO WHAT I THINK IS MORAL ONLY!!!!!!!!!!!!'

Wow, that hit you too close to home for comfort didn't it?

Now, stop crying that some people think you're fucked in the head and won't celebrate your degeneracy for a second and read his comment carefully...

Done?

Exactly where does he say he wants to force anyone to do or not do X?

'Muh-muh civilization is ruined because of people having consensual kinky sex!!!! Waahh!!!!!!!!!'

That's all the post boils down to. I have all the right in the world to mock him for it.

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:14:29 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:09:44 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:05:32 PM

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on July 16, 2023, 11:12:52 AM
Anime is full of sexual degeneracy. Female characters are routinely given blowup doll proportions and constantly groped and molested by the male characters but it's treated as harmless fun. Yet it's always the woke who criticize it and non-woke who defend it. We should be critical of all sexual degeneracy, even if it's heterosexual. The slippery slope is everywhere.

Japan is hugely sexually repressed, which results in their media treating rape as acceptable, depicting women as blowup dolls, and sexualizing children. America is sexually open, which results in our media sexualizing children, animals, corpses, inanimate objects, etc... but at least women have more realistic proportions and groping women is seen as evil? Both seem pretty fucked up to me.

We need to express our sexuality in healthy ways that respect the human rights of women and children, as opposed to dehumanizing them into sex toys.

No. Art is above morality. To think it isn't paves the way for censorship of media. I'm willing to use any means to prevent that, because it is inherently evil.

That's fine and dandy, now... Who defines WHAT is art?

We ALREADY censor media: No Snuff or CP for instance, certain themes aren't fit to be shown on stuff aimed at kids.

I was speaking in reference to media centering around fictional characters- either played by humans in live action, or drawn. REAL LIFE MEDIA performed by REAL LIFE PEOPLE that AREN'T ACTING should be censored if it harms the people involved.

I also should say that drawn art (as long as it doesn't sexualize a real life person without their permission (and children cannot give permission)) should be known. Also, I have no problem with certain television or comic books or novels not being shown to children, I have a problem when it's deemed as inferior or morally dubious due to child-unfriendly content. I have a problem when it is not only limited to certain audiences, but banned outright, like in the Hays Code.

Quote

Good to hear you're a violent extremist. But it's okay, because your violence is for the good cause and only aimed against the bad guys...

I'll only respond with violence when the censors get violent. Otherwise, I'll just attack the basis of their argument.

So, you want to regulate how others think but you think you're the good guy?

I consider lot's of stuff to be Immoral, doesn't mean I want it (all) outright banned, because I think you have the God given right to sin and go to hell.

So here we are, criticizing something, and then you come along to say you want to control what we criticize and why we do it, effectivelly making you into a censor of the worst type.

Nope, you didn't say ANYTHING about violence only after being violently attacked, but sure, you can clarify your position, that's fine.

What isn't fine is your wish to control what others think and say, in the name of protecting free speech of course.

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:15:42 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:13:30 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:10:01 PM

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on July 17, 2023, 03:37:20 PM
People who like to be strangled, because it's strangulation not choking (choking is when there's a object inside the windpipe), are fucked in the head. If that's considered normal now because of all the rampant violent porn addiction, then civilization is well and truly fucked.

'NOO!!!!!! YOU CAN'T JUST PRACTICE YOUR FETISH CONSENSUALLY!!!!!!! REEEEE YOU MUST BOW DOWN TO WHAT I THINK IS MORAL ONLY!!!!!!!!!!!!'

Wow, that hit you too close to home for comfort didn't it?

Now, stop crying that some people think you're fucked in the head and won't celebrate your degeneracy for a second and read his comment carefully...

Done?

Exactly where does he say he wants to force anyone to do or not do X?

'Muh-muh civilization is ruined because of people having consensual kinky sex!!!! Waahh!!!!!!!!!'

That's all the post boils down to. I have all the right in the world to mock him for it.

Did I say you couldn't mock anyone?

Nope, what I asked you is to provide evidence that he wants to prevent people from doing or not doing X, you still haven't provided it.

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:24:42 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:14:29 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:09:44 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:05:32 PM

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on July 16, 2023, 11:12:52 AM
Anime is full of sexual degeneracy. Female characters are routinely given blowup doll proportions and constantly groped and molested by the male characters but it's treated as harmless fun. Yet it's always the woke who criticize it and non-woke who defend it. We should be critical of all sexual degeneracy, even if it's heterosexual. The slippery slope is everywhere.

Japan is hugely sexually repressed, which results in their media treating rape as acceptable, depicting women as blowup dolls, and sexualizing children. America is sexually open, which results in our media sexualizing children, animals, corpses, inanimate objects, etc... but at least women have more realistic proportions and groping women is seen as evil? Both seem pretty fucked up to me.

We need to express our sexuality in healthy ways that respect the human rights of women and children, as opposed to dehumanizing them into sex toys.

No. Art is above morality. To think it isn't paves the way for censorship of media. I'm willing to use any means to prevent that, because it is inherently evil.

That's fine and dandy, now... Who defines WHAT is art?

We ALREADY censor media: No Snuff or CP for instance, certain themes aren't fit to be shown on stuff aimed at kids.

I was speaking in reference to media centering around fictional characters- either played by humans in live action, or drawn. REAL LIFE MEDIA performed by REAL LIFE PEOPLE that AREN'T ACTING should be censored if it harms the people involved.

I also should say that drawn art (as long as it doesn't sexualize a real life person without their permission (and children cannot give permission)) should be known. Also, I have no problem with certain television or comic books or novels not being shown to children, I have a problem when it's deemed as inferior or morally dubious due to child-unfriendly content. I have a problem when it is not only limited to certain audiences, but banned outright, like in the Hays Code.

Quote

Good to hear you're a violent extremist. But it's okay, because your violence is for the good cause and only aimed against the bad guys...

I'll only respond with violence when the censors get violent. Otherwise, I'll just attack the basis of their argument.

So, you want to regulate how others think but you think you're the good guy?

I consider lot's of stuff to be Immoral, doesn't mean I want it (all) outright banned, because I think you have the God given right to sin and go to hell.

So here we are, criticizing something, and then you come along to say you want to control what we criticize and why we do it, effectivelly making you into a censor of the worst type.

Nope, you didn't say ANYTHING about violence only after being violently attacked, but sure, you can clarify your position, that's fine.

What isn't fine is your wish to control what others think and say, in the name of protecting free speech of course.

I want to debunk the line of thinking that leads to censorship of anime, manga, ttrpgs, novels by conservatives or leftists. These people try to change the real world in their favor (as we have seen many times before from both sides). I want to call out their bullshit and ridicule them in public. I would only become a censor were there really no other option to keep (near) absolute creative freedom. Even then, I would rather kill myself.

I literally said 'ignore it' and one guy responded with 'THIS IS DESTROYING CIVILIZATION, WE CAN'T IGNORE IT FUCK OFF' with the undertone that 'WE MUST STOP THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL'. Another guy said 'WE MUST CENSOR ART, YES YES YES' again with the undertone 'WE MUST STOP THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL'. They don't want to have it exist, PERIOD. Hence I remind them that the source of their arguments is shallow.

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:35:50 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:24:42 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:14:29 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:09:44 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:05:32 PM

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on July 16, 2023, 11:12:52 AM
Anime is full of sexual degeneracy. Female characters are routinely given blowup doll proportions and constantly groped and molested by the male characters but it's treated as harmless fun. Yet it's always the woke who criticize it and non-woke who defend it. We should be critical of all sexual degeneracy, even if it's heterosexual. The slippery slope is everywhere.

Japan is hugely sexually repressed, which results in their media treating rape as acceptable, depicting women as blowup dolls, and sexualizing children. America is sexually open, which results in our media sexualizing children, animals, corpses, inanimate objects, etc... but at least women have more realistic proportions and groping women is seen as evil? Both seem pretty fucked up to me.

We need to express our sexuality in healthy ways that respect the human rights of women and children, as opposed to dehumanizing them into sex toys.

No. Art is above morality. To think it isn't paves the way for censorship of media. I'm willing to use any means to prevent that, because it is inherently evil.

That's fine and dandy, now... Who defines WHAT is art?

We ALREADY censor media: No Snuff or CP for instance, certain themes aren't fit to be shown on stuff aimed at kids.

I was speaking in reference to media centering around fictional characters- either played by humans in live action, or drawn. REAL LIFE MEDIA performed by REAL LIFE PEOPLE that AREN'T ACTING should be censored if it harms the people involved.

I also should say that drawn art (as long as it doesn't sexualize a real life person without their permission (and children cannot give permission)) should be known. Also, I have no problem with certain television or comic books or novels not being shown to children, I have a problem when it's deemed as inferior or morally dubious due to child-unfriendly content. I have a problem when it is not only limited to certain audiences, but banned outright, like in the Hays Code.

Quote

Good to hear you're a violent extremist. But it's okay, because your violence is for the good cause and only aimed against the bad guys...

I'll only respond with violence when the censors get violent. Otherwise, I'll just attack the basis of their argument.

So, you want to regulate how others think but you think you're the good guy?

I consider lot's of stuff to be Immoral, doesn't mean I want it (all) outright banned, because I think you have the God given right to sin and go to hell.

So here we are, criticizing something, and then you come along to say you want to control what we criticize and why we do it, effectivelly making you into a censor of the worst type.

Nope, you didn't say ANYTHING about violence only after being violently attacked, but sure, you can clarify your position, that's fine.

What isn't fine is your wish to control what others think and say, in the name of protecting free speech of course.

I want to debunk the line of thinking that leads to censorship of anime, manga, ttrpgs, novels by conservatives or leftists. These people try to change the real world in their favor (as we have seen many times before from both sides). I want to call out their bullshit and ridicule them in public. I would only become a censor were there really no other option to keep (near) absolute creative freedom. Even then, I would rather kill myself.

I literally said 'ignore it' and one guy responded with 'THIS IS DESTROYING CIVILIZATION, WE CAN'T IGNORE IT FUCK OFF' with the undertone that 'WE MUST STOP THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL'. Another guy said 'WE MUST CENSOR ART, YES YES YES' again with the undertone 'WE MUST STOP THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL'. They don't want to have it exist, PERIOD. Hence I remind them that the source of their arguments is shallow.

You complained the ppl find it immoral, that's wanting to control their thoughts and free speech, you're a worst censor than what BCT could ever be.

As for what YOU read into his post... Well, that's on you, you can't prove that's the intention, you're playing at being proffesor X.

Just wanted to say thanks to Larian Studios. I was on the fence about buying...but I'm saving my money for something else. Appreciate it 

Quote from: Thorn Drumheller on July 19, 2023, 02:44:57 PM
Just wanted to say thanks to Larian Studios. I was on the fence about buying...but I'm saving my money for something else. Appreciate it 

based good sir

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:42:53 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:35:50 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:24:42 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:14:29 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:09:44 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:05:32 PM

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on July 16, 2023, 11:12:52 AM
Anime is full of sexual degeneracy. Female characters are routinely given blowup doll proportions and constantly groped and molested by the male characters but it's treated as harmless fun. Yet it's always the woke who criticize it and non-woke who defend it. We should be critical of all sexual degeneracy, even if it's heterosexual. The slippery slope is everywhere.

Japan is hugely sexually repressed, which results in their media treating rape as acceptable, depicting women as blowup dolls, and sexualizing children. America is sexually open, which results in our media sexualizing children, animals, corpses, inanimate objects, etc... but at least women have more realistic proportions and groping women is seen as evil? Both seem pretty fucked up to me.

We need to express our sexuality in healthy ways that respect the human rights of women and children, as opposed to dehumanizing them into sex toys.

No. Art is above morality. To think it isn't paves the way for censorship of media. I'm willing to use any means to prevent that, because it is inherently evil.

That's fine and dandy, now... Who defines WHAT is art?

We ALREADY censor media: No Snuff or CP for instance, certain themes aren't fit to be shown on stuff aimed at kids.

I was speaking in reference to media centering around fictional characters- either played by humans in live action, or drawn. REAL LIFE MEDIA performed by REAL LIFE PEOPLE that AREN'T ACTING should be censored if it harms the people involved.

I also should say that drawn art (as long as it doesn't sexualize a real life person without their permission (and children cannot give permission)) should be known. Also, I have no problem with certain television or comic books or novels not being shown to children, I have a problem when it's deemed as inferior or morally dubious due to child-unfriendly content. I have a problem when it is not only limited to certain audiences, but banned outright, like in the Hays Code.

Quote

Good to hear you're a violent extremist. But it's okay, because your violence is for the good cause and only aimed against the bad guys...

I'll only respond with violence when the censors get violent. Otherwise, I'll just attack the basis of their argument.

So, you want to regulate how others think but you think you're the good guy?

I consider lot's of stuff to be Immoral, doesn't mean I want it (all) outright banned, because I think you have the God given right to sin and go to hell.

So here we are, criticizing something, and then you come along to say you want to control what we criticize and why we do it, effectivelly making you into a censor of the worst type.

Nope, you didn't say ANYTHING about violence only after being violently attacked, but sure, you can clarify your position, that's fine.

What isn't fine is your wish to control what others think and say, in the name of protecting free speech of course.

I want to debunk the line of thinking that leads to censorship of anime, manga, ttrpgs, novels by conservatives or leftists. These people try to change the real world in their favor (as we have seen many times before from both sides). I want to call out their bullshit and ridicule them in public. I would only become a censor were there really no other option to keep (near) absolute creative freedom. Even then, I would rather kill myself.

I literally said 'ignore it' and one guy responded with 'THIS IS DESTROYING CIVILIZATION, WE CAN'T IGNORE IT FUCK OFF' with the undertone that 'WE MUST STOP THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL'. Another guy said 'WE MUST CENSOR ART, YES YES YES' again with the undertone 'WE MUST STOP THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL'. They don't want to have it exist, PERIOD. Hence I remind them that the source of their arguments is shallow.

You complained the ppl find it immoral, that's wanting to control their thoughts and free speech, you're a worst censor than what BCT could ever be.

As for what YOU read into his post... Well, that's on you, you can't prove that's the intention, you're playing at being proffesor X.

i very frequently read posts in the same tone those two posts were written, they're made by people who want censorship. i want to be wrong but at the same time my experience tells me that I'm not.

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:51:31 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:42:53 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:35:50 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:24:42 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:14:29 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:09:44 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:05:32 PM

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on July 16, 2023, 11:12:52 AM
Anime is full of sexual degeneracy. Female characters are routinely given blowup doll proportions and constantly groped and molested by the male characters but it's treated as harmless fun. Yet it's always the woke who criticize it and non-woke who defend it. We should be critical of all sexual degeneracy, even if it's heterosexual. The slippery slope is everywhere.

Japan is hugely sexually repressed, which results in their media treating rape as acceptable, depicting women as blowup dolls, and sexualizing children. America is sexually open, which results in our media sexualizing children, animals, corpses, inanimate objects, etc... but at least women have more realistic proportions and groping women is seen as evil? Both seem pretty fucked up to me.

We need to express our sexuality in healthy ways that respect the human rights of women and children, as opposed to dehumanizing them into sex toys.

No. Art is above morality. To think it isn't paves the way for censorship of media. I'm willing to use any means to prevent that, because it is inherently evil.

That's fine and dandy, now... Who defines WHAT is art?

We ALREADY censor media: No Snuff or CP for instance, certain themes aren't fit to be shown on stuff aimed at kids.

I was speaking in reference to media centering around fictional characters- either played by humans in live action, or drawn. REAL LIFE MEDIA performed by REAL LIFE PEOPLE that AREN'T ACTING should be censored if it harms the people involved.

I also should say that drawn art (as long as it doesn't sexualize a real life person without their permission (and children cannot give permission)) should be known. Also, I have no problem with certain television or comic books or novels not being shown to children, I have a problem when it's deemed as inferior or morally dubious due to child-unfriendly content. I have a problem when it is not only limited to certain audiences, but banned outright, like in the Hays Code.

Quote

Good to hear you're a violent extremist. But it's okay, because your violence is for the good cause and only aimed against the bad guys...

I'll only respond with violence when the censors get violent. Otherwise, I'll just attack the basis of their argument.

So, you want to regulate how others think but you think you're the good guy?

I consider lot's of stuff to be Immoral, doesn't mean I want it (all) outright banned, because I think you have the God given right to sin and go to hell.

So here we are, criticizing something, and then you come along to say you want to control what we criticize and why we do it, effectivelly making you into a censor of the worst type.

Nope, you didn't say ANYTHING about violence only after being violently attacked, but sure, you can clarify your position, that's fine.

What isn't fine is your wish to control what others think and say, in the name of protecting free speech of course.

I want to debunk the line of thinking that leads to censorship of anime, manga, ttrpgs, novels by conservatives or leftists. These people try to change the real world in their favor (as we have seen many times before from both sides). I want to call out their bullshit and ridicule them in public. I would only become a censor were there really no other option to keep (near) absolute creative freedom. Even then, I would rather kill myself.

I literally said 'ignore it' and one guy responded with 'THIS IS DESTROYING CIVILIZATION, WE CAN'T IGNORE IT FUCK OFF' with the undertone that 'WE MUST STOP THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL'. Another guy said 'WE MUST CENSOR ART, YES YES YES' again with the undertone 'WE MUST STOP THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL'. They don't want to have it exist, PERIOD. Hence I remind them that the source of their arguments is shallow.

You complained the ppl find it immoral, that's wanting to control their thoughts and free speech, you're a worst censor than what BCT could ever be.

As for what YOU read into his post... Well, that's on you, you can't prove that's the intention, you're playing at being proffesor X.

i very frequently read posts in the same tone those two posts were written, they're made by people who want censorship. i want to be wrong but at the same time my experience tells me that I'm not.

Nope, you very frequently pretend you can read people's minds. Hint, you can't.

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:52:37 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:51:31 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:42:53 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:35:50 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:24:42 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:14:29 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:09:44 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 02:05:32 PM

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on July 16, 2023, 11:12:52 AM
Anime is full of sexual degeneracy. Female characters are routinely given blowup doll proportions and constantly groped and molested by the male characters but it's treated as harmless fun. Yet it's always the woke who criticize it and non-woke who defend it. We should be critical of all sexual degeneracy, even if it's heterosexual. The slippery slope is everywhere.

Japan is hugely sexually repressed, which results in their media treating rape as acceptable, depicting women as blowup dolls, and sexualizing children. America is sexually open, which results in our media sexualizing children, animals, corpses, inanimate objects, etc... but at least women have more realistic proportions and groping women is seen as evil? Both seem pretty fucked up to me.

We need to express our sexuality in healthy ways that respect the human rights of women and children, as opposed to dehumanizing them into sex toys.

No. Art is above morality. To think it isn't paves the way for censorship of media. I'm willing to use any means to prevent that, because it is inherently evil.

That's fine and dandy, now... Who defines WHAT is art?

We ALREADY censor media: No Snuff or CP for instance, certain themes aren't fit to be shown on stuff aimed at kids.

I was speaking in reference to media centering around fictional characters- either played by humans in live action, or drawn. REAL LIFE MEDIA performed by REAL LIFE PEOPLE that AREN'T ACTING should be censored if it harms the people involved.

I also should say that drawn art (as long as it doesn't sexualize a real life person without their permission (and children cannot give permission)) should be known. Also, I have no problem with certain television or comic books or novels not being shown to children, I have a problem when it's deemed as inferior or morally dubious due to child-unfriendly content. I have a problem when it is not only limited to certain audiences, but banned outright, like in the Hays Code.

Quote

Good to hear you're a violent extremist. But it's okay, because your violence is for the good cause and only aimed against the bad guys...

I'll only respond with violence when the censors get violent. Otherwise, I'll just attack the basis of their argument.

So, you want to regulate how others think but you think you're the good guy?

I consider lot's of stuff to be Immoral, doesn't mean I want it (all) outright banned, because I think you have the God given right to sin and go to hell.

So here we are, criticizing something, and then you come along to say you want to control what we criticize and why we do it, effectivelly making you into a censor of the worst type.

Nope, you didn't say ANYTHING about violence only after being violently attacked, but sure, you can clarify your position, that's fine.

What isn't fine is your wish to control what others think and say, in the name of protecting free speech of course.

I want to debunk the line of thinking that leads to censorship of anime, manga, ttrpgs, novels by conservatives or leftists. These people try to change the real world in their favor (as we have seen many times before from both sides). I want to call out their bullshit and ridicule them in public. I would only become a censor were there really no other option to keep (near) absolute creative freedom. Even then, I would rather kill myself.

I literally said 'ignore it' and one guy responded with 'THIS IS DESTROYING CIVILIZATION, WE CAN'T IGNORE IT FUCK OFF' with the undertone that 'WE MUST STOP THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL'. Another guy said 'WE MUST CENSOR ART, YES YES YES' again with the undertone 'WE MUST STOP THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL'. They don't want to have it exist, PERIOD. Hence I remind them that the source of their arguments is shallow.

You complained the ppl find it immoral, that's wanting to control their thoughts and free speech, you're a worst censor than what BCT could ever be.

As for what YOU read into his post... Well, that's on you, you can't prove that's the intention, you're playing at being proffesor X.

i very frequently read posts in the same tone those two posts were written, they're made by people who want censorship. i want to be wrong but at the same time my experience tells me that I'm not.

Nope, you very frequently pretend you can read people's minds. Hint, you can't.

the only way to find out is to ask.

does anyone in here not only want to ignore or cease consuming media they find morally objectionable

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on July 17, 2023, 03:37:20 PM
People who like to be strangled, because it's strangulation not choking (choking is when there's a object inside the windpipe), are fucked in the head. If that's considered normal now because of all the rampant violent porn addiction, then civilization is well and truly fucked.

While the distinction is technically true, I'm pretty sure nobody was confused as to what "choking" meant.

My data indicates the total opposite. All of the women I've interacted with who are into this are functional well-adjusted adult women. They're regular people with regular people jobs. They didn't use drugs, and I can't recall any of them ever drinking particularly heavily. This even tracks with what we see around us. Isn't it something like the average man has three times the upper body strength and twice the lower body strength of the average woman? Why would it be shocking for women to want to be tossed around and manhandled?

This brings us back to the point about individuals who pay lip service to "healthy expressions of sexuality." When the rubber hits the road, it turns out there is no such thing in their mind. Banging on about the normal sexual desires of normal people being some kind of mental illness induced by addiction to violent pornography is what got us into a situation where we have pedophiles teaching sex ed in elementary school. We got so desensitized to nutjobs yelling about porn and the gay agenda that even when sane, rational people raised the alarm, we thought it was more boy who cried wolf nonsense. It wasn't until weirdos with designer pronouns started livestreaming their classrooms on TikTok that we began to believe.

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 03:08:57 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:52:37 PM

Nope, you very frequently pretend you can read people's minds. Hint, you can't.

the only way to find out is to ask.

does anyone in here not only want to ignore or cease consuming media they find morally objectionable

Maybe you should have started by asking instead of assuming you can read people's minds?

Yes, I don't want to censor anything we're not already censoring besides banning degenerates from showing porn to children in schools.

Quote from: Corolinth on July 19, 2023, 03:20:22 PM

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on July 17, 2023, 03:37:20 PM
People who like to be strangled, because it's strangulation not choking (choking is when there's a object inside the windpipe), are fucked in the head. If that's considered normal now because of all the rampant violent porn addiction, then civilization is well and truly fucked.

While the distinction is technically true, I'm pretty sure nobody was confused as to what "choking" meant.

My data indicates the total opposite. All of the women I've interacted with who are into this are functional well-adjusted adult women. They're regular people with regular people jobs. They didn't use drugs, and I can't recall any of them ever drinking particularly heavily. This even tracks with what we see around us. Isn't it something like the average man has three times the upper body strength and twice the lower body strength of the average woman? Why would it be shocking for women to want to be tossed around and manhandled?

This brings us back to the point about individuals who pay lip service to "healthy expressions of sexuality." When the rubber hits the road, it turns out there is no such thing in their mind. Banging on about the normal sexual desires of normal people being some kind of mental illness induced by addiction to violent pornography is what got us into a situation where we have pedophiles teaching sex ed in elementary school. We got so desensitized to nutjobs yelling about porn and the gay agenda that even when sane, rational people raised the alarm, we thought it was more boy who cried wolf nonsense. It wasn't until weirdos with designer pronouns started livestreaming their classrooms on TikTok that we began to believe.

i agree with you

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 03:21:06 PM

Quote from: MeganovaStella on July 19, 2023, 03:08:57 PM

Quote from: GeekyBugle on July 19, 2023, 02:52:37 PM

Nope, you very frequently pretend you can read people's minds. Hint, you can't.

the only way to find out is to ask.

does anyone in here not only want to ignore or cease consuming media they find morally objectionable

Maybe you should have started by asking instead of assuming you can read people's minds?

Yes, I don't want to censor anything we're not already censoring besides banning degenerates from showing porn to children in schools.

you know what, my mistake, I get very sensitive over the topic of censorship, i feel very strongly about it. I apologize.