This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

C&S First Edition Revised

Started by crkrueger, June 12, 2014, 09:29:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Warthur

Quote from: CRKrueger;760137As opposed to the players of every other game that isn't currently being actively published?
Nah, the impression I had was that it was much the same when the game was actively being published: there was a core of people who got very, very into it but it didn't seem to get much traction beyond them. Kind of like Palladium Books; they must have a substantial and active fanbase because they're still in business and merrily putting out product, but I've literally never met a single fan of their work offline.
I am no longer posting here or reading this forum because Pundit has regularly claimed credit for keeping this community active. I am sick of his bullshit for reasons I explain here and I don\'t want to contribute to anything he considers to be a personal success on his part.

I recommend The RPG Pub as a friendly place where RPGs can be discussed and where the guiding principles of moderation are "be kind to each other" and "no politics". It\'s pretty chill so far.

Marleycat

#61
Quote from: CRKrueger;760211Oh how cute, you're stalking me now.



It was a legitimate question given Warthur didn't say anything that remarkable for you to get all faux enraged about. C&S is a very niche game  with very loyal fans what's wrong with that?
Don\'t mess with cats we kill wizards in one blow.;)

Spellslinging Sellsword

What I'd like to see is the new edition be OGL. It would mix nicely with Runequest (under the name of Legend) being OGL.

crkrueger

#63
Quote from: Marleycat;760273It was a legitimate question given Warthur didn't say anything that remarkable for you to get all faux enraged about. C&S is a very niche game  with very loyal fans what's wrong with that?

Hon, now your trolling has become a little too obvious, anyone who's been here a while knows that if I get enraged, faux or not...
Quote from: MeAs opposed to the players of every other game that isn't currently being actively published?
...is not what that looks like.

If all you're going to do is follow every single one of my posts basically saying nothing more then "CRKrueger does not get an opinion because he disagreed with me and dammit my posts are worth more." you should at least make them not appear so pathetically transparent as such. ;)

EDIT: Oh and to answer your question, nothing's wrong with that, but that isn't what he said, either.
Even the the "cutting edge" storygamers for all their talk of narrative, plot, and drama are fucking obsessed with the god damned rules they use. - Estar

Yes, Sean Connery\'s thumb does indeed do megadamage. - Spinachcat

Isuldur is a badass because he stopped Sauron with a broken sword, but Iluvatar is the badass because he stopped Sauron with a hobbit. -Malleus Arianorum

"Tangency Edition" D&D would have no classes or races, but 17 genders to choose from. -TristramEvans

crkrueger

#64
Quote from: Warthur;760249there was a core of people who got very, very into it but it didn't seem to get much traction beyond them.

You realize you just defined a hobby, right?  NFL Football - there is a group of people who get very, very into it but it doesn't seem to get much traction beyond them.  Model Trains, Saltwater Fish, Cave Diving, Bow Hunting, Auto-erotic asphyxiation, etc...

Never met a gamer who played a Palladium game, where do you live?  

On the West Coast, people who were into D&D bought or read Dragon, where just about every other game company had advertisements, and those games got bought and used.  On the FGU front, I played Bushido and Villains and Vigilantes, but people played C&S.  The reason I didn't play that game was because they had too many people really playing as it was.

Compared to D&D all the FGU games were more crunchy, so they had a smaller audience, same with Rolemaster and Harnmaster, but you would be stretching to say that they had "little contact with the wider RPG community".

Of course after...
1e went OOP...
2e went OOP and company changed...
3e went OOP and company changed...
Both original authors died...
Yeah, little bit of a disconnect from the people who don't play.

Of course, people used to say the exact same thing about AD&D 1e and still do.
Even the the "cutting edge" storygamers for all their talk of narrative, plot, and drama are fucking obsessed with the god damned rules they use. - Estar

Yes, Sean Connery\'s thumb does indeed do megadamage. - Spinachcat

Isuldur is a badass because he stopped Sauron with a broken sword, but Iluvatar is the badass because he stopped Sauron with a hobbit. -Malleus Arianorum

"Tangency Edition" D&D would have no classes or races, but 17 genders to choose from. -TristramEvans

Larsdangly

It isn't easy to understand a game like C&S unless you were into the scene ca. 1976-7, when D&D was starting to blow up and lots of people knew about it, and there was a big urge to make games that were intended to be direct responses to it, where one or two major things were changed to transform it in some way. This is basically where Runequest, T&T and C&S were coming from. There are now so many games and so many shades fine shades of gray that it these games just seem like part of the pointless infinitude of game design at this stage.