This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Setting begone!

Started by BarefootGaijin, December 19, 2013, 06:18:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

BarefootGaijin

I am not a fan of Warhammer, 40k or Games Workshop material. Rather than go into the "Re-Imagining Warhammer 40k???" thread and shitting all over it I thought I'd start a new one.

Here is my premise: I do not like 40k, I think it should vanish off the face of the earth/up its own backside/whatever. No real reason why. Perhaps it is the aesthetic, the mood, the grimdark, the absurdity of it all. Whatever.

My boat doth not float with this one.

And what about you? What RPG/wargaming setting do you not buy or engage with? What setting sits there and makes you go: nope. I've heard it said of Planescape before, which I am personally not bothered about. Forgotten Realms kind of makes my teeth itch, but that is probably due to personal hygiene issues (not mine, hygiene issues of certain fans of "THE REALMS!" I have known in the past).

Cthulhutech, Battletech, Dragonlance, "The 'Verse", World of Darkness (Old, New, or Classic flavour. It's a choice not a compromise.)?

No need to shout "No! You're wrong!" and get butthurt about all this. No one is taking anyone else's toys away, so relax. I am just curious. It won't hurt I promise.
I play these games to be entertained... I don't want to see games about rape, sodomy and drug addiction... I can get all that at home.

Shipyard Locked

While I like the Star Wars universe just fine, I wish it wasn't always sucking all the air out of other science-fantasy settings through its mere existence. I also really wish it wasn't currently the top scifi rpg, leaving only the grimdark 40k as the consensus alternative.

Dan Vince

Everything I've heard about Cthulhutech makes it sound irredeemably moronic.
That said, I've found many published settings just aren't all that useful at the table.

Joey2k

I can't stand Earth.  It's much too hard to gain levels and the NPCs don't behave realistically at all.
I'm/a/dude

LordVreeg

Umm.
All of them.  
Very early on, I was taught or got the idea that part of the job of GMing was the creation of the setting for the games to exist in.
Currently running 1 live groups and two online group in my 30+ year old campaign setting.  
http://celtricia.pbworks.com/
Setting of the Year, 08 Campaign Builders Guild awards.
\'Orbis non sufficit\'

My current Collegium Arcana online game, a test for any ruleset.

The Traveller

I can't play in supers games, or generally games which allow/encourage excessive degrees of superiority over average human beings (Exalted, D&D etc). It's all a bit wanketty wank for me.
"These children are playing with dark and dangerous powers!"
"What else are you meant to do with dark and dangerous powers?"
A concise overview of GNS theory.
Quote from: that muppet vince baker on RPGsIf you care about character arcs or any, any, any lit 101 stuff, I\'d choose a different game.

Omega

40ks setting, despite making sense within its background. Is a turn off. Mainly all the Imperium stuff. But some other too.

World of Darkness: Hated the coyotes. Wraith was interesting though and the Hengeyokai stuff had potential never used.

Forgotten Realms never really grabbed me. Just kinda... there.

Dragonlance and Dark Sun: interesting try at something new. But they couldnt stick with the premise. Dragonlance especially suffered.

Any Gamma World after 2nd ed. Boy has that game suffered ping ponging every new edition. The latest version was just short of cartoon slapstick in setting and zero to do with Gamma World.

Buck Rogers: There was something just kinda... bland about it... It lacked the flare of Star Frontiers somehow.

Too Bland or too Bleak seem to be my personal turn off points.

Catelf

#7
Everything that is or feels too "generic" to me.
This obviously includes most or all of the well-known D&D, except perhaps Ravenloft, and also most Fantasy, and probably all strict historical.

I used to like cyberpunk, but that feels too often generic to me nowadays, too, and "steampunk" is in the dangerzone of going the same way.

I still like the "Sci-Goth" of WH40K, the only thing with it i dislike is the "only war" and that everyone in it is or seems to be Shitheads, bastards and/or murderers.

(Sure, combinating settings works fine, like giving Twilight 2000 the "Shadowrun-treatment" by adding beings from D&D, or mix medevial with CoC-things instead .... or why not mix D&D and CoC?)

I also severly dislike StarWars, and i find Star Trek too confined.
I may not dislike D&D any longer, but I still dislike the Chaos-Lawful/Evil-Good alignment system, as well as the level system.
;)
________________________________________

Link to my wip Ferals 0.8 unfinished but playable on pdf on MediaFire for free download here :
https://www.mediafire.com/?0bwq41g438u939q

thedungeondelver

Exalted, Vampire...well, pretty much all of WoD.

Nobilis.

Shadowrun.

Twilight: 2013 (not the rules, the rules are pretty good!)
THE DELVERS DUNGEON


Mcbobbo sums it up nicely.

Quote
Astrophysicists are reassessing Einsteinian relativity because the 28 billion l

Benoist


therealjcm

Any fantasy setting with magic item shops.

Sooner or later the players have the following realization: Hey guys, why are we raiding these dangerous dungeons, lets break into magic item shops!

The Butcher

#11
There are plenty of settings that I find dull and uninspired, but none that inspire active dislike of the "I'd rather this didn't exist" sort.

Shit, I'm not crazy about Rokugan and I'm playing a L5R game right now.

TristramEvans

#12
I can't think of a setting that couldn't be made interesting by the right GM.

But if I had to pick one that as written does nothing for me, then Blue Rose's Venisonochracy.

thedungeondelver

Quote from: TristramEvans;717102I can't think of a setting that couldn't be made interesting by the right GM.

But if I had to pick one that as written does nothing for me, then Blue Rose's Venisonochracy.

That one too.  The world of Blue Rose needs to be destroyed via orbital bombardment.
THE DELVERS DUNGEON


Mcbobbo sums it up nicely.

Quote
Astrophysicists are reassessing Einsteinian relativity because the 28 billion l

Shipyard Locked

Quote from: Benoist;717078Anime everything.

Hehe, these days I rarely use an existing setting without injecting more anime/JRPG into it. I like the weird flavors I get when Robert E. Howard crashes into Final Fantasy, and Outlaw Star is a pretty good example of the wilder sort of Traveller campaign.