This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Which painting is most realistic?

Started by hamstertamer, June 26, 2013, 04:31:37 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

hamstertamer

a) Woman with a flower



b) Woman riding a dragon

Gary Gygax - "It is suggested that you urge your players to provide painted figures representing their characters, henchmen, and hirelings involved in play."

JeremyR

I think that's a wyvern, not a dragon.

But that one could actually happen in this universe, someday. If we colonize a world with lower gravity, and if we can genetically engineer Iguanas so they are giant and have wings...

hamstertamer

Quote from: JeremyR;665704I think that's a wyvern, not a dragon.

But that one could actually happen in this universe, someday. If we colonize a world with lower gravity, and if we can genetically engineer Iguanas so they are giant and have wings...

I believe that the painting is called Dragon Warrior.
Gary Gygax - "It is suggested that you urge your players to provide painted figures representing their characters, henchmen, and hirelings involved in play."

jibbajibba

Quote from: hamstertamer;665707I believe that the painting is called Dragon Warrior.

Just cos the artist doesn't know a dragon from a wyvern doesn;t make it more realistic :)

The first is a drawing of a real subject done in a stylised technique.

The second is a drawing of an imaginary creature done in a realistic technique.

(Caveat: Of course the Girl with Flower could be just as imaginary as the Dragon/wyvern)

Of course in another sense both are real as both exist in the physical universe as real objects.
Then again from my perspective as an observer through a computer interface both are just light being emitted from a collection of pixels on a screen controlled by a microprocessor so either have any reality beyond the fact of my observation of them.
Then again from a Solipsistic perspective I am on the only real thing in the universe, which is primarily composed just of me and everything else is just my imagination run rampant.
No longer living in Singapore
Method Actor-92% :Tactician-75% :Storyteller-67%:
Specialist-67% :Power Gamer-42% :Butt-Kicker-33% :
Casual Gamer-8%


GAMERS Profile
Jibbajibba
9AA788 -- Age 45 -- Academia 1 term, civilian 4 terms -- $15,000

Cult&Hist-1 (Anthropology); Computing-1; Admin-1; Research-1;
Diplomacy-1; Speech-2; Writing-1; Deceit-1;
Brawl-1 (martial Arts); Wrestling-1; Edged-1;

JeremyR

Quote from: jibbajibba;665710Just cos the artist doesn't know a dragon from a wyvern doesn;t make it more realistic :)

The first is a drawing of a real subject done in a stylised technique.

But how do you know it's a painting of a real subject? You can just as easily say that it's a stylized portrait of an Elder Thing from At the Mountains of Madness.

hamstertamer

Quote from: jibbajibba;665710Just cos the artist doesn't know a dragon from a wyvern doesn;t make it more realistic :)

The first is a drawing of a real subject done in a stylised technique.

The second is a drawing of an imaginary creature done in a realistic technique.

(Caveat: Of course the Girl with Flower could be just as imaginary as the Dragon/wyvern)

Of course in another sense both are real as both exist in the physical universe as real objects.
Then again from my perspective as an observer through a computer interface both are just light being emitted from a collection of pixels on a screen controlled by a microprocessor so either have any reality beyond the fact of my observation of them.
Then again from a Solipsistic perspective I am on the only real thing in the universe, which is primarily composed just of me and everything else is just my imagination run rampant.

Considering the people posting on this forum I should have put a third option for the poll.  

3. I am the only thing real in this universe.
Gary Gygax - "It is suggested that you urge your players to provide painted figures representing their characters, henchmen, and hirelings involved in play."

jibbajibba

Quote from: JeremyR;665711But how do you know it's a painting of a real subject? You can just as easily say that it's a stylized portrait of an Elder Thing from At the Mountains of Madness.

As per the whole of my post  ....
(Caveat: Of course the Girl with Flower could be just as imaginary as the Dragon/wyvern)

As to your point .... unlikely that Piccasso was familar with the Mythos and as that picture was painted in 1932 it is I suspect unlikely Picasso had read At the Mountains of Madness which Lovecraft wrote in 1931 but wasn;t published until 1936 ....
Of course it is possible that Lovercraft, a great letter writter as we know, might have send a copy to the increasingly well known artist but chances are small.....
No longer living in Singapore
Method Actor-92% :Tactician-75% :Storyteller-67%:
Specialist-67% :Power Gamer-42% :Butt-Kicker-33% :
Casual Gamer-8%


GAMERS Profile
Jibbajibba
9AA788 -- Age 45 -- Academia 1 term, civilian 4 terms -- $15,000

Cult&Hist-1 (Anthropology); Computing-1; Admin-1; Research-1;
Diplomacy-1; Speech-2; Writing-1; Deceit-1;
Brawl-1 (martial Arts); Wrestling-1; Edged-1;

vytzka

The dragon, I guess? Not sure as to the point of the question.


One Horse Town

If you actually have a point relevant to RPGs make it, otherwise this doesn't belong here.

hamstertamer

Quote from: One Horse Town;665723If you actually have a point relevant to RPGs make it, otherwise this doesn't belong here.

The poll has barely been up for two hours now.  If I attempted to explain the point then the poll would become pointless.
Gary Gygax - "It is suggested that you urge your players to provide painted figures representing their characters, henchmen, and hirelings involved in play."

One Horse Town

Quote from: hamstertamer;665728The poll has barely been up for two hours now.  If I attempted to explain the point then the poll would become pointless.

Very well, i'll let you wow us with your intellect and super-duper site profiling later.

Opaopajr

It's all realistic with enough LSD.:cheerleader:
Just make your fuckin\' guy and roll the dice, you pricks. Focus on what\'s interesting, not what gives you the biggest randomly generated virtual penis.  -- J Arcane
 
You know, people keep comparing non-TSR D&D to deck-building in Magic: the Gathering. But maybe it\'s more like Katamari Damacy. You keep sticking shit on your characters until they are big enough to be a star.
-- talysman

vytzka

Quote from: Opaopajr;665731It's all realistic with enough LSD.:cheerleader:

Or the opposite.

Opaopajr

Quote from: vytzka;665732Or the opposite.

;) It's magical that way. One of the few things on Earth that is! :D
Just make your fuckin\' guy and roll the dice, you pricks. Focus on what\'s interesting, not what gives you the biggest randomly generated virtual penis.  -- J Arcane
 
You know, people keep comparing non-TSR D&D to deck-building in Magic: the Gathering. But maybe it\'s more like Katamari Damacy. You keep sticking shit on your characters until they are big enough to be a star.
-- talysman