Enjoy.

[Brad]

there's no proof of that.

LOL

[Zak S]

First, you went after Macris before he got involved with Milo; when he was at Defy Media. And second, "false accusations" was not what you accused him of. You went after him for having hired someone who had different views on transgender people from you.

Macris supported a person who made false accusations about trans people and many other people.

And the fact that later Macris went on to support Milo is just another nail.

[GeekyBugle]

claimed that someone like me shouldn't have free speech on other platforms. I don't expect he'll be likely to apologize for any of that. It's up to you readers to decide who is the more principled person in this context.

In spite of all this, I will continue to provide for him a platform.

Pundit, why did he claim that you shouldn't have free speech? On what grounds?

Because despite Zak's rhetoric, he's still a leftist at heart and we all know how leftists feel about free speech.

Interesting... That makes no sense in my book, anyone that is against free speech is a fool and I say this as an old left-winger. The old left was always pro-free speech, freedom of creativity, and anti-censorship. This nu 'leftist' thing seems to be an American/Canadian phenomenon.

You're thinking of classical liberals, not leftists, leftists ARE Marxists/Socialists/Commie Scum. By still supporting those 3 things you have now become ultra-mega-MAGA-AltRight.

Even our own Grim Jim, who calls himself a socialist-libertarian (an oxymoron like Christian-Socialist), is in favor of censorship regarding the jabs for instance.

Reading Zak's last post he supported the cancellation/went after Macris for the high crime of:

First, you went after Macris before he got involved with Milo; when he was at Defy Media. And second, "false accusations" was not what you accused him of. You went after him for having hired someone who had different views on transgender people from you.

Macris supported a person who made false accusations about trans people and many other people.

And the fact that later Macris went on to support Milo is just another nail.

Supporting a terri-bad person.

[Zak S]

Reading Zak's last post he supported the cancellation/went after Macris for the high crime of:
Supporting a terri-bad person.

I went after him for supporting harmful misinformation. He helped someone who made false accusations.

False accusations are bad and stopping them and the people who make them is good. This is not an unusual view.

[GeekyBugle]

Reading Zak's last post he supported the cancellation/went after Macris for the high crime of:
Supporting a terri-bad person.

I went after him for supporting harmful misinformation. He helped someone who made false accusations.

False accusations are bad and stopping them and the people who make them is good. This is not an unusual view.

Yes comrade we must kill all the kulaks and anyone whose family was friends with one 5 generations ago.

Should we also extend the sin to the people who walked by the kulak on the street?

But you claim there's no proof you're a POS?

[Zak S]

Yes comrade we must kill all the kulaks and anyone whose family was friends with one 5 generations ago.

False equivalence.

Macris gave someone a public-facing job on his media site after he spread misinformation, while the guy was doing it and after Macris was informed of it

And, not for nothing, that dude also supported Milo before and while Macris hired him.

Supporting these guys in this way is basically turning your business into a giant lie amplifier.

[Rob Necronomicon]

Even our own Grim Jim, who calls himself a socialist-libertarian (an oxymoron like Christian-Socialist), is in favor of censorship regarding the jabs for instance.

Sadly, GJ had a lot of very false accusations made about him too, and stuff that definitely hurt his career options and earning potential. Lots of people spread the rumor about that article he wrote and just labeled him a 'rape apologist' (which he was not). BUT yet they never even read through the article but the mud sticks, unfortunately...

[GeekyBugle]

Yes comrade we must kill all the kulaks and anyone whose family was friends with one 5 generations ago.

False equivalence.

Macris gave someone a public-facing job on his media site after he spread misinformation, while the guy was doing it and after Macris was informed of it

Nope, it's exactly what you fuckers want to do: To have the "sinner" die in the curb penniless, and anyone who dares help him to not die should also suffer the same fate.

Fuck you and your fake virtue you POS. Back to ignoring you, I feel dirty just by talking to you over the internet.

[GeekyBugle]

Even our own Grim Jim, who calls himself a socialist-libertarian (an oxymoron like Christian-Socialist), is in favor of censorship regarding the jabs for instance.

Sadly, GJ had a lot of very false accusations made about him too, and stuff that definitely hurt his career options and earning potential. Lots of people spread the rumor about that article he wrote and just labeled him a 'rape apologist' (which he was not). BUT yet they never even read through the article but the mud sticks, unfortunately...

And yet he's in favor of censorship when he disagrees with your speech.

[Rob Necronomicon]

Even our own Grim Jim, who calls himself a socialist-libertarian (an oxymoron like Christian-Socialist), is in favor of censorship regarding the jabs for instance.

Sadly, GJ had a lot of very false accusations made about him too, and stuff that definitely hurt his career options and earning potential. Lots of people spread the rumor about that article he wrote and just labeled him a 'rape apologist' (which he was not). BUT yet they never even read through the article but the mud sticks, unfortunately...

And yet he's in favor of censorship when he disagrees with your speech.

Was that just about masks? Because in gaming terms he's pretty much very anti-censorship like myself.

[GeekyBugle]

Even our own Grim Jim, who calls himself a socialist-libertarian (an oxymoron like Christian-Socialist), is in favor of censorship regarding the jabs for instance.

Sadly, GJ had a lot of very false accusations made about him too, and stuff that definitely hurt his career options and earning potential. Lots of people spread the rumor about that article he wrote and just labeled him a 'rape apologist' (which he was not). BUT yet they never even read through the article but the mud sticks, unfortunately...

And yet he's in favor of censorship when he disagrees with your speech.

Was that just about masks? Because in gaming terms he's pretty much very anti-censorship like myself.

Wearing masks, asking if the jabs were safe or refusing to take them.

[Rob Necronomicon]

Wearing masks, asking if the jabs were safe or refusing to take them.

'Nout wrong with asking questions about a new vaccine (not that it was actually new per se because of a lot of research had been done on other influenza-type variants). But not many people knew that at the time (myself included).

I can understand why you had to wear masks at one point. Especially if you had to see vulnerable poeple or go into a hospital. I still have to wear one in the doctor's surgery but i don't mind that. Again, I'm doing it to protect any vulnerable patients they might have.

I got the jabs myself (3 of them) but it should be down to the person. My neighbors for example are cool young hippies and won't go near them.

It boils down to choice.

[GeekyBugle]

Wearing masks, asking if the jabs were safe or refusing to take them.

'Nout wrong with asking questions about a new vaccine (not that it was actually new per se because of a lot of research had been done on other influenza-type variants). But not many people knew that at the time (myself included).

I can understand why you had to wear masks at one point. Especially if you had to see vulnerable poeple or go into a hospital. I still have to wear one in the doctor's surgery but i don't mind that. Again, I'm doing it to protect any vulnerable patients they might have.

I got the jabs myself (3 of them) but it should be down to the person. My neighbors for example are cool young hippies and won't go near them.

It boils down to choice.

Especially because it WAS developed at warp speed, with not enough testing and without informing the public about the possible secondary effects.

I won't use a mask unless forced, got the jabs (2) and regret doing so since it doesn't prevent contagion or stop the spread and since it has severe secondary effects and I'm not in the at risk group.

But like you say it should be a personal choice.

[David Johansen]

Whoa!  Wait!  How'd we get to vaccines again?  Do they have one that's effective against Zak?  Was it developed quickly?  Are there side effects?  Fox news wants to know.

Anyhow, I'm in favor of free speech but I'm also in favour of back alley beatings relating to its abuse.  I guess that makes me a hick or a fascist or maybe just someone who doesn't think years of litagation resulting in meaningless, heartless apologies are good for anyone but the lawyers.  No, I'm aware of the issues with it, but I think more immediate and visceral consequences lead to greater civility at any rate.

Oh wait...the police are at my door and there's some men in white coats with butterfly nets.  It must be about something I said yesterday, the government is simply incapable of staying current with the internet.

[Rob Necronomicon]

Anyhow, I'm in favor of free speech but I'm also in favour of back alley beatings relating to its abuse.

The only thing about that, is the latter vigilante style, while very cheap may result in you having to spend a loooong time in prison.

In Europe at least they don't like vigilante justice.