Enjoy.

[Tubesock Army]

Zak, your signature states that you won a jillion RPG design awards. There is no such number as "a jillion", and even if there was, you appear to have won something in the neighborhood of ten. Since this is an obvious lie, and you have been caught in it, nothing else you say can be taken seriously.

Ok, if that's your evidence that I am dishonest then I am happy for the public to look at that and decide whether I am honest or not based on that claim.

So now you're doubling down on your claim that you've won "a jillion" awards?

Jillion is an undefined number (as you appear to acknowledge), I am saying what I said above...

I am happy for the public to look at that and decide whether I am honest or not based on that claim.

...that's what I'm saying.

Most dictionaries define jillion as "an indeterminately large number", or "an extremely large number". The ten or so awards you've won, while nothing to sneeze at, are definitely not an that. Please stop lying, Zak.

[Zak S]

Zak, your signature states that you won a jillion RPG design awards. There is no such number as "a jillion", and even if there was, you appear to have won something in the neighborhood of ten. Since this is an obvious lie, and you have been caught in it, nothing else you say can be taken seriously.

Ok, if that's your evidence that I am dishonest then I am happy for the public to look at that and decide whether I am honest or not based on that claim.

So now you're doubling down on your claim that you've won "a jillion" awards?

Jillion is an undefined number (as you appear to acknowledge), I am saying what I said above...

I am happy for the public to look at that and decide whether I am honest or not based on that claim.

...that's what I'm saying.

Most dictionaries define jillion as "an indeterminately large number", or "an extremely large number". The ten or so awards you've won, while nothing to sneeze at, are definitely not an that. Please stop lying, Zak.

Since "large" is a relative term with no fixed amount it actually can't be a lie.

Again I am completely happy with the public evaluating your claim that I'm dishonest based on you wanting to argue about what's in my post signature.

I am also happy with the public evaluating your dishonesty based on the concrete claim below:

\
Your statement (as quoted) appears to be intended to say that Mike recommends that you speak with a lawyer and then signs the papers.

Here's the exact quote from me, precisely:

Mike said he "recommended" you not sign them unless you've talked to a lawyer and understand it, etc. (The scope is also limited to affidavits and contracts not "any legal papers")

That doesn't match what you said at all.

Mike's quote ( "...I do not recommend anyone sign any affadavit [sic] or contract without first consulting legal representation to understand the full scope of what is written and any ramifications." ) also doesn't match what Tubesock said, which was (unmodified quote)

Mike Evans, has even told people in the comments NOT to sign any legal papers offered by Zak.

Point fully addressed.

You both should each talk to a therapist about your desire to lie and distort information on the internet and, if you understand the risks, undergo treatment.

No further claim from either of you can be trusted since you just had what you said disproved in the thread in black-and-white and aren't addressing it.  Since it's such a clear demonstration, this post demonstrating your dishonesty should be a helpful reference point in any further conversation where you attempt to present your ideas as relevant.

[Tubesock Army]

Zak, your signature states that you won a jillion RPG design awards. There is no such number as "a jillion", and even if there was, you appear to have won something in the neighborhood of ten. Since this is an obvious lie, and you have been caught in it, nothing else you say can be taken seriously.

Ok, if that's your evidence that I am dishonest then I am happy for the public to look at that and decide whether I am honest or not based on that claim.

So now you're doubling down on your claim that you've won "a jillion" awards?

Jillion is an undefined number (as you appear to acknowledge), I am saying what I said above...

I am happy for the public to look at that and decide whether I am honest or not based on that claim.

...that's what I'm saying.

Most dictionaries define jillion as "an indeterminately large number", or "an extremely large number". The ten or so awards you've won, while nothing to sneeze at, are definitely not an that. Please stop lying, Zak.

Since "large" is a relative term with no fixed amount it actually can't be a lie.

Again I am completely happy with the public evaluating your claim that I'm dishonest based on you wanting to argue about what's in my post signature.

I am also happy with the public evaluating your dishonesty based on the concrete claim below:

\
Your statement (as quoted) appears to be intended to say that Mike recommends that you speak with a lawyer and then signs the papers.

Here's the exact quote from me, precisely:

Mike said he "recommended" you not sign them unless you've talked to a lawyer and understand it, etc. (The scope is also limited to affidavits and contracts not "any legal papers")

That doesn't match what you said at all.

Mike's quote ( "...I do not recommend anyone sign any affadavit [sic] or contract without first consulting legal representation to understand the full scope of what is written and any ramifications." ) also doesn't match what Tubesock said, which was (unmodified quote)

Mike Evans, has even told people in the comments NOT to sign any legal papers offered by Zak.

Point fully addressed.

You both should each talk to a therapist about your desire to lie and distort information on the internet and, if you understand the risks, undergo treatment.

No further claim from either of you can be trusted since you just had what you said disproved in the thread in black-and-white and aren't addressing it.  Since it's such a clear demonstration, this post demonstrating your dishonesty should be a helpful reference point in any further conversation where you attempt to present your ideas as relevant.

There is an undeniable difference between "large" (which I'd still argue "ten or so" is not, in this context, as would most sane, truthful people), and "extremely" or "indeterminately" large. The fact that you had to substantially alter what I said in order to pretend to refute it proves that you are lying. Or are you saying that ten is an "extremely" or "indeterminately" large number? Which would also be a lie. Why do you persist in this blatant and easily proven dishonesty, Zak?

[tenbones]

I will add scientific rigor to this. I am Ten. I am Large.

[SHARK]

I will add scientific rigor to this. I am Ten. I am Large.

Greetings!

*Laughing* Fucking hilarious, Tenbones!

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

[deadDMwalking]

Zak,

I've been thinking about me and you a lot over the past few days.  I have been over conversation after conversation where you've been an asshole to many people who originally showed up to take your side, or warn you that you were talking to assholes.  I feel bad for those people.  I feel like it's important to warn them in advance that you're toxic, and that trying to support you or POLITELY disagree with you will invite you to inflict harm on them.  And since you are a crazy asshole, the amount of harm that you inflict on people who have trouble ignoring disparaging remarks even HALF as much as you is extraordinarily large.  As a result, I feel that calling you out on your bullshit is a moral imperative. 

But thanks to all of your posts up to this point, I can say that I have been guilty of extreme ARROGANCE.  Based on how quickly the people who came to support you realized you were a duplicitous bastard who tries to control the terms of debate and sets yourself up as the sole judge of what is acceptable or right, there are very few people incapable of coming to the same conclusion.  That said, there may be those people, and caring too much about what Zak S. thinks of them is a dangerous place and I'll continue to warn them when I feel it is appropriate (read, whenever you and I happen to meet online). 

I look forward to hearing you say 'he's just as asshole and he gave up his right to be treated as a human being 10 years ago when he said something mean about an incomplete rule I wrote in 1 minute that really qualifies as a subsystem that totally works if you let me explain the thousands of unwritten words required but obviously can't be typed in 2 minutes, oh and I posted it more than 7 hours after I read the expectations'.  Oh wait, I mean without any context at all.  And I look forward to you posting 'oh, I've rebutted all that shit he said' either with a quote that doesn't do that, or better yet a post that says 'see post x' without a link, or even better yet, 'Google Zak S, shitmuffin, deadDMwalking, left-handed scissors'. [/b]

I'm not promising that I'm not going to say more things on this thread.  I have an outline of material that I think would be really helpful in deconstructing your 'arguments' and showing exactly what violations of discourse you are repeatedly guilty of, but as I said, it's arrogant to expect that anyone else over the age of 15 can't spot them if they're involved in online discussions.  But just because it is REDUNDANT doesn't mean it isn't ACCURATE.  So we'll see. 

[Zak S]

...are you saying that ten is an "extremely" or "indeterminately" large number?...

Depends on what you're counting.

But anyway:

If you want to say to the public that your claim that I am dishonest is my post signature I am fine with that.

Proof you aren't honest is above on this page in my previous, longer post, #571.

[Zak S]

But thanks to all of your posts up to this point, I can say that I have been guilty of extreme ARROGANCE. 

Already answered:

You're doing it again. Trying to change the topic from the firm and provable ground "you lied" to whether some trolls like me or not.

...if we accept 'your opinion' about 'things' because 'it's your opinion, man and we're all unique', you'd also have to accept our opinion about things because we're all unique....

I already pointed it out pages and pages ago:

So just as someone saying something antisemitic and getting caught might say "You're unamerican!" because it's easier to be vague about what's "American" people who are caught lying say "You're an asshole" because it's way easier to endlessly be vague about who is and isn't an asshole.

You got caught not telling the truth.

Up there. In that post that got posted over and over again.

That's what's important.

Proof that you are dishonest is above, in the longer post I made on this page, #571.

[I HATE THE DEMIURGE I HATE THE DEMIURGE]

lol why are you guys engaging with an accused sex offender? he has the eyes of someone who has a criminal mindset. not to mention the actual accusations of sexual abuse.

[GeekyBugle]

lol why are you guys engaging with an accused sex offender? he has the eyes of someone who has a criminal mindset. not to mention the actual accusations of sexual abuse.

Because innocent until proven guilty isn't just the law, it's also a good principle to uphold. Also because we're not lunatic SJWs.

[Ghostmaker]

lol why are you guys engaging with an accused sex offender? he has the eyes of someone who has a criminal mindset. not to mention the actual accusations of sexual abuse.

Accusation isn't adjudication.

Now kill yourself.

[I HATE THE DEMIURGE I HATE THE DEMIURGE]

lol why are you guys engaging with an accused sex offender? he has the eyes of someone who has a criminal mindset. not to mention the actual accusations of sexual abuse.

Because innocent until proven guilty isn't just the law, it's also a good principle to uphold. Also because we're not lunatic SJWs.

lol, why? Zak S has proven time and time again that he's a shitty person who dances on the edge of rules. All of his co-workers turn against him. And, like I said, physiognomy suggests that he's a criminal, barely human.

lol why are you guys engaging with an accused sex offender? he has the eyes of someone who has a criminal mindset. not to mention the actual accusations of sexual abuse.

Accusation isn't adjudication.

Now kill yourself.

Ooooh-ho-ho-ho, we got a tough guy here. You're so impotent, it's great. Why are you sucking Zackie's pee-pee anyway, you lame anime-watching dweeb.

[GeekyBugle]

lol why are you guys engaging with an accused sex offender? he has the eyes of someone who has a criminal mindset. not to mention the actual accusations of sexual abuse.

Because innocent until proven guilty isn't just the law, it's also a good principle to uphold. Also because we're not lunatic SJWs.

lol, why? Zak S has proven time and time again that he's a shitty person who dances on the edge of rules. All of his co-workers turn against him. And, like I said, physiognomy suggests that he's a criminal, barely human.

Being a shitty person =/= being a criminal
Dancing on the edsge of rules =/= Breaking the rules
Leftist purity spirals have become worst since the SJW mindvirus overtook them.
I wonder what menguele would find from studying your cranium.

[I HATE THE DEMIURGE I HATE THE DEMIURGE]

It's "Mengele," and he would find that I am a Jew, so cool it with the anti-semitism, buddy.

[Tubesock Army]

Zak's continued posting warns everyone of his true nature. It's good to goad him into posting. It makes everyone safer. And it's funny.