2020 Election Commentary

[EOTB]

"In any event, lawyers for the state wrote, the matter is largely moot, as the state's election results in favor of Joseph R. Biden Jr. have been certified and submitted. The challengers' remaining argument, they wrote, is that the Supreme Court should simply overturn the state's election results. That request, they wrote, was breathtaking and unconstitutional."

LOL. All of this whiny pussy bullshit by some Republicans will be ending very soon now.

It's not strange a defendant lawyer would write that

Your AP fact check doesn't say anything at all - no one is asserting that the state is lacking a signature check procedure.

The very way your responses obfuscate says you either also have a context-recognition problem, or that you inherently disrespect the people you're responding to, giving such manipulatively dishonest responses.  It's very akin to a lawyer lawyering on someone without their own representation present, and justifying that because they don't have their own representation present

This is why the real issue is separating RINOs into a different party; it's what they do to the base of voters voting republican, in a nutshell

[jeff37923]

Fap fap fap

The leftest masturbation continues.....

Between your obsession with masturbation and SHARK's ceaseless use of the term, "cock-sucking", I'm beginning to wonder if this is a forum or a bath house...

For us, it's a forum. For you, rawma, HappyDaze, Mistwell, and jhkim it is a booth at a porn shop where you can jack off to your favorite fantasies.

There you go with that masturbation talk again

Your kink is not OK.

Who are you to judge their kinks? Even if imaging you IS their kink?

They are your kinks too. Your kink is not OK.

[Mistwell]

jkin is right, the problem is not with the machines.

Keep your eye on the voter fraud ball : absentee ballots need signature comparison confirmation.

They got signature comparison.  Asked and answered. They always had signature verification.

Also, in case you had not noticed, all the cases are flaming out. In all the states. Even if you somehow discount Georgia (which you cannot), he loses. 

It's done. As of today, realistically, it will be done. The Supreme Court is just not having this nonsense.

[Mistwell]

or that you inherently disrespect the people you're responding to

It's not inherent. The disrespect was earned. If you continue to behave like gullible asshole nutcases, eventually you lose respect. It's like we're debating with the guy ranting about religion on the street corner who is covered in his own filth. We get it - you lost your fucking minds and are demanding everyone else join you in your insanity. Which gets me my sympathy for your plight, but not my respect. 

[oggsmash]

or that you inherently disrespect the people you're responding to

It's not inherent. The disrespect was earned. If you continue to behave like gullible asshole nutcases, eventually you lose respect. It's like we're debating with the guy ranting about religion on the street corner who is covered in his own filth. We get it - you lost your fucking minds and are demanding everyone else join you in your insanity. Which gets me my sympathy for your plight, but not my respect.

I have no doubt the the king felt the same way in the 1770's.  I guess he made a slight miscalculation or two as to how easily a bit of nutty ranting was going to blow over.

[Mistwell]

or that you inherently disrespect the people you're responding to

It's not inherent. The disrespect was earned. If you continue to behave like gullible asshole nutcases, eventually you lose respect. It's like we're debating with the guy ranting about religion on the street corner who is covered in his own filth. We get it - you lost your fucking minds and are demanding everyone else join you in your insanity. Which gets me my sympathy for your plight, but not my respect.

I have no doubt the the king felt the same way in the 1770's.  I guess he made a slight miscalculation or two as to how easily a bit of nutty ranting was going to blow over.

Just more bullshit internet tough guy bluff.

The Supreme Court, and the lower courts and investigations, will all conclude there is no case to be made here. The electors will certify Biden won. Biden will be sworn in. There will be no civil war. All that will be left is a bunch of idiots bitching whining moaning and complaining like the sore losers they are that the election was stolen like Bigfoot believers.

You want to think this will be like the Revolutionary war? Cool story broheim. When that doesn't happen, then what? How stupid do you think will you look when Biden is sworn in and nothing else happens? Yes, more stupid than you're thinking you will look.

You think there is some special permanent movement going on with Trumpism, but it's not. It's just going into the scrap heap with the Tea Party, and then the Religious Right before them. The overwhelming majority of the 20th and 21st century has just be ordinary Republicanism, with some drift to neo cons. None of which is Trumpism, and none of which will be Trumpism ever again. Your guy flamed out, and went down looking like a whiny little pussy bitch doing it. Voters are not going to want to associate with such a loser any more. Americans don't like losers.

[EOTB]

or that you inherently disrespect the people you're responding to

It's not inherent. The disrespect was earned. If you continue to behave like gullible asshole nutcases, eventually you lose respect. It's like we're debating with the guy ranting about religion on the street corner who is covered in his own filth. We get it - you lost your fucking minds and are demanding everyone else join you in your insanity. Which gets me my sympathy for your plight, but not my respect.

Except its not insanity.  You write "1 for 36 in court" in response to accusations of impropriety; implying that 35 courts made a decision whether the accusation was materially possible, or likely. The reality is the courts are declining to hear cases based on procedural issues, or other technical issues completely apart from the issues - materially similarly to a judge refusing to take a 10-year old accusation of theft says nothing as to whether the theft occurred or not. 



The real question is whether or not the people would accept that technicalities should overrule their concerns; i.e., whether they should "color revolution" in support of Trump because they think the election is a sham.  The US encourages this in other countries so they can't really oppose it philosophically here.

You desperately don't want that to happen, so you spin all of this in response as smarter people than you saying you're full of shit.  Sit back down, boy - you're stupid.  Accept the process.  There's nothing wrong here, you're just too dumb or deranged to understand. 

But in doing so you're going beyond what your "sources" actually say and load it with meaning not even present.  Depending upon them to not see, which is itself manipulating whatever trust they may have, or even a simple difference in ability.  Because the means justify the end.

[Mistwell]

or that you inherently disrespect the people you're responding to

It's not inherent. The disrespect was earned. If you continue to behave like gullible asshole nutcases, eventually you lose respect. It's like we're debating with the guy ranting about religion on the street corner who is covered in his own filth. We get it - you lost your fucking minds and are demanding everyone else join you in your insanity. Which gets me my sympathy for your plight, but not my respect.

Except its not insanity.  You write "1 for 36 in court" in response to accusations of impropriety; implying that 35 courts made a decision whether the accusation was materially possible, or likely. The reality is the courts are declining to hear cases based on procedural issues, or other technical issues completely apart from the issues - materially similarly to a judge refusing to take a 10-year old accusation of theft says nothing as to whether the theft occurred or not. 



The real question is whether or not the people would accept that technicalities should overrule their concerns; i.e., whether they should "color revolution" in support of Trump because they think the election is a sham.  The US encourages this in other countries so they can't really oppose it philosophically here.

You desperately don't want that to happen, so you spin all of this in response as smarter people than you saying you're full of shit.  Sit back down, boy - you're stupid.  Accept the process.  There's nothing wrong here, you're just too dumb or deranged to understand. 

But in doing so you're going beyond what your "sources" actually say and load it with meaning not even present.  Depending upon them to not see, which is itself manipulating whatever trust they may have, or even a simple difference in ability.  Because the means justify the end.

I keep asking the same question and you keep running from it like a coward.

WHAT. WILL. YOU. DO. WHEN. BIDEN. IS. SWORN. IN. AND. NO. CIVIL. WAR. HAPPENS?

[moonsweeper]

WHAT. WILL. YOU. DO. WHEN. BIDEN. IS. SWORN. IN. AND. NO. CIVIL. WAR. HAPPENS?

Sit back and watch the major cities burn to the ground when the establishment uniparty doesn't give the rioters what they want and no longer have Trump to use as cover....

Oh and I'll probably watch most of the MSM go more bankrupt since they will be losing 90% of their feed...(but that is why the tech companies bought them out.  Taxes are so much easier to avoid if you have a drain on the income sitting around somewhere in the portfolio)

[EOTB]

I don't have to consider what I would do in that situation until it happens.  That's not running from anything; that's refusing to entertain a tactic of persuasion; it's how to pace and lead someone into acquiescence - if they say they won't accept, you'll call them internet tough guy. 

Here's what I won't do: I won't go chameleon and act neutral when I'm not.  Men inherently despise other men who only take visible stands for something when it looks like they're safe, but who stay quiet when they don't have the advantage.  That's you Mistwell.  Anyone can search your profile for "trump" and see the difference in how you present when MAGA is ascendant vs when its fighting for legitimacy.  There's only a handful of entries outside of this thread.

There is one minor benefit to this rules change. Now people who say things like, "I bet you're a Trump supporter" can also be banned for attempting to bait someone into breaking the rules. And that's not speculation - they mention that.

Maybe there's some spit-polish on it that might otherwise be missing from a non-Hollywood game, but it hardly rises to the energy you're wasting on it. Just my two cents...

Mercer gets a lot of attention, so Pundit is bashing him to gain attention for himself. It's not more complicated than that. Pundit is trying to ride Mercer's coat tails, sort of like CNN rides Trump's coat tails. Anything for ratings (though I am not sure it's working for Pundy).

There is of course another option. It could be Pundy is pissed Mercer is stealing his shtick. After all, The RPG Pundit is itself an act.

I dont know if it is because of the Jews but Bob is not wrong that the Media hates Trump.

Seems like a storm in a tea cup to me.

It's not. He's said some very antisemitic things. Things which have nothing to do with Trump or the media. Would you like to see more of them, so you can see this is not a storm in a tea cup sort of thing? I am not exaggerating - there is some really bad stuff in there, and this is not about being a Conservative or a Trump Supporter - stuff which goes back before Trump in fact.

Very different tone from

You think there is some special permanent movement going on with Trumpism, but it's not. It's just going into the scrap heap with the Tea Party, and then the Religious Right before them. The overwhelming majority of the 20th and 21st century has just be ordinary Republicanism, with some drift to neo cons. None of which is Trumpism, and none of which will be Trumpism ever again. Your guy flamed out, and went down looking like a whiny little pussy bitch doing it. Voters are not going to want to associate with such a loser any more. Americans don't like losers.

So what will I do?  Not sure, and I wouldn't post it here if I did.  But I know that whatever I do will be consistent, and dependable, and principled.  Not head-down.  Not safely quiet.  Not RINO.  Not Mistwell.

[VisionStorm]

Americans don't like losers.

Then why the fuck did they supposedly elect a senile old man who became Vice President after he failed to garner enough support to beat Hillary or Obama the first time around and an unpopular heartless bitch who dropped out after she got devastated in the primaries?

And if you think nothing will happen IF/when Biden and his soon to be actual President get sworn in you're even more delusional than you come off as being. People have been rioting already and the so-called "Left" hates Biden, cuz delusional as they are they know he's just a corporatist war criminal puppet piece of shit and hate his ass as well. I doubt many of them would be fine with a "woman of colour" who locked up a bunch of people for petty offences then laughed her ass about it. The ones who voted for them did so out of pure moronic tribalism. Any Kamala Harris, erm... I mean "Biden" presidency is going to get fucked over by the so-called Left and the so-called Right once desperate out of work people forced to wear face diapers start revolting.

[Shasarak]

Americans don't like losers.

Then why the fuck did they supposedly elect a senile old man.

If Americans dont like losers then how come old Mccain suddenly gets so much love?

How come we always have to remember the Alamo?

Seems like Americans got a secret love for losers.

[Mistwell]

Jesus, you idiots have been taking your claims from some Qanon rando named Spyder?

[Mistwell]

Americans don't like losers.

Then why the fuck did they supposedly elect a senile old man.

If Americans dont like losers then how come old Mccain suddenly gets so much love?

How come we always have to remember the Alamo?

Seems like Americans got a secret love for losers.

Not whiny cry baby losers who flame out and repeatedly publicly embarrass themselves like some pimply faced teenager.

[Mistwell]

I don't have to consider what I would do in that situation until it happens.  That's not running from anything; that's refusing to entertain a tactic of persuasion; it's how to pace and lead someone into acquiescence - if they say they won't accept, you'll call them internet tough guy. 

Here's what I won't do: I won't go chameleon and act neutral when I'm not.  Men inherently despise other men who only take visible stands for something when it looks like they're safe, but who stay quiet when they don't have the advantage.  That's you Mistwell.  Anyone can search your profile for "trump" and see the difference in how you present when MAGA is ascendant vs when its fighting for legitimacy.  There's only a handful of entries outside of this thread.

There is one minor benefit to this rules change. Now people who say things like, "I bet you're a Trump supporter" can also be banned for attempting to bait someone into breaking the rules. And that's not speculation - they mention that.

Maybe there's some spit-polish on it that might otherwise be missing from a non-Hollywood game, but it hardly rises to the energy you're wasting on it. Just my two cents...

Mercer gets a lot of attention, so Pundit is bashing him to gain attention for himself. It's not more complicated than that. Pundit is trying to ride Mercer's coat tails, sort of like CNN rides Trump's coat tails. Anything for ratings (though I am not sure it's working for Pundy).

There is of course another option. It could be Pundy is pissed Mercer is stealing his shtick. After all, The RPG Pundit is itself an act.

I dont know if it is because of the Jews but Bob is not wrong that the Media hates Trump.

Seems like a storm in a tea cup to me.

It's not. He's said some very antisemitic things. Things which have nothing to do with Trump or the media. Would you like to see more of them, so you can see this is not a storm in a tea cup sort of thing? I am not exaggerating - there is some really bad stuff in there, and this is not about being a Conservative or a Trump Supporter - stuff which goes back before Trump in fact.

Very different tone from

You think there is some special permanent movement going on with Trumpism, but it's not. It's just going into the scrap heap with the Tea Party, and then the Religious Right before them. The overwhelming majority of the 20th and 21st century has just be ordinary Republicanism, with some drift to neo cons. None of which is Trumpism, and none of which will be Trumpism ever again. Your guy flamed out, and went down looking like a whiny little pussy bitch doing it. Voters are not going to want to associate with such a loser any more. Americans don't like losers.

So what will I do?  Not sure, and I wouldn't post it here if I did.  But I know that whatever I do will be consistent, and dependable, and principled.  Not head-down.  Not safely quiet.  Not RINO.  Not Mistwell.

The answer is, you will do nothing except post more bullshit on the Internet. Just like the douchebag leftists did in 2004 who thought that election was stolen by Bush.

As for my "tone" it's been the same all along and it sure as fuck isn't a "safe" approach I take. Posting that Biden won here is the vast minority view, and every time I do I face a sea of you guys. There is nothing "safe" about my approach to this here.

I've ALWAYS been a neo con. I like the neo cons. I've always supported the neo cons. I know you think they're "Not true Republican" or some bullshit, but they're consistently the Republicans I've known and loved my whole life. Trump isn't. That doesn't make me a RINO - it makes your guy the outlier. You guys are Trump supporters, not Republican supporters. You only care if someone supports Trump - not if they support actual Republican principals and policies. Trumps immigration policies are not Republican policies. His trade war policies are not Republican policies. His globalism policies are not Republican policies. His approach to certain international allies are not Republican policies. NONE of this is Republican policies - it's just Trump policies which had more in common with the pro-union left of the 1970s than they do with Republican policies.

Trump is the RINO. It's not even clear he was voting for Republicans all these years, and he sure as fuck doesn't support most Republican policies. You guys got suckered by a populist first, who chose the Republican party because it was the easiest path for his populism.

Does my position still sound safe to you? Go ahead, run your circle jerk with your buddies here. Do the whole SJW group tactic, add in some subtle threats, go down that Internet tough guy path some more.

At the end of the day, Biden will be President and you guys will just be more sore losers along with those moping leftists from 2004 and the SJW progressives who lost this election as well.