Quote from: Crazy_Blue_Haired_Chick on May 12, 2024, 04:58:33 PM

Quote from: Corolinth on May 12, 2024, 04:57:42 PMI tried to watch this, because I understand the appeal of Studio Ghibli, but as soon as the chode started talking about his ADHD and his ass burgers, I'm done.

If that pissed you off, there's more where that came from!

Disinterest is more accurate than anger. It lets me know the vlogger is a useless poon with nothing to say.

Quote from: Crusader X on May 11, 2024, 11:02:07 PMAny word on when this new edition is coming out?

The best I can say is it is expected to be by the end of the year. The publishers are just considering their best options for printing and distribution. 

Quote from: Omega on May 14, 2024, 06:36:04 AM

Quote from: Votan on May 13, 2024, 08:36:17 PMSo clever sculpting but if they wanted to highlight cool female characters, the Red Box has Aleena, who is both memorable and taught players important lessons about the way that the game was meant to be played. Sure, the character has a typical female presentation, but that isn't necessarily a bug in a game about heroic fantasies. Archetypes are good, right? Right? Or am I too old fashioned?

Some years back there was much bitching by the woke about how she was "Sexualized" and "pornographic" even. Because these idiots have no clue what those words even mean.

Aleena? Elmore has done quite a bit of cheesecake art but Aleena wasn't one of them. She was depicted wearing full chainmail. I guess where leftists are concerned, a female drawn with actual female body proportions is pornographic. Remember these are the people who can't even define what a woman is.

I have been very much mad at Renegade Game Studios since I bought a copy of Altered Carbon RPG.  You can check out my review if you want a deep dive but the short answer is they dumped a shitty system that clearly wasn't play tested on the market and charged a bundle for it.

Never again.  I will never buy another product from them and I will never recommend anything they produce.

Quote from: Darrin Kelley on May 13, 2024, 01:35:44 PMThat's not something I want to play. So for me, the Transformers RPG was a waste of money.

I have been unimpressed with about everything IDW produces. This is just par for the course of agenda laden junk they put out.

Quote from: Abraxus on May 12, 2024, 06:48:05 PMhe mental gymnastics to try and prove the equivalent that 2+2=5 because math can universally interpreted differently. With no such thing as objective truth makes them look mentally ill.

Thats because they are mentally ill.

But this whole minis fiasco is just more proof that someone in marketing thinks outrage marketing will bring in the free advertising. And odds are it is working.

Quote from: Votan on May 13, 2024, 08:36:17 PMSo clever sculpting but if they wanted to highlight cool female characters, the Red Box has Aleena, who is both memorable and taught players important lessons about the way that the game was meant to be played. Sure, the character has a typical female presentation, but that isn't necessarily a bug in a game about heroic fantasies. Archetypes are good, right? Right? Or am I too old fashioned?

Some years back there was much bitching by the woke about how she was "Sexualized" and "pornographic" even. Because these idiots have no clue what those words even mean.

Quote from: RPGPundit on May 13, 2024, 11:39:02 PM

Quote from: BadApple on May 13, 2024, 05:25:03 AM

Quote from: Slipshot762 on May 13, 2024, 02:43:17 AMInteresting to me is the lore surrounding how magic users are regarded. What is that dividing line between "muh court whyzhard" and "burn her before she turns us all into newts!" I've often wondered?

Historically you had magicians like dee and kelly, who worked for the crown as magicians, known to be engaged with divining contact with angels to learn from them the enochian language, the language of creation, in order to work magic...the whole thing appearing to have the approval of both government and heaven, as opposed the hated reviled witch or sorceror in lore.

I suppose it likely has something to do with the nature of the practices in question; if man is given earthly dominion by god then it would be contradictory to serve or deal with as equals any demons, devils, undead, entities, or spirits...yet it would seem there is an implication i am detecting which says that conjuring an old bitch-devil and beating it into submission with your wand in the name of god and making it teach you featherfall is perfectly ok or something.

Never quite nailed this down but thats the best i came up with.

In Christian tradition, any use of magic is considered a contract with the devil.  There were no officially recognized court mages in Christian European nations.  This is also true in Islamic countries.  There was no distinction between witches and great wizards, they were all sinners in need of burning.  Many western magic users practiced in secret, always afraid of getting caught.

That's completely wrong. For most of the middle ages there was no distinction between science and magic, and for that matter some of the humanities and medicine too. And there was no notion whatsoever that high magic was "of the devil". Folk magic was a bit different but for most of the middle ages the main view of both Church and Crown to folk magic was that most of it was just empty powerless superstition.

Only certain very specific forms of magical activities were either illegal or banned by the church or both. Poisoning and enchantment were illegal. Making pacts with demons (summoned by evocation) was banned by the church (note: binding demons was not). Doing divinations about the King without the King's express permission was illegal, as it was seen as somewhere between espionage and treason. The church forbade certain practices of Alchemy which required dead bodies, and these were typically outlawed by the crown too.  Magic that attempted to spontaneously create life (homunculi, for example) was banned by the church. And trying to make gold using alchemy required a costly permit.

There were absolutely court magicians in various Christian nations. Dee was Queen Elizabeth's astrologer (and also one of the first spies in Her Majesty's Secret Service, with the code number "007"); he selected the date for her coronation using astrology, everyone knew it, and thought it was perfectly fine. He was later courted by various monarchs of Europe who wanted him to be THEIR court magician. Likewise Edward Kelley.

Of course, a MUCH bigger patron of magic than the royal crowns was the CHURCH. Countless monasteries engaged in the studies of "natural philosophy", including alchemy and all kinds of conjuring. There were popes who had practiced magic. And great saints; including Thomas Aquinas, who studied under the great and renowned philosopher-friar Albertus Magnus, who as not only a Dominican monk but also the CHAIR OF THEOLOGY at the University of Paris in the 1240s.

So you're just unbelievably, ridiculously, moronically wrong.

I fully acknowledge that my statement was way overly simplified.  The middle ages covers a lot of time, a lot of perspectives, and a lot of cultures.  Doctrinal interpretation was spotty at best and so was what magic was understood to be.

If you mean that magic is an umbrella term for anything that doesn't have an immediate corporal explanation, then you are correct.  However, there is a lot of distinction made between "divine mysteries" and "magic" from a Roman Catholic perspective.  The exploration of the first was encouraged while the second was heresy.  Natural philosophies were largely seen to fall into the divine mysteries camp.

I don't have access to my library right now so I can't give you references and I'm unable to give a counterpoint in the developed and intelligent way I would like to.  What I can say is that the Roman Catholic church has reclassified many fields of study but the principle idea that messing with the supernatural for personal gain is magic and heretical just like it was a thousand years ago.

Quote from: ForgottenF on May 13, 2024, 10:07:40 PMAll that said, 5e is still the most played game and the easiest to find people playing. If you're looking for games in that realm, it's mostly just a matter of scoping out the game a little before you ask to join. The hyper-woke usually can't resist advertising it, so if you read the game listings with a critical eye, you can often pick up hints at what kind of game it is. Obviously keywords like "safe space", "LGBTQ+ friendly" etc. are to be avoided. You can also look at the players' avatars and on Roll20 at least, read the DM's profile to see what they're about. Don't be afraid to profile; if all the posters in the player applications are asking about pronouns and triggers, it's probably a game to avoid. But also don't write people off too quickly. I've played with multiple trans players in the last few years, and not a one of them has made an issue of it. Don't give up too easily. Even in 5e world, most people just want a good game to play, and will prioritize that over making political beefs.

I've already started doing so, hence this post, I don't want to happen on a situation where I'll get into a game because there's been no prior flags, then I'll have to leave because woke is inserted anyway.

I tried Roll20 but there's been more woke listings than not recently.

Quote from: yosemitemike on May 13, 2024, 10:59:31 AMI would guess that, since WoD/CoD is mostly moribund now, people don't have the motivation to publish that WoD Heartbreaker that they did when it was big.

All except #OnyxPath themselves, who are working on a new line called #CurseBorne.

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on May 13, 2024, 07:14:33 PMThere's been precisely zero conspiracy thriller rpgs released in the last decade to my knowledge, which is weird because cryptids are more popular than they've ever been, the government has publicly acknowledged UFOs, the WEF is openly trying to conquer Earth, Resident Alien is airing on Syfy, and the X-Files is getting a reboot.

That's entirely due to the industry being dominated by left wing ideologues who view any 'conspiracy theories' as an alt-right thing despite having plenty of their own.