This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Mapping style poll.

Started by thedungeondelver, March 19, 2013, 12:29:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

thedungeondelver

March 19, 2013, 12:29:04 PM
Which kind of dungeon map do you prefer - flat style (the majority of modules) or isometric, like I6 and (I think) some of the DL modules?
THE DELVERS DUNGEON


Mcbobbo sums it up nicely.

Quote
Astrophysicists are reassessing Einsteinian relativity because the 28 billion l

Haffrung

#1
March 19, 2013, 12:30:28 PM
Flat style for constructed dungeons.

Isometric for natural cave systems (which should be anything but flat).
 

deadDMwalking

#2
March 19, 2013, 12:31:35 PM
Isometric is harder, but if done right, is really nice.  

But I like maps, so where possible, I'd take both.
When I say objectively, I mean \'subjectively\'.  When I say literally, I mean \'figuratively\'.  
And when I say that you are a horse\'s ass, I mean that the objective truth is that you are a literal horse\'s ass.

There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all. - Peter Drucker

Sacrosanct

#3
March 19, 2013, 12:42:21 PM
flat is best for only a couple levels.  For a dungeon that's mostly vertical, iso works best
D&D is not an "everyone gets a ribbon" game.  If you\'re stupid, your PC will die.  If you\'re an asshole, your PC will die (probably from the other PCs).  If you\'re unlucky, your PC may die.  Point?  PC\'s die.  Get over it and roll up a new one.

Bobloblah

#4
March 19, 2013, 12:49:02 PM
I didn't answer the poll, as it isn't one or the other. For me it depends on what's being depicted. A cleverly 3D-Jaquayed dungeon? ISO is the way to go, possibly with supplementary 2D of some areas. A more starightforward floorplan? 2D works great and is more space-efficient, possibly with some cross-sections for connections.
Best,
Bobloblah

Asking questions about the fictional game space and receiving feedback that directly guides the flow of play IS the game. - Exploderwizard

Bobloblah

#5
March 19, 2013, 12:50:57 PM
Quote from: Haffrung;638375Isometric for natural cave systems (which should be anything but flat).
You know, I stopped worrying about this after I went spelunking for the first time. Almost all natural caves are so unlike anything found in a D&D adventure (and so few people at the table know this) that it didn't seem to be worth worrying about.
Best,
Bobloblah

Asking questions about the fictional game space and receiving feedback that directly guides the flow of play IS the game. - Exploderwizard

Philotomy Jurament

#6
March 19, 2013, 06:59:29 PM
Flat.  If needed, an elevation or diagram to show the vertical dimension for some areas can be added.
The problem is not that power corrupts, but that the corruptible are irresistibly drawn to the pursuit of power. Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.

Justin Alexander

#7
March 19, 2013, 07:10:59 PM
Quote from: Philotomy Jurament;638482Flat.  If needed, an elevation or diagram to show the vertical dimension for some areas can be added.

Seconding this.

Isometric maps can be evocative, but their utility is questionable 99% of the time. On the rare occasion when a map would be aided by the isometric view, it's generally easier (and more effective) to simply include a cut-away of that specific section of the map with an isometric reference.
Note: this sig cut for personal slander and harassment by a lying tool who has been engaging in stalking me all over social media with filthy lies - RPGPundit

RPGPundit

#8
March 20, 2013, 04:09:17 PM
Flat, graph-paper type.
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

Benoist

#9
March 20, 2013, 10:09:23 PM
Flat, graph paper.

Also this:

Quote from: Justin Alexander;638485Seconding this.

Isometric maps can be evocative, but their utility is questionable 99% of the time. On the rare occasion when a map would be aided by the isometric view, it's generally easier (and more effective) to simply include a cut-away of that specific section of the map with an isometric reference.

thedungeondelver

#10
March 20, 2013, 10:26:01 PM
The overwhelming majority of votes (and I've asked this poll on many sites) go to flat maps.

Looking at I6, I came to the following conclusions:

1 - it's difficult to use as-is
2 - it's gorgeous
3 - #2 hides the fact that it is a very small map to explore (yes, I know I6 isn't a dungeon crawl, and there's the town and locales to consider too, but the DL modules have very dungeony places so there's no excuse for it being there).

A corollary to that is that not many other modules have ever, ever used that format, nor adventures for other games and from other companies.

So, the conclusion is obvious: stick with what I know, and do flat maps.  

Isometric maps are cute, but usability is foremost.
THE DELVERS DUNGEON


Mcbobbo sums it up nicely.

Quote
Astrophysicists are reassessing Einsteinian relativity because the 28 billion l
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions