SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Where the heck is D&D 5e?

Started by 1989, November 12, 2013, 10:23:37 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Arduin

Quote from: Haffrung;707460And the great bulk of D&D players who don't have any strong allegiance to a particular edition will give it a try.

Most players DO have a strong affinity for a particular edition.  Doesn't bode well..

Haffrung

Quote from: thecasualoblivion;707453Just asking if you are a real fan, or another one of the bitter old schoolers who is happy 5E is validating their playstyle but won't actually be playing it.

I'm not sacrosanct, but I can say I'll actually buy and play Next because at this stage I need a game that has strong setting and adventure support. And since I already prefer the Next system to 3E, Pathfinder, and 4E, that's where I'm going to look for adventures.
 

Haffrung

Quote from: Arduin;707466Most players DO have a strong affinity for a particular edition.  Doesn't bode well..

Nah. Most hardcore RPGers who hang out on forums all day bullshitting about D&D and system design have a strong preference. But they're just a fraction of the people who actually play the game. And of course, the new players who WotC are hoping to attract don't have any strong preferences either.
 

Arduin

Quote from: Haffrung;707471Nah.

Yes.

thecasualoblivion

Quote from: Haffrung;707471Nah. Most hardcore RPGers who hang out on forums all day bullshitting about D&D and system design have a strong preference. But they're just a fraction of the people who actually play the game. And of course, the new players who WotC are hoping to attract don't have any strong preferences either.

Might not be a majority, but there's usually at least one at every table, and guess who tends to have the most say in what does or doesn't get played. Combine that with the lack of appeal for 3E/4E players and it doesn't look so good.
"Other RPGs tend to focus on other aspects of roleplaying, while D&D traditionally focuses on racially-based home invasion, murder and theft."--The Little Raven, RPGnet

"We\'re not more violent than other countries. We just have more worthless people who need to die."

Kaiu Keiichi

Most players I've met actually make their decision after trying the game with friends and seeing whether or not it's fun. Ideology and first principles mean nothing to them.

That's my plan.
Rules and design matter
The players are in charge
Simulation is narrative
Storygames are RPGs

flyingcircus

I am in the middle with NEXT still yet, I really don't know that much about it to really like or dis-like it either way.  I am an old AD&D 1E gamer at best, I have just recently picked up the AD&D 2E reprints and am looking to run those next (ha play on word there hum?), dabbled in 3.5 for a bit, ehhh.  Played PF and have run 4E for my kids who like it, personally It doesn't really float my boat, but neither did 3.5 or PF much.  I like d100 system stuff like RQ, Legend, etc. and the old D&D originals and AD&D stuff at best, so if NEXT is close to something like AD&D, I might give it a go but not right off the cuff, I will wait and see how the waters do for maybe a year before jumping into that, by then maybe all the D&D bashing will die down by then.
Current Games I Am GMing:  HarnMaster (HarnWorld)
Games I am Playing In None.

RPGNet the place Fascists hangout and live.
"The multitude of books is making us ignorant" - Voltaire.
"Love truth, pardon error" - Voltaire.
"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" - Voltaire.

Sacrosanct

Quote from: thecasualoblivion;707453If it makes you feel better to think that, more power to you.

Question: if they release a Next that bears a 90-100% resemblance to the final playtest, will you be playing Next or some other game?

Just asking if you are a real fan, or another one of the bitter old schoolers who is happy 5E is validating their playstyle but won't actually be playing it.

Maybe you missed the part where I said I'm already playing it, with people who are fans of every edition and we're having fun.

Reading comprehension is not really your strong suit, is it?
D&D is not an "everyone gets a ribbon" game.  If you\'re stupid, your PC will die.  If you\'re an asshole, your PC will die (probably from the other PCs).  If you\'re unlucky, your PC may die.  Point?  PC\'s die.  Get over it and roll up a new one.

therealjcm

They could be waiting for a good time to introduce it. I think a big reason for 4e not being as successful as they wanted was edition fatigue.

I'll probably get it, and our group will probably play it - we're okay with pathfinder, but we've all played D&D since at least the early 80s (some of us since the early 70s) so we will give a new edition of D&D a chance.

If they can successfully accommodate all the play styles as they claim I will actually be pretty excited about it, but I'm not holding my breath.

Arduin

Quote from: therealjcm;707488They could be waiting for a good time to introduce it. I think a big reason for 4e not being as successful as they wanted was edition fatigue.

Not really.  Initial sales of 4E were off the charts.  More than for any edition release prior.  It was 4E that was the problem.  Not "edition fatigue".  

5E isn't done yet.  I'm sure that they will want to do a proper mktg launch.  They have missed the best window for '13.   Earliest will probably be Q2 '14.

FickleGM

I would put my money on GenCon '14.
 

Rincewind1

I already have a copy, and I'm willing to part with it, for a reasonable price of course. Bids by PM, please, auction closes at 15 November, 1 AM, Central European Time.
Furthermore, I consider that  This is Why We Don\'t Like You thread should be closed

gamerGoyf

To be honest I don't see how Next isn't going to flop, especially since their lead guy was responsible for both skill challenges and Iron Heroes.

Skywalker

Quote from: 1989;707393This was announced back in Jan. 2012, and the internet was hoppin' with buzz.

It's soon going to be Jan. 2014. That's two years! (Good grief, it took less time to film TLotR than it did to develop a PnP RPG).

When is this train going to leave the station?

GenCon 2014 has been the best estimate from the first announcement and accords with the playtesting period for 3e and 4e. The only difference is that they announced it almost two years earlier in the name of "open playtest".

2014 is also D&D's 40th anniversary.

Bill

Quote from: gamerGoyf;707542To be honest I don't see how Next isn't going to flop, especially since their lead guy was responsible for both skill challenges and Iron Heroes.

I hate skill challenges, but what is Iron Heroes?