This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

The appeal of "hard" historical settings in rpgs?

Started by faelord, May 07, 2025, 12:14:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Trond

A weird sidenote; I think the problems mentioned by the OP are part of the reason why many people are drawn to historical settings other than the West. Because they *THINK* that e.g. ancient Japan or China or Pre-Columbian America had less of such issues, or at the very least fewer people know about the issues. Meanwhile the West has been doing nothing but wallowing in its own misery over past wrongdoing for the last few decades. So the past of e.g. the ancient East might seem more "heroic". (see e.g. how ridiculously the movie "The Eternals" handles the past of different regions.)

RNGm

I've never played a hard historical setting in an rpg... unless dying of dysentery in Oregon Trails on an Apple IIe during the 4th grade in the 1980s counts.   :)