TheRPGSite

Pen & Paper Roleplaying Central => Pen and Paper Roleplaying Games (RPGs) Discussion => Topic started by: Bilharzia on February 05, 2014, 05:03:53 AM

Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: Bilharzia on February 05, 2014, 05:03:53 AM
Deleted
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: hedgehobbit on February 05, 2014, 07:30:59 AM
I don't particularly care for the changes they made to RQ in 6 but this sure is tempting.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: Claudius on February 05, 2014, 03:29:50 PM
Quote from: hedgehobbit;729409I don't particularly care for the changes they made to RQ in 6 but this sure is tempting.
Compared to MRQ2, RQ3, or RQ2? I'm curious.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: Skywalker on February 06, 2014, 12:33:12 AM
Quote from: Bilharzia;729395Taken with everything else at this price I would almost recommend it if you aren't using the RQ rules since it sets up a wonderful arrangement cultures and powers ripe for adventures to crash into and precipitate catastrophe into that delicate balance.

I agree. I plan to use Book of Quests and Monster Island with Atlantis: The Second Age. Both supplements are top notch.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: danskmacabre on February 06, 2014, 12:43:57 AM
I already have RQ6, but got it for all the extra stuff, that's been tempting me for a while anyway.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: Imperator on February 06, 2014, 09:19:39 AM
I've got it, and it's a great deal.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: hedgehobbit on February 08, 2014, 11:46:25 AM
Quote from: Claudius;729492Compared to MRQ2, RQ3, or RQ2? I'm curious.
Compared to Chaosiums Runequest. I guess most of the changes I don't like occurred originally in the Mongoose version.

I got the bundle of holding. Not sure how that thing works but I'm pretty sure the price went up from the first time I looked to when I bought it.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: smiorgan on February 08, 2014, 01:21:25 PM
Quote from: hedgehobbit;730083Compared to Chaosiums Runequest. I guess most of the changes I don't like occurred originally in the Mongoose version

Agreed. MRQ/Legend/RQ6 is a continuing iteration of the Whitaker/Nash vision of RQ, and there are bits I don't care for; but respect for the authors' dedication in making RQ6 so comprehensive.

I have my RQ3 books (plus Stormbringer/Elric!) and I prefer them.

QuoteI got the bundle of holding. Not sure how that thing works but I'm pretty sure the price went up from the first time I looked to when I bought it.

You pay the minimum and get the core offering. You pay more than the average to level up to the extras, and the initial average is calculated based on so many purchases of X dollars. If you offer less than the average the site will tell you before you click the paypal button.

Great deal, but I've got so many pdfs I'll probably never read, let alone play.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: arminius on February 08, 2014, 11:41:10 PM
I also don't care for some of the changes such as action-counting, and I'm ambivalent about doing away with skill checks. Not to mention these days I prefer the Elric! approach to injury which simplifies armor and does away with hit locations. But the newer RQ editions continue to elaborate the culture/profession approach to chargen that was first used in RQIII, along with expanding the "anthropological" breakdown of magic to reflect different belief systems. I'm also intrigued by the Special Effects system they've added to combat, which provides opportunities for decision-making and maneuver without resorting to D&D 3e/4e feats.

There's one thing though that gets under my skin and that's the use of decorative ligatures throughout the text. As one commenter says here (http://archive.is/7ZNfj), these things distract from reading for no apparent purpose other than drawing attention to themselves. I notice that I'm also not the only person to feel, specifically, that the RQ text would be better off without them. (Just google runequest ligatures.) I hope RPG writers and publishers will think twice before choosing this approach in the future.

In short aside from that one concern I think this is a fantastic deal and thanks to Loz & Pete for making it possible. Of course they and BoH are also contributing to some (IMO) worthy charities through this.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: selfdeleteduser00001 on February 11, 2014, 07:49:20 AM
It's a lovely development of the d100 trope. It isn't always the one everyone wants to play, but it has a charm and style of it's own and I am appreciating running RQ6.
I also like the brevity of OpenQuest and the more Elric!/Stormbringer feel of Magic World.
I find Legend to be a halfway between OQ and RQ6 and don't bother with it, but it is a good cheap and well supported ruleset.

d100 gamers are very well served by these 4 iterations of the engine, alongside the monster that is Call of Cthulhu.

I like the ligatures and English spelling.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: Brad on February 11, 2014, 09:17:32 AM
Quote from: tzunder;730634I also like the brevity of OpenQuest

I had been thinking about purchasing the new OpenQuest PDF; is it worth the money?
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: Warthur on February 11, 2014, 10:26:31 AM
The Runequest 6 book is a thing of absolutely beauty, as is the system. About the only reason I'd use RQ2 (my previous favourite RuneQuest) these days is for Glorantha, because it's more tied to the setting than RQ6 is.

I find the crying in some quarters about the ligatures to be beyond laughable.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: Sigmund on February 11, 2014, 10:33:13 AM
I'd do the bag of holding thing, but I already own everything in it :D LOVE me some RQ6.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: Bobloblah on February 11, 2014, 10:33:49 AM
Appreciate the tip off on the Bag of Holding.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: selfdeleteduser00001 on February 12, 2014, 02:21:03 AM
I bought a second hand copy of RQ2 for pure nostalgia, and read it.
This was just after reading and starting to run RQ6, and after 30 years of d100 gaming.
Wow! They are so much the same game, but reweaved.

it is perhaps the Chaosium BGB line that has introduced the widest range of changes and options.

But if you wanted you could merge RQ2 and RQ6 into each other using either as a base with relative ease.

Is RQ6 better or RQ2? The question is almost irrelevant, it's still the same game with settimgs adjusted. The one thing that feels better is that RQ6 magic, although very comprehensive, has a more nuanced touch and is open to cleverer interpretations.

But RQ2 is entrenched in Glorantha. RQ6, when the Glorantha book is done, may bring me back to Glorantha gaming.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: Tahmoh on February 12, 2014, 02:34:29 AM
how much longer will this offer be in place? i want to take part but kinda short on funding atm so wont have the spare cash till next week(if im lucky).
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: selfdeleteduser00001 on February 12, 2014, 02:38:41 AM
Quote from: Brad;730654I had been thinking about purchasing the new OpenQuest PDF; is it worth the money?

It's clean, it's lean. It has a more old skool primitivist art style, if you have IQ1 then you won't be overly surprised, the changes are incremental. If you haven't then if you read it and play it you'll get every penny back in value.

Unless you already hate d100 games, in which case walk away.

If you already have d100 games you love to play, then you may find the value is lower.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: Skywalker on February 12, 2014, 02:45:18 AM
Quote from: Broken-Serenity;730782how much longer will this offer be in place? i want to take part but kinda short on funding atm so wont have the spare cash till next week(if im lucky).

It's only open for the next 8 hours.
Title: RuneQuest for the curious
Post by: Tahmoh on February 12, 2014, 07:29:10 PM
Ah well i guess i shall have to save up for a hardback copy of the rules instead then since leisure games just got some in stock :)