SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

OD&D without Chainmail. . .

Started by jdrakeh, February 02, 2007, 11:24:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jdrakeh

I've never run OD&D without Chainmail, though now I may have to (my copy of Chainmail having been destroyed due to a burst water pipe). That said, OD&D is largely self contained (and includes the alternate system for determining hits in combat).

The one thing that OD&D does not seem to be clear on is the order in which charcters take action during combat (it only mentions that it's based on Dex). And I cannot, for the life of me, recall how Chainmail handles this. Could somebody fill me in? Thanks much!

Also, while I'm at it, I picked up copies of the Role-Aids supplements Dark Folk and Arch Magic today with an eye toward using them with OD&D (Dark Folk looks particularly good). Any thoughts on good ways to implement either?
 

Melan

I don't have my Chainmail handy, but in Holmes Basic (bridging O and OA), characters went in the order of Dexterity, which was rolled for monsters every encounter. That's not the Chainmail system, but probably in the spirit of the game. I usually just roll a d6 when running one-offs.

[edit]IIRC, Chainmail uses d6s, higher wins, but gives special considerations to missiles and artillery.[/edit]
Now with a Zine!
ⓘ This post is disputed by official sources

jdrakeh

Quote from: MelanI don't have my Chainmail handy, but in Holmes Basic (bridging O and OA), characters went in the order of Dexterity, which was rolled for monsters every encounter. That's not the Chainmail system, but probably in the spirit of the game. I usually just roll a d6 when running one-offs.

Yeah, I own Holmes (in PDF and print), but I was shooting for a 100% Original D&D feel. That said, I may end up using the Holmes "first blow" system (which also uses a d6 for characters whose Dex scores are within q-2 points of each other) just because it builds on the idea of first blows trading on Dex (which is, actually, briefly mentioned in OD&D but never explained).
 

Hezrou

Also you can pick up Chainmail as a PDF over on paizo.com, that would solve the problem of not having the book handy.