This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

M&M 2e - startign a new game

Started by jibbajibba, June 22, 2014, 01:07:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jibbajibba

So my Fables Diceless short finished and for variety and because I am on a Marvel kick I decided to run a supers game.

Because my players are all new to RPGs and because so far they have only played my homebrew games I thought I would use a system that was much less free form and crunchier. So I decided on M&M 2e.

Wouldn't be my ideal choice as a lot of system mastery required to get teh most out of it and a whole lot of charop but I think I can run it free form enough for it to be manageable.

So today we built characters which took about 3 hours :) 4 players and a GM unfamiliar with the system will do that I reckon .

So we have a Gadgeteer, a combat guy that can turn to water, a natobot cloud that can take human form and an outerspace adapter flier guy.

I am sure the PCs could be more optimised etc but I don;t really care too much about that.

I am looking for some hits as to the pitfalls. Specifically -
i) do all PCs need to max out their toughness? The gadgeteer as a laser pistol (rank 10 blast). With which she was easily able to hit and badly damage the other PCs who has toughness ranging from 3 to 10.
ii) The Nanobot cloud has a mental blast and mind control power that only works at touch range. Do they need to make a grapple or a roll to hit to use that from their cloud form (want to know the official rule before I change it but a little unclear)?
iii) The gadgeteer also has hi tech armour suit with Rank 10 protection and rank 10 Immunity. This effectively makes her invulnerable to all physical attacks from creatures less powerful than the PCs (PL 10) and seems cheap at 19 points (10 ranks protection at 1/R + immunity +1/R -1 point for it being a device that could be lost or disabled rather than innate). Am I reading it right or have I missed a trick?

Any answers to these or other generic guidance warmly welcomed.
No longer living in Singapore
Method Actor-92% :Tactician-75% :Storyteller-67%:
Specialist-67% :Power Gamer-42% :Butt-Kicker-33% :
Casual Gamer-8%


GAMERS Profile
Jibbajibba
9AA788 -- Age 45 -- Academia 1 term, civilian 4 terms -- $15,000

Cult&Hist-1 (Anthropology); Computing-1; Admin-1; Research-1;
Diplomacy-1; Speech-2; Writing-1; Deceit-1;
Brawl-1 (martial Arts); Wrestling-1; Edged-1;

jibbajibba

Really? No one plays this game or are we only interested in flame wars about 5e?
No longer living in Singapore
Method Actor-92% :Tactician-75% :Storyteller-67%:
Specialist-67% :Power Gamer-42% :Butt-Kicker-33% :
Casual Gamer-8%


GAMERS Profile
Jibbajibba
9AA788 -- Age 45 -- Academia 1 term, civilian 4 terms -- $15,000

Cult&Hist-1 (Anthropology); Computing-1; Admin-1; Research-1;
Diplomacy-1; Speech-2; Writing-1; Deceit-1;
Brawl-1 (martial Arts); Wrestling-1; Edged-1;

cranebump

Wish I could help ya, but when I run heroes, I run Supers! Very freeform and fun. PC creation is much faster.

http://www.rpgnow.com/product/130108/SUPERS-Revised-Edition
"When devils will the blackest sins put on, they do suggest at first with heavenly shows..."

Bill

Mutants and Masterminds has some pitfalls, allthough I am far from an expert on it.


The main 'problem' I saw, was that if you have too many points, characters tend to all have everything 'maxed out' in regards to toughness, dodgyness, etc...

I suspect the system works better with less points and or higher campaign power limit.

Also, some combinations of powers can be trouble, such as max toughness dude that then adds regeneration at a relatively trivial cost.

I am sure some people have either solved these issues, or may not share my concerns.

jibbajibba

I deliberately picked M&M 2e because of its capacity for optimised builds and system mastery. These are not my favoured game styles, though I have to admit the character creation is very flexible, but I want to give the players a chance to experience that type of game because just cos I don;t like it doesn't mean thy might not love it to bits.

Of course its not a fair deal if I fuck up GM'ing it due to some inherent system balance issues that I was unaware of.

As I noted I am particularly wary of the PC with an armoured 10 protection suit with immunity.
No longer living in Singapore
Method Actor-92% :Tactician-75% :Storyteller-67%:
Specialist-67% :Power Gamer-42% :Butt-Kicker-33% :
Casual Gamer-8%


GAMERS Profile
Jibbajibba
9AA788 -- Age 45 -- Academia 1 term, civilian 4 terms -- $15,000

Cult&Hist-1 (Anthropology); Computing-1; Admin-1; Research-1;
Diplomacy-1; Speech-2; Writing-1; Deceit-1;
Brawl-1 (martial Arts); Wrestling-1; Edged-1;

Bill

Quote from: jibbajibba;760538I deliberately picked M&M 2e because of its capacity for optimised builds and system mastery. These are not my favoured game styles, though I have to admit the character creation is very flexible, but I want to give the players a chance to experience that type of game because just cos I don;t like it doesn't mean thy might not love it to bits.

Of course its not a fair deal if I fuck up GM'ing it due to some inherent system balance issues that I was unaware of.

As I noted I am particularly wary of the PC with an armoured 10 protection suit with immunity.

Well, if you are allowing uber characters, then the only real problem I see is if someone is 'Unassailable' or 'Immune to Everything'

If someone is immune to physical attacks but not energy and mental, its fine.

If someone is always invisible and attacks through walls with an invisible attack; that's bad.

daniel_ream

Quote from: jibbajibba;760275Wouldn't be my ideal choice as a lot of system mastery required to get teh most out of it and a whole lot of charop but I think I can run it free form enough for it to be manageable.

M&M 2E is, IMHO, irreparably broken.  The character build system has some stunning loopholes that create such huge point discrepancies that there's no disincentive to use them, and character sheets very quickly get bizarre and counterintuitive.

One obvious case in point: there is virtually no case where it makes sense to buy up Attributes, since everything every Attribute bonus point gives can be bought cheaper somewhere else in the system.  In fact, it can be extremely effective to buy all your Attributes down to 0, and then use the extra points to buy back the bonuses where they actually count.  You can save as much as 10-20 HP this way.

Also, PL is God.  If every character and villain doesn't have every attack and defense within a few points of PL (remember you can trade off), then you're going to have one-shot "kills".  The Protection +10, Immunity 10 is one kind of gamebreaking character, but so is the bathroom mentalist.  In M&M2 it is very easy to get rock-paper-scissors builds that are invincible within a narrow set of assumptions; change those assumptions and they're useless.

There are certain character concepts that you just can't do in M&M2's power mechanics, because the rules are materialistic; there's no concept of the soul distinct from the body, alternate dimensions, afterlife, etc.  Characters like Katana or Deadman are nearly impossible to build given the system as written.

The rules for damaging objects and the damage values given for mundane weaponry are nonsensical; ignore them and handwave it.

The grappling rules are broken.

i) Yes.  See above about PL.
ii) If the power works at touch range, it doesn't matter what form the character is in.  It's a straight up attack roll.
iii) Read up on PL tradeoffs and Power Attack. Also, exactly what is the character Immune to?  They have to specify. Or did you perhaps mean Impervious?
D&D is becoming Self-Referential.  It is no longer Setting Referential, where it takes references outside of itself. It is becoming like Ouroboros in its self-gleaning for tropes, no longer attached, let alone needing outside context.
~ Opaopajr

jibbajibba

Quote from: daniel_ream;760890M&M 2E is, IMHO, irreparably broken.  The character build system has some stunning loopholes that create such huge point discrepancies that there's no disincentive to use them, and character sheets very quickly get bizarre and counterintuitive.

One obvious case in point: there is virtually no case where it makes sense to buy up Attributes, since everything every Attribute bonus point gives can be bought cheaper somewhere else in the system.  In fact, it can be extremely effective to buy all your Attributes down to 0, and then use the extra points to buy back the bonuses where they actually count.  You can save as much as 10-20 HP this way.

Also, PL is God.  If every character and villain doesn't have every attack and defense within a few points of PL (remember you can trade off), then you're going to have one-shot "kills".  The Protection +10, Immunity 10 is one kind of gamebreaking character, but so is the bathroom mentalist.  In M&M2 it is very easy to get rock-paper-scissors builds that are invincible within a narrow set of assumptions; change those assumptions and they're useless.

There are certain character concepts that you just can't do in M&M2's power mechanics, because the rules are materialistic; there's no concept of the soul distinct from the body, alternate dimensions, afterlife, etc.  Characters like Katana or Deadman are nearly impossible to build given the system as written.

The rules for damaging objects and the damage values given for mundane weaponry are nonsensical; ignore them and handwave it.

The grappling rules are broken.

i) Yes.  See above about PL.
ii) If the power works at touch range, it doesn't matter what form the character is in.  It's a straight up attack roll.
iii) Read up on PL tradeoffs and Power Attack. Also, exactly what is the character Immune to?  They have to specify. Or did you perhaps mean Impervious?

Thanks.
Yes I meant Impervious . I will look at the effect but it may be that I am happy with her being impervious I can think of a few hundred other way sto cause damage :)
I guess I will give a "Gas' a to hit bonus against a person.
I can generate a quick grapple subsystem I think.
No longer living in Singapore
Method Actor-92% :Tactician-75% :Storyteller-67%:
Specialist-67% :Power Gamer-42% :Butt-Kicker-33% :
Casual Gamer-8%


GAMERS Profile
Jibbajibba
9AA788 -- Age 45 -- Academia 1 term, civilian 4 terms -- $15,000

Cult&Hist-1 (Anthropology); Computing-1; Admin-1; Research-1;
Diplomacy-1; Speech-2; Writing-1; Deceit-1;
Brawl-1 (martial Arts); Wrestling-1; Edged-1;

APN

I recall character creation being a chore. The game itself - rolling a D20 and adding stuff - no problem.

Strange since I'd played (and loved) DC Heroes (point buy) but this seemed more fiddly. You could play it straight - buy X points of power for Y cost, or play one of the pre-made archetypes - but you would be woefully outgunned by someone who knew how to min/max the system.

They'd somehow manage to eke out a more effective character within the PL limits. I just wanted to play, rather than learn to min/max the system and add this, that, the other, so that the character sheet had listings within listings and you needed to know what all that stuff did or you'd be forever looking in the book to work it out. Then multiply that by half a dozen players.

Always wanted to go back and give the game another shot - so many people love it so I must be wrong, and them right, right? Never did. Like Hero system, sometimes more is not better.

I'm GMing a long running DC Heroes campaign at the moment but think I will switch to something simpler soon. I get the system, no problem, but my players never really felt comfortable with it. When a couple of people joined who really knew how to squeeze max bang for buck it really unsettled things, to the point of asking one of the players to leave the game. All of her posts were rules lawyer arguments about how this many points bought this or that and should do this when in fact her character had been min/maxed to grant near limitless power and flexibility and made the others redundant.

Maybe I have a problem with point buy games - they are wildly open to abuse in my opinion.

Bill

Iv'e never been truly satisfied with a supers system. Probably because the genre is very demanding about what can exist (everything from all other genres). Also, it is tricky at best to represent Robin and Superman with the same game mechanics.

MM may not be perfect, but if the players are focused on roleplay I think it works.

If the game is about who's build is better, or pure combat, not so great.

Saplatt

(i) You don't want to be stingy with any of your defenses. The vast majority of effective builds usually try to hit level limits on all of them. The main reason you might have a lower toughness save is if you'd done a trade off under the rules to increase another defensive feature.  

(ii) IIRC, you don't ordinarily need to succeed in a grapple to hit someone with a touch range attack. Requiring a grapple would be a limitation on the power.

(iii) There are several ways to get around the protection 10/impervious 10 problem.

1. Your villains won't necessarily be restricted to PL 10 attacks. Your major ones should always be at least a level or two higher than the PCs.
2. The penetrating extra can bypass an impervious defense. A power can be either purchased that way or stunted for the same effect. Even on a mundane armor piecing shells or rockets should have that extra.
3. Although there is some controversy about it, most GMs allow "combined" attacks to raise the rank of an attack in a way that can bypass impervious protection. (Use this for mooks.)
4. There are plenty of attacks that bypass protection altogether: basically anything that requires a Will or Fort save. And ensnaring attacks can be fun.

Hope that helps.

Saplatt

Quote from: daniel_ream;760890... There are certain character concepts that you just can't do in M&M2's power mechanics, because the rules are materialistic; there's no concept of the soul distinct from the body, alternate dimensions, afterlife, etc.  Characters like Katana or Deadman are nearly impossible to build given the system as written.


Deadman
PL: 10 (184pp)

Abilities: STR: 14 (+2) DEX: 16 (+3) CON: -- (+) INT: 14 (+2) WIS: 16 (+3) CHA: 16 (+3)

Skills: Acrobatics 12 (+15), Bluff 8 (+11), Escape Artist 8 (+11), Gather Information 12 (+15), Notice 8 (+11), Profession [Circus Performer] 8 (+11), Sense Motive 8 (+11), Stealth 4 (+7)

Feats: Acrobatic Bluff, All-Out Attack, Defensive Attack, Dodge Focus (5), Elusive Target, Improved Block, Power Attack, Takedown Attack, Taunt

Powers: Astral Form 9 (Extras: Continuous [+1]; Flaws: Permanent [-1]; Power Feats: Selective, Subtle, Dimensional; 47pp), Immunity 30 (Fortitude Effects; 30pp), Possession 8 (24pp), Super Senses 1 (Spirit Awareness; 1pp)

Combat: Attack +10 [Unarmed +2] Defense 20 (13 flat-footed) Init +3

Saves: Toughness +0 (0 flat-footed) Fortitude +NA Reflex +3 Will +8

Abilities 16 + Skills 17 (68 Ranks) + Feats 13 + Powers 102 + Combat 30 + Saves 6 – Drawbacks 0 = 184pp


Katana



Power Level: 10; Power Points Spent: 150

STR: +4 (18.), DEX: +6 (22), CON: +4 (18.), INT: +3 (16), WIS: +2 (14), CHA: +9 (28.)

Tough: +4/+8, Fort: +7, Ref: +10, Will: +5

Skills: Bluff 4 (+13), Diplomacy 4 (+13), Intimidate 4 (+13), Language 4 (+4), Sleight of Hand 8 (+14), Stealth 8 (+14), Knowledge (arcane Lore) 4 (+7), Knowledge (theology & philsophy) 4 (+7)

Feats: Equipment 2, Fighting Style: Sword-fighting, Accurate Attack, Defensive Attack, Improved Block, Improved Disarm, Improved Initiative, Power Attack, Taunt, Fighting Style: Judo, Improved Grab, Improved Pin, Improved Trip, Stunning Attack, Takedown Attack 2, Weapon Bind, Ritualist, Quick Draw, Defensive Roll 4, All-Out Attack, Dodge Focus 2, Evasion, Attack Focus (Melee)

Powers:
Soultaker (Device 2) (easy to lose; Indestructible)
Strike 5 (DC 24; Mighty, Variable Descriptor (Narrow group - Cutting or Bashing with the Flat of the Blade))
Absorbs the Souls of Victims It Slays (Features 1)
Absolute Control of Souls It's Taken (Features 1)
Can Summon Forth the Dead Stored in It. (Features 1)

Equipment: Knife, Shuriken

Attack Bonus: +10 (Ranged: +10, Melee: +11, Grapple: +15)

Attacks: Unarmed Attack, +11 (DC 19), Knife, +11 (DC 20), Shuriken, +10 (DC 20), Strike 5, +11 (DC 24)

Defense: +12 (Flat-footed: +5), Knockback: -4

Initiative: +10

Languages: Native Language (Japanese), English, Chinese (Mandarin), Vietnamese, Korean

Totals: Abilities 56 + Skills 10 (40 ranks) + Feats 27 + Powers 7 + Combat 40 + Saves 10 + Drawbacks 0 = 150

daniel_ream

Quote from: Saplatt;761320Powers:
Absorbs the Souls of Victims It Slays (Features 1)
Absolute Control of Souls It's Taken (Features 1)
Can Summon Forth the Dead Stored in It. (Features 1)

First of all, that's 3E, not 2E, and second of all, fuck off.  Being able to enslave anyone she kills in the blade and summon them later is a major feature of the character, both in terms of story impact and in terms of raw objective-defeating power.  Three points?  That's a 60-foot-tall billboard with neon letters spelling out "THE GAME CAN'T DO THIS BUT I'M TOO STUBBORN TO ADMIT IT".

Quote from: APNMaybe I have a problem with point buy games - they are wildly open to abuse in my opinion.

Effects-based point buy is a trap in RPGs.  If the number of effects is kept very small, it can work fine in skirmish minis games (I'm thinking Dirtside II, Song of Blades and Heroes, or Hordes of the Things) but it just doesn't work at all for RPGs, period.  All it does is act as a tar baby for people obsessed with detail and complexity.
D&D is becoming Self-Referential.  It is no longer Setting Referential, where it takes references outside of itself. It is becoming like Ouroboros in its self-gleaning for tropes, no longer attached, let alone needing outside context.
~ Opaopajr

Saplatt

Quote from: daniel_ream;761867First of all, that's 3E, not 2E...

Demonstrably wrong. Features were introduced in the 2e Ultimate Powers book. Pages 50-51.

Quote from: daniel_ream;761867and second of all, fuck off.  Being able to enslave anyone she kills in the blade and summon them later is a major feature of the character, both in terms of story impact and in terms of raw objective-defeating power.  Three points?  That's a 60-foot-tall billboard with neon letters spelling out "THE GAME CAN'T DO THIS BUT I'M TOO STUBBORN TO ADMIT IT"....

Blah, blah, blah. If you don't like the features angle then just giver her ranks of the summoning power, limited to people she's killed, with whatever extras are appropriate.



Quote from: daniel_ream;761867Effects-based point buy is a trap in RPGs.

Nonsense. If you can't define what effect a power has, it's meaningless anyway.  


Quote from: daniel_ream;761867If the number of effects is kept very small, it can work fine in skirmish minis games (I'm thinking Dirtside II, Song of Blades and Heroes, or Hordes of the Things) but it just doesn't work at all for RPGs, period.  All it does is act as a tar baby for people obsessed with detail and complexity.

Which I assume is why games like M&M, Champions, and DC Heroes will never sell a copy.

Bill

Games like Hero, Gurps, and MM can usually cover the unusual character concepts, but may not be able to do it on the budget set in the campaign.

Batman, for example, can be expensive. That utility belt costs more points than Robin. :)