SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Do it yourself GMs?

Started by Mcrow, May 21, 2007, 01:26:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mcrow

After reading Zachary's thread on homebrewing, I figured a poll should be done.

It seems that we have a higher concentration of "DIY" GM's here than on other sites.


are you a DIY GM?

James McMurray

I need a third option. Currently I'm generating everything from scratch, but I'm also angling the campaign towards a module I bought, which I'll run but also heavily modify to make it fit better.

Mcrow

I would say that if you more often than not create your own worlds, systems,adventures, or other gaming material it woudl count as a "yes". You don't have to make up all of it to be a DYI GM, hacking and modifying count as well.

Koltar

I voted ...I'm more like a two-thirds/one-third kind of guy.
 One third of my stuff is based on either GDW  or SJ Games product, the other two-thirds is stuff that I make up.

 I DO try to make sure the stuff that I make up could believably exist in the TRAVELLER universe.


- Ed C.
The return of \'You can\'t take the Sky From me!\'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUn-eN8mkDw&feature=rec-fresh+div

This is what a really cool FANTASY RPG should be like :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-WnjVUBDbs

Still here, still alive, at least Seven years now...

Megamanfan

All 3 of my Supers settings were homebrews (Heroes Earth, Guardian Earth and the Lightbringers), I have a fantasy setting that's getting scrapped and salvaged for what I can only describe as a pulp action magitech fantasy adventure setting.  I'm also working on a Sci-Fi space opera setting.  It's going slowly though.

I just love creating settings.  I don't know exactly why, but I derive great enjoyment through world building.
"Beware the righteous man who KNOWS God exists, for he has no faith at all." - Spike

Brimshack

11 Yes, 0 No.

Apparently, we non-conformists are all alike.

Mcrow

I wonder if the lower % for ENworld has to do with the fact that most of the people there play primarily d20?:confused:

Sosthenes

Even though I've been using some pre-existing settings lately, the fact that I barely run pre-generated adventures and add quite a lot during the course of a campaign, I'd consider myself firmly in the DIY camp.

I haven't read boxed adventure text in quite a while ;)
 

James McMurray

Quote from: McrowI would say that if you more often than not create your own worlds, systems,adventures, or other gaming material it woudl count as a "yes". You don't have to make up all of it to be a DYI GM, hacking and modifying count as well.

In that case I voted Yes. While I prefer to have something to base my games off of, very little survives to make it to my table unchanged, and my players are pretty good at wandering off the beaten path and forcing me to improvise.

Gunslinger

I guess I should explain my solo "no" response.  I rarely stray from the rules as written.  If they seem wonky, I try to make sense of them narratively as opposed to mechanically.
 

James McMurray

Same here. I'll change a rule if I have to, but not "just because." I thought the thread was aimed at DIY settings and adventures, but I didn't read the thread mentioned in the OP, so I may have voted wrong.

Gunslinger

Quote from: James McMurraySame here. I'll change a rule if I have to, but not "just because." I thought the thread was aimed at DIY settings and adventures, but I didn't read the thread mentioned in the OP, so I may have voted wrong.
Argghh, you're right.  I guess I'm 50/50 depending on which game.
 

JamesV

I'm not sure how to put it, as I like to take established settings and demolish them with a few choice ideas of my own.
Running: Dogs of WAR - Beer & Pretzels & Bullets
Planning to Run: Godbound or Stars Without Number
Playing: Star Wars D20 Rev.

A lack of moderation doesn\'t mean saying every asshole thing that pops into your head.

Calithena

Yep. If I weren't I'd probably still be playing 3.14159, and likely would have never spent all that time at the Forge trying to figure out why modern game designs fuck me up so bad. I'm happy for the increased self-understanding but sometimes I sort of wish I'd stuck with chess instead.
Looking for your old-school fantasy roleplaying fix? Don't despair...Fight On!

Pierce Inverarity

Partly, partly. Totally depends on the game in hand. D&D has always been DIY for me (very loosely based on Greyhawk). Actually, I would probably DIY virtually all fantasy RPGs.

Or would I... I wouldn't modify Talislanta, but I *would* modify Cyradon...

Now I'm confused. What the hell are my criteria? :D
Ich habe mir schon sehr lange keine Gedanken mehr über Bleistifte gemacht.--Settembrini