TheRPGSite

Other Games, Development, & Campaigns => Other Games => Topic started by: KrakaJak on November 10, 2006, 01:01:58 PM

Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: KrakaJak on November 10, 2006, 01:01:58 PM

A quick breakdown of the Pros and Cons of the systems:
 
Wii
 
Pros: Price ($250 with a pack in game), Nintendo Franchises (Zelda, Mario, Pokemon), Unique control scheme (Wiimote, Nunchuck), Wi-Fi support out of the box.
 
Big Game: Legen of Zelda: The Twilight Princess
 
Coming Soon: Mario Galaxy, Smash Bros.,
 
Cons: Power (only moderately more powerful than the GameCube), Unique Control Scheme (Does it work? Can I play Street Fighter on it?), No HD support.
 
PS3
Pros: Power (The most power potential of all the new systems), Sony First Party developers (Incog Inc., Naughty Dog, Insomniac), Full Integration with the PSP.
 
Big Game: Resistance: Fall of Man
 
Coming Soon: Metal Gera Solid 4
 
Cons: Price ($500-600 depeneding on the model, no pack in game), Questionable 3rd Party Support (Many developers are delaying or cancelling their projects).
 
Xbox 360
 
Pros: Proven Excellent Online Support (Xbox Live Arcade), Back Library (360 has been out for a year now, with plenty of good games), Direct Interactivity with Zune and Widows Vista.
 
Big Game: Gears of War
 
Coming Soon: Halo 3
 
Cons: Price ($500 for the only version worth buying, $50 a year for X-Box Live Gold account), Frequent Technical Issues (console bricking, damaging discs), Weak First Party (besides Bungie, the rest of the Microsoft Game Studios are crap).
 
So I'm getting a Wii. It's both interesting and inexpensive. Even the 3rd party developers are going crazy with it. It looks like it will bring new kinds of games instead of just better graphics.
 
Which one are you getting?
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: Gabriel on November 10, 2006, 01:28:17 PM
I already have a X360.  It's growing on me.

I'll be buying a PS3 when Tekken comes out.  So, sometime next year.

I see no reason to get a Wii.  Nothing on the horizon is of interest, either.  I'll probably end up with one in 2 or 3 years, just because I do usually tend to end up with all the consoles of a generation, but there's certainly nothing compelling about the system.
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: J Arcane on November 10, 2006, 02:01:02 PM
Eh, so far I'm not buying a one of them.

Sony can choke on the PS3, and there's no damn games worth paying such an obscene price for anyway.

There's not really anything at all I want on the 360 either.  

The Wii looks like a cheap gimmick that's likely to turn out as well as the DS in terms of gameplay:  Lots of shitty minigames, or games with Wii-style controls grafted on uneccessarily.

I'm stickin' with my PC, and the occasional PSP game.  Once I get a new vid-capture card I'll probably pick up an old Xbox, but that's about it.
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: fonkaygarry on November 10, 2006, 03:25:34 PM
Wii!  Wii!

It calls to me from the mists!  Shigeru Miyamoto haunts my dreams with ethereal images of Link and Mario!

I am powerless to resist.  

:hyper:
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: KrakaJak on November 10, 2006, 05:01:49 PM
Quote from: fonkaygarryWii!  Wii!

It calls to me from the mists!  Shigeru Miyamoto haunts my dreams with ethereal images of Link and Mario!

I am powerless to resist.  

:hyper:
I'm with you on this. I lost faith in Nintendo after the last couple generations. But the Wii looks like it's trying to do something REALLY different with gaming. It's got me all giddy about gaming (the videogaming kind) again.
 
The Wii also has LOTS of games I want. Zelda, Raving Rabbids, Mario Galaxy, Red Steel, Wii Sports (BTW, I want a FPS with Mii's).
 
That back library of Nintendo, Super Nintendo (EarthBound Woooo!), N64 (please give me Goldeneye....Please!), Genesis, and TurboGrafx 16 games will be awesome too.
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: Mystery Man on November 10, 2006, 06:46:47 PM
Got the 360. I can play video games, download crap to it, watch the porn on my pc by connecting to my windows media center, attach a HDDVD to it, and soon HiDef movies.

360 FTW!!
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: Dr Rotwang! on November 10, 2006, 10:44:56 PM
In a perfect world where I have money flying out of my butt, I'd buy all three.  I'm not likely to buy any one of them any time soon in this world, but maybe later when the prices drop and the games are plenty.

That said, I think that the most revolutionary of 'em is the Wii.  It's frantically ridiculous name aside, its interface, and its place in your home, is what marks it as truly next-gen.

I dunno, maybe I'll get a PS3.  Whatever.  Just so I can play that futuristic GTA game that no one plans to make for me anyway.
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: JongWK on November 11, 2006, 01:13:26 AM
Quote from: KrakaJak
A quick breakdown of the Pros and Cons of the systems:
 
Wii
 
Pros: Price ($250 with a pack in game), Nintendo Franchises (Zelda, Mario, Pokemon), Unique control scheme (Wiimote, Nunchuck), Wi-Fi support out of the box.
 
Big Game: Legen of Zelda: The Twilight Princess
 
Coming Soon: Mario Galaxy, Smash Bros.,
 
Cons: Power (only moderately more powerful than the GameCube), Unique Control Scheme (Does it work? Can I play Street Fighter on it?), No HD support.

Mind you, the Wii also comes with a standard controller (which somewhat resembles the venerable SNES one). It has a small HD, and you can get memory cards for it. The games also seem to cost less than the 360 and PS3, and the Virtual Console is just the icing of the cake.
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: J Arcane on November 11, 2006, 01:40:00 AM
QuoteI dunno, maybe I'll get a PS3. Whatever. Just so I can play that futuristic GTA game that no one plans to make for me anyway.

I would kill for another cyberpunk-style GTA, like what was done with GTA2.  Positively kill.
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: Gabriel on November 11, 2006, 03:41:12 PM
Quote from: JongWKMind you, the Wii also comes with a standard controller (which somewhat resembles the venerable SNES one). It has a small HD, and you can get memory cards for it. The games also seem to cost less than the 360 and PS3, and the Virtual Console is just the icing of the cake.

If you're talking about the "Retro controller", as far as I've read that is available separately.  Only a Wiimote and a Nunchuk controller come with the system.

The hard drive is internal flash memory of 512 MB.

The games are projected to cost $50.
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: JongWK on November 12, 2006, 09:45:37 AM
Quote from: GabrielIf you're talking about the "Retro controller", as far as I've read that is available separately.  Only a Wiimote and a Nunchuk controller come with the system.

The hard drive is internal flash memory of 512 MB.

The games are projected to cost $50.

Yes, that's what I heard. You'll be able to buy memory sticks (1 or 2 GB, IIRC), and the retro ("Classic") controller will sell for $19.99.
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: Rezendevous on November 12, 2006, 10:31:09 AM
I have a 360 and I like it a lot, but I am concerned about whether or not it will break down too soon, and I wish there were more games available for it (although this is getting better, and there are all the Xbox games I can play on it that I missed since I never got the original Xbox).

I wouldn't have any interest in getting a PS3 (mainly because there hasn't been anything announced for it that is not also going to be on the 360 that I am interested in) except that my PS2 is broken.  However, I still lean towards getting it fixed or even buying a new PS2 than getting the PS3, especially since I have serious doubts as to how it will turn out over the long term in terms of support and game availability.

The Wii looks interesting, though.
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: Mr. Analytical on November 12, 2006, 07:54:33 PM
I say don't buy any of them and spend the money on books and cake instead.

Hurrah for books and cake!

Boo to the creatively sterile hackfest that is the videogame industry!
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: peteramthor on November 12, 2006, 09:41:15 PM
Well the only one of the three that I could afford, or more correctly, justify spending that much money on would be the Wii.  But I was never a real big Nintendo fan.  The new controllers and such look neat but I would want to play before I buy.

The PS3 and XBox 360 are just to high.  Sad since the Silent Hill series is my favorite video game series of all time.  For as much as they are costing I could upgrade my computer to play games just as good for half the price.

Well there's my two cents.
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: JongWK on November 14, 2006, 10:33:12 AM
PS3 glitches:

QuoteTOKYO (Reuters) -- Sony said Tuesday its new video game console, the PlayStation 3, does not run about 200 PlayStation and PlayStation 2 software titles properly, the latest problem the electronics maker has run into in its cash-cow game business.

Full story here. (http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/14/technology/ps3.reut/index.htm)
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: Mystery Man on November 23, 2006, 08:33:40 AM
I've been reading a lot of folks talking about the Wii lately and I liken it to this: Everyone is standing around a 1980 Honda Civic talking about how great it is, and I'm looking across the room at my 2006 Mercedes Benz (360) wondering why everyone has lost their fucking minds. :D
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: JongWK on November 23, 2006, 08:58:16 AM
Quote from: Mystery ManI'm looking across the room at my 2006 Mercedes Benz (360) wondering why everyone has lost their fucking minds.

Because they like this? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5cPVP_llfo)
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: Gabriel on November 23, 2006, 11:50:56 AM
Quote from: Mystery ManI've been reading a lot of folks talking about the Wii lately and I liken it to this: Everyone is standing around a 1980 Honda Civic talking about how great it is, and I'm looking across the room at my 2006 Mercedes Benz (360) wondering why everyone has lost their fucking minds. :D

I completely agree with you.

Of course, I also think the same thing regarding the DS (Civic) versus PSP (Benz).
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: JongWK on November 23, 2006, 12:55:05 PM
Here's an interesting article from the Washington Post: (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/22/AR2006112201857.html?nav=hcmodule)


QuoteIn the Wii-PS3 Playoff, Nintendo Upsets Sony on the Fun Factor

By Mike Musgrove, Technology Columnist
Thursday, November 23, 2006; Page D01


There was a showdown between the Nintendo Wii and the Sony PlayStation 3 at The Post's game testing lab last weekend.

Here's how it went down: I invited a bunch of my friends, five guys and three gals, over to check out the new systems. Few of them play or care about video games, but they were all curious to see the PlayStation 3, the cutting-edge game console that sparked real-world mayhem on its release Friday.

By comparison, most of my friends arrived having heard little about Nintendo's new system. But, as it turned out, that device was the hit of the party.

Here's the deal with Nintendo's Wii system, in case you missed it. The system's controls contain motion-detecting technology. In some games, you don't have to punch any buttons to play. In a tennis game, for example, you swing the wireless controller like a racket. When you hit a ball in the game, the controller shudders as if you'd hit a real ball. The controllers also contain speakers that make a satisfying "thwok" whenever you connect.

It's the same for the bowling, baseball and boxing games designed for the system. Players in all those games use motions with their hands, arms and wrists that roughly replicate the movements you'd make in the real world.

The graphics on the Wii aren't the system's strong suit, however. One of my friends, who liked the system, summed up its games' looks as "cheesy."

Speaking of graphics, I gave the PS3 an unfair advantage in this department. You could have called it a fixed fight if my friends had fallen for the new PlayStation over the Wii because the $600 Sony system was running on a new $4,500, 50-inch plasma TV set from Pioneer, borrowed from the company just for this test. The $250 Nintendo, meanwhile, was running on an old tube set half the size of the plasma screen.

It was that tube set that got most of the traffic. While the people in my group preferred looking at the PS3's games, they preferred playing the Wii.

My friends played the Wii's sports games against each other all weekend, using goofy, cartoony avatars called "Miis" that they constructed to represent themselves in the game. Give a couple of newlyweds a pair of Wii controllers, pop in the boxing game and the entertainment value is priceless. We started out playing the game sitting down, but eventually we took to our feet to get a better range of motion with the controllers.

I have never seen a bunch of non-gamers get into this stuff like this, and I have never heard anybody laugh so much while playing any video game. A few of them now say they plan to buy the system for themselves.

My friend Andy has always seemed to dislike video games, but he was immediately taken by the Nintendo system in a way that I -- and he -- did not expect. "I'm surprised by how much I like it," he said. "The controller is so intuitive."

A few minutes later, he was cursing the PS3. Most of my friends who picked up the PS3's controller ended up frustrated. The typical game for the system requires players to have memorized where all the buttons are, and it's much harder to just pick up a controller and have a good time. Some of the verdicts they offered are unprintable.

My friend Jon, a technophile who likes racing games, reached first for the PS3 and wrestled with the menus and controls for the driving game Ridge Racer. Eventually, we played some races on the system and enjoyed some crisp and realistic-looking racetrack scenarios. But, for a while, he gave up on that and watched Andy and me fall over the furniture as we boxed each other on the Nintendo system. "I'm having more fun just watching you guys play that," he said.

Jon gave the PS3 a thumbs up in at least one area. He was eventually impressed with the quality of the Blu-ray movie format when we watched "Talladega Nights," the movie that Sony is including with the first shipments of the PS3.

Game developers say the PS3 is so powerful that they haven't exploited the system's full potential. I have no idea what the system is capable of, but I can testify that you have to be pretty sharp-eyed to tell much of a difference between the first batch of PS3 games and Xbox 360 versions of the same titles.

When it comes to accessing all of the multimedia features that Sony is promoting with its console . . . well, I still prefer the Xbox 360's approach.

With the Xbox 360, a Microsoft product, using the interface and getting online has been easy and almost as intuitive as using an iPod. Trying to get online with the PS3, on the other hand, was a vale of tears because I didn't have a USB-compatible keyboard to plug into the console, and using the game controller to enter my user information was a tedious process that I gave up on twice.

Imagine filling out a mortgage application on a cellphone. It's something like that.

So I headed out of town for Thanksgiving to spend some time with my girlfriend's family. Just to be safe, I locked away the expensive and hard-to-find PS3 in an undisclosed location, where it is being guarded by ninjas and feral dogs. The thing has some features I look forward to exploring some more, but that can wait.

The Wii, on the other hand, rode shotgun with me for some show-and-tell action because Nintendo got one feature right with the system on Day One:

It's just darn fun.
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: blakkie on November 23, 2006, 02:31:00 PM
Quote from: JongWKBecause they like this? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5cPVP_llfo)
http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2006/11/13

But that aside, umm, I think it is a lot more like a bunch of people standing around a snowmobile with a paddled longtrack talking about how fun it is and you looking across at your Benz thinking they are insane.  Because you aren't looking to rocket straight up a snow covered mountain. So you both just might be right. ;)

Personally I might evetually get a PS3. But I will buy a Wii by end-of-year if I can at something close to list price if it wasn't too much of a hassle for me. Because I don't see the need yet to drop the extra $400 for the Blu-ray player capability, which is frankly the one thing the PS3 has going for it for me. If I want a better graphics video game I'll just do what I've always done, buy one for my PC.

The 360? Well I like the idea of online, but that's pretty much a mixed bag for me now. I've got lots of competition in my own house now that the kids are getting older, so once again I'll save the few hundred dollars and just go with the wacky cheap toy that emphasises face-to-face (or shoulder-to-shoulder I guess) social play.
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: Mystery Man on November 23, 2006, 06:21:20 PM
Quote from: JongWKBecause they like this? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5cPVP_llfo)

LoL, yeah if I'm going to get up and exercise it's going to be doing something that is actually athletic, like playing football, lifting weights or riding a bike... not jumping around in front of my TV looking like a complete tool. :D
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: Quasar on November 25, 2006, 04:40:15 AM
I expect at some point I'll grab a PS3. Though it will probably be due to its linux  support as much as anything else. Well...unless the 360 gets hacked so I can use it as a media player like I do its predecessor.

The price has to come down quite a long way though.
Title: Wii vs. PS3 vs. 360
Post by: Rezendevous on November 26, 2006, 01:08:25 PM
Quote from: Mystery ManLoL, yeah if I'm going to get up and exercise it's going to be doing something that is actually athletic, like playing football, lifting weights or riding a bike... not jumping around in front of my TV looking like a complete tool. :D

Since when has playing a video game ever looked cool, though?  Aside from maybe Guitar Hero and DDR.