I've bolded the relevant part of your post, just in case you really are confused as to why a site like RPGnet would take you to task over it. You identified a group, then attacked it by claiming it's members were "mentally unstable, physically unattractive, and financially instable -- i.e. subaverage women."
No. That's not what I said. You have a reading comprehension problem.
I was theorizing why mentally unstable, physically unattractive, and financially instable -- i.e. subaverage women -- seem to be drawn to gaming. There is a very real and meaningful difference between what I said and how you are summarizing it. You seem to be under the
greatly mistaken impression that I was identifying women gamers as mentally unstable, physically unattractive, and financially instable. That is not what I said at all. I was attempting to explain why I had encountered so many subaverage women in my gaming career. You can't attack subaverage women by identifying them as subaverage women.
There's nothing in what I said to get offended by, unless of course
you can't actually comprehend written English. Which I honestly think is a huge part of the problem. I am constantly amazed by people's utter inability to read simple English.
Unless, of course, you consider acknowledging that subaverage women
exist is an attack on women as a whole. Which is exactly how people reacted. But that's utterly irrational. Subaverage women
must exist, it's necessitated by the existence of average and above average women.
A rational person would agree that the average woman is not mentally unstable, physically unattractive, and financially instable, and that these are negative traits, and thus a woman displaying these traits must be subaverage.
It's really not that hard to comprehend, unless you're a moderator on rpg.net.