Point out any mistakes I made besides getting the total city budget confused with the budget for the homeless programs. I was asking honest questions, and you got butthurt and lashed out like a child. We already knew you were a troll and an asshole, no better than the people you complain about. This is just more evidence towards that.
I don't even care about your opinions anymore. I just like to watch you dig your hole deeper.
HappyDaze's first reply to you pointed out a lot of things that were included in that xB$ total that didn't belong, in another post specifically told you where to look for the real number, and then in a later post provided the actual numbers. HD does troll, but not in this case. It wasn't particularly polite, but neither is your post.
I agree with Pat here. The conversation here has devolved into trading insults rather than discussing the issues. Regarding the issue of cost of homeless... Currently in Seattle, the number I heard was,
$100M/11751 homeless persons = $8510/homeless person
I'm curious about how much that is compared to other programs. For example, in Houston, there was a $58 million program that aimed to end chronic homelessness - but Houston has a homeless population only one-third the size.
https://communityimpact.com/houston/cy-fair/government/2020/06/30/updated-harris-county-houston-commit-58-million-to-program-that-could-functionally-end-chronic-homelessness-in-the-county/$58M / 3938 homeless persons = $14,728 per homeless person
Maybe the Houston program is much better -- but the cost is also greater per homeless person. Now, Houston has a lower homeless population per capita than Seattle. On the other hand, homeless population interacts with prison population. If a city effectively makes being homeless illegal, then there is a lower homeless population but a higher prison population.
Texas has nearly double the prison population per capita as Washington, and the cost of a prisoner averages $33,000 per capita in the U.S. So that's not a great tradeoff economically.