This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.
The RPGPundit's Own Forum Rules
This part of the site is controlled by the RPGPundit. This is where he discusses topics that he finds interesting. You may post here, but understand that there are limits. The RPGPundit can shut down any thread, topic of discussion, or user in a thread at his pleasure. This part of the site is essentially his house, so keep that in mind. Note that this is the only part of the site where political discussion is permitted, but is regulated by the RPGPundit.

Author Topic: Turning the corner on "woke"?  (Read 107183 times)

Redwanderer
BANNED

  • BANNED
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • ?
  • Posts: 58
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #345 on: February 28, 2022, 04:23:12 PM »
Been hearing that for years too. Problem is the left is stealing the whole damned system look up Zuckerbucks, and the 92% is too scared to even speak up. The whining here about the BLM and ADL is just because people figure it's safe.

Look, in my never to be approved post about WHY the 92% are terminal losers I said the obvious and you brought it up- the 8% may be stupid insane losers but they aren't scared and want to WIN no matter what.

The 92%? Just say you'll call them whateverist and they'll run away EVERY SINGLE DAMNED TIME. Corner a rabbit and it'll fight but not the 92%- hell, they'll turn on their own to suck up to the people hating on them.

« Last Edit: February 28, 2022, 04:26:05 PM by Redwanderer »

oggsmash

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4007
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #346 on: February 28, 2022, 04:29:40 PM »
    Message me to make the point you want to make.  I do not understand where you are on this, and how you feel shaking a fist at the clouds changes it.  It honestly makes you look a little like you joined the forum from an office in an FBI building.

Shasarak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4032
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #347 on: February 28, 2022, 04:43:09 PM »
It honestly makes you look a little like you joined the forum from an office in an FBI building.

If that is true then I have some autistic ideas regarding my government that could be turned into reality with appropriate funding.

In cash please.
Who da Drow?  U da drow! - hedgehobbit

There will be poor always,
pathetically struggling,
look at the good things you've got! -  Jesus

oggsmash

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4007
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #348 on: February 28, 2022, 04:45:07 PM »
It honestly makes you look a little like you joined the forum from an office in an FBI building.

If that is true then I have some autistic ideas regarding my government that could be turned into reality with appropriate funding.

In cash please.

  It would have to be, otherwise you get the Canada Banking treatment.

Redwanderer
BANNED

  • BANNED
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • ?
  • Posts: 58
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #349 on: March 17, 2022, 06:31:05 PM »
    Message me to make the point you want to make.  I do not understand where you are on this, and how you feel shaking a fist at the clouds changes it.  It honestly makes you look a little like you joined the forum from an office in an FBI building.


You know perfectly well what I'm saying. The woke- Pundit's 8%- keep winning because they ain't afraid to fight dirty. Call them names like "anti tradition" "anti American" and "anti white guys" think they'll care? They don't. Hell, they'll take it as a damn compliment.

I'll make this as simple as possible for you- the 92% been losing for a long time. This is why saying orcs are evil is racist and you got those x-cards. This is why the 8% got the media, colleges, government, dnd, schools, you name it.

So how did a minority of total losers pull that off? Because the 92%- as in you- are too damned scared to do anything. Call the 92% bigots or racists or sexists or whatever and it's like pulling a cross on Dracula. They always back down. Maybe you haven't noticed but what you been doing all these years hasn't exactly worked?

Redwanderer
BANNED

  • BANNED
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • ?
  • Posts: 58
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #350 on: March 17, 2022, 06:33:23 PM »
And here we go.


Look, I'll take a chance riverdancing in hobnail boots through the ban minefield like Lord of the Dunce so maybe the 92% learns something and finally starts figuring out why they've always been hopeless losers to the 8% losers. Maybe tomorrow morning I'll find a pot of gold left by friendly leprechauns. Hard to say what's more likely. We'll also see just how much free speech is really allowed here or if it's rpg.net blarney, watch for that stupid line through my name.

The biggest problem is the 92%s obeying to what the 8% wants. The 8% draws lines saying "don't say this don't do that" pushing the 92% closer and closer to the edge of the cliff and the 92% obeys when it's not busying itself pushing each other off first. The 8% tells the 92% to fight polite and clean while the 8% can fight dirty as all hell. HEY 92% YOU DON'T WIN FIGHTS DOING WHAT THE 8% TELLS YOU TO DO.
Ask about banning here and surely someone babbles about "anti semite white supremist whatever". We're talking about black and jewish bigot groups saying only white people can be racist and needing to be MURDERED so what does someone here go on about? White supremist anti semite of course- so other supremist talk is okey dokey fine? But did anyone complain about that except Yours Truly? Course not, we're talking about the 92% here.
Since the 92% ain't ever going to figure this out I'll keep saying it- you have a black group like BLM saying kill all the whites and jewish groups like the ADL and SPLC saying only whites can be racist. SO- if all the whites are killed no more racism giving BLM real good reason to say kill all whites! Gah, just a coincidence I'm sure, like always. Could it be maybe just maybe the problem today is- gasp!- jews and blacks hating on whites and not white supremist anti semitism? Ooooo I'm surely dancing on a ban mine for saying the obvious ain't I? HAH!
Since that post will never be approved here's some of it- government, schools, pop culture like dnd and media aren't going anywhere so SOMEONE'S got to run them. It's either you 92% or the 8% and those are the only two choices. If by some miracle the 92% is ever running things again maybe it'll remember what happened when they let the 8% get it's foot in the door by being told to be "reasonable" by the 8%- and how the 8% returned the favor by taking EVERYTHING? How bad the 92% got itself screwed over and over and over? If there is a next time it won't give ONE DAMN INCH?

Another problem is the 92% don't want to do anything about the 8%. Yeah you heard me right Pundit and you lot, none of you wants to do anything about them. What you want is SOMEONE ELSE to do something about them, problem is anyone who isn't a damned coward knows the 92% will NEVER back him up, they'll either do nothing or more likely push him off the cliff to suck up to the 8% when it comes down to it. So nothing gets done and if you think it's bad now just what the hell do you think it's going to be like twenty years from now? We're in this dungheap now because worthless cowards did nothing about it years ago and the same cowardice now surely means worse years from now.

Another problem is that "just extremists not the whole groups" blarney because you'll notice nobody in those groups is saying anything against them?
You have BLM saying kill white people. All right, how come the non-BLM black people're not saying anything against it? And I mean a whole lot of them, not just a few, loud for ALL to hear? But surprise! nothing.
With the SPLC and ADL it gets a wee bit more complicated so pay attention- those groups are jewish, right? And they're trashing white people.
Now here's the wee bit more complicated part- when you look at a list of who runs what in the media it's plain to anyone no matter how sloshed if there is anyone on this world can speak up against those "extremists" it's that group. Nobody can say anything against them or else. So NOBODY is in a better position to say something so why don't I hear that group protesting? But all you get from the media is leftism and stuff about white racism and white bashing. Guess what I DIDN'T see- anything about those "extremist" bigot groups bashing and even calling for white murder. Nothing. And the non-media types ain't exactly marching in the streets protesting any of it are they?

So just what the hell am I supposed to think? Imagine if powerful Irish groups started saying jews and blacks were rotten hooligans who should be killed and suppose the media and ad business was run by Irishmen and pushed nasty anti black and jewish stuff and the Irish never said anything about any of it, what do you think jews and blacks would think about the Irish? Got that part now? "Silence is violence" did some people suddenly forget that? Gah!
Some whites say anything bad about those groups- even if they ain't calling for murder- ALL whites better damn them to hell and back good and loud but when it's the other way around it's whites better just make excuses for them and damn themselves about white supremists. Ever notice those other groups never return the favor?


The 92% been dumbed down and scared so much the 8% already won but this really goes for white people because they can't even figure out people hedging their bets. Sooner or later something's got to give if this keeps up, so one of two things got to happen- one, and my money's on this one, whites just bend over and let themselves get screwed over and killed rather than be called names even helping by pushing each other off the cliff like the whole 92% been doing for years. Well those other groups will surely want to share in the spoils of victory. Think they'll cry over what happened and damn the "extremists"? HAH! You believe that then I got some really nice tropical property in Dublin I'd like to sell you!
But suppose the moon rises in the west and whites crack open a dictionary and look up words like courage and unity then finally stand up for themselves and WIN? Oh then SOMEONE is going to be neck deep in the dungheap for sure- NOW those groups will speak up good and loud, whining about how it wasn't them it was those "extremists".
Could it be they figure not saying anything now then no matter what happens later they win or at least lose nothing?
This is why I'm not going to give a rat's arse anymore if anything ever happens to those groups. They never did speak up for me, maybe they hated on me and agreed with it all, either way why the hell should I do anything for them? I'll just sit back and do what they did for me- NOTHING. I'm not wasting my time crying over anyone never did anything for me.


HappyDaze

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • H
  • Posts: 5337
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #351 on: March 17, 2022, 06:48:19 PM »
And here we go.


Look, I'll take a chance riverdancing in hobnail boots through the ban minefield like Lord of the Dunce so maybe the 92% learns something and finally starts figuring out why they've always been hopeless losers to the 8% losers. Maybe tomorrow morning I'll find a pot of gold left by friendly leprechauns. Hard to say what's more likely. We'll also see just how much free speech is really allowed here or if it's rpg.net blarney, watch for that stupid line through my name.

The biggest problem is the 92%s obeying to what the 8% wants. The 8% draws lines saying "don't say this don't do that" pushing the 92% closer and closer to the edge of the cliff and the 92% obeys when it's not busying itself pushing each other off first. The 8% tells the 92% to fight polite and clean while the 8% can fight dirty as all hell. HEY 92% YOU DON'T WIN FIGHTS DOING WHAT THE 8% TELLS YOU TO DO.
Ask about banning here and surely someone babbles about "anti semite white supremist whatever". We're talking about black and jewish bigot groups saying only white people can be racist and needing to be MURDERED so what does someone here go on about? White supremist anti semite of course- so other supremist talk is okey dokey fine? But did anyone complain about that except Yours Truly? Course not, we're talking about the 92% here.
Since the 92% ain't ever going to figure this out I'll keep saying it- you have a black group like BLM saying kill all the whites and jewish groups like the ADL and SPLC saying only whites can be racist. SO- if all the whites are killed no more racism giving BLM real good reason to say kill all whites! Gah, just a coincidence I'm sure, like always. Could it be maybe just maybe the problem today is- gasp!- jews and blacks hating on whites and not white supremist anti semitism? Ooooo I'm surely dancing on a ban mine for saying the obvious ain't I? HAH!
Since that post will never be approved here's some of it- government, schools, pop culture like dnd and media aren't going anywhere so SOMEONE'S got to run them. It's either you 92% or the 8% and those are the only two choices. If by some miracle the 92% is ever running things again maybe it'll remember what happened when they let the 8% get it's foot in the door by being told to be "reasonable" by the 8%- and how the 8% returned the favor by taking EVERYTHING? How bad the 92% got itself screwed over and over and over? If there is a next time it won't give ONE DAMN INCH?

Another problem is the 92% don't want to do anything about the 8%. Yeah you heard me right Pundit and you lot, none of you wants to do anything about them. What you want is SOMEONE ELSE to do something about them, problem is anyone who isn't a damned coward knows the 92% will NEVER back him up, they'll either do nothing or more likely push him off the cliff to suck up to the 8% when it comes down to it. So nothing gets done and if you think it's bad now just what the hell do you think it's going to be like twenty years from now? We're in this dungheap now because worthless cowards did nothing about it years ago and the same cowardice now surely means worse years from now.

Another problem is that "just extremists not the whole groups" blarney because you'll notice nobody in those groups is saying anything against them?
You have BLM saying kill white people. All right, how come the non-BLM black people're not saying anything against it? And I mean a whole lot of them, not just a few, loud for ALL to hear? But surprise! nothing.
With the SPLC and ADL it gets a wee bit more complicated so pay attention- those groups are jewish, right? And they're trashing white people.
Now here's the wee bit more complicated part- when you look at a list of who runs what in the media it's plain to anyone no matter how sloshed if there is anyone on this world can speak up against those "extremists" it's that group. Nobody can say anything against them or else. So NOBODY is in a better position to say something so why don't I hear that group protesting? But all you get from the media is leftism and stuff about white racism and white bashing. Guess what I DIDN'T see- anything about those "extremist" bigot groups bashing and even calling for white murder. Nothing. And the non-media types ain't exactly marching in the streets protesting any of it are they?

So just what the hell am I supposed to think? Imagine if powerful Irish groups started saying jews and blacks were rotten hooligans who should be killed and suppose the media and ad business was run by Irishmen and pushed nasty anti black and jewish stuff and the Irish never said anything about any of it, what do you think jews and blacks would think about the Irish? Got that part now? "Silence is violence" did some people suddenly forget that? Gah!
Some whites say anything bad about those groups- even if they ain't calling for murder- ALL whites better damn them to hell and back good and loud but when it's the other way around it's whites better just make excuses for them and damn themselves about white supremists. Ever notice those other groups never return the favor?


The 92% been dumbed down and scared so much the 8% already won but this really goes for white people because they can't even figure out people hedging their bets. Sooner or later something's got to give if this keeps up, so one of two things got to happen- one, and my money's on this one, whites just bend over and let themselves get screwed over and killed rather than be called names even helping by pushing each other off the cliff like the whole 92% been doing for years. Well those other groups will surely want to share in the spoils of victory. Think they'll cry over what happened and damn the "extremists"? HAH! You believe that then I got some really nice tropical property in Dublin I'd like to sell you!
But suppose the moon rises in the west and whites crack open a dictionary and look up words like courage and unity then finally stand up for themselves and WIN? Oh then SOMEONE is going to be neck deep in the dungheap for sure- NOW those groups will speak up good and loud, whining about how it wasn't them it was those "extremists".
Could it be they figure not saying anything now then no matter what happens later they win or at least lose nothing?
This is why I'm not going to give a rat's arse anymore if anything ever happens to those groups. They never did speak up for me, maybe they hated on me and agreed with it all, either way why the hell should I do anything for them? I'll just sit back and do what they did for me- NOTHING. I'm not wasting my time crying over anyone never did anything for me.
I feel like I'm at work listening to the ranting of an involuntarily committed behavior patient...except here I don't have to give a shit.

Trond

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2743
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #352 on: April 10, 2022, 04:02:34 PM »
Perhaps violence is a sign of desperation? I arrived in the USA about ten years ago, and it’s hard not to notice the political left has turned more and more violent. Despite what some “studies” say about the right I’m no longer in doubt that the left has completely overtaken the right in the use of violence. Andy Ngo alone has suffered several injuries (and some leftists again called for violence against him recently, turns out they harassed the wrong Asian though). I also know of Trump supporters who were killed for their politics but not a single case the other way round (correct me if I’m wrong).

Wntrlnd

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • W
  • Posts: 180
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #353 on: April 10, 2022, 05:20:22 PM »
Perhaps violence is a sign of desperation? I arrived in the USA about ten years ago, and it’s hard not to notice the political left has turned more and more violent. Despite what some “studies” say about the right I’m no longer in doubt that the left has completely overtaken the right in the use of violence. Andy Ngo alone has suffered several injuries (and some leftists again called for violence against him recently, turns out they harassed the wrong Asian though). I also know of Trump supporters who were killed for their politics but not a single case the other way round (correct me if I’m wrong).

You are wrong.

CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies) a centrist and bipartisan thinktank has taken a look at almost 900 politically motivated attacks and plots since 1994 (up to 2020)

What they found was 21 victims killed in leftwing attacks and 117 victims killed in rightwing attacks (between 2010 and 2020) in the US.

Could it be that left wing attacks are overrepresented in the last 10 years are non-lethal attacks that doesnt end up in fatalities while rightwingers are more prone to shoot to kill? Possible.

Could also be that the news sources you watch doesn't frame the right wing attacks as politically motivated but "just one  mentally ill person"


GeekyBugle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7399
  • Now even more Toxic
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #354 on: April 10, 2022, 06:02:34 PM »
Perhaps violence is a sign of desperation? I arrived in the USA about ten years ago, and it’s hard not to notice the political left has turned more and more violent. Despite what some “studies” say about the right I’m no longer in doubt that the left has completely overtaken the right in the use of violence. Andy Ngo alone has suffered several injuries (and some leftists again called for violence against him recently, turns out they harassed the wrong Asian though). I also know of Trump supporters who were killed for their politics but not a single case the other way round (correct me if I’m wrong).

You are wrong.

CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies) a centrist and bipartisan thinktank has taken a look at almost 900 politically motivated attacks and plots since 1994 (up to 2020)

What they found was 21 victims killed in leftwing attacks and 117 victims killed in rightwing attacks (between 2010 and 2020) in the US.

Could it be that left wing attacks are overrepresented in the last 10 years are non-lethal attacks that doesnt end up in fatalities while rightwingers are more prone to shoot to kill? Possible.

Could also be that the news sources you watch doesn't frame the right wing attacks as politically motivated but "just one  mentally ill person"

Please cite those attacks, both the "left wing" and the "right wing" ones. Because I have noticed that black separatists, black ethno-nationalists tend to be counted as "right-wing never mind their political ideas are socialism/communism.

Also, do we count how many people have died or do we count how many attacks were commited?

Because by YOUR standard all the people attacked by the antifart and burn loot murder that didn't die means those don't count.

Just during the latest "summer of love" during the "fiery but mostly peaceful 30+ people were killed by those two leftwing groups. BILLIONS in damages, how many wounded?

But you go ahead and keep on drinking the koolaid.
Quote from: Rhedyn

Here is why this forum tends to be so stupid. Many people here think Joe Biden is "The Left", when he is actually Far Right and every US republican is just an idiot.

“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”

― George Orwell

Wntrlnd

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • W
  • Posts: 180
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #355 on: April 10, 2022, 06:59:29 PM »
Perhaps violence is a sign of desperation? I arrived in the USA about ten years ago, and it’s hard not to notice the political left has turned more and more violent. Despite what some “studies” say about the right I’m no longer in doubt that the left has completely overtaken the right in the use of violence. Andy Ngo alone has suffered several injuries (and some leftists again called for violence against him recently, turns out they harassed the wrong Asian though). I also know of Trump supporters who were killed for their politics but not a single case the other way round (correct me if I’m wrong).

You are wrong.

CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies) a centrist and bipartisan thinktank has taken a look at almost 900 politically motivated attacks and plots since 1994 (up to 2020)

What they found was 21 victims killed in leftwing attacks and 117 victims killed in rightwing attacks (between 2010 and 2020) in the US.

Could it be that left wing attacks are overrepresented in the last 10 years are non-lethal attacks that doesnt end up in fatalities while rightwingers are more prone to shoot to kill? Possible.

Could also be that the news sources you watch doesn't frame the right wing attacks as politically motivated but "just one  mentally ill person"

Please cite those attacks, both the "left wing" and the "right wing" ones. Because I have noticed that black separatists, black ethno-nationalists tend to be counted as "right-wing never mind their political ideas are socialism/communism.

Also, do we count how many people have died or do we count how many attacks were commited?

Because by YOUR standard all the people attacked by the antifart and burn loot murder that didn't die means those don't count.

Just during the latest "summer of love" during the "fiery but mostly peaceful 30+ people were killed by those two leftwing groups. BILLIONS in damages, how many wounded?

But you go ahead and keep on drinking the koolaid.

Why?

It's not like it would matter to you if I directly linked to the CSIS database because you've already made up your mind.

And I'm the one who is drinking kool-aid?


Chris24601

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • C
  • Posts: 3326
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #356 on: April 10, 2022, 07:06:06 PM »
Perhaps violence is a sign of desperation? I arrived in the USA about ten years ago, and it’s hard not to notice the political left has turned more and more violent. Despite what some “studies” say about the right I’m no longer in doubt that the left has completely overtaken the right in the use of violence. Andy Ngo alone has suffered several injuries (and some leftists again called for violence against him recently, turns out they harassed the wrong Asian though). I also know of Trump supporters who were killed for their politics but not a single case the other way round (correct me if I’m wrong).

You are wrong.

CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies) a centrist and bipartisan thinktank has taken a look at almost 900 politically motivated attacks and plots since 1994 (up to 2020)

What they found was 21 victims killed in leftwing attacks and 117 victims killed in rightwing attacks (between 2010 and 2020) in the US.

Could it be that left wing attacks are overrepresented in the last 10 years are non-lethal attacks that doesnt end up in fatalities while rightwingers are more prone to shoot to kill? Possible.

Could also be that the news sources you watch doesn't frame the right wing attacks as politically motivated but "just one  mentally ill person"

Please cite those attacks, both the "left wing" and the "right wing" ones. Because I have noticed that black separatists, black ethno-nationalists tend to be counted as "right-wing never mind their political ideas are socialism/communism.

Also, do we count how many people have died or do we count how many attacks were commited?

Because by YOUR standard all the people attacked by the antifart and burn loot murder that didn't die means those don't count.

Just during the latest "summer of love" during the "fiery but mostly peaceful 30+ people were killed by those two leftwing groups. BILLIONS in damages, how many wounded?

But you go ahead and keep on drinking the koolaid.
Another key point for the “nonpartisan” (i.e. Leftists pretending to not be) report… it covers up to 2020… not through 2020. In other words, they cut off their data just before Burn Loot Murder went on its rampage.

And my gut instinct was right… I looked them up and nonpartisan centrist my ass. Their board is a who’s who of anti-Trump and big government figures and their sponsors read like a listing of the top Forever War military contractors.

Leftists lie.

Wntrlnd

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • W
  • Posts: 180
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #357 on: April 10, 2022, 07:09:20 PM »
Perhaps violence is a sign of desperation? I arrived in the USA about ten years ago, and it’s hard not to notice the political left has turned more and more violent. Despite what some “studies” say about the right I’m no longer in doubt that the left has completely overtaken the right in the use of violence. Andy Ngo alone has suffered several injuries (and some leftists again called for violence against him recently, turns out they harassed the wrong Asian though). I also know of Trump supporters who were killed for their politics but not a single case the other way round (correct me if I’m wrong).

You are wrong.

CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies) a centrist and bipartisan thinktank has taken a look at almost 900 politically motivated attacks and plots since 1994 (up to 2020)

What they found was 21 victims killed in leftwing attacks and 117 victims killed in rightwing attacks (between 2010 and 2020) in the US.

Could it be that left wing attacks are overrepresented in the last 10 years are non-lethal attacks that doesnt end up in fatalities while rightwingers are more prone to shoot to kill? Possible.

Could also be that the news sources you watch doesn't frame the right wing attacks as politically motivated but "just one  mentally ill person"

Please cite those attacks, both the "left wing" and the "right wing" ones. Because I have noticed that black separatists, black ethno-nationalists tend to be counted as "right-wing never mind their political ideas are socialism/communism.

Also, do we count how many people have died or do we count how many attacks were commited?

Because by YOUR standard all the people attacked by the antifart and burn loot murder that didn't die means those don't count.

Just during the latest "summer of love" during the "fiery but mostly peaceful 30+ people were killed by those two leftwing groups. BILLIONS in damages, how many wounded?

But you go ahead and keep on drinking the koolaid.
Another key point for the “nonpartisan” (i.e. Leftists pretending to not be) report… it covers up to 2020… not through 2020. In other words, they cut off their data just before Burn Loot Murder went on its rampage.

And my gut instinct was right… I looked them up and nonpartisan centrist my ass. Their board is a who’s who of anti-Trump and big government figures and their sponsors read like a listing of the top Forever War military contractors.

Leftists lie.

Actually no.

It's because the report IS from June 2020
https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/200612_Jones_DomesticTerrorism_v6.pdf

Also... Using expressions like "anti-trump" and "big goverment" is just such a great way to make me disregard anything you say, because every opinion you have comes from the mouth of your right-wing media overlords.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2022, 07:19:03 PM by Wntrlnd »

Pat
BANNED

  • BANNED
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • ?
  • Posts: 5252
  • Rats do 0 damage
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #358 on: April 10, 2022, 07:23:58 PM »

Also... Using expressions like "anti-trump" and "big goverment" is just such a great way to make me disregard anything you say, because every opinion you have comes from the mouth of your right-wing media overlords.
There are right-wing media overlords? I thought the right had whatshisface over at Fox, and... echo echo? A bunch of podcasts? Maybe a few radio stations? A few youtube channels?


GeekyBugle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7399
  • Now even more Toxic
Re: Turning the corner on "woke"?
« Reply #359 on: April 10, 2022, 08:35:27 PM »
Perhaps violence is a sign of desperation? I arrived in the USA about ten years ago, and it’s hard not to notice the political left has turned more and more violent. Despite what some “studies” say about the right I’m no longer in doubt that the left has completely overtaken the right in the use of violence. Andy Ngo alone has suffered several injuries (and some leftists again called for violence against him recently, turns out they harassed the wrong Asian though). I also know of Trump supporters who were killed for their politics but not a single case the other way round (correct me if I’m wrong).

You are wrong.

CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies) a centrist and bipartisan thinktank has taken a look at almost 900 politically motivated attacks and plots since 1994 (up to 2020)

What they found was 21 victims killed in leftwing attacks and 117 victims killed in rightwing attacks (between 2010 and 2020) in the US.

Could it be that left wing attacks are overrepresented in the last 10 years are non-lethal attacks that doesnt end up in fatalities while rightwingers are more prone to shoot to kill? Possible.

Could also be that the news sources you watch doesn't frame the right wing attacks as politically motivated but "just one  mentally ill person"

Please cite those attacks, both the "left wing" and the "right wing" ones. Because I have noticed that black separatists, black ethno-nationalists tend to be counted as "right-wing never mind their political ideas are socialism/communism.

Also, do we count how many people have died or do we count how many attacks were commited?

Because by YOUR standard all the people attacked by the antifart and burn loot murder that didn't die means those don't count.

Just during the latest "summer of love" during the "fiery but mostly peaceful 30+ people were killed by those two leftwing groups. BILLIONS in damages, how many wounded?

But you go ahead and keep on drinking the koolaid.

Why?

It's not like it would matter to you if I directly linked to the CSIS database because you've already made up your mind.

And I'm the one who is drinking kool-aid?

Unlike YOU, I do change my mind when evidence is provided.

World wide, terrorism is mainly Islamist, followed by left wing in a distant second place, then right wing.

You provide the number of deaths and not the number of attacks to obscure the fact that YOUR side IS the more violent one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents#1970%E2%80%93present

Check it year by year if you wish.
Quote from: Rhedyn

Here is why this forum tends to be so stupid. Many people here think Joe Biden is "The Left", when he is actually Far Right and every US republican is just an idiot.

“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”

― George Orwell