Y'know, banning a Jew for antisemitism is the motherfucking HEIGHT of irony.
Pundit was given a series of options he could choose from for reasons to ban you. It could have been your use of the n-word with the "joggers" slang, for instance. Or the fact you were constantly posing off-topic. Instead he chose your, "Gentiles, obey" sig. It's really quite difficult to get banned here, and you managed to do the near-impossible in multiple ways in one post. Bravo?
As for the election fraud topic, I don't really care what you think about it. But I do care about what others think about it here. I don't think there was meaningful election fraud but it's a type of allegation which is so important that, even if I think the odds are extremely against it being real, I have to be willing to listen because the ramifications of it being real are pretty dire.
And I do agree with Pundit that we should be reacting by tightening up the security of our elections system. It doesn't matter if you think it's silly - when nearly half the nation doesn't think it's silly, that's reason enough to react by tightening up your security.
I am of the view that we need a national paid holiday for election day (move President's Day to that date for instance). No excuse of "I can't afford to take time off from work" if it's a national paid holiday.
Voting should be done in person unless a note from your doctor says you cannot make it to the polls or your nearest polling station is so far that it would be impractical to demand you go that far to vote.
And then we should issue a free, universal nation-wide high security voter ID to everyone, which can be obtained by the same means as a passport or selective service. Post offices, DMVs, government passport service agencies, etc.. MOST other nations use a national voter ID, and I don't see why we can't do that as well.
And finally the voting machines should all be the same, and involve no computers in taking votes, involve a paper ballot which you get a recipe for, and never touch in the Internet (which if they're low tech and use no computers to take votes shouldn't be hard to achieve). While counting can use a machine, that machine cannot be attached to the Internet and should be available for observers from any party on the ballot. Counting methods for unusual issues should be standardized across the nation, and hand counting should be allowed if the vote count of the machine is close, or if one party is willing to pay for a hand count. to verify the count.
Other nations can and have done elections in this same way, and they have far fewer problems than we do. We should take the security of our elections seriously. Technology is great for many things, but we need to go lower tech for elections due to the risks involved. Even if that means it takes longer to process results.