If anyone makes off-topic political posts on any forum other than the Pundit's forum, moderators should be alerted to this fact. It's not allowed.
I came here actually because I heard about you. You fucking degenerate, you.
Anyway, I'll bring up a problem right now, in all fairness:
1- No complaining about how the Pundit's piece of the forum is 'ruining' the forum, just because you don't like it or disagree with it.
2- Don't post any sociopolitical stuff outside Pundit's forum. Mods will move it there most of the time, if it encroaches on that.
3- If Pundit doesn't like the topic or it isn't specifically tailored to his own interest, then it will be closed/deleted. Despite, you know, rule #1.
Just sort of want to put that out there, because that's been the case in the past. Fair is fair, and if you say "It's my forum, I do what I want" then okay, have it your way.
On to other things.
It was fun for a while but whatever the reasons, you have recently went full retard as far as I am concerned, and I no longer have any desire to speak with someone who lunches such accusations as me selling out my classmates alongside Merkel (if only because seeing how I was born in the 90s, I'd have a rather hard time selling people to communist secret police). Verbal wrestling is sure fun, but I had my share of it for the year.
"Full Retard" = "People who disagree with me". I disagree with much of what you say, but I don't think you're retarded. I think you may be a person who sees the same problems everyone else does, and you see a different solution. Or you may be misinformed, or not informed enough, or simply have a different moral position. However, you're later going to complain about 'ego' while in the same post claiming people who disagree with you are 'retarded'.
And yes, it is safe-spacian. First step of it, actually. "Don't answer if you know you're gonna have a bad time (because you don't fit in) is about 2-3 steps away from "You just aren't a good fit for the board." Setting a mob on someone ain't the same as banning, sure, but it's mostly semantics. You're not taking steps to raise the level of conversation, you are taking steps that only those who fit in (and hold no dissenting opinions) are part of it. Which is the very definition of safe space.
No, it isn't. It's saying that if you're going to whine for people to do away with all of these topics because you dislike them, then simply do not take a role in discussing those topics. That's it. It'd be like you coming over to my house to complain about how I arrange my furniture- if you do not like it, and insist on complaining or demanding I remove the furniture- do not come over. Or, suck it up and stop being a pussy.
Pussy? I ain't traumatized by your bullshit one bit, I just ain't much in a mood to fight you and your bunch of alt-right cheerleaders every time I sneak my head into the wasteland that the political part of this forum has become.
You didn't even know what the Alt-Right was before someone came on television two months ago and told you they were racists and assholes. Quit pretending you know anything about it. And I don't care if you think it's an argument or not, if you dislike it- there are other forums. Or start your own- hey, tell you what- I will even HELP you start your own forum.
Free will seems to be too much for some people.
Exactly. This is why I think we should start considering 'legal adulthood' to be a series of achievements, rather than an age. When 20-30 year olds can't control their emotions on the internet or in normal life scenarios, we probably should evaluate this.