This story about several repubs in one area whose votes all were wrong by almost the same number is debunked because it’s comparative to that time in Florida where 1 candidate had his votes change in significantly varying amounts between-50 and +1,000 across all the counties in the state.
Also, trust your scientists because their advanced degrees mean they know how to evaluate the data into summaries you can depend on
Hell, EOTB. You're missing out on the best part, which the article didn't even address.
Look at the actual counts.
All 4 have the R
under-counted by ~300 votes (297, 298, 299, 303)
3 of them have the D
under-counted by ~23 votes (18, 21, 28)
So the difference between the 2 parties is R was under-counted by
an order of magnitude more than the D...
That seems kind of odd for a 'random generic error'....
Then we have the one outlier.
1 D was
over-counted by ~100 votes (99)
Hmm...What can we take away from this?
Actual total votes were off by 1165 votes.
Of those miscount votes only 67 favored R (5.8%) while the other 1098 (94.2%) favored D...
Isn't it also interesting that the sole over-count that happened occurred for D...and happened in the only contest that was actually remotely competitive? (R 52.3% vs D 47.7% final result after correction of a 4.3% count error)
Nothing to see here, Citizen. Move along, please.