The core issue, to my thinking, is that we need a federal decision on what the legal status of a fetus is. Roe v Wade sidestepped this, and that's what led to it's inevitable challenging by the SCOTUS.
Sadly, the core issue has nothing to do with when human life begins. It's about whether or not people are expected to live with the consequences of their own actions. One does not randomly become pregnant. And there is a large population of so-called "civilized" people (both male and female) who are willing to kill their own children in the womb to escape the consequences of sex. At that point, there's very little hope that those people will ever seek understanding or compromise...
While I agree that their core issue is to evade the responsability of their own actions the point at where it's alive is relevant since they love to argue it's not life or a human life.
Problem: Unwanted pregnancy.
Solutions:
1.- Don't have sex (alternatively anal/oral sex doesn't get you pregnant)
2.- Contraceptives
3.- Plan B
4.- Give it in adoption.
5.- Put on your big girl panties and pay the piper
That's really unfair. You act like women go on and get pregnant and have abortions like their trading pokemon cards. Like women get abortions to score points like in video games.
You have no idea and you have no empathy.
98.5% of abortions are elective, ergo yes, they do take it like sports, they engage in an activity that risks certain outcomes and fail to take the adecuate precautions.
Condomns + the pill or gel or ovules or foam makes it more likely to get hit by lightning than getting pregnant. but the only way to make the risk zero is to not fuck.
You get on a plain put on a parachute and jump out at 3,000 feet. Both the main and the back up fail... Unintended and unexpected consecuences of your actions nobody else is to blame.
You have the right to close your legs
You have the right to use contraceptives
You have the right to get fixed
You have the right to give the baby for adoption
You have the right to become a parent
You don't have the right to murder a baby because you were careless.
Let’s turn this around and aim it at men:
You have the right to keep it in your pants
You have the right to wear a condom or use spermicide or other male-use contraceptives
You have the right to get a vasectomy
You have the right to fight for custody of your baby
You have the right to make that hoe you impregnated an honest woman
You don’t have the right to dump your baby on a hoe because you were careless or because your contraceptives were in the ineffective percentage
Do you agree or disagree? Why?
Lets take it by the numbers shall we?
You have the right to keep it in your pants Agreed 100%
You have the right to wear a condom or use spermicide or other male-use contraceptives Yep, so?
You have the right to get a vasectomy Of course
You have the right to fight for custody of your baby LOL, yes you have but the courts are stacked against you.
You have the right to make that hoe you impregnated an honest woman No, You have the OBLIGATION to make her an honest woman.
You don’t have the right to dump your baby on a hoe because you were careless or because your contraceptives were in the ineffective percentage YES.
You thought this only went one way?
The post is written like that because you don't see men (unless you consider male feminists men, I don't) clamoring for the "right" to kill babies.
But I find it interesting that you gave the men ZERO outs, while I recognize that giving the baby in adoption is a solution.
Could it be because you, like all society consider men SHOULD be responsible of their actions and face the consecuences? I do.
I also think that women aren't children and should be responsible of their actions and face the consecuences.
I'm an egalitarian.