This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.
The RPGPundit's Own Forum Rules
This part of the site is controlled by the RPGPundit. This is where he discusses topics that he finds interesting. You may post here, but understand that there are limits. The RPGPundit can shut down any thread, topic of discussion, or user in a thread at his pleasure. This part of the site is essentially his house, so keep that in mind. Note that this is the only part of the site where political discussion is permitted, but is regulated by the RPGPundit.

Author Topic: Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?  (Read 19053 times)

HappyDaze

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • H
  • Posts: 5337
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #90 on: August 23, 2020, 05:17:29 PM »
Quote from: sureshot;1146159
If Trump wins and he is still on this site expect a very public meltdown of epic proportions.

What the fuck are you talking about shitstain?

Abraxus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2434
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #91 on: August 23, 2020, 05:28:37 PM »
Quote from: GeekyBugle;1146163
No Idea, I only see his shit slinging when quoted.


So no big loss then on my part. I have better things to do than engage with the Troll.

SHARK

  • The Great Shark Hope
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5039
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #92 on: August 23, 2020, 10:38:42 PM »
Quote from: RandyB;1146154
Remember:

SJWs always project. They accuse you of what they are guilty of, if only in their secret thoughts.


Greetings!

So true, RandyB! Geesus, the SJW's are such scum.

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK
"It is the Marine Corps that will strip away the façade so easily confused with self. It is the Corps that will offer the pain needed to buy the truth. And at last, each will own the privilege of looking inside himself  to discover what truly resides there. Comfort is an illusion. A false security b

SHARK

  • The Great Shark Hope
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5039
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #93 on: August 23, 2020, 10:43:13 PM »
Quote from: jeff37923;1146148
I believe that there are two things at work here.

1) These very vocal CISGs (Common Internet Shit Gibbons, nod to Larry Correia for the acronym) believe themselves to be martyrs. They have been fighting the social justice fight for so long that they have forgotten the difference between good attention and bad attention, so any attention is worth the effort to them.

2) They are not serious about arguing their points and trying to change people's minds. Instead, they are playing to an unseen audience that they believe follows their ramblings with rapt attention and cheers them on to greater heights of "speaking truth to power".

Among SJW circle jerks, they can link to these exchanges and use them as evidence about how they go into the most EVIL places and fearlessly show those non-woke asswipes who's the boss, virtue signalling their "heroism" all the way. Thus giving their empty lives some semblance of meaning.


Greetings!

Goddamn, Jeff! Talk about hitting the nail on the head, my friend! So very true! "Speaking truth to power" and believing themselves to be martyrs. All so desperate to give their empty lives some semblance of meaning.

Outstanding, Jeff!

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK
"It is the Marine Corps that will strip away the façade so easily confused with self. It is the Corps that will offer the pain needed to buy the truth. And at last, each will own the privilege of looking inside himself  to discover what truly resides there. Comfort is an illusion. A false security b

Spinachcat

  • Toxic SocioCat
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • S
  • Posts: 14805
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #94 on: August 23, 2020, 11:47:48 PM »
Quote from: shuddemell;1146111
This is a genuine question. What conservative values do you actually hold? I'm not on here all the time, and so far I have yet to see you support or endorse what I would consider a core conservative value.


THIS would be a good thread of its own for everyone to discuss.

It will be interesting to see how various people define "conservative values".


Quote from: HappyDaze;1146072
The small children you groom must be terrified.


THAT was funny. Good to see you're still capable of a comeback.

Sorry guys, but THAT's the kinda line my friends throw around the table.


Quote from: jeff37923;1146134
Every banning/ragequit has a period of pedophile name-calling right before the poster self-destructs.


I have faith in HD to hang in there!!!

He can dooooo it!


Quote from: SHARK;1146138
Soon, HappyDaze will be a shit-covered baboon screeching in the dark mineshaft, listening only to himself.


Fuck that!!!

I will never miss the Adventures of HappyChew Toy!!

shuddemell

  • Wondering Taoist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 621
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #95 on: August 24, 2020, 07:58:30 AM »
Quote from: HappyDaze;1146123
So we don't go back and forth with the No True Conservative game, you start by making me a list of what you consider core conservative values.


I would say this is a good summary...

THE SIX CORE BELIEFS OF CONSERVATISM
July 31, 2018 By Russell Kirk
The following is excerpted from The Essential Russell Kirk, a collection of his finest essays and writings.

"What is conservatism?" Abraham Lincoln inquired rhetorically, as he campaigned for the presidency of the United States. "Is it not adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried?" By that test, the candidate told his audience, Abraham Lincoln was a conservative.

Other definitions have been offered. In Ambrose Bierce's Devil's Dictionary one encounters this:

"Conservative, n. A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them with others." . . .
Although it is no ideology, conservatism may be apprehended reasonably well by attention to what leading writers and politicians, generally called conservative, have said and done. . . . "Conservatism," to put the matter another way, amounts to the consensus of the leading conservative thinkers and actors over the past two centuries. For our present purpose, however, we may set down below several general principles upon which most eminent conservatives in some degree may be said to have agreed implicitly. The following first principles are best discerned in the theoretical and practical politics of British and American conservatives.

1. TRANSCENDENT ORDER
First, conservatives generally believe that there exists a transcendent moral order, to which we ought to try to conform the ways of society. A divine tactic, however dimly descried, is at work in human society. Such convictions may take the form of belief in "natural law" or may assume some other expression; but with few exceptions conservatives recognize the need for enduring moral authority. This conviction contrasts strongly with the liberals' utilitarian view of the state (most consistently expressed by Bentham's disciples), and with the radicals' detestation of theological postulates.

2. SOCIAL CONTINUITY
Second, conservatives uphold the principle of social continuity. They prefer the devil they know to the devil they don't know. Order and justice and freedom, they believe, are the artificial products of a long and painful social experience, the results of centuries of trial and reflection and sacrifice. Thus the body social is a kind of spiritual corporation, comparable to the church; it may even be called a community of souls. Human society is no machine, to be treated mechanically. The continuity, the lifeblood, of a society must not be interrupted. Burke's reminder of the social necessity for prudent change is in the minds of conservatives. But necessary change, they argue, ought to be gradual and discriminatory, never "unfixing old interests at once." Revolution slices through the arteries of a culture, a cure that kills.

3. PRESCRIPTION
Third, conservatives believe in what may be called the principle of prescription. "The wisdom of our ancestors" is one of the more important phrases in the writings of Burke; presumably Burke derived it from Richard Hooker. Conservatives sense that modern men and women are dwarfs on the shoulders of giants, able to see farther than their ancestors only because of the great stature of those who have preceded us in time. Therefore conservatives very frequently emphasize the importance of "prescription"--that is, of things established by immemorial usage, so "that the mind of man runneth not to the contrary." There exist rights of which the chief sanction is their antiquity--including rights in property, often. Similarly, our morals are prescriptive in great part. Conservatives argue that we are unlikely, we moderns, to make any brave new discoveries in morals or politics or taste. It is perilous to weigh every passing issue on the basis of private judgment and private rationality. "The individual is foolish, but the species is wise," Burke declared. In politics we do well to abide by precedent and precept and even prejudice, for "the great mysterious incorporation of the human race" has acquired habits, customs, and conventions of remote origin which are woven into the fabric of our social being; the innovator, in Santayana's phrase, never knows how near to the taproot of the tree he is hacking.

4. PRUDENCE
Fourth, conservatives are guided by their principle of prudence. Burke agrees with Plato that in the statesman, prudence is chief among virtues. Any public measure ought to be judged by its probable long-run consequences, not merely by temporary advantage or popularity. Liberals and radicals, the conservative holds, are imprudent: for they dash at their objectives without giving much heed to the risk of new abuses worse than the evils they hope to sweep away. Human society being complex, remedies cannot be simple if they are to be effective. The conservative declares that he acts only after sufficient reflection, having weighed the consequences. Sudden and slashing reforms are perilous as sudden and slashing surgery. The march of providence is slow; it is the devil who always hurries.

5. VARIETY
Fifth, conservatives pay attention to the principle of variety. They feel affection for the proliferating intricacy of long-established social institutions and modes of life, as distinguished from the narrowing uniformity and deadening egalitarianism of radical systems. For the preservation of a healthy diversity in any civilization, there must survive orders and classes, differences in material condition, and many sorts of inequality. The only true forms of equality are equality in the Last Judgment and equality before a just court of law; all other attempts at leveling lead, at best, to social stagnation. Society longs for honest and able leadership; and if natural and institutional differences among people are destroyed, presently some tyrant or host of squalid oligarchs will create new forms of inequality. Similarly, conservatives uphold the institution of private property as productive of human variety: without private property, liberty is reduced and culture is impoverished.

6. IMPERFECTION
Sixth, conservatives are chastened by their principle of imperfectibility. Human nature suffers irremediably from certain faults, the conservatives know. Man being imperfect, no perfect social order ever can be created. Because of human restlessness, mankind would grow rebellious under any utopian domination, and would break out once more in violent discontent--or else expire of boredom. To aim for utopia is to end in disaster, the conservative says: we are not made for perfect things. All that we reasonably can expect is a tolerably ordered, just, and free society, in which some evils, maladjustments, and suffering continue to lurk. By proper attention to prudent reform, we may preserve and improve this tolerable order. But if the old institutional and moral safeguards of a nation are forgotten, then the anarchic impulses in man break loose: "the ceremony of innocence is drowned."

Such are six of the major premises of what Walter Bagehot, a century ago, called "reflective conservatism." To have set down some principal convictions of conservative thinkers, in the fashion above, may be misleading: for conservative thought is not a body of immutable secular dogmas. Our purpose here has been broad description, not fixed definition. If one requires a single sentence--why, let it be said that for the conservative, politics is the art of the possible, not the art of the ideal.

Edmund Burke turned to first principles in politics only with reluctance, believing that "metaphysical" politicians let loose dreadful mischief by attempting to govern nations according to abstract notions. Conservatives have believed, following Burke, that general principles always must be tempered, in any particular circumstances, by what Burke called expedience, or prudence; for particular circumstances vary infinitely, and every nation must observe its own traditions and historical experience--which should take precedence over universal notions drawn up in some quiet study. Yet Burke did not abjure general ideas; he distinguished between "abstraction" (or a priori notions divorced from a nation's history and necessities) and "principle" (or sound general ideas derived from a knowledge of human nature and of the past). Principles are necessary to a statesman, but they must be applied discreetly and with infinite caution to the workaday world. The preceding six conservative principles, therefore, are to be taken as a rough catalog of the general assumptions of conservatives, and not as a tidy system of doctrines for governing a state.
Science is the belief in the ignorance of the expertsRichard Feynman

Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more.Nikola Tesla

A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer.Bruce Lee

He who lives in harmony with himself lives in harmony with the universe.Marcus Aurelius

For you see we are aimless hate filled animals scampering away into the night.Skwisgaar Skwigelf

Greywolf76

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 64
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #96 on: August 24, 2020, 08:03:51 AM »
Quote from: sureshot;1146159

If Trump wins...

Hi, Sureshot.

"if"? No, he will win, and I think it will be a landslide.

In fact, he must, because there's no other option.

You see, I'm not even American, but I know very well what a Biden victory means not only to America, but to the rest of the world.

I remember during the Cold War days how we looked up to America as our first line of defense against the URSS and, decades later, against global terrorism. Now we need America to stand up against communist China and globalists like Soros. And so far Pres. Trump has done a very good job.

The USA can neither compromise nor make concessions to their enemies, like Pres. Obama did with Iran and Cuba.  And I shudder to imagine a world with Biden in the White House.

Ghostmaker

  • Chlorine trifluoride
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4013
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #97 on: August 24, 2020, 08:07:41 AM »
Quote from: GeekyBugle;1146157
Yep, they always project, lie and double down.


While I consider Vox Day to be a very silly fellow, said axiom is proof that just because someone is an ass doesn't mean they're wrong.

(And considering the tendency of 'male feminists' to be revealed as sex pests...)

Greywolf76

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 64
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #98 on: August 24, 2020, 08:46:32 AM »
Quote from: SHARK;1146035
Greetings!

Hello, my friend! Yeah, the naked racism towards black people and others is so sad, but also horrifying. The SJW's whole view of black people being orcs? WTF? It's all projection on their part, you know? The SJW's are all smug, condescending, elitist fucksticks that believe they are a special, anointed elite that has a mission and duty to guide, instruct, and ultimately rule over everyone else. The more they run their mouth and spread their shit, the more disgusting and horrifying they become. Then you see how they treat Hispanics or black people that are Conservative--calling them hateful names, describing them of not being "Hispanic" or "Black"--it's all so shrill and genuinely hateful.

I am always overjoyed to meet and hear--especially Hispanics and black folks that are Conservative, or have become so. They stand tall often not just against sniveling white people everywhere around them trying to tear them down, intimidate them, and silence them--but also members of their own minority community, and even their own families.

I love them, and it always makes me want to stand next to them in unity, whatever the odds. Fuck the SJW's. All of these kinds of people--the SJW's, BLM, Antifa--they are all Marxists. I've known this for decades. It's finally getting out to all the ordinary Americans as they watch our cities burn, and as they observe how these fucktards seek to bring their poisonous ideology into our hobby. Years ago, many that were say, not "Red Pilled"--would claim a Conservative such as myself was an extremist, too strident, harsh, alarmist, and uncharitable towards all of these jello-minded, sweet, "peace loving" Leftists.

Now, how is that looking?:D

Not bragging, but a good part of it is that I am a Historian, and have carefully studied history with passion all my life, since I was a kid. Most other Americans simply haven't. They are typically grossly ignorant and uneducated. I had learned through history about how Marxists infiltrated societies and organized revolutions and changing cultures--Russia, China, Vietnam, Eastern Europe, etc, etc. Then I see stupid American Marxists using the same language, the same ideologies, and pushing for the same kinds of divisions, conflict, and power grabs that Marxists have used before, not just to overthrow governments, but to change, influence, and overthrow *cultures*.

These people are traitors, and they are dark, evil, and savage. They see themselves as a special elite, destined to rule over everyone else, including you and I. This is why I get so passionate and vocal about opposing them, even in the seemingly "trivial" corners of our hobby. They work to make terrible changes in every aspect of culture and society--despite their often sweet words and worthy-seeming goals. Their deeper intentions and goals are most certainly malevolent, elitist, and tyrannical.

Even apart from historical knowledge and academics, I have served with many black Americans and Hispanic Americans alike at my side in a Marine Rifle Company. These aren't minorities that these SJW scum would like, though. They are men of strength, loyalty, and honour. They are thoroughly Conservative, passionate, and faithful. I'd love to see these SJW's get in their faces, of my fellow Marines, and spout their elitist, Marxist, racism and hate.:D

There are more minority folks though getting smart to these SJW's though! More and more gamers are getting smart to the SJW's and Marxists as well.

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK


Hello, Shark!

First of all, thanks for you service.

I agree with you 100%, my friend.

Marxists failed to take the world with their "proletarian vs. bourgeois" bullshit, and after the collapse of Communism in the former URSS and Eastern Europe they started waging a "Culture War" against anyone that actively opposes them, especially Christians, Conservatives and Classical Liberals. They follow to the letter the teaching of Antonio Gramsci, Saul Alinsky and the Frankfurt School.

The "proletariat" has been replaced by the "minorities", and class struggle has been replaced by victimization, politically correct and hypernormalisation. They are actively working to undermine our values and our society by their infiltration in Entertainment, Academia, Sports and the Press. And the SJWankers are nothing but the puppets and useful idiots of Marxist leaders, just like the Russian "proletarians" before them. And they will have the same ending if their revolution is successful.

That's why I feel relieved and happy about the "Walk Away Movement" and that so many Conservative Blacks and Hispanics are speaking against the mob rule and Marxist values, and that they are influencing more and more people by the day.

You see, I was shocked to see how a blatantly Marxist and racist movement such as BLM could grow in America. How a domestic terrorist group such as "Antifa" could become so strong there.

I'm not American, but I grew up admiring this great country for its values. Of course it's not a perfect country (there's no such thing) but it is a great country. I always wanted to move there as a kid. It didn't work out unfortunately, but I visited many times and my love and admiration has grown with each and every visit. (I still have a dream to move to Wyoming with my family someday; I love the nature and weather there - it's such a beautiful State - and the "small town" feel of the cities. And the people, too, of course).

But I digress.

Anyway, I find ridiculous to see people like Kaepernick and other privileged "Hollyweird" folks saying they "hate America", that it's not a good place to live, and disrespecting the country's flag and anthem by "taking a knee" (WTF?). Hey, if any of these idiots want to trade places with me, I'll be more than happy to oblige! :)

But after I found out about the influence that disgusting cultural Marxists and America-haters such as Saul Alinsky and Bill Ayers had upon an entire generation, things became more and more clear.

And that's why we cannot compromise with neither SJWankers nor their masters. We must fight back in this Culture War and take our stand.

Sorry for the long-winded rant, by the way!

Greywolf

RandyB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • R
  • Posts: 1218
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #99 on: August 24, 2020, 09:04:37 AM »
Quote from: shuddemell;1146218
I would say this is a good summary...

THE SIX CORE BELIEFS OF CONSERVATISM
July 31, 2018 By Russell Kirk
The following is excerpted from The Essential Russell Kirk, a collection of his finest essays and writings.

"What is conservatism?" Abraham Lincoln inquired rhetorically, as he campaigned for the presidency of the United States. "Is it not adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried?" By that test, the candidate told his audience, Abraham Lincoln was a conservative.

Other definitions have been offered. In Ambrose Bierce's Devil's Dictionary one encounters this:

"Conservative, n. A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them with others." . . .
Although it is no ideology, conservatism may be apprehended reasonably well by attention to what leading writers and politicians, generally called conservative, have said and done. . . . "Conservatism," to put the matter another way, amounts to the consensus of the leading conservative thinkers and actors over the past two centuries. For our present purpose, however, we may set down below several general principles upon which most eminent conservatives in some degree may be said to have agreed implicitly. The following first principles are best discerned in the theoretical and practical politics of British and American conservatives.

1. TRANSCENDENT ORDER
First, conservatives generally believe that there exists a transcendent moral order, to which we ought to try to conform the ways of society. A divine tactic, however dimly descried, is at work in human society. Such convictions may take the form of belief in "natural law" or may assume some other expression; but with few exceptions conservatives recognize the need for enduring moral authority. This conviction contrasts strongly with the liberals' utilitarian view of the state (most consistently expressed by Bentham's disciples), and with the radicals' detestation of theological postulates.

2. SOCIAL CONTINUITY
Second, conservatives uphold the principle of social continuity. They prefer the devil they know to the devil they don't know. Order and justice and freedom, they believe, are the artificial products of a long and painful social experience, the results of centuries of trial and reflection and sacrifice. Thus the body social is a kind of spiritual corporation, comparable to the church; it may even be called a community of souls. Human society is no machine, to be treated mechanically. The continuity, the lifeblood, of a society must not be interrupted. Burke's reminder of the social necessity for prudent change is in the minds of conservatives. But necessary change, they argue, ought to be gradual and discriminatory, never "unfixing old interests at once." Revolution slices through the arteries of a culture, a cure that kills.

3. PRESCRIPTION
Third, conservatives believe in what may be called the principle of prescription. "The wisdom of our ancestors" is one of the more important phrases in the writings of Burke; presumably Burke derived it from Richard Hooker. Conservatives sense that modern men and women are dwarfs on the shoulders of giants, able to see farther than their ancestors only because of the great stature of those who have preceded us in time. Therefore conservatives very frequently emphasize the importance of "prescription"--that is, of things established by immemorial usage, so "that the mind of man runneth not to the contrary." There exist rights of which the chief sanction is their antiquity--including rights in property, often. Similarly, our morals are prescriptive in great part. Conservatives argue that we are unlikely, we moderns, to make any brave new discoveries in morals or politics or taste. It is perilous to weigh every passing issue on the basis of private judgment and private rationality. "The individual is foolish, but the species is wise," Burke declared. In politics we do well to abide by precedent and precept and even prejudice, for "the great mysterious incorporation of the human race" has acquired habits, customs, and conventions of remote origin which are woven into the fabric of our social being; the innovator, in Santayana's phrase, never knows how near to the taproot of the tree he is hacking.

4. PRUDENCE
Fourth, conservatives are guided by their principle of prudence. Burke agrees with Plato that in the statesman, prudence is chief among virtues. Any public measure ought to be judged by its probable long-run consequences, not merely by temporary advantage or popularity. Liberals and radicals, the conservative holds, are imprudent: for they dash at their objectives without giving much heed to the risk of new abuses worse than the evils they hope to sweep away. Human society being complex, remedies cannot be simple if they are to be effective. The conservative declares that he acts only after sufficient reflection, having weighed the consequences. Sudden and slashing reforms are perilous as sudden and slashing surgery. The march of providence is slow; it is the devil who always hurries.

5. VARIETY
Fifth, conservatives pay attention to the principle of variety. They feel affection for the proliferating intricacy of long-established social institutions and modes of life, as distinguished from the narrowing uniformity and deadening egalitarianism of radical systems. For the preservation of a healthy diversity in any civilization, there must survive orders and classes, differences in material condition, and many sorts of inequality. The only true forms of equality are equality in the Last Judgment and equality before a just court of law; all other attempts at leveling lead, at best, to social stagnation. Society longs for honest and able leadership; and if natural and institutional differences among people are destroyed, presently some tyrant or host of squalid oligarchs will create new forms of inequality. Similarly, conservatives uphold the institution of private property as productive of human variety: without private property, liberty is reduced and culture is impoverished.

6. IMPERFECTION
Sixth, conservatives are chastened by their principle of imperfectibility. Human nature suffers irremediably from certain faults, the conservatives know. Man being imperfect, no perfect social order ever can be created. Because of human restlessness, mankind would grow rebellious under any utopian domination, and would break out once more in violent discontent--or else expire of boredom. To aim for utopia is to end in disaster, the conservative says: we are not made for perfect things. All that we reasonably can expect is a tolerably ordered, just, and free society, in which some evils, maladjustments, and suffering continue to lurk. By proper attention to prudent reform, we may preserve and improve this tolerable order. But if the old institutional and moral safeguards of a nation are forgotten, then the anarchic impulses in man break loose: "the ceremony of innocence is drowned."

Such are six of the major premises of what Walter Bagehot, a century ago, called "reflective conservatism." To have set down some principal convictions of conservative thinkers, in the fashion above, may be misleading: for conservative thought is not a body of immutable secular dogmas. Our purpose here has been broad description, not fixed definition. If one requires a single sentence--why, let it be said that for the conservative, politics is the art of the possible, not the art of the ideal.

Edmund Burke turned to first principles in politics only with reluctance, believing that "metaphysical" politicians let loose dreadful mischief by attempting to govern nations according to abstract notions. Conservatives have believed, following Burke, that general principles always must be tempered, in any particular circumstances, by what Burke called expedience, or prudence; for particular circumstances vary infinitely, and every nation must observe its own traditions and historical experience--which should take precedence over universal notions drawn up in some quiet study. Yet Burke did not abjure general ideas; he distinguished between "abstraction" (or a priori notions divorced from a nation's history and necessities) and "principle" (or sound general ideas derived from a knowledge of human nature and of the past). Principles are necessary to a statesman, but they must be applied discreetly and with infinite caution to the workaday world. The preceding six conservative principles, therefore, are to be taken as a rough catalog of the general assumptions of conservatives, and not as a tidy system of doctrines for governing a state.


I am a Traditionalist, not a Conservative, because Chesterton was right:

"The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of Conservatives is to prevent mistakes from being corrected. Even when the revolutionist might himself repent of his revolution, the traditionalist is already defending it as part of his tradition. Thus we have two great types -- the advanced person who rushes us into ruin, and the retrospective person who admires the ruins. He admires them especially by moonlight, not to say moonshine. Each new blunder of the progressive or prig becomes instantly a legend of immemorial antiquity for the snob. This is called the balance, or mutual check, in our Constitution." (Illustrated London News, 1924)

shuddemell

  • Wondering Taoist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 621
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #100 on: August 24, 2020, 10:24:02 AM »
Quote from: RandyB;1146232
I am a Traditionalist, not a Conservative, because Chesterton was right:

"The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of Conservatives is to prevent mistakes from being corrected. Even when the revolutionist might himself repent of his revolution, the traditionalist is already defending it as part of his tradition. Thus we have two great types -- the advanced person who rushes us into ruin, and the retrospective person who admires the ruins. He admires them especially by moonlight, not to say moonshine. Each new blunder of the progressive or prig becomes instantly a legend of immemorial antiquity for the snob. This is called the balance, or mutual check, in our Constitution." (Illustrated London News, 1924)

I largely consider myself a classical liberal ala John Locke, though economically conservative. I wouldn't consider it a fair interpretation of conservatism to say their business is to prevent correction of mistakes, even though it often does manifest that way due to our two party system. I might even consider myself a Libertarian, unfortunately they are as prone to Utopian thinking as the Marxists and neither is practical in many cases.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2020, 10:32:12 AM by shuddemell »
Science is the belief in the ignorance of the expertsRichard Feynman

Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more.Nikola Tesla

A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer.Bruce Lee

He who lives in harmony with himself lives in harmony with the universe.Marcus Aurelius

For you see we are aimless hate filled animals scampering away into the night.Skwisgaar Skwigelf

Ratman_tf

  • Alt-Reich Shitlord
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8330
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #101 on: August 24, 2020, 02:38:09 PM »
Quote from: Spinachcat;1146197

THAT was funny. Good to see you're still capable of a comeback.

Sorry guys, but THAT's the kinda line my friends throw around the table.


Eh. I can appreciate a good pedophilia joke, but when it's just a direct insult, it's lame. "You diddle kiddies!" Pffft. Whatever.
The notion of an exclusionary and hostile RPG community is a fever dream of zealots who view all social dynamics through a narrow keyhole of structural oppression.
-Haffrung

Spinachcat

  • Toxic SocioCat
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • S
  • Posts: 14805
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #102 on: August 24, 2020, 11:04:14 PM »
Quote from: Greywolf76;1146220
"if"? No, he will win, and I think it will be a landslide.

In fact, he must, because there's no other option.


I will be happy if Trump wins by 1 electoral college vote. I couldn't care if he loses the "popular vote" by 400 million.

The country is too divided for landslides to exist anymore, and the upcoming voter fraud by the left means that Trump has to win by a huge margin just to scrape by with any victory.
 
But unfortunately, there is very much another "option." If Americans don't get out and vote IN PERSON for Trump in massive droves, the Harris/Biden ticket will win, then Biden will step down and his handlers will puppet Harris to fuck us all.


Quote from: Greywolf76;1146220
You see, I'm not even American, but I know very well what a Biden victory means not only to America, but to the rest of the world.


Sadly, I fear most Americans do not.

I have a hard time believing the Silent Majority is going to show up and vote (if they even exist). I haven't heard about massive voter registrations happening.


Quote from: Greywolf76;1146220
The USA can neither compromise nor make concessions to their enemies, like Pres. Obama did with Iran and Cuba.  And I shudder to imagine a world with Biden in the White House.


Biden's handlers will hand the world to China.

And the MSM will cover for them.
 


Quote from: Greywolf76;1146226
You see, I was shocked to see how a blatantly Marxist and racist movement such as BLM could grow in America. How a domestic terrorist group such as "Antifa" could become so strong there.


I was shocked by the mass capitulation to Burn Loot Murder's violence.

Notice you didn't see business owners and citizens protesting in Portland, Seattle and Minneapolis for something to be done. By the hundreds, businesses have been destroyed and the citizens do nothing.

But I shouldn't have been shocked because the country has capitulated to Kung Flu hysteria and happily thrown away the Constitution in the hope that we can trade enough rights to make the sniffles go away.


Quote from: Greywolf76;1146220
I'm not American, but I grew up admiring this great country for its values.


That was a different America.

The current America thinks its "totes awesomesauce" when 3 year olds want to change gender and their single moms get them chemically castrated.

Greywolf76

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 64
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #103 on: August 26, 2020, 05:42:31 PM »
Quote from: Spinachcat;1146328
I will be happy if Trump wins by 1 electoral college vote. I couldn't care if he loses the "popular vote" by 400 million.

The country is too divided for landslides to exist anymore, and the upcoming voter fraud by the left means that Trump has to win by a huge margin just to scrape by with any victory.
 
But unfortunately, there is very much another "option." If Americans don't get out and vote IN PERSON for Trump in massive droves, the Harris/Biden ticket will win, then Biden will step down and his handlers will puppet Harris to fuck us all.


Well, "popular vote" in the USA is not what the biased media wants everybody to think it is. So I don't care, either.

And I really believe Trump will win, perhaps not by a landslide, but he will (bar any election frauds).



Quote from: Spinachcat;1146328

Sadly, I fear most Americans do not.

I have a hard time believing the Silent Majority is going to show up and vote (if they even exist). I haven't heard about massive voter registrations happening.


I hope you're wrong, Spinachcat.

Just one question, if I may: do you have to register to vote for each and every election? Or is it just a one-time registration, unless you move to a different district or city?


Quote from: Spinachcat;1146328

Biden's handlers will hand the world to China.

And the MSM will cover for them.


That's why I said if Biden wins the world will go down in a shitstorm of Apocalyptic proportions. Obama's presidency will be considered marvelous by comparison (and I think Pres. Obama was one of the worst presidents in American History, as bad as - if not worse than - Jimmy Carter).



Quote from: Spinachcat;1146328

I was shocked by the mass capitulation to Burn Loot Murder's violence.

Notice you didn't see business owners and citizens protesting in Portland, Seattle and Minneapolis for something to be done. By the hundreds, businesses have been destroyed and the citizens do nothing.

But I shouldn't have been shocked because the country has capitulated to Kung Flu hysteria and happily thrown away the Constitution in the hope that we can trade enough rights to make the sniffles go away.


You can add Chicago to the list. All of them "Blue" cities in "Blue" states, right? I hope people really wake up in those places.

In cities and states where people are more aware of those things or where local governments haven't backed up and supported BLM and "Antifart" terrorists (the so-called Red states and cities), I haven't seen it happening. I may be wrong, though.


Quote from: Spinachcat;1146328

That was a different America.

The current America thinks its "totes awesomesauce" when 3 year olds want to change gender and their single moms get them chemically castrated.


You may be right. I've seen terrorists slapping people inside churches, and bullying and throwing flour over an old lady and no one did anything, and Kenosha looks like Fallujah.

But, then again, I've been watching the RNC and some of those speeches showed me that America is still a great country. Perhaps more people need to remember this. I hope they do.

Chris24601

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • C
  • Posts: 3324
Is there any monster the SJWs don't see as Black People?
« Reply #104 on: August 26, 2020, 08:36:38 PM »
Quote from: Spinachcat;1146328
The current America thinks its "totes awesomesauce" when 3 year olds want to change gender and their single moms get them chemically castrated.

Don't confuse the internet and media boosted tiny minority with an actual majority. I mentioned in another thread regarding cancel culture, but when they came after Rush Limbaugh's advertisers and stations he actually had it investigated and they discovered that all the tens of thousands of tweets and angry emails and Facebook posts claiming broad nationwide outrage were the result of sock puppets run by just TEN people.

Similarly, these protests are a few hundred people in each city (many not even local) of 100+ thousand.

We're actually talking about maybe 1% of the population with a complicit media and Leftist elected officials (many probably holding their positions not by actual popular vote but fraud) acting as a megaphone to make them look invincible.

There is a silent majority who fear being targeted by that insane 1%; they're keeping their heads down until election day because cold anger is much more purposeful and willing to endure slings and arrows until it's time to act decisively.

If there weren't a legitimate silent majority set to crush them, the Leftists wouldn't be throwing everything into their increasingly unhinged vote stealing schemes, orchestrated violence and attempts to crash the economy. Nancy Pelosi wouldn't be calling Trump voters "enemies of the state" and pondering yet another attempt at impeachment.

No, if they had an actual majority they'd be sitting back and saying "let's have a proper election where we'll win a clear electoral mandate."

My personal feeling is that the current powers that be were so convinced that, via Hillary, THEY were finally going to be the generation who actually got to institute and oversee the end results of the generational push towards their Marxist utopia (and the establishment Republicans were in position to be permanent underdogs grifting off the conservative voters while lamenting their inability to act)... only to have victory snatched from them at the last possible moment (like it was the climax of some action film) by an unplanned for third party... and the realization that, if that third party actually followed through on his promises the opportunity for their utopia would not come again in their lifetimes (because Soros, Nancy, Bill Gates, et al are all old farts who make the septuagenarian President Trump look like a fresh young buck in comparison... yes, I know Gates is younger but the dude is aging like a reverse Dorian Grey).

So they RAGE! They scream and scheme to snatch the Ring of Power back from those with the will to throw it into Mount Doom. There is NOTHING they will not be willing to do to get the power they sold their souls for and was convinced belonged to them.

The entire Leftist power structure is flailing about like your favorite chew toy HappyDaze is because it's literally all they have left. They either regain their power now or (at least for this generation) never. These aren't the flexing of hidden muscles... they're the death throes of this Leftist generations' dreams of power (and the dawning horror that it will be up to the likes of idiots like AOC to actually carry the ball down the field for the next attempt).

At least that's my read on it.