This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.
NOTICE: Some online security services are reporting that information for a limited number of users from this site is for sale on the "dark web." As of right now, there is no direct evidence of this, but change your password just to be safe.
The RPGPundit's Own Forum Rules
This part of the site is controlled by the RPGPundit. This is where he discusses topics that he finds interesting. You may post here, but understand that there are limits. The RPGPundit can shut down any thread, topic of discussion, or user in a thread at his pleasure. This part of the site is essentially his house, so keep that in mind. Note that this is the only part of the site where political discussion is permitted, but is regulated by the RPGPundit.

Author Topic: Holy smokes, Project Veritas suing both CNN and Twitter, winning NYT case  (Read 1609 times)

This Guy

  • You Know?
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • T
  • Posts: 530
    • View Profile
Project Veritas is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.
CNN is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.
NYT is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.

So I guess popcorn is in order, as the proven lying shitheads throw shit at each other?

it's all rich people wasting money it's fine
I don't want to play with you.

SHARK

  • Great White Hope
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2798
    • View Profile
Greetings!

The NYT and CNN both are fucking pathetic propaganda organs of the Democratic party. Absolutely full of cock-sucking Marxists. I would rejoice if they were both fed slowly to hungry alligators. ;D

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK
"It is the Marine Corps that will strip away the façade so easily confused with self. It is the Corps that will offer the pain needed to buy the truth. And at last, each will own the privilege of looking inside himself  to discover what truly resides there. Comfort is an illusion. A false security bred from familiar things and familiar ways. It narrows the mind. Weakens the body. And robs the soul of spirit and determination. Comfort is neither welcome nor tolerated here."

"Courage is not the absence of fear, but is doing what you have to, in spite of the fear."
"Let Death and Fire Be Their Portion!"
"Delenda Est Parthia!"

Pat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • P
  • Posts: 2766
    • View Profile
We all know sharks are the garbage disposals of the ocean and eat anything up to and including license plates and Jimmy Hoffa, but I think crocodiles are more sensible and would just barf after trying to choke down that much newsprint and that many teleprompters.

jhkim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8871
    • View Profile
Project Veritas is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.
CNN is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.
NYT is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.

So I guess popcorn is in order, as the proven lying shitheads throw shit at each other?

it's all rich people wasting money it's fine

Most people in the world are lying shitheads to some degree. Social media is just as full of lies as traditional media.

The public should hold companies accountable for their lies. Court cases can help with this, and I hope justice is served in these lawsuits.

The only way that media corporations will change is if it is more often profitable to print the truth. Court cases can help with this - but to be really effective, it needs to come from people not consuming news based on their preferred politics, but based on the quality of the information.

GeekyBugle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2869
  • Now even more Toxic
    • View Profile
Project Veritas is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.
CNN is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.
NYT is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.

So I guess popcorn is in order, as the proven lying shitheads throw shit at each other?

Funny thing is of those 3 only one has a wall of shame filled with the retractions of the lying sumbags in the NYT, CNN and other corporate media about the lies they told about them.

But I would love to see the proof that Project Veritas lies in their reporting. IDGAF if the owner lies in his private life, I care about the news source. Any of the claims of doctored videos has been proven?
“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”

― George Orwell

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjC7-w5KDKNiD-k0tVo1DPw?view_as=subscriber

Mistwell

  • Smarter than Arduin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3631
    • View Profile
Project Veritas is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.
CNN is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.
NYT is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.

So I guess popcorn is in order, as the proven lying shitheads throw shit at each other?

Funny thing is of those 3 only one has a wall of shame filled with the retractions of the lying sumbags in the NYT, CNN and other corporate media about the lies they told about them.

But I would love to see the proof that Project Veritas lies in their reporting. IDGAF if the owner lies in his private life, I care about the news source. Any of the claims of doctored videos has been proven?

You're kidding, right?

Project Veritas has a pretty long wall of "caught lying, deceiving, intentionally editing out crucial context, etc.."

Come on man, you can't have missed them unless you were an extreme level bubble of information. You can start here if you like.

To be very clear I am not arguing they're any worse than CNN or NYT. But this falls into the category of, "Yes Mary, your shit also stinks."

GeekyBugle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2869
  • Now even more Toxic
    • View Profile
Project Veritas is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.
CNN is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.
NYT is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.

So I guess popcorn is in order, as the proven lying shitheads throw shit at each other?

Funny thing is of those 3 only one has a wall of shame filled with the retractions of the lying sumbags in the NYT, CNN and other corporate media about the lies they told about them.

But I would love to see the proof that Project Veritas lies in their reporting. IDGAF if the owner lies in his private life, I care about the news source. Any of the claims of doctored videos has been proven?

You're kidding, right?

Project Veritas has a pretty long wall of "caught lying, deceiving, intentionally editing out crucial context, etc.."

Come on man, you can't have missed them unless you were an extreme level bubble of information. You can start here if you like.

To be very clear I am not arguing they're any worse than CNN or NYT. But this falls into the category of, "Yes Mary, your shit also stinks."

Lot's of claims, zero evidence and they cite snoopes as a source, among others, come on if half the shit in your link was true Veritas would have been sued into oblivion years ago.

Do not pass go, do not collect $200 go straight to lying jail.
“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”

― George Orwell

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjC7-w5KDKNiD-k0tVo1DPw?view_as=subscriber

Mistwell

  • Smarter than Arduin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3631
    • View Profile
Project Veritas is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.
CNN is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.
NYT is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.

So I guess popcorn is in order, as the proven lying shitheads throw shit at each other?

Funny thing is of those 3 only one has a wall of shame filled with the retractions of the lying sumbags in the NYT, CNN and other corporate media about the lies they told about them.

But I would love to see the proof that Project Veritas lies in their reporting. IDGAF if the owner lies in his private life, I care about the news source. Any of the claims of doctored videos has been proven?

You're kidding, right?

Project Veritas has a pretty long wall of "caught lying, deceiving, intentionally editing out crucial context, etc.."

Come on man, you can't have missed them unless you were an extreme level bubble of information. You can start here if you like.

To be very clear I am not arguing they're any worse than CNN or NYT. But this falls into the category of, "Yes Mary, your shit also stinks."

Lot's of claims, zero evidence and they cite snoopes as a source, among others, come on if half the shit in your link was true Veritas would have been sued into oblivion years ago.

Do not pass go, do not collect $200 go straight to lying jail.

No man, that's you doing your typical "I deny what you say, show me evidence even though I will present no counter evidence" schtick you do. I then provide evidence, and you just repeat "That's not enough, show me more, even though I will never show you any counter evidence." We've played this game before. It's you being an asshole. It's not OK. This is a back and forth. You don't get to demand evidence, and then group it all with a single sentence response, and act like you just "proved me wrong." We ALL know what you just did, and it sure as fuck isn't that.

Veritas was caught red handed attempting to manufacture fake news. Just outright, unquestionably they we're attempting to create a fake story from whole cloth. If the NYT or CNN had tried to do what they tried to do, you'd be screaming bloody murder. But because you like Veritas, you will spin it however you need to, to make yourself more comfortable with the idea you support a lying piece of shit source. See for example.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2021, 07:46:15 PM by Mistwell »

SHARK

  • Great White Hope
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2798
    • View Profile
Greetings!

The Guardian is in the same group of cock-sucking Marxists that the NYT and CNN. I don't trust a thing the Guardian says. Overall, I have found Project Veritas to be far more accurate and truthful than the aforementioned Liberal media sources.

Are the Liberal, cock-sucking Marxist media going to attempt to lie, smear, and disparage organizations like Project Veritas?

Yes, of course. They collectively hate organizations like Project Veritas because Veritas exposes their lying, their deception, and fucking corruption, and then broadcasts it out to the public, for all to see what fraudulent, corrupt bastards they are.

I love it when the Liberal cunt media gets fucked! It's always a great day whenever that occurs. ;D

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK
"It is the Marine Corps that will strip away the façade so easily confused with self. It is the Corps that will offer the pain needed to buy the truth. And at last, each will own the privilege of looking inside himself  to discover what truly resides there. Comfort is an illusion. A false security bred from familiar things and familiar ways. It narrows the mind. Weakens the body. And robs the soul of spirit and determination. Comfort is neither welcome nor tolerated here."

"Courage is not the absence of fear, but is doing what you have to, in spite of the fear."
"Let Death and Fire Be Their Portion!"
"Delenda Est Parthia!"

GeekyBugle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2869
  • Now even more Toxic
    • View Profile
Project Veritas is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.
CNN is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.
NYT is run by a bunch of proven lying shitheads.

So I guess popcorn is in order, as the proven lying shitheads throw shit at each other?

Funny thing is of those 3 only one has a wall of shame filled with the retractions of the lying sumbags in the NYT, CNN and other corporate media about the lies they told about them.

But I would love to see the proof that Project Veritas lies in their reporting. IDGAF if the owner lies in his private life, I care about the news source. Any of the claims of doctored videos has been proven?

You're kidding, right?

Project Veritas has a pretty long wall of "caught lying, deceiving, intentionally editing out crucial context, etc.."

Come on man, you can't have missed them unless you were an extreme level bubble of information. You can start here if you like.

To be very clear I am not arguing they're any worse than CNN or NYT. But this falls into the category of, "Yes Mary, your shit also stinks."

Lot's of claims, zero evidence and they cite snoopes as a source, among others, come on if half the shit in your link was true Veritas would have been sued into oblivion years ago.

Do not pass go, do not collect $200 go straight to lying jail.

No man, that's you doing your typical "I deny what you say, show me evidence even though I will present no counter evidence" schtick you do. I then provide evidence, and you just repeat "That's not enough, show me more, even though I will never show you any counter evidence." We've played this game before. It's you being an asshole. It's not OK. This is a back and forth. You don't get to demand evidence, and then group it all with a single sentence response, and act like you just "proved me wrong." We ALL know what you just did, and it sure as fuck isn't that.

Veritas was caught red handed attempting to manufacture fake news. Just outright, unquestionably they we're attempting to create a fake story from whole cloth. If the NYT or CNN had tried to do what they tried to do, you'd be screaming bloody murder. But because you like Veritas, you will spin it however you need to, to make yourself more comfortable with the idea you support a lying piece of shit source. See for example.

Nope, your "evidence" is just claims of editing videos in a deceptive manner, or that both the people being exposed and the exposer work for veritas, you believe it because of YOUR bias. And Snoopes as a source? Not even you can truly believe Snoopes is a good source.

What you're trying to do is whatabouthism, if any of the claims on your link was true veritas would be sued to oblivion and you know it. Yet it's TNYT, CNN and other "MSM" that constantly have to publish retractions of their hit pieces on veritas.

But you keep on sucking from the woke koolaid.

Edited to add:

LOL, so The Guardian claims a woman was seen entering veritas offices, and that's your evidence? Where's the video of the woman entering there? Where's the evidence she wasn't trying to trick veritas into publishing her story?

Like I said earlier: CLAIMS is all you have, while Veritas publishes video evidence of the "MSM" being lying, duplicitous fucks.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2021, 08:11:19 PM by GeekyBugle »
“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”

― George Orwell

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjC7-w5KDKNiD-k0tVo1DPw?view_as=subscriber

GeekyBugle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2869
  • Now even more Toxic
    • View Profile
Greetings!

The Guardian is in the same group of cock-sucking Marxists that the NYT and CNN. I don't trust a thing the Guardian says. Overall, I have found Project Veritas to be far more accurate and truthful than the aforementioned Liberal media sources.

Are the Liberal, cock-sucking Marxist media going to attempt to lie, smear, and disparage organizations like Project Veritas?

Yes, of course. They collectively hate organizations like Project Veritas because Veritas exposes their lying, their deception, and fucking corruption, and then broadcasts it out to the public, for all to see what fraudulent, corrupt bastards they are.

I love it when the Liberal cunt media gets fucked! It's always a great day whenever that occurs. ;D

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

And the article has exactly ZERO evidence to support it's claims.

Of course we should believe The Guardian because they are a left wing source and they would never lie about anything/anyone.
“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”

― George Orwell

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjC7-w5KDKNiD-k0tVo1DPw?view_as=subscriber

Pat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • P
  • Posts: 2766
    • View Profile
Veritas was caught red handed attempting to manufacture fake news. Just outright, unquestionably they we're attempting to create a fake story from whole cloth. If the NYT or CNN had tried to do what they tried to do, you'd be screaming bloody murder. But because you like Veritas, you will spin it however you need to, to make yourself more comfortable with the idea you support a lying piece of shit source. See for example.
The first webpage you linked is a wall of text with the readability of a dictionary and a complete lack of context on almost everything. Sussing out what each section is trying say much less verifying them, would take forever. Can you point to one specific case that you consider irrefutable?

When you first mentioned it, I looked a little into PV's credibility on my own (hadn't heard of it before, but then I know very little about PV), and The Guardian article you just linked is actually the first one I found. But the article is written with a lot of bias, which makes it feel less like objective journalism, and more like a hit piece. And when I also read the counter on Project Veritas' website, their response seems quite reasonable. They use lies, disguises and false identities in order to get interviews and access. Which, as they point out, is standard for investigative reporting. That leaves the only real claim against the claim that they were trying to fabricate a story about sex and abortion and get that published, in order protect a creepy Republican judge by drowning out the news. That seems pretty far fetched, and their own explanation seems plausible. So it's hardly compelling evidence.

GeekyBugle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2869
  • Now even more Toxic
    • View Profile
Veritas was caught red handed attempting to manufacture fake news. Just outright, unquestionably they we're attempting to create a fake story from whole cloth. If the NYT or CNN had tried to do what they tried to do, you'd be screaming bloody murder. But because you like Veritas, you will spin it however you need to, to make yourself more comfortable with the idea you support a lying piece of shit source. See for example.
The first webpage you linked is a wall of text with the readability of a dictionary and a complete lack of context on almost everything. Sussing out what each section is trying say much less verifying them, would take forever. Can you point to one specific case that you consider irrefutable?

When you first mentioned it, I looked a little into PV's credibility on my own (hadn't heard of it before, but then I know very little about PV), and The Guardian article you just linked is actually the first one I found. But the article is written with a lot of bias, which makes it feel less like objective journalism, and more like a hit piece. And when I also read the counter on Project Veritas' website, their response seems quite reasonable. They use lies, disguises and false identities in order to get interviews and access. Which, as they point out, is standard for investigative reporting. That leaves the only real claim against the claim that they were trying to fabricate a story about sex and abortion and get that published, in order protect a creepy Republican judge by drowning out the news. That seems pretty far fetched, and their own explanation seems plausible. So it's hardly compelling evidence.

Plus the article in The Guardian has ZERO evidence to back up it's claims.
“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”

― George Orwell

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjC7-w5KDKNiD-k0tVo1DPw?view_as=subscriber

Pat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • P
  • Posts: 2766
    • View Profile
Veritas was caught red handed attempting to manufacture fake news. Just outright, unquestionably they we're attempting to create a fake story from whole cloth. If the NYT or CNN had tried to do what they tried to do, you'd be screaming bloody murder. But because you like Veritas, you will spin it however you need to, to make yourself more comfortable with the idea you support a lying piece of shit source. See for example.
The first webpage you linked is a wall of text with the readability of a dictionary and a complete lack of context on almost everything. Sussing out what each section is trying say much less verifying them, would take forever. Can you point to one specific case that you consider irrefutable?

When you first mentioned it, I looked a little into PV's credibility on my own (hadn't heard of it before, but then I know very little about PV), and The Guardian article you just linked is actually the first one I found. But the article is written with a lot of bias, which makes it feel less like objective journalism, and more like a hit piece. And when I also read the counter on Project Veritas' website, their response seems quite reasonable. They use lies, disguises and false identities in order to get interviews and access. Which, as they point out, is standard for investigative reporting. That leaves the only real claim against the claim that they were trying to fabricate a story about sex and abortion and get that published, in order protect a creepy Republican judge by drowning out the news. That seems pretty far fetched, and their own explanation seems plausible. So it's hardly compelling evidence.

Plus the article in The Guardian has ZERO evidence to back up it's claims.
Well, it's reporting on an article from another paper (The Washington Post). The Guardian article is basically the text version of a newsreader, with snark. I wouldn't expect it to have evidence, that's the job of the article that's being written about. But yes, the Guardian article is the wrong article to link as proof.

This Guy

  • You Know?
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • T
  • Posts: 530
    • View Profile
Greetings!

The Guardian is in the same group of cock-sucking Marxists that the NYT and CNN. I don't trust a thing the Guardian says. Overall, I have found Project Veritas to be far more accurate and truthful than the aforementioned Liberal media sources.

Are the Liberal, cock-sucking Marxist media going to attempt to lie, smear, and disparage organizations like Project Veritas?

Yes, of course. They collectively hate organizations like Project Veritas because Veritas exposes their lying, their deception, and fucking corruption, and then broadcasts it out to the public, for all to see what fraudulent, corrupt bastards they are.

I love it when the Liberal cunt media gets fucked! It's always a great day whenever that occurs. ;D

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Do all marxists suck cock or is that like incidental to the ideology
I don't want to play with you.