My whole point was to listen to doctors and other experts in vaccine and infectious disease. Pat - you're not a medical doctor any more than I am, so I don't see how my credentials are any more relevant than yours. I'm happy to debate logical points here on this forum, but I would again urge for any actual medical decisions about one's own body - talk to your actual doctor. If you don't trust your doctor, get a different doctor.
I would urge *against* is looking up a video from a doctor based on Internet search or forum recommendation for making one's medical decisions. There are hundreds of thousands of MDs in the world, and even hundreds who are long-time specialists in any given subject like vaccines.
You never said anything about listening to the doctors. That claim is false. What happened is you started this conversation by comparing vaccination rates in different groups. I was the one who referenced a doctor to poke holes in your theories, not you.
You were also the one who started making a logical argument. I replied in kind. But now that I've poked holes in your arguments, you're claiming that we shouldn't be saying anything about it, because people should only be getting information from their own personal physician. In other words, you can't defend your point, so you've switched to arguing that the whole discussion is invalid. That's a very dishonest rhetorical technique. In addition, you're implying that I told people to ignore their own doctors. Which again is just false. I never said any such thing.
You also said that people should ignore the doctor I referenced. Because -- I couldn't make this up -- there are a lot of doctors. Which isn't even the start of an argument. In other words, you're saying people should listen to your fear-mongering, and their own personal doctor, and ignore everyone else, regardless of their credentials. In a single post you managed to claim that you weren't an expert and we shouldn't be talking about this, and that people should listen to you, and not a doctor who happens to be one of the 2 or 3 most qualified people on the planet in this particular subject.
Also, and this is trivial in comparison, I do have more credentials than you do, in this very specific field. I've never mentioned them before, because I don't make arguments from a position of authority, they're relatively minor, and they're out of date. But you're wrong again.
I can't seen any way to interpret any of these as honest mistakes. You're being deliberately deceptive, disingenuous, and making attacks on my character. In doing so, you've had to contort your arguments so far that you're not only contradicting yourself in subsequent posts, but between paragraphs.
Every last trace of respect I had for you is gone. You're pond scum.