That isn't anywhere in that quote. Mike said he "recommended" you not sign them unless you've talked to a lawyer and understand it, etc. (The scope is also limited to affidavits and contracts not "any legal papers")
I plan to address your comments aimed at me tomorrow, but I can't NOT respond to this today.
Zak S., I have up to this point, refrained from calling you an idiot. I've maintained that you're an asshole, and when you don't understand something it is because you're WILLFULLY choosing to misrepresent or misunderstand because you're an ASSHOLE. I will ask you to clarify if you are deliberately misrepresenting in this case or if I've been wrong and you're both an
IDIOT and an
ASSHOLE.
Your statement (as quoted) appears to be intended to say that Mike recommends that you speak with a lawyer
and then signs the papers. He does not. He is recommending to people NOT to sign anything, but if they want to sign it, do a lot of investigation, first. He does not offer any benefits to signing any legal documents, and reiterates that signing them is UNNCESSARY from his perspective.
That is to say, he is clearly recommending NOT signing an affidavit or contract.
Only because you're an asshole and constantly try to redefine the meaning of natural language to your advantage would you think otherwise. Of course, your pattern of behavior doesn't require that your 'rebuttals' have actual meaning. You have a history of asserting that you did a rebuttal, and given enough posts and enough pages, only someone with a vested interest (like a court of law) would dig through those pages to confirm who is being honest and who is being a liar.
I'm looking forward to relitigating the stupid argument where my initial point was (obvious to everyone with a functional brain, just as Mike's post above) was that you were willing to grant a similar bonus in a 'bajillion situations' not strictly limited to playing a musical instrument, but rather than simply say that (resolving the crux of the argument) you instead persisted in arguing for pages upon pages calling people liars, failing to engage and respond to their points, and then continuing to do so once you confirmed that the community was right.
Just to get ahead of the indictment that I'm a liar, there's a chance that I don't present my post tomorrow. Since you're asking me to go dig through potentially hundreds of posts and you are pathologically incapable of characterizing a person's stated position accurately, explaining that you're a liar liar pants on fire asshole idiot (which is self-evident to anyone with at least average intelligence [except you]) is both time consuming and ultimately pointless (you are a narcissist who cannot accept that you're an asshole even if the whole world agreed and they printed your picture in the dictionary for the word), so there's a CHANCE that I find something EVEN MORE FUN to do with my time, but I have to admit, calling you an asshole every day has been enjoyable.