Just making an observation. To wit: you step out of line and suddenly you're an "SJW."
I can't tell you how many conversations I've had where I post X, someone decides that means I support Y, and then goes off on me for supporting Y. I reply by saying no, I don't support Y, I just said X. Which you'd think would end it, because not only didn't I express any kind of support for Y, I never even mentioned it. And then I explicitly denied it. And even if all that wasn't sufficient, who's the subject matter expert on what
I believe? Me, or someone with whom I've only exchanged a handful of posts? The only correct response would be to backtrack, and respond to what I actually said. But that never happens. Instead, they invariably double down, and keep attacking me for supporting Y.
This the result of manichean groupthink, where people have mentally divided the world into sides. Usually there are just 2, but occasionally there's some grudging acceptance of a small subset of heterodox positions. And then they look for signals that they use to immediately and irrevocably categorize people into one of those mental boxes. The signals they use to classify people are invariably trivial, not substantive. At most they're a single issue litmus test; at least, they're often just based on the use of a phrase or a term.
The reason the signals have to be superficial is because until you're slotted into one of their boxes, they can't respond. They only have a limited set of arguments, tailored to those prefabricated, imaginary mental models, so they can't deal with anything beyond that. Even their arguments aren't arguments in any real sense, because arguing involves listening to what the other person says, and responding to that. They're incapable of dealing with real people, with complex and contradictory beliefs. The boxes don't represent the human diversity of thought, they're just caricatures, imaginary goblins, or boogeymen.
If fear is the mind-killer, this is the conversation-killer. I typically make the mistake of trying to explain what I really believe, but it never works. And there's no way to advance the conversation, because it inevitably circles back to "I didn't say that".