TheRPGSite

Fan Forums => The RPGPundit's Own Forum => Topic started by: Anon Adderlan on September 07, 2020, 04:41:26 pm

Title: An in-depth exoneration of Chris Avellone
Post by: Anon Adderlan on September 07, 2020, 04:41:26 pm


A masterful takedown of the deceitful #MeToo accusers responsible for destroying Chris Avellone's career (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Avellone). Not much more to add other than this is the way to do an exposé: thorough, accurate, and free of embellishment or personal bias.

Still not sure I understand why these women would turn on him like this though.
Title: Re: An in-depth exoneration of Chris Avellone
Post by: Arkansan on September 26, 2020, 04:30:28 pm
So a 45 minute video to say "bitches be lying"?
Title: Re: An in-depth exoneration of Chris Avellone
Post by: CRKrueger on October 13, 2020, 03:33:39 pm


A masterful takedown of the deceitful #MeToo accusers responsible for destroying Chris Avellone's career (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Avellone). Not much more to add other than this is the way to do an exposé: thorough, accurate, and free of embellishment or personal bias.

Still not sure I understand why these women would turn on him like this though.

Because these people’s lives, livelihood, self-esteem and self-worth are based on clicks received?
Title: Re: An in-depth exoneration of Chris Avellone
Post by: Snowman0147 on October 14, 2020, 02:15:02 am
Yeah I am starting to see why in the Magna Carta it said men have to back up any claim made by a woman in ordered to be taken seriously.  These lying bitches do more damage to other women and those bitches don't care at all.
Title: Re: An in-depth exoneration of Chris Avellone
Post by: Ghostmaker on October 14, 2020, 07:59:07 am
Yeah I am starting to see why in the Magna Carta it said men have to back up any claim made by a woman in ordered to be taken seriously.  These lying bitches do more damage to other women and those bitches don't care at all.
Claims need to be backed by hard evidence, period. We REALLY need to bring back the 'calumny' charge.

I am so glad the Sandmann suits continue to grind through the courts.
Title: Re: An in-depth exoneration of Chris Avellone
Post by: Delete_me on October 14, 2020, 10:04:32 am
In the UK it still does, I thought. There was a case of fraudulent calumny before the court in 2017. (Or am I wrong in believing you're in the UK for some reason?)

In the US, there's no charge of calumny, but that's mostly because we found it to be redundant with all the other types of fraud in common law and in statute. If the specific action, for whatever reason, did not rise to the level of fraud, then there's still defamation actions. Basically, any time where calumny could become an issue, there was another criminal or civil action which could be levied.
Title: Re: An in-depth exoneration of Chris Avellone
Post by: Ghostmaker on October 14, 2020, 01:24:33 pm
In the UK it still does, I thought. There was a case of fraudulent calumny before the court in 2017. (Or am I wrong in believing you're in the UK for some reason?)

In the US, there's no charge of calumny, but that's mostly because we found it to be redundant with all the other types of fraud in common law and in statute. If the specific action, for whatever reason, did not rise to the level of fraud, then there's still defamation actions. Basically, any time where calumny could become an issue, there was another criminal or civil action which could be levied.
Naw, I'm in the U.S.

Considering the reach of social media and the Internet, though, there needs to be harsh penalties for smearing someone's name.
Title: Re: An in-depth exoneration of Chris Avellone
Post by: Snowman0147 on October 14, 2020, 01:57:24 pm
Going with a innocent man who gets locked in prison for a decade on the charges of rape the lying bitch should be locked up for those same amount of years.  No exceptions to this shit.  Once these lying bitches (as I refuse to call them women) know the full weight of what they face if caught it may prevent innocent men from going to prison.