Beyond that, the affidavit witnesses will go to prison if they are lying. Various officials and politicians--whether Democrat or Republican--can say whatever they want; they can lie through their teeth nine ways to Sunday, and suffer zero consequences. Same thing goes for all of the "Fact Checkers" and members of the MSM. I have zero faith in anything the MSM media says.
Here, we have lots of evidence, lots of eye witnesses, affidavits, and testimony. Hundreds, and more. A storm of questions, analysis, and concerns over problems in several states during this election. I want justice to prevail, Mistwell. TRUTH.
Here is the root of our disagreement. You might believe that *Republicans* can lie, but you are convinced that a *Trump supporter* would never lie. You decide on truth or falsehood based on whether or not they support Trump. You seem explicit about this here. I might be a cock-sucking liberal, but I believe that both conservatives and liberals can lie and/or be wrong, even under oath.
I think that this sort of absolute partisan belief is dangerous in both liberals and conservatives. Someone might *say* they are liberal, but really, they care nothing about helping the poor and disadvantaged or saving the environment -- they are just greedy, and there is profit to be made in fame and business from liberals. Likewise, someone might *say* they are a Trump supporter, but they don't actually care about helping the middle class and traditional Americans -- they are just greedy, and there is profit to be made in fame and business from Trump supporters.
Affidavit witnesses *risk* prison, but that's only if it can be *proven* beyond reasonable doubt they are maliciously lying to sway the case. In most cases, the lies amount to a he-said/she-said, where it can't be conclusively proven that either side is lying. Prosecutions for perjury are quite rare.
(ref)Getting down to the brass tacks of evidence...
There are thousands of Twitter posts -- but it seems to me that there are only a few dozen legal affidavits. I obviously haven't had time to look at all of them, but I've looked at a few of the most prominent - as cited by pro-Trump posters here. I'll try to post a summary in a following post. The question is, how do we assess their credibility? Do we just accept that they *must* be telling the truth because they're pro-Trump, or do we assess their credibility by some other method?
I don't need to hear testimonies of eye-witnesses, Conservative alternative media news people, or Conservative lawyers to tell me that fraud has taken place in this election. I knew all by myself on election night, when President Trump was overwhelmingly ahead, and had the election won easily. Then, somehow in the middle of the night--hundreds and hundreds of thousands of votes--all going for Biden--somehow gets dumped in the deep of the night, and Biden is then declared the winner? That is just BS, man. Mathematicians, pollster experts, and so on have all discussed how such an occurrence is BS as well, and has never, ever happened before. So, from election night alone--or immediately in the morning--I knew the Democrats were engaged in fraud and BS.
I felt like this was similar emotionally for supporters of Hillary Clinton in 2016, when all the polls and analyses - and even many early returns - seemed to favor her, but the election went to Trump, despite her winning the popular vote. But early estimates and measures aren't always right. You're claiming that the mail-in was filled with hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes. But what if there wasn't fraud? What would have happened?
In most states, the mail-in ballots are processed later than the in-person ballots. So what we'd expect to see is that the early returns will reflect more the in-person voting, and the later returns will reflect more the mail-in voting. Note that out of 150 million votes cast in this election, a hundred thousand votes is less than 0.1%. This year, it's no secret that Democrats are more concerned about covid-19 than Republicans are. Concerned about filing in with thousands of others, a great many Democrats voted by mail. So I'll offer two possibilities:
1) Legal Democrat voters were more concerned about covid-19, and on average, they used mail-in voting more - for a difference of a few percent.
2) Legal Republican voters used mail-in voting exactly as much as the Democrats.
I think that #1 is at least reasonably believable, given the different rhetoric between the parties. And if it was true, then the later mail-in returns would favor Biden.