WATCH THE FUCKING VIDEO AND LISTEN TO THE DISCUSSION!
Geesus some of you are fucking full of sand. I posted the video as examples of more people talking about this, for discussion here. I already said I don't know much about the events in Germany, though I am interested to hear more--and I keep an open mind.
I watched the BlazeTV and the Steve Turley video, which were at least short. I didn't watch the B Tatum video which was an hour and half. The Steve Turley video at least showed testimony being given in court. But what was being presented in court in their clip was the contents of an anonymous email!!! Turley acted shocked and outraged over the contents of the email -- I was shocked that a fucking anonymous email was being presented as evidence in court.
From about 6:00 in the video, "This was an anonymous email that was sent to all the members of the Arizona legislature and it was also sent to DOJ. This individual sent the email wanted to remain anonymous but had enough concern that he sent this to the criminal division at the U.S. Department of Justice. He did not want to be included in the investigation." He goes on to detail the horrible things exposed by the email, leaving aside that... it's a fucking anonymous email. Also, interestingly, it goes against the Dominion machine theory by claiming now that *any* election machine can have the same.
The BlazeTV segment was just people talking second-hand about what McInerny said -- when he's fucking 83 and long retired. He's not an inside information source to army operations. What's amazing was how all the players were emphasizing how the claims were completely unbelievable -- but then they keep going on because they have absolute faith in McInerny.
Like you, I'm trying to keep an open mind, but there has to be a filter at some point for what one is trying to keep an open mind about. Seriously, I realize that your emotions are running high - but there needs to be a filter at some point. Anonymous emails are not, in fact, shocking proof as Turley is claiming. McInerny at least is a named source, but as far as I can tell, he's not talking about anything he has first-hand knowledge of. He's just someone who has decided to believe the rumors.
But what if there are, like, *hundreds* of Twitter posts and anonymous emails. Surely that shows there is something there to be concerned about? Maybe. But also maybe not. The only thing it definitely shows is that people really *want* to believe.
Greetings!
Excellent, Jhkim. Indeed, some "whistleblowers" and other sources often remain anonymous--to protect their identities because of where they work, or who they work with, and that kind of thing. Law Enforcement agencies and government agencies have skills and resources and analysts with which to follow up on investigations, authenticating data within the anonymous source, and so on. Obviously, depending on the details, such can warrant extensive investigations. Even within corporate investigations, I have seen this done routinely. The more damning or serious such allegations are made, the more seriousness that investigations are proceeded with.
Furthermore, yeah, some people can be nuts, just grinding an axe, indulging fantasies, whatever. The seriousness of the events in question though--and the integrity of our election system--warrants thorough and comprehensive investigations.
Instead, what we get is told to sit down, shut up, there's nothing to see here. There's no fraud! There's no widespread fraud! There's no substantial fraud! and on and on--but little or no investigation. It's like a knee-jerk response, all of the talking heads repeating it all like a mantra. Meanwhile a whole bunch of people are screaming bullshit. Politicians, witnesses, mathematicians, cyber expert people, professional bookies, IT people, and so on.
I remember reading that AG Barr ordered DOJ agents to go about the country, and if they saw anything noteworthy, to proceed to investigate. Not three days later--less than that, as I recall--some group of DOJ agents and officials all unanimously declared there was no fraud, no corruption, nothing to see here. The election was just fine. WTF? We have states that can't seem to count their fucking votes properly in weeks--and these DOJ morons in less than three days are fucking certain that the election was just fine? You have to be fucking kidding me, you know?
Shit needs to be thoroughly investigated.
As far as Lieutenant General McInerney, well, I have heard EOTB mention it--in reference to a Colonel that was interviewed and who is a cyber expert--then Dr. Turley, then Dan Bongino, then Glenn Beck--and in some additional pieces I have read, Congressman Rep. Gohmert of Texas has discussed this, as well as Lawyer Lin Wood, and Sidney Powell, and several other commentators.
So, it seems like something is going on. If nothing happened, well, that will come out too, somewhere along the way.
If this operation really did in fact occur--and the US government has seized servers and shit, then that will be presented somewhere too. That being the case, don't you think something like that should be investigated? Again, all's I hear from the MSM and Democrat talking heads and morons like Politifact--is the Reeing that it never happened, nothing to see here. Like Politifact can be trusted? *laughing* Like the MSM such as CNN and MSNBC can be trusted? No, they have never lied, distorted, or ignored the facts. They have never bent over to get plough fucked by their Democrat candidate or favourite ever, showering them with praise and glory and cock-sucking, while hiding or ignoring uncomfortable truths?
So, no, I don't feel such sources are trustworthy at all, in the slightest. I would trust my coffee girl at the restaurant more. She might not always be right or accurate--but she is not intentionally seeking to lie to me. The MSM outlets lie on a constant basis.
Semper Fidelis,
SHARK