This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Author Topic: [LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?  (Read 2764 times)

Arref

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
    • http://www.skyseastone.net/itsog/
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« on: April 11, 2016, 04:59:59 PM »
I'm curious about the range of shape shifting and how it is divided into 4 classes for effects.

Anyone bought and read the supplement already?
in the Shadow of Greatness
—sharing on game ideas and Zelazny's Amber

JesterRaiin

  • An Outsider
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1331
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2016, 02:48:17 AM »
I'd be interested in a review too.

The idea that a shape might take control over the shapeshifter seems highly alluring.
"If it's not appearing, it's not a real message." ~ Brett

Jason D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2016, 03:04:27 AM »
I can't offer an unbiased review, but I'm happy to answer questions.

JesterRaiin

  • An Outsider
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1331
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2016, 03:18:34 AM »
Quote from: Jason D;891170
I can't offer an unbiased review, but I'm happy to answer questions.


1st of all: thank you, Jason, for LoGS. It's one of my most favorite games, one of seldom I was more than happy to buy, run and play.

A question, if I may: it is stated on FB, that the more powerful shape might take over the mind of a shapeshifter, especially if the shape is of a (usually) more powerful entity.

Does the same rule apply for inferior shapes? I mean, is there a risk of becoming an animal if one wears its skin too often?

And one more: how does Shapeshifting and Eidolon Mastery come along? The former seems like an offspring of Umbra, so a conflict might be expected.
"If it's not appearing, it's not a real message." ~ Brett

Jason D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2016, 11:10:31 AM »
Quote from: JesterRaiin;891172
1st of all: thank you, Jason, for LoGS. It's one of my most favorite games, one of seldom I was more than happy to buy, run and play.


Thanks for the kind words!

Quote from: JesterRaiin;891172
A question, if I may: it is stated on FB, that the more powerful shape might take over the mind of a shapeshifter, especially if the shape is of a (usually) more powerful entity.

Does the same rule apply for inferior shapes? I mean, is there a risk of becoming an animal if one wears its skin too often?


Not so much, unless the shapeshifter's Psyche is very, very low (like below Paragon). That said, there's always the potential that it skews their way of thinking.

Quote from: JesterRaiin;891172
And one more: how does Shapeshifting and Eidolon Mastery come along? The former seems like an offspring of Umbra, so a conflict might be expected.


Here's a quote from the section Shape Shifting and the Other Powers:

Quote
Eidolon Mastery: The rigid discipline of the Eidolon is almost antithetical to the focus of the Shape Shifting ability, and as a result, the powers may be at odds. A character with both of these powers will be pulled in opposite directions, between rigid order and between fluid adaptability. For any but Advanced Shape Shifters, using Eidolon and Shape Shifting at the same time might prove difficult, with the Eidolon enforcing a single archetypal idealized form upon the Shape Shifter’s body rather than allowing for flexible transformation. In a more positive fashion, the Eidolon might be used to rid the Shape Shifter of any negative conditions incurred by out-of-control Shape Shifting, allowing a quick (or even immediate) return to the pristine “basic” form.


There's more in the section on possible power rejection, but it's addressed.

JesterRaiin

  • An Outsider
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1331
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2016, 02:11:20 AM »
Quote from: Jason D;891232
There's more in the section on possible power rejection, but it's addressed.


Thanks for the explanations. This satiates my curiosity. :)
"If it's not appearing, it's not a real message." ~ Brett

Panjumanju

  • Radio Wizard
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 951
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2016, 10:54:56 AM »
Shape-shifting was the one thing I missed most in the core LoG&S.

//Panjumanju
"What strength!! But don't forget there are many guys like you all over the world."
--
Now on Crowdfundr: "SOLO MARTIAL BLUES" is a single-player martial arts TTRPG at https://fnd.us/solo-martial-blues?ref=sh_dCLT6b

Jason D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« Reply #7 on: April 18, 2016, 03:35:51 AM »
We're right now discussing a means of getting all of the Advanced powers into players' hands, as well as expanding the list to include a revision of Sorcery.

JesterRaiin

  • An Outsider
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1331
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« Reply #8 on: April 18, 2016, 05:13:15 AM »
Quote from: Jason D;892429
We're right now discussing a means of getting all of the Advanced powers into players' hands, as well as expanding the list to include a revision of Sorcery.


Sorcery? Any details concerning those "revisions"? ;)

btw, any chance for a more detailed Domain generator? I think the way it's presented in corebook leaves much to be desired - it's ok to create a skeletal world, enough to serve as what I like to call "a quick trip to Bahamas and back", but past that it's pretty much a wild territory.

Pardon me if it was covered in some additional sourcebook already, but I didn't hear about that.

SPOILER (Hover over section below to view.)


This might be a good place to remind about a small world generator I made for this specific purpose. :D
"If it's not appearing, it's not a real message." ~ Brett

Jason D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2016, 04:45:42 AM »
I was trying to keep LoG&S as compatible with Amber as possible, based on patron and publisher feedback, so Sorcery was presented warts-and-all as it appeared prior.

However, I've long been dissatisfied with it, and think it should work in accordance with the other powers, in a fashion that doesn't cause such consternation for GMs and require such meticulous bookkeeping (and simultaneous hand-waving) for players.

Quote from: JesterRaiin;892441
btw, any chance for a more detailed Domain generator?


There's always a chance, but it's not something I've given a lot of thought to, to be honest.

JesterRaiin

  • An Outsider
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1331
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2016, 05:44:16 AM »
Quote from: Jason D;892666
However, I've long been dissatisfied with it, and think it should work in accordance with the other powers, in a fashion that doesn't cause such consternation for GMs and require such meticulous bookkeeping (and simultaneous hand-waving) for players.


Intriguing... Vague, but intriguing.

Quote from: Jason D;892666

There's always a chance, but it's not something I've given a lot of thought to, to be honest.


Well, many-worlds setting is always at risk of becoming many-dull-underdeveloped-worlds-copies-of-themselves-really. I think that Logs could use some clever, original pattern, a set of detailed worldgenerating guidelines, or a well done instruction along the lines of "how to introduce famous settings like Warhammer's Old World, or Westeros as one of LoGS' world".
"If it's not appearing, it's not a real message." ~ Brett

Jason D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« Reply #11 on: April 21, 2016, 10:01:33 AM »
Quote from: JesterRaiin;892673
Intriguing... Vague, but intriguing.


Unintentionally vague, and I apologize for that.

I've always just disliked the whole ADRP micro-spell/lynchpin thing. It's maddeningly difficult to actually built a new spell from whole cloth, and the issues of what lynchpins are needed puts the whole Sorcery system into this weird high-crunch, low-specifics place, where there's the semblance of a bunch of specific systems and requirements, but there's no real support for it once you start to actually look.

My thoughts would be to come up with a system where Sorcery works like the other powers, lower bookkeeping and more

Quote from: JesterRaiin;892673
Well, many-worlds setting is always at risk of becoming many-dull-underdeveloped-worlds-copies-of-themselves-really. I think that Logs could use some clever, original pattern, a set of detailed worldgenerating guidelines, or a well done instruction along the lines of "how to introduce famous settings like Warhammer's Old World, or Westeros as one of LoGS' world".


True, true. My goal had been to include more on creating and running Gossamer Worlds in the core rulebook, but I didn't manage to get that into what was an already oversized book.

RTrimmer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • R
  • Posts: 122
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« Reply #12 on: April 24, 2016, 10:49:34 PM »
Wouldn't a lot of what Sorcery does be covered by Enchantment?

daniel_ream

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2016, 01:09:09 AM »
Quote from: Jason D;893280
I've always just disliked the whole ADRP micro-spell/lynchpin thing. It's maddeningly difficult to actually built a new spell from whole cloth, and the issues of what lynchpins are needed puts the whole Sorcery system into this weird high-crunch, low-specifics place, where there's the semblance of a bunch of specific systems and requirements, but there's no real support for it once you start to actually look.


The problem with Sorcery is that it was developed at a time when Merlin was the only published character who used any source of power not based on the Logrus or the Pattern.

Once all the books and short stories were done, it was very clear that every sorceror (Mandor, Luke, Julia, the Tower) had a unique style of Sorcery that looked and operated differently.  Merlin's Sorcery looks the way it does because he's a computer programmer.

Treating linchpins, microspells and all the details of Merlin's Sorcery as cosmetic trappings of a magic system that allows manipulation of Shadow in a more abstract manner is probably the way to go.
D&D is becoming Self-Referential.  It is no longer Setting Referential, where it takes references outside of itself. It is becoming like Ouroboros in its self-gleaning for tropes, no longer attached, let alone needing outside context.
~ Opaopajr

VivianneClaire

  • The Travelling Storyeller
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
[LoGaS] comments/reviews for supplement Shape Shifting?
« Reply #14 on: April 30, 2016, 08:06:22 PM »
Quote from: Jason D;892666
However, I've long been dissatisfied with it, and think it should work in accordance with the other powers, in a fashion that doesn't cause such consternation for GMs and require such meticulous bookkeeping (and simultaneous hand-waving) for players.
Quote from: Jason D;893280
I've always just disliked the whole ADRP micro-spell/lynchpin thing. It's maddeningly difficult to actually built a new spell from whole cloth, and the issues of what lynchpins are needed puts the whole Sorcery system into this weird high-crunch, low-specifics place, where there's the semblance of a bunch of specific systems and requirements, but there's no real support for it once you start to actually look.

My thoughts would be to come up with a system where Sorcery works like the other powers, lower bookkeeping and more.
Actually that is something I have felt myself, being frustrated with Sorcery as shown on both Amber and LoG&S. It is overly complex, tedious, and time consuming while all around not being very fun to use. Lynchpins, microspells, and other details increasing the time it takes to cast a spell even with racking while so severely limiting the number of spells prepared and how/where you can use it.

It feels like you have to unfairly jump through hoops just to use Sorcery while other powers are can get away with being less complex and easier to use yet also being more powerful... Because of this I am very glad to hear that you will be making an expansion/revision to Sorcery. I hope it leads to being a more fun power, or series of powers.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2016, 08:10:40 PM by GreyScholar »
”Life is but a story waiting to be discovered… or created. If one understands the plot and characters you can change not only your own story but others as well.”