SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Scrying: Plot solvent?

Started by RTrimmer, January 30, 2015, 12:09:45 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

RTrimmer

How has that worked out in actual play? It looks like plot solvent.

Evermasterx

Quote from: RTrimmer;813181How has that worked out in actual play? It looks like plot solvent.

It's an interesting topic.
I have a PC with the best EGO and Scrying in my actual campaign, and for sure you as a GM must consider her power when planning the story.

Scrying in the past requires you are in the place or with the person of interest and you will see only the major event.
Scrying requires the subject to be known and this is a good limit.
Scrying someone in the present requires acceptance of the link, and this too is a big limitation.
Scrying in the future is of course vague as the GM desires and for sure you can give hints like the Oracle, saying nothing or all, but in an obscure way. Actually this could be a tool for moving the campaign in a new direction.

So I would say that it can be plot solvent if the GM didn't take it into account.

Oh, and remember that you only see, not hear: so the GM could use this to let you misunderstand what you see...
"All my demons cast a spell
The souls of dusk rising from the ashes
So the book of shadows tell
The weak will always obey the master"

Kamelot, The Spell
--------
http://evermasterx.altervista.org/blog/tag/lords-of-olympus/

Artifacts of Amber

In amber I love scrying as a Gm.

Trump scrying gives me an opportunity to give out information and to also separate Trump artist a little by giving them much more information than another person might receive.

I have one character in my PbP that has traditionally scrying using pools of water to see things. It once again allows me to hand out information.

The plot or plans of the bad guys must hold up well enough to be able to handle this. Also in a world like Amber or ones where this is possible the opposition should be prepared for things like that to happen.

LordVreeg

Scrying is one of the many areas of magic a GM must actually understand and set boundaries for if they intend to run a longer term game.

Scrying is used heavily in GS, mainly in mentalist spells.  It is used most heavily for communication (the Bardic Broadcasting Network is the best example), but it is also used for viewing other areas, and even viewing dreams.

Anti-scrying needs to be understood, as well.  Any group that can scry and knows about it wants to prevent the scrying on them.  So that needs to be taken care of as well.
Currently running 1 live groups and two online group in my 30+ year old campaign setting.  
http://celtricia.pbworks.com/
Setting of the Year, 08 Campaign Builders Guild awards.
\'Orbis non sufficit\'

My current Collegium Arcana online game, a test for any ruleset.

finarvyn

Totally off topic, but did anyone else notice that the Amber board was dead for around eight weeks. From November 28 through January 29 ... not a post to be found. :(
Marv / Finarvyn
Kingmaker of Amber
I'm pretty much responsible for the S&W WB rules.
Amber Diceless Player since 1993
OD&D Player since 1975

Evermasterx

Quote from: finarvyn;813973Totally off topic, but did anyone else notice that the Amber board was dead for around eight weeks. From November 28 through January 29 ... not a post to be found. :(
I guess we all are busy in the shadows...
"All my demons cast a spell
The souls of dusk rising from the ashes
So the book of shadows tell
The weak will always obey the master"

Kamelot, The Spell
--------
http://evermasterx.altervista.org/blog/tag/lords-of-olympus/

Artifacts of Amber

I've been running my game and tend to post less when I am getting my "Fix"

Croaker

Yes :-/
Nothing to contribute, so...
 

Jason D

Quote from: finarvyn;813973Totally off topic, but did anyone else notice that the Amber board was dead for around eight weeks. From November 28 through January 29 ... not a post to be found. :(

I've been buried at work, went on vacation in the middle of that, and have been busy working freelance on Assault on the Mountains of Madness, as well as prepping another freelance gig that will be announced shortly about a very famous IP.

Gavken

I've been busy running my game and playing in Artifacts game.
 

RPGPundit

Quote from: Evermasterx;813418It's an interesting topic.
I have a PC with the best EGO and Scrying in my actual campaign, and for sure you as a GM must consider her power when planning the story.

Scrying in the past requires you are in the place or with the person of interest and you will see only the major event.
Scrying requires the subject to be known and this is a good limit.
Scrying someone in the present requires acceptance of the link, and this too is a big limitation.
Scrying in the future is of course vague as the GM desires and for sure you can give hints like the Oracle, saying nothing or all, but in an obscure way. Actually this could be a tool for moving the campaign in a new direction.

So I would say that it can be plot solvent if the GM didn't take it into account.

Oh, and remember that you only see, not hear: so the GM could use this to let you misunderstand what you see...

Sounds like not too much of a "plot ruiner". Anyways, in LoO the plot should be whatever is happening!  There should definitely not be some well-defined former script.
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

RPGPundit

As for the dead-forum, yeah, it's lamentable.  I was hugely busy with work, trying to finish Dark Albion, doing the new column, all kinds of stuff.
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.