This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Author Topic: (Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra  (Read 17622 times)

PrinceofNothing
BANNED

  • BANNED
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« on: December 04, 2014, 06:37:58 AM »
Prince of Nothing Reviews: Arrows of Indra.
 
Copy-pasting does not a good game make...

Note: I edited this so it conforms with forum rules. Edited text is in brackets.

Disclaimer: As most of you reading this already know, I am peripherally affiliated with the entity known as YDIS. YDIS as a community does not condone the actions, statements, products or indeed, very existence of [RPGPUNDIT]. As such I cannot truthfully state that this review is free of personal bias. However, I have striven to be as honest as humanly possible in reviewing as Arrows of Indra. Take what grains of salt you deem appropriate.

This is a long-ass review so you might want to read it in shifts and take frequent coffee-breaks.

Reading Arrows of Indra was not a pleasant experience for me. [Like most of you here] I do not believe the OSR is entirely creatively bankrupt. I love D&D, I’ve run 2nd edition, Basic and 3.5 and even a one-shot game of Carcosa in the past, and I like the philosophy of old school gaming in general. I believe there is room for innovation in the OSR and that people use retroclones to explore new ground(i.e adventures, settings) with an old system. Arrows of Indra made me question this assumption. Maybe the OSR is pointless and we should have let D&D die along with TSR.

Moving on, for this particular review I have used the pdf version, generously donated to me by a close personal friend [NOT ON 7CHAN]. The cover(which is nice and well-executed) allegedly contains a depiction of a [cis-gender] character(as Pundit is quick to remind anyone who cares(i.e nobody)), but this is hard to verify and not immediately obvious. The layout is fine, the artwork varies from acceptable (some landscapes, deities, items and animals) to terrible(everything else). The in-game map is serviceable.

We start with our Introduction by Pundit where he proudly proclaims that you do not need to know anything about Indian myth outside of this book. Remember this point. He follows it up with the obligatory stupid disclaimer where he informs us that it should not be taken as an authoritative source on anything [Hindu related], with the addendum that he does not advocate any caste system and acknowledges ‘the equality of all regardless of circumstance.’ Will Dark Albion contain a similar disclaimer about hereditary aristocracies and goblin slaying? However, a lot of rpgs feel the need to contain such ridiculous disclaimers so I will let this one slide.

Chapter 1 contains character generation rules. You will be pleased to know 4d6 drop lowest, in order or whatever the GM deems fit is still as functional as it was in the 80s. Everything is pretty much B/X with a resurrection probability table for Con. Next up is a caste system(roll randomly), which offers cultural context and ability bonus scores/penalties along with a recommendation that you should think twice about letting people play a Dalit(untouchable caste). Please note that class choice is determined by caste for humans. Overall, this section works fairly well and provides the necessary context for playing in caste.

The we have random family generation (which they mention is important in Arrows of Indra so I guess it is then) and this little gem.

“When the number of surviving siblings have been determined, the GM should roll randomly to determine which point in the birth order that PC is found; for example, if there are 5 surviving siblings, the GM could roll d6 (with a 1 indicating the PC is the oldest, 2 the second oldest, etc). If the number of surviving siblings is less convenient for a simple die roll the GM should pick the method that works best.”

I think he might be on to something here. The next [GOSH DARNED] rule section anyone writes should just have ‘THE GM SHOULD PICK THE METHOD THAT WORKS BEST” plastered a several hundred times across each page, The Shining Style. I want to make merry and mock Arrows but it is so uninspiring even its failures are pedestrian. It fails not by the virtue of its grasp extending its reach, it fails by having no reach and by being made by a [PROUD AND NOBLE DEFENDER OF RPGS]

Next up we have the different races drawn from Indian myth, which are all mechanically superior to their human counterparts(token level limits here and there) and, with the omission of some flavour text, more or less mechanically identical to the demi-humans we have been gently inoculated with for all our role-playing lives(exception, Rakshasa’s). Gandharva’s get a +1 to dex and a -1 to con and are immune to charm(ahem, Mantra of Irresistable Presence), sleep, aging and get +1 to ranged weapons and +1 additional with bows. Vanara’s are monkey men that get an AC bonus versus medium or large creatures and a bonus to saves vs poison magic items spells/sneaking/ and a strength penalty/dex bonus. Yaksha’s are mountain spirits that get a +4 AC vs Giant sized creatures.

THIS IS THE REVERSE OF WHAT A NEW RACE SHOULD BE LIKE. A new race should bring variety and role-playing opportunity and mechanics should reflect that. If your new race amounts to an elf with a bollywood coat of paint and two paragraphs of background slapped on you should rework it until it is something new. The worst thing is that Pundit claims this is a deliberate choice so it would be ‘familiar’ to DnD players. Yes. Pundit deliberately chose to do [THE BESTEST JOB HE POSSIBLY COULD DO UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES], because he knew anyone [COURAGEOUS AND NOBLE] enough to buy his stuff would be too [KIND-HEARTED AND CONTENT] to protest. He is giving you something nearly identical to something that already exists, and he is charging money for it.

[Example of] new races well done: Empire of the Petal Throne. I will be referring to EoPT(OD&D edition) more often in this review(later editions of which have been much maligned by [RPGPUNDIT], [ENTIRELY UNRELATED WITH] part of a plot to cover up how much he ripped off the OD&D version in writing Arrows of Indra). In many ways Arrows of Indra is a mirror-universe EoPT, derivative where EoPT was original, uninspiring where EoPT was overflowing with creativity etc. Arrows of Indra lacks depth, and nearly all the background material is just a thin veneer covering yet another retroclone. If you just want a retroclone, get one that is free. If you want an original setting, look elsewhere. This is [A WONDERFUL PRODUCT BY A TALENTED KIND HEARTED SOUL]

Classes are inoffensive because they are identical to AD&D 1st edition with token tweaks and different names to make them more Indian-y and to avoid accusations of directly copy-pasting the Player’s Handbook(Priests can’t turn undead, Paladins can summon a giant eagle(Garruda) instead of a horse, Yogi’s are monks but called Yogi’s etc.). XP is now the same for every class. Saving throws are reduced to a single saving throw(which was pretty balsy when Swords & Wizardry did it). [BORROWING] mechanics from better games and incorporating them into itself is also very Arrows of Indra.

Alignment has been changed to Holy, Neutral and Unholy, and covers one’s standing with the gods(Holy means the gods like you Unholy means the Asura’s like you). That’s okay and reflects the setting a bit better. Next comes the vaunted skill system, which [PUNDIT] is quick to add is new, which either makes him [VERACIOUSLY HANDICAPPED] or simply unaware of the definition of the word ‘new’.

We get a hybridized d20 system for the skill resolution which works reasonably well. D20+ability score bonus+Proficiency ‘score’ roll against DC 10, 15 or 20.
 As Pundit mentions, you get both ‘background’ skills based on your randomly generated caste(e.g proficiency-esque skills like brickmaking) and class skills(class abilities for the anyone except the monk I mean Yogi) for which you roll randomly each level.

This innovative new approach is so undeniably brilliant, M.A Barker resurrected himself, read arrows of Indra, was blown away and invented time travel so he could put pretty much the same system in EoPT(page 18). Of course Barker calls them ‘original skills’ and ‘professional skills’ and you roll randomly for which skill group you select them from(Unlike AoI, which uses random dice to determine which skills you get based on caste) and to his credit Barker did change the way you get new skills each level.

To further illustrate what a hack Barker is, he also had the temerity to copy Pundit’s professional skill I mean class skill system. Barker did remove some of the randomness in the skill selection, but that’s a taste thing. So on to the class skills themselves. Every class rolls a d6 and gets a skill from the Tier 1 skill table.
 Priests need skills to cast spells(though some of the skills they get per level just allow them to learn things like languages, a design Barker cynically copies in his hack-job Empire of the Petal Throne Indra-clone). Most of the skills give the user the ability to conduct rituals, which are mostly defensive or utility based spells that take several minutes to cast and require incense. When you randomly get a particular spell-like ability you can generally use it once per day.
This is a [TOTALLY AND COMPLETELY DIFFERENT] from priest skills in EoPT, which are mostly defensive or utility based spells that you can generally use about once per day. No tier system in EoPT, simply a line of skills and the order in which they are to be taken though.
 
Fighter skills are sort of what you’d expect, you get bonuses on specific weaponry, some charioteering, same proficiency twice means more bonuses, some Tier 2 stuff for improved defensive fighting, command and chakrams.
 
On to the Siddhi skills(different from a wizard, Siddhi’s cannot wear armour and are bad at fighting). Here we see the Pundit really shine. Skills include a mixture of offensive, defensive and utility spellike abilities that can be used 1/day in general, and a really cool skill that is the first skill on the first table called Asana, that allows you to freeze your entire body in place or hold your breath for an extremely long period of time(1 breath per day).
 
Of course that time-travelling asshole Barker has to ruin things again by making Control of Self the first skill magic users get in his hack-job Arrows of Indra Clone(page 21), which allows them to hold their breath for extremely long periods of time and freeze their body into place. And he also has the gall to make most of the magic user abilities spell-like abilities with a mixture of defensive, offensive and utility based powers that can generally be used 1/day. And of course Barker bases his last power, the Grey Hand(p. 21), a touch spell that destroys a target utterly and is usable 1/day, heavily off of [Edited out, doxxing -Admin-] THE BHAIRAVA-MUDRA, a touch spell that destroys a target utterly but with a saving throw that is usable 1/day.

Now, I have been slightly cynical towards the Pundit’s work, but thankfully Pundit has incorporated another way of getting spell-like powers for wizards and clerics, a wholly original system called Enlightenment Powers, and oh boy has he earned back my trust. You have a percentile based chance to get 1 randomly generated spell-like power, generally useable 1/day, from each of the 3 tiers of enlightenment powers each level. Sounds pretty cool, and guarantees each priest/wizard is different. Naturally the percentile based chance of gaining powers from different tiers increases as one goes up in levels.
Would you care to guess at the nature of the bonus spells system for priests and magic-users in EoPT? If you guessed percentile based chance of getting 1 or more spellike abilities from 3 different tiers of powers each level(some of which are essentially the same spells across editions) with increased percentage based chances as you go up in level, you are [A WONDERFUL INDIVIDUAL WITH HAPPY FEELINGS AND LOVE]

Lest I be accused of anything but the utmost diligence, the equipment section is next. It is mostly unoffensive and contains pretty much exactly what you would expect in an equipment section for mythic India. Of interest to some of you might be the listed price for concubines and various other slaves, where special mention is made of the existence of ‘kliba’ or cis-gender concubines. Delicious.
This section gives EoPT a break and instead borrows the weapons vs AC from AD&D 1st edition. Chariots and elephants included along with some rules for how to use them(chariot rules were a bit lacking imho) Of particular interest to historians might be the encumbrance system, which is streamlined and very easy to use and stolen from Star Without Numbers GODDAMMIT I WANT TO READ SOMETHING NEW GIVE ME SOMETHIOQUIIOUDHFISHDFOIASJF

 …
 …
A crash dump has occurred. Rebooting in safe mode.
…Standby
…Standby
…Welcome Prince of Nothing

Moving on to GM procedures, this section amounts to little more then house rules and minor modifications to B/X and AD&D. I should be fair and say this section, while undoubtedly [STOLEN I MEAN BORROWED DAMN YOU] from various sources with rodent-like ingenuity and [ONLY THE BESTEST OF INTENTIONS], is pretty well done. The house rules are a decent interpretation of Basic, with a few additions, tweaks and clarifications that will no doubt make it fun to play for the shadowy un-beings that hide in the spaces between worlds where deleted pdf files go. Notably missing are rules for underwater combat as well as mass combat, an essential part in emulating Indian Myths(the latter, not the former). It turns out a system that has withstood over two decades of continued play is pretty functional and most of the house rules work out some of the tweaks. I say house rules, but that’s only because I don’t feel like going through each retro-clone and figuring out when exactly Pundit [BORROWED] what from where.

On to the big selling point, the Gazetteer of the Bharata Kingdoms. This section is a lot less painful then the rest, but that also makes it the most tragic. Because this could have been a very good setting. Instead it is decent at best. I blame this on one central flaw; It adheres too closely to the Mahabarata(or whatever it is based on), at the cost of playability, maybe because Pundit didn’t feel confident enough in his abilities as a writer to put other shit in there. The Bharata Kingdoms as a setting needed more hooks and more shit going on. What is there is good, there is simply not enough of it, and some of it needs more description.
 When the gazzeteer is good, its pretty decent; most of the rulers for each kingdom are described and have various histories, feuds and other stuff that makes them reasonably interesting(a bad-ass emperor(Jarasandha) that seeks to sacrifice 100 kings to Shiva in order to complete some sort of ritual that will allow him mastery over all the worlds, a Rakshasa King, An Asura King who is a total pussy and loyal to the emperor out of fear etc). Mention is made of the occasional Naga(snake-dudes) city ruins, Asura Kingdoms and so forth, but details are very sparse and the single sentence descriptions are not evocative. While it could have used more structure(im thinking Greyhawk boxed set with population figures and shit, and maybe some levels and classes for the npcs?), it gives a decent amount of background information. I should point out that most of this is high level shit, entire kingdoms at eachother throats, super-powerful mythical demi-god warrior stuff etc. and for most Pcs, a lot of this shit will be background stuff for a long time. What also happens sometimes is that you get a region where Shiva or Rama did something cool and now it is a wasteland with no reason to go there. Overall, while what’s there is decent, it needs more. More descriptions of Asura kings kicking ass and impaling midgets, more Rakshasa warlords burning villages, more mad and feuding kings etc. Give us some ruins with descriptions and origins and some reason to go there and find shit other then treasure. THERE IS AN NAGA CITY HEAAR is not a good hook. Nevertheless, this section is alright.

Next up is the dungeon section, or Patala underworld, a gigantic cave structure with seven lairs that runs all the way to hell, filled with Asuras, Nagas and other cool shit that you can beat the shit out of. This section is undeniably badass and I am mostly positive about it.
 
We get an overview of all seven lairs of the Patala underworld, one requires you to sneak/fight past a Naga king with poison breath to even get in and is ruled by a badass Asura named Bala with his 1000 strong succubi harem(or the Indian Equivalent). They will try to charm and seduce guests into “Unholy acts of sensual lust until they die of exhaustion.” Aw yeah.
 Second lair is populated by ghosts and goblins(no wonder they call him ‘Pundit’. Ha ha. Get it? Pun?), Haragrivya, an Asura king who can only be slain by someone who is also called Haragrivya(I shit you not, that kicks ass). Also a city by Shiva for players to discover and retrieve something from.
 Third lair is a paradise-prison guarded by Deva’s(demigods) trapping Bali, an Asura king so powerful he once almost conquered the universe. He seeks penance now but the gods are still understandably nervous about letting him go. Good place to have shit happen.
 4th layer is ruled by Mayu, Asura lord of deception and architect of hell. He used to build gigantic floating death cities and now his entire clan has been imprisoned in the 4th layer, a labyrinth filled with architectural marvels and he likes to corrupt and torment visitors until they go insane. My first though was ‘why the fuck am I reading about cities that have already been destroyed? That sounds kickass. Why wasn’t I there? Fuck!’
5th layer we have our Naga-demi gods and our Asuras and our Rakshasas. Nothing special.
 6th layer is ruled by a special tribe of Asuras but we don’t know what makes them special so we don’t care.
 7th layer leads into the hell realms and holds the largest Naga City ever, with plenty of stuff to loot and magical aging-retardant disease curing milk to loot, along with a shitload of Nagas and a Naga god-king to guard your shit.
There’s a bunch of tables for generating random caves, tunnels, contents and different encounter tables for each level. This section is very useful but the random encounter tables are strange. We would expect the encounter tables to get progressively harder as you descend into the underworld, instead they actually get slightly easier as you descend, which is an odd choice.

Overland encounters is okay, encounter tables for overland shit. Nothing spectacular that you have not seen before, but it’s useful. Random quest table bears an unerring resemblance to the one from EoPt(p. 41) but I am inclined to let it go since the quests are very vague and general.

Next comes the monster section and it is bizarre(and not in a good way). People have pointed out the monsters are derivative(goblins, giants etc.) and Pundit retaliates by hiding behind mythological accuracy. He mentions 84 different creatures specifically taken from Indian mythology. What we actually get are 84 creatures, 40 of which are mundane or giant animals, reptiles, vermin or humans(bandits, barbarians etc.). We get giants, goblins, living dead(zombies), animate statues, air deva’s(air elemental), earth deva’s(guess), Fire Spirits(yup), Ghost ; Bhuta(like a ghost but indian and with the same stats) and skeletons. That’s 49 creatures we have seen before, not sufficiently different either mechanically or flavour-wise to qualify as different.
 We get Type A to Type E Asura’s, which depressed me to no end, as well as pundit smugly mentioning that the GM can modify them to no end as these are meant to be general categories, along with a general purpose Asura Prince and King template. They might as well have been ripped straight from the AD&D monster manual. Terrible. Why isn’t the random monstrosity generator(there is a random creature in it, which also doesn’t count) used to generate Asura’s? Another bizarre case is the Preta, a super interesting creature from Hindu myth(looked it up on wiki) that Pundit actually went out of his way to make mechanically identical to a ghoul. This is symptomatic of Arrows of Indra as a whole. It doesn’t turn D&D into something cool. It turns something cool into D&D. It is anti-creative. It smothers heterogeneity wherever it rears its ugly head. We could go on, but the monster section was a massive letdown, and even a seven headed cobra couldn’t save it. Fucking throw out half the giant animals, rewrite every undead creature so it feels weird and exotic and make at least 6 entries about Asura Princes/races. Go nuts. Raktaveya, Ravana, Vritra, Trisias. Make up some yourself. These things are a major antagonist in your setting. Show us them.

The treasure section is the coup de grace. The [WARM HAPPY FEELINGS] of a retro-clone. The paint is scraped off and reveals the corpse of D&D underneath. Again we see the pattern of Arrow of Indra taking shit that could have been really unique and fun and making it resemble the D&D we already know as much as possible. It’s almost as if it was made in some kind of alternate universe totalitarian world government controlled by a council of TsR Gygax androids where everything that deviates from the accepted parameters of D&D is ruthlessly supressed.
-The Herb section. (Potion section with the serial numbers filed off). Curing Herb. Endurance Herb(gives con bonus). Herb Against Cold. Herb of Invisibility. Herb of Swiftness.
-Minor Sutra’s! Like scrolls only they replicate enlightenment powers(which mostly replicate wizard spells).
-Major Sutras. Like Librams and Tomes. This section feels slightly less derivative. Honourable mention to the Supreme Bhakti Sutras, which increases the chance of divine intervention by 5% for anyone who studies it. The rest mostly gives a level to certain classes or a permanent +1 to attacks or damage with something.
-Mala beads(Palette swapped amulet section). Mala of Calming Animals. Mala of protection from affliction. Mala of sensing magic. Is this deliberate? Why not make something new and inspiring and fun?
-Staffs. Like the staff section in D&D only the staffs have less abilities and may even have different names. For example, Pundit re-named the Rod of Cancellation to the Staff of Annuling Magic, and I think you should donate to his blog to support him fighting the good fight[SECTION OMITTED].
-Ring Section. Ring of Protection+2. Ring of True Vision. Ring of Aescetics(sustenance). Terrible.
-Conch shells. Like horns. Guess which horn they correspond to. Shanka of devastating force. Deva-summoning Shaka. Shaka of Confusion in Battle. To be fair, these are the worst offenders, the conch shells have a lot of different powers. I would almost give it a pass if by this time I was not seething with rage.
-Wonderous Items. Mostly derivative garbage(e.g gauntlets of ogre power in a dress, rope of climbing, plentiful cup that is a decanter of endless something), with a handful of decent items. A flying chariot of the gods. A magic wicker basket with a palace inside that is impregnable against all but the most powerful magic(If it’s a Daern’s instant fortress clone, it’s at least well disguised). A third eye that lets you control winds but not to hurricane strength.
-A magic item and weapon section with an emphasis on bows that is not worth the price of admission but is not actively offensive either. Be prepared to gaze in awe at magic things that inflict 1d6 extra fire damage. A child could have thought of that.
-Last and certainly not least is a list of artefact weapons to be granted by the gods themselves for specific quests. All of them are ridiculously powerful(an arrow that instantly disintegrates anything below 9 HD within 2000 feet, an arrow that gets +20 to hit and instantly kills his target(printed twice for no reason, once for shiva once for Vishnu, different names) etc.). They have no drawbacks and are likely to function mostly as plot devices(arrow that transforms into a rain of arrows and chakrams inflicting the enemies HD d8 to each enemy within 2000 feet). However, some have at least some lore attached to them and the effects can be a little badass, so these too get a very perfunctory pass. Note that some form of mass combat rules would have greatly increased the utility of shit like this.

And…close off with a decent overview of major religions. Recent amount of detail is given. No information of Asura princes and their rituals. Lame. Guessing its Unholy acts and perverse reflections of what the gods want. Whatever. Two appendixes, dealing with higher level play(what you would expect in B/X only without siege rules or mass combat) and one detailing future events in the Mahabharata. Not likely to see much use, but more interesting then 80% of the book.

Overall, while Arrows of Indra is undeniably functional, it is uninspired, derivative and falsely advertised. Pundit’s claims of only having to read the product to get a grip on Mythic India gaming [CANNOT BE VERIFIED BUT I CANT PROVE ANYTHING]. The few nuggets of creativity buried here and there do not save it from a likely unmarked rpg-grave at the bottom of a pit. I would pay perhaps $3.50 for the setting and underworld sections. The GM section should be free on a blog.

My recommendation is you spend your 10$ on reference works for Indian Mythology(you can read the Mahabharata and probably others online for free btw), download a free copy of labyrinth lord, OSRIC or swords and wizardry, and make your own setting. You can do better then this drivel.

Utility: Derivative but undeniably functional.
 Presentation: mostly shitty art.
 Creativity: Source material is great. Presentation thereof is lacking and the author should not be afraid to go beyond his source material a bit more. Game is overall a derivative waste of time, with the possible exception of the gazetteer and underworld sections.
 Use your $10: To check out Against the Dark Yogi Instead.

crkrueger

  • Hulk in the Vineyard
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12559
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2014, 02:30:38 PM »
Aside from the probable sock banning, you missed one banning offense in the text.
Even the the "cutting edge" storygamers for all their talk of narrative, plot, and drama are fucking obsessed with the god damned rules they use. - Estar

Yes, Sean Connery's thumb does indeed do megadamage. - Spinachcat

Isuldur is a badass because he stopped Sauron with a broken sword, but Iluvatar is the badass because he stopped Sauron with a hobbit. -Malleus Arianorum

"Tangency Edition" D&D would have no classes or races, but 17 genders to choose from. -TristramEvans

PrinceofNothing
BANNED

  • BANNED
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2014, 04:03:30 PM »
I assure you, i am not a sockpuppet. Please inform me where i went wrong so i can correct this error. Thank you!:)

RPGPundit

  • Administrator - The Final Boss of Internet Shitlords
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48855
    • http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2014, 04:06:55 PM »
First, banned for doxxing, stalking, and intentional site disruption (posting a character assassination masquerading as a legitimate review).

Later, I'll  respond to the post itself, and point out all the ways that it's bullshit.
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you've played 'medieval fantasy' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

Doom

  • Fact and Truth Ideologue
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2675
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2014, 05:48:44 PM »
Man, that's a painful read, trolling is supposed to at least be droll.

What's YDIS, anyway?
(taken during hurricane winds)

A nice education blog.

misterguignol

  • Instigator and Agent
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2278
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2014, 07:29:45 PM »
Quote from: Doom;802274
What's YDIS, anyway?


It's the big news source for the OSR

Ladybird

  • \"Demonic cleric\"
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2875
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2014, 07:37:54 PM »
The only funny concept RPG review was FATAL, and it was only funny for a week back in, what, 2002; the RPG "community" of the time killed it by refusing to develop new jokes, instead sticking to the same tired feigned outrage, exaggerated complaints, and aimless rants.

That the writers themselves couldn't even improve on the concept in seven years might be a clue that there simply isn't anywhere else for the concept to go.
one two FUCK YOU

Ladybird

  • \"Demonic cleric\"
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2875
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2014, 07:41:42 PM »
Quote from: Doom;802274
Man, that's a painful read, trolling is supposed to at least be droll.

What's YDIS, anyway?


The Yamaha Dual Intake System, which is something technical to do with engines (I'm a Top Gear fan, which means I clearly know fuck all about the inside of a car).

Quite what Pundit did to upset a community of engine obsessives, who can say.
one two FUCK YOU

Necrozius

  • Black Flame Devotee
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1180
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2014, 09:46:04 PM »
I swear that I read this same review on the SA forums a year or two ago.

The Butcher

  • Cyborg Shock Trooper
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7183
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2014, 10:30:27 PM »
I might actually enjoy it if the YDIS crowd showed up and more or less played by the rules (e.g. no doxxing). There's a gram of valid criticism of certain OSR trends beneath the tons of adolescent humor. And they even managed to be genuinely funny (if really, really uncouth) every now and then. Obviously not the case here.

YDIS used to be the Tijuana bible of the OSR, you had to be "this popular" to merit a quote in a blog post (I seem to recall Benoist getting a rise out of being named in one such post).

RPGPundit

  • Administrator - The Final Boss of Internet Shitlords
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48855
    • http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« Reply #10 on: December 05, 2014, 01:03:35 AM »
Quote from: misterguignol;802288
It's the big news source for the OSR


No, its a hate-blog created by an SA-Goon, usually filled with 4chan-levels of profanity and adolescent dirty-jokes, that attacks OSR games and game designers.  They have for a long time had a hate-on for Zak, Raggi, and myself in roughly that order (but they often branch out to attack other OSR designers).
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you've played 'medieval fantasy' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

RPGPundit

  • Administrator - The Final Boss of Internet Shitlords
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48855
    • http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« Reply #11 on: December 05, 2014, 04:00:18 AM »
Ok, let's do this; though I should really not be wasting my time with this given that (as no doubt the Swine over at YDIS will be tickled pink to know) I've just been hired on a permanent contract with a major website to do some major writing work based on the quality of my blog and RPG writing.  More on that in a couple of weeks, folks.  But in any case, let's give this stupid fuck's hatchet job the attention it utterly does not deserve:

Quote from: PrinceofNothing;802169


Note: I edited this so it conforms with forum rules. Edited text is in brackets.


Apparently not well enough, you ridiculous fuck.  

Quote

Reading Arrows of Indra was not a pleasant experience for me. [Like most of you here] I do not believe the OSR is entirely creatively bankrupt. I love D&D, I’ve run 2nd edition, Basic and 3.5 and even a one-shot game of Carcosa in the past, and I like the philosophy of old school gaming in general. I believe there is room for innovation in the OSR and that people use retroclones to explore new ground(i.e adventures, settings) with an old system. Arrows of Indra made me question this assumption. Maybe the OSR is pointless and we should have let D&D die along with TSR.


I'm fairly sure that last sentence is the only true statement of your beliefs out of that entire paragraph.  Since, for starters, you clearly don't know or understand the general principles of the OSR.


Quote

The cover(which is nice and well-executed) allegedly contains a depiction of a [cis-gender] character... but this is hard to verify and not immediately obvious.


You mean to say transgender, right?
In any case, I'll write more about just how much of an ass you are for this part sometime soon. I'll leave it for now.

Quote

He follows it up with the obligatory stupid disclaimer where he informs us that it should not be taken as an authoritative source on anything [Hindu related], with the addendum that he does not advocate any caste system and acknowledges ‘the equality of all regardless of circumstance.’


It was only obligatory because it was absolutely predicted (and of course came to pass that) you and your fellow pseudo-activists tried to self-servingly attack AoI as though I was endorsing caste systems or any number of other equally stupid claims of outrage over things you wouldn't give a shit about at any time that it didn't serve your purpose of trying to 'take me down'.

Quote
The we have random family generation (which they mention is important in Arrows of Indra so I guess it is then) and this little gem.

“When the number of surviving siblings have been determined, the GM should roll randomly to determine which point in the birth order that PC is found; for example, if there are 5 surviving siblings, the GM could roll d6 (with a 1 indicating the PC is the oldest, 2 the second oldest, etc). If the number of surviving siblings is less convenient for a simple die roll the GM should pick the method that works best.”

I think he might be on to something here. The next [GOSH DARNED] rule section anyone writes should just have ‘THE GM SHOULD PICK THE METHOD THAT WORKS BEST” plastered a several hundred times across each page, The Shining Style. I want to make merry and mock Arrows but it is so uninspiring even its failures are pedestrian. It fails not by the virtue of its grasp extending its reach, it fails by having no reach and by being made by a [PROUD AND NOBLE DEFENDER OF RPGS]


So... you're an allegedly experienced player of OSR games, and yet you don't get that from the OSR perspective "rulings not rules" is not only a feature-not-bug but one of the GUIDING PRINCIPLES of the movement?

I guess that shouldn't be a surprise since you go on to pretend that sticking to tradition and not reinventing the wheel for gaming mechanics are somehow failings rather than the entire point of OSR design.

Quote

THIS IS THE REVERSE OF WHAT A NEW RACE SHOULD BE LIKE. A new race should bring variety and role-playing opportunity and mechanics should reflect that. If your new race amounts to an elf with a bollywood coat of paint and two paragraphs of background slapped on you should rework it until it is something new.


Your claims of OSR street-cred are becoming increasingly ridiculous here, but you certainly are showing yourself to be a likely candidate to be well versed in hipster indie-gaming design ideas from the Forge.   The proof of this is in the way that you think mechanics are the way to make something different (bwah hahaha) and are somehow what defines roleplay.  Since in Forge games things like setting are a completely meaningless facade for a set of mechanics for story-creation, I guess I can understand how you would have focused on the mechanical similarity between a Dwarf and a Yaksha, and ignored completely the detailed descriptions of each race that point out just how different they are in action.  That's because over in the OSR, we don't use mechanics to show how to roleplay different, we just fucking roleplay it.

Quote
The worst thing is that Pundit claims this is a deliberate choice so it would be ‘familiar’ to DnD players. Yes. Pundit deliberately chose


Yup, I absolutely did. Because that would serve the dual goal of pointing out how the underlying concepts of myth could be familiar to anyone who is already steeped in the (western) mythology of D&D (rather than thinking that these creatures are unapproachable concepts that we have no base for understanding), while the descriptive material would make very clear how at the same time they are an exotically different presentation of some of these similar concepts.  Elves, Dwarves, Vanara, Yaksha, Gandharvas, etc. (even hobbits) are all fairy or nature spirits in their mythological core, and thus comprehensible to anyone who is already familiar with some of these models (e.g., western elves or dwarves), but in the particulars of behaviour and presentation a Dwarf is not a Yaksha and a Vanara is definitely not a Hobbit.

Quote
He is giving you something nearly identical to something that already exists, and he is charging money for it.


AoI is more different than Lamentations of the Flame Princess (which is awesome, mind you) and way more different than ACKS or Adventures Dark and Deep or Labyrinth Lord; but yes, what you wrote above is pretty much what the OSR does. The only real variation (and a source of debate within the OSR) is just how "nearly identical" you want it (and you might have missed the past and recent arguments on this, though given that you're clearly obsessed with me I strongly suspect you haven't, but I actually fall on the more radically innovative side of the spectrum).

Quote
In many ways Arrows of Indra is a mirror-universe EoPT


I don't know if I'd go that far, but of course just recently someone who actually played with Barker and loved AoI felt that AoI would make a great Tekumel ruleset, and felt that the professor would have liked it a lot.

Quote
derivative where EoPT was original


Only inasmuch as any OSR rpg is "derivative".  Again, you seem confused because you keep suggesting this as though it's a dirty word.
EPT was definitely original, no one could argue that. Except of course inasmuch as big parts of it were already mechanically 'derivative' of OD&D.  As indeed, you could say of pretty much every RPG in history, if you look at the very broad skeletal structure of what an RPG is (though of course in EPT's case, it was more than just broadly derivative in some areas).

Quote
uninspiring where EoPT was overflowing with creativity etc.


I suppose that this is a matter of taste.  If you feel that six-legged aliens are more 'inspiring' than the mythology that has driven an entire culture for the last 3000 years, I guess you're entitled to think that.

Quote
Arrows of Indra lacks depth, and nearly all the background material is just a thin veneer covering yet another retroclone.


You don't seem to know what "retroclone" means; but that's not surprising given that you don't know what "OSR" is about either.  Let me put it this way: no one actually in the OSR would ever claim AoI is a 'retroclone' (a few might claim that AoI is not a 'true OSR' game, but that's another story).
And I'm afraid you have it backwards (again, as a consequence of having your brain so poisoned that you don't understand old-school and barely understand roleplaying games in general, it would seem): the background is not a veneer for the mechanics; the mechanics are a veneer for the background.  That's how it works in RPGs.  It's one of the big differences between RPGs and storygames.

Quote
If you just want a retroclone, get one that is free. If you want an original setting, look elsewhere.


Well, technically speaking, I can't argue with either of these points.  If you actually want a RETROCLONE (that is, an OSR game intended to be a nearly-flawless and direct copy of a specific old-school D&D ruleset/edition) I would definitely suggest you get a free one.  I'm not a big fan of retroclones; I invented the term "clonemania" to describe the fever for them that erupted a few years back.

As for original setting, yes, if you want an 'original setting' you should definitely look elsewhere.  AoI is not meant to have an original setting at all. It has a setting that is absolutely and explicitly based on the legendary "Epic India" (the collection of places and kingdoms of the Mahabharata, some of which existed in history but not quite the way portrayed in the legends, and others which probably never really existed at all).

Quote
[BORROWING] mechanics from better games and incorporating them into itself is also very Arrows of Indra.


Totally.  It's very OSR, in fact. Its part of what's made the OSR so successful, compared to the creative bankruptcy of 'tiddlywinks-as-game-resolution-mechanic' reinventing-the-wheel gibberish of the storygames/indie movement.  That's why some storygamers are now desperately trying to reinvent themselves and their games as OSR games (even though they're not), why the most successful (the only really successful) game to come out of the storygames movement in the last few years is based on dungeon-crawling and is so orthodox that it's not a storygame anymore, and why Ron Edwards is frantically trying to rewrite history to pretend that he was the inventor of old-school gaming.

Quote
Alignment has been changed to Holy, Neutral and Unholy, and covers one’s standing with the gods(Holy means the gods like you Unholy means the Asura’s like you). That’s okay and reflects the setting a bit better.


I'll only comment here to point out that this is an endemic example of why this review is hatchet job: it glosses over some of the most significant portions of AoI (including most of the setting, and everything that is relatively innovative in the game) in a sentence or without mention at all, while grossly exaggerating and elaborating on something that is a secret to no one (that OSR games are mechanically derived from old-school games) to try to give a totally false impression of the product.  

But hey, I guess that's why I've been sent literally hundreds and hundreds (maybe into the four digits at this point?) of free RPG products to review (there's 13 books on my desk right now waiting to be reviewed, and at least 5 more in the mail that I know of), while you have to pirate PDFs from 7chan.

Quote

Next comes the vaunted skill system, which [PUNDIT] is quick to add is new, which either makes him [VERACIOUSLY HANDICAPPED] or simply unaware of the definition of the word ‘new’.


Again, a perfectly understandable confusion on the part of an asshole who has no idea what he's talking about.  "New" here is in the context of the OSR, as in "new" meaning "different from standard old-school D&D".  

Quote
We get a hybridized d20 system for the skill resolution which works reasonably well. D20+ability score bonus+Proficiency ‘score’ roll against DC 10, 15 or 20.
 As Pundit mentions, you get both ‘background’ skills based on your randomly generated caste(e.g proficiency-esque skills like brickmaking) and class skills(class abilities for the anyone except the monk I mean Yogi) for which you roll randomly each level.

This innovative new approach is so undeniably brilliant, M.A Barker resurrected himself, read arrows of Indra, was blown away and invented time travel so he could put pretty much the same system in EoPT(page 18). Of course Barker calls them ‘original skills’ and ‘professional skills’ and you roll randomly for which skill group you select them from(Unlike AoI, which uses random dice to determine which skills you get based on caste) and to his credit Barker did change the way you get new skills each level.


Having not recently pirated EPT as you appear to have done, I can't actually confirm everything you write about it here.  But I'm about 99% sure from my recollection of the last time I did read it that Barker didn't use a system cribbed from the D20 OGL (he was percentage based?).

But I had read EPT a while before writing AoI.   Is your next stunning revelation going to be that I "stole" Hit Points from D&D, or Ascending AC from D&D 3.0?

Quote

 Priests need skills to cast spells(though some of the skills they get per level just allow them to learn things like languages, a design Barker cynically copies in his hack-job Empire of the Petal Throne Indra-clone).


You haven't gone all the way down the rabbit hole yet, my friend!  While its true that Barker came back to life and copied the notion that Priests should be familiar with Languages from me (and Theology? I don't remember if Barker asked to borrow that too or if it isn't in EPT), you should also note how the ancient founders of the Vedic Priesthood actually traveled through time (soma was a really powerful magical drug, after all) and got the idea that priests should be erudite lore keepers from me and Barker while we were having turkish coffee together (me smoking a pipe, and him chewing on a cigar)!

Yes, the entire concept of Vedic Brahmin knowledge-training was clearly inspired (via time-traveling Brahmins) by Arrows of Indra, in a stunning case of temporal paradox.

Or, you know, Barker and I both have priests learning things like languages and theology because we were both copying ancient India.  It might be that too.

Quote
Most of the skills give the user the ability to conduct rituals, which are mostly defensive or utility based spells that take several minutes to cast and require incense. When you randomly get a particular spell-like ability you can generally use it once per day.
This is a [TOTALLY AND COMPLETELY DIFFERENT] from priest skills in EoPT, which are mostly defensive or utility based spells that you can generally use about once per day. No tier system in EoPT, simply a line of skills and the order in which they are to be taken though.


Again, this obviously has nothing to do with ancient Vedic priests conducting rituals. Nothing.
 
Quote

On to the Siddhi skills(different from a wizard, Siddhi’s cannot wear armour and are bad at fighting).


Yeah, again, totally NOT like in Ancient India, where ascetic magic-users regularly went around wearing +5 plate armor and beating the shit out of people with swords.  Why, the Buddha himself had a +5 Frostbrand.

Quote
a really cool skill that is the first skill on the first table called Asana, that allows you to freeze your entire body in place or hold your breath for an extremely long period of time(1 breath per day).
 
Of course that time-travelling asshole Barker has to ruin things again by making Control of Self the first skill magic users get in his hack-job Arrows of Indra Clone(page 21), which allows them to hold their breath for extremely long periods of time and freeze their body into place.


Yeah, and nothing at all like Asana, the first and most basic skill of Raja-Yoga, which allows skilled practitioners to stay frozen in place and hold their breath for extremely long periods of time.

The real question here is whether that fucker Patanjali ripped off Barker or myself!


Quote

 And he also has the gall to make most of the magic user abilities spell-like abilities with a mixture of defensive, offensive and utility based powers that can generally be used 1/day. And of course Barker bases his last power, the Grey Hand(p. 21), a touch spell that destroys a target utterly and is usable 1/day, heavily off of [Edited out, doxxing -Admin-] THE BHAIRAVA-MUDRA, a touch spell that destroys a target utterly but with a saving throw that is usable 1/day.


And nothing at all like the siddhis who could develop the power to kill instantly.  In some cases not even needing to touch a victim!  
Fun fact: one infamous shiva-yogi recently claimed to have this power, and a noted Indian skeptic challenged him to a Televised test where the yogi in question would kill the skeptic on live tv using only his power.  The yogi failed, of course.  It just goes to show how much more interesting the woo-woo guys are in India than here in the west, where the best we can manage is Uri Geller pretending to bend spoons.

Quote

Lest I be accused of anything but the utmost diligence, the equipment section is next. It is mostly unoffensive and contains pretty much exactly what you would expect in an equipment section for mythic India. Of interest to some of you might be the listed price for concubines and various other slaves, where special mention is made of the existence of ‘kliba’ or cis-gender concubines. Delicious.


Delicious indeed that you mention the inclusion of third-gendered characters in the section on slaves, but not the section of description they get in the Setting chapter (including the level of acceptance they had in Vedic society and the heroic roles kliba PCs can play, like the one on the cover you maligned).  But hey, this is a fair review and not a pathetic attempt a character assassination, right?

Quote
This section gives EoPT a break and instead borrows the weapons vs AC from AD&D 1st edition.


First, it's pretty different (in that its far more streamlined and easy to use) than anything in the AD&D 1e rules.  Second, you still keep saying this like its a bad thing and not the entire point of making an OSR rules-set.  I really don't have the time to explain to you what the OSR is (though you clearly know and are just willfully choosing to ignore that knowledge, given how utterly obsessed YDIS is with destroying the OSR), but if you were actually going to write an honest review of an OSR game it would have been great if you'd done a little less pretending to be an ignorant fucking piece of shit about it.

Quote
Of particular interest to historians might be the encumbrance system, which is streamlined and very easy to use and stolen from Star Without Numbers GODDAMMIT I WANT TO READ SOMETHING NEW GIVE ME SOMETHIOQUIIOUDHFISHDFOIASJF



Really? that's news to me. I thought I was 'stealing' from LotFP. Not exactly the same of course, but LotFP totally opened my eyes as to how to correctly do an encumbrance system.  In spite of having received SWN for free and having written a lengthy review of it, I have to admit that right now I don't even remember what the SWN encumbrance system was like (you'll have to forgive me, like I said, I've been sent hundreds and hundreds of RPGs to review, and SWN was quite a long time ago).  Maybe SWN 'stole' their encumbrance system from LotFP?  Or maybe LotFP stole it from SWN?  Well, either way, I'm sure you and your gang will be jumping onto the Mystery Machine to go solve that case right away in your apparently unending quest to reveal the shocking fact that Old School Renaissance RPGs borrow Old-school ideas from each other.

Quote

Moving on to GM procedures, this section amounts to little more then house rules and minor modifications to B/X and AD&D.


Well, you're partly right, of course.  They are from my house rules, definitely. And those house rules do come from things I've picked up in B/X (or rather, the RC D&D), AD&D, Majestic Wilderlands, LotFP, DCC, D20/3e, and several other places, as well as a few things that (as far as I know) were a product of my own inspiration.

Golly, the OSR was Old Man Jenkins all along! And he would have gotten away with it too, if it hadn't been for you darn gang of fucking morons!

Quote

 Notably missing are rules for underwater combat as well as mass combat, an essential part in emulating Indian Myths(the latter, not the former).


Maybe the first authentic and non-asinine criticism you've had in the entire review! Congratulations.  I guess if you spray out a steady stream of bullshit, some turd is bound to actually hit the mark at some point.

Anyways, since AoI assumes party-level adventuring, it doesn't have a mass-combat mechanic. But this being the OSR, I'm sure anyone who actually buys AoI to play it (rather than pirating it to try to slander its author in a particularly ridiculous manner) will end up using.. sorry, STEALING!.. the mass-combat rules from another RPG.
In a few months, they'll even be able to use (after some houserule/mods) the mass-combat rules I'll be including in Dark Albion!  I look forward to seeing what kind of ridiculous claims you make about that one (that my setting seems suspiciously to have been totally ripped off from Shakespeare, perhaps? Or that there are curious and shady similarities between my 'Rose War' setting and George R. R. Martin's Game of Thrones, perhaps?).

Quote

On to the big selling point, the Gazetteer of the Bharata Kingdoms. This section is a lot less painful then the rest, but that also makes it the most tragic. Because this could have been a very good setting. Instead it is decent at best. I blame this on one central flaw; It adheres too closely to the Mahabarata(or whatever it is based on), at the cost of playability, maybe because Pundit didn’t feel confident enough in his abilities as a writer to put other shit in there. The Bharata Kingdoms as a setting needed more hooks and more shit going on. What is there is good, there is simply not enough of it, and some of it needs more description.


I can't really argue with a totally subjective statement. And surely, if I had another 100-200 pages of space, I might have added a lot more local-detail full of even more adventure hooks.  But I suspect again that you are operating from a non-OSR point of view here.  I think OSR-gamers (as compared to anti-OSR fuckwits) who look at the setting material in AoI as it currently stands will likely feel its got a plethora of material to set adventures in and similarly enough space that one isn't inundated in metaplot and culture-wank that prevents the GM from putting his own stamp on the world.

Quote
When the gazzeteer is good, its pretty decent; most of the rulers for each kingdom are described and have various histories, feuds and other stuff that makes them reasonably interesting(a bad-ass emperor(Jarasandha) that seeks to sacrifice 100 kings to Shiva in order to complete some sort of ritual that will allow him mastery over all the worlds, a Rakshasa King, An Asura King who is a total pussy and loyal to the emperor out of fear etc).


Ok, I feel like I have to make a confession here.  This hard-hitting review is prompting me to come clean: I have to admit I didn't think up any of this.
I'm sorry. To everyone I've disappointed, I'm sorry.  I didn't invent any of this stuff; it was totally ripped off, 'stolen', if you will in a blatant act of plagiarism, from a number of ancient texts I didn't quite cut-and-paste from but I might as well have. Unlike the rules-system, which is a construction from a variety of sources, compiled by me and not a clone of any other rules-system as such, the setting is a total and complete ripoff, of a non-western culture.
I was so sure I could get away with it too, but there you go, the truth must come out.  All those awesome NPCs in there? Krishna, Arjuna, Queen Kunti, all the various gods, all the cities, I didn't invent a single fucking one of them. I even ripped off things like the legal code and gender norms! Its shameless, and I have no excuse.


Quote
What also happens sometimes is that you get a region where Shiva or Rama did something cool and now it is a wasteland with no reason to go there.


Really? Where the fuck is that? I can think of a place where a god did something cool and now the whole place is a super-dangerous desert or ruin that is full of (roughly mid-level) peril and potential for exploration and treasure-seeking.
But as we've seen, you and I seem to have very different ideas of what defines 'creativity'.  I imagine you'd think that something like My Life With Master is 'creative', and not drivel.
What about dungeon world? Derivative theft from D&D and Apocalypse world? Trying to rip off the OSR? Or greatest storygame evar?

Quote
Overall, while what’s there is decent, it needs more.


Can't ultimately argue with that.  Its why I still have in mind to get around to writing one or more regional sourcebooks.  I'll be excited to hear your damning critique about how my sourcebook on the Indus river valley blatantly rips off Indian geography.


Quote

Next up is the dungeon section, or Patala underworld, a gigantic cave structure with seven lairs that runs all the way to hell, filled with Asuras, Nagas and other cool shit that you can beat the shit out of. This section is undeniably badass and I am mostly positive about it.


I'm surprised you're not claiming its just "a blatant ripoff of the 'random dungeon generation' rules in the AD&D 1e DMG appendix of the same name".  Is it that your clown-like absurdity only goes so far, or are you just too ignorant of AD&D rulebooks to have thought of that one?
 
Quote

 4th layer is ruled by Mayu, Asura lord of deception and architect of hell. He used to build gigantic floating death cities and now his entire clan has been imprisoned in the 4th layer, a labyrinth filled with architectural marvels and he likes to corrupt and torment visitors until they go insane. My first though was ‘why the fuck am I reading about cities that have already been destroyed? That sounds kickass. Why wasn’t I there? Fuck!’


Because settings have a past. Also because I am only 'stealing' from Indian myth, and Indian myth didn't all happen at the same time.

Also, if you were an OSR GM, your first thought would have been "Fuck, those cities must have crashed SOMEWHERE."

Quote

There’s a bunch of tables for generating random caves, tunnels, contents and different encounter tables for each level. This section is very useful but the random encounter tables are strange. We would expect the encounter tables to get progressively harder as you descend into the underworld, instead they actually get slightly easier as you descend, which is an odd choice.


Again, because I'm 'blatantly ripping-off' Indian mythology, and that's how it is in the mythology.

Quote
Random quest table bears an unerring resemblance to the one from EoPt(p. 41) but I am inclined to let it go since the quests are very vague and general.


Really? I was thinking Traveller.  What about Caravanserais, did the ancient Indians rip those off of Barker, or me?

Quote
Next comes the monster section and it is bizarre(and not in a good way). People have pointed out the monsters are derivative(goblins, giants etc.) and Pundit retaliates by hiding behind mythological accuracy. He mentions 84 different creatures specifically taken from Indian mythology. What we actually get are 84 creatures, 40 of which are mundane or giant animals, reptiles, vermin or humans(bandits, barbarians etc.). We get giants, goblins, living dead(zombies), animate statues, air deva’s(air elemental), earth deva’s(guess), Fire Spirits(yup), Ghost ; Bhuta(like a ghost but indian and with the same stats) and skeletons. That’s 49 creatures we have seen before, not sufficiently different either mechanically or flavour-wise to qualify as different.


Yeah, its funny how ancient mythologies of all kinds have living dead, goblins, nature spirits, and humans! Crazy.


Quote
Why isn’t the random monstrosity generator(there is a random creature in it, which also doesn’t count) used to generate Asura’s?


There could have, maybe should have been, a random Asura generator.
I tell you what: I'll write one up if I make an AoI source/setting book at some point, and then you can accuse me of having 'stolen' it from somewhere because its an OSR product and not a game that uses jenga for task-resolution.

Quote
Another bizarre case is the Preta, a super interesting creature from Hindu myth(looked it up on wiki) that Pundit actually went out of his way to make mechanically identical to a ghoul.


I didn't have to go out of my way. There are a variety of different represenations of pretas in the 3000-year history of Vedic/Brahminical/Buddhist/Hindu religions/cultures, but 'basically ghouls' is one of the most common.

Quote
This is symptomatic of Arrows of Indra as a whole. It doesn’t turn D&D into something cool. It turns something cool into D&D.



AH.
OK.
I didn't think you'd go and out-and-out admit the fundamental flaw in your review, in your general intellectual philosophy as a gamer, and I daresay in your inherent value as a human being: you don't actually think D&D is cool.
Well, kudos for you for coming right out and admitting it. You should probably have just said so up front, rather than lie to people at the start of your review, though.

Quote

 It’s almost as if it was made in some kind of alternate universe totalitarian world government controlled by a council of TsR Gygax androids where everything that deviates from the accepted parameters of D&D is ruthlessly supressed.


Good for you. It must have been a relief for you to just admit your hate for D&D. But that's quite a jump, from subtle statement to outright spittle-throwing hatred in just one paragraph.

Quote

-The Herb section. (Potion section with the serial numbers filed off). Curing Herb. Endurance Herb(gives con bonus). Herb Against Cold. Herb of Invisibility. Herb of Swiftness.


Yeah, because magical herbs are in no way described in the Vedas, including the Rig Veda, the oldest holy book in the Hindu canon and one of the oldest in the entire world. You know, like Soma.
Oh, and curing herbs. And endurance herbs. And herbs that grant swiftness (though I think that one might actually be in the Atharva Veda; its hard to remember, since there's 107 herbs in the Rig Veda alone, and then more in the Atharva and Yajur Vedas), invisibility (technically, that one isn't from a 'herb' but from a powder derived from a killing, drying and crushing a certain snake).

Quote
-Minor Sutra’s! Like scrolls only they replicate enlightenment powers(which mostly replicate wizard spells).


Well, I'll admit that making them one-use items is anachronistic. That can be house-ruled though.  You know, "Rulings, not Rules".

Quote

-Wonderous Items. Mostly derivative garbage(e.g gauntlets of ogre power in a dress, rope of climbing, plentiful cup that is a decanter of endless something), with a handful of decent items. A flying chariot of the gods. A magic wicker basket with a palace inside that is impregnable against all but the most powerful magic(If it’s a Daern’s instant fortress clone, it’s at least well disguised). A third eye that lets you control winds but not to hurricane strength.


I've skipped over the rest of your bullshit to here, just to point out that the whole deal (that you are assuming is just "ripped off D&D") is actually about "all this shit FITS into the Epic India of myths".  
I mean for fucks' sake, you don't know what a Vimana is, or where it comes from, and you think you qualify to judge this stuff?!

But that's actually beside the point; the point isn't to argue from authority here, but that you fundamentally misunderstand/reject the design goal on the one hand, trying to argue that AoI should be as different as possible from D&D for its own sake even though that's NOT what an OSR game does; and lack the knowledge of the mythology to realize that this isn't just about filing the serial numbers off of D&D but rather showing just how much D&D there is in 3000-year old Indian mythology.

Quote

-A magic item and weapon section with an emphasis on bows that is not worth the price of admission but is not actively offensive either. Be prepared to gaze in awe at magic things that inflict 1d6 extra fire damage. A child could have thought of that.


And here is something that so brutally demonstrates your (almost certainly intentional) catastrophic lack/refusal of comprehension.  You gloss over the entire significance of the Bow to Indian heroic culture on the one hand, while on the other complaining about 1d6 fire damage as a mechanic on the other, and not grasping how much of an moron that makes you.  You think tradition is bad, we got that. You think an arrow that requires you to change a plot point or generates a narrative theme would be better than fire damage, and that "scene resolution via tiddlywinks and interpretive dance" is so much more sophisticated than rolling 1d6 for damage, we got that to.  What you don't get is why that explains how utterly vacuous your ideas are, and why my side is winning and yours is losing.


Quote

And…close off with a decent overview of major religions. Recent amount of detail is given. No information of Asura princes and their rituals. Lame. Guessing its Unholy acts and perverse reflections of what the gods want. Whatever. Two appendixes, dealing with higher level play(what you would expect in B/X only without siege rules or mass combat) and one detailing future events in the Mahabharata. Not likely to see much use, but more interesting then 80% of the book.


And I love how, in the truest example of the spirit of your utterly unbiased reviewing, you sum up 15 pages of book material and tons of mechanics (divine intervention, divine quests, cost of living, housing, land management, name-level rewards, schools of philosophy, organized crime, merchant/business mechanics, taxation (relatively historically accurate), royal attention, marriage/children and inheritance, crime and punishment (directly taken from the vedic law codes), and a brief but detailed outline of about 20 years of potential campaign history) in a dismissive paragraph.

Quote
Overall, while Arrows of Indra is undeniably functional, it is uninspired, derivative and falsely advertised. Pundit’s claims of only having to read the product to get a grip on Mythic India gaming


I think this very review proved the contrary. The fact that you DON'T LIKE that you can run OSR-D&D in the Mythic India setting doesn't disprove the fact that AoI shows you exactly how to do it (well, one way to do it). And since you gloss over or dismiss most of the setting material (a significant chunk of the book) you in fact make no coherent argument as to how or why this would be inadequate for an experienced OSR GM with little to no knowledge of Indian mythology to be able to take AoI and run a successful Epic India setting game.

Quote
The few nuggets of creativity buried here and there do not save it from a likely unmarked rpg-grave at the bottom of a pit.


Before Bedrock switched companies and had to resubmit it on rpgnow, AoI was a silver bestseller.  In the month or so it's been back on, its already a copper bestseller again.  Its print book sales have been good enough that there's interest in more product (that I don't have time to do right now), and its distribution is good enough that just today Chris Kutalik pointed out to me that AoI is one of the only smaller-print OSR games he's actually seen on FLGS shelves.

Just because you wish I was unsuccessful doesn't make it so.

Quote
I would pay perhaps $3.50 for the setting and underworld sections. The GM section should be free on a blog.


I'm sure Bedrock is hugely interested in your pricing advice.  Meanwhile, the royalty checks I've been getting, as well as the general praise from the OSR, has me crying all the way to the bank.

Quote
My recommendation is you spend your 10$ on reference works for Indian Mythology(you can read the Mahabharata and probably others online for free btw), download a free copy of labyrinth lord, OSRIC or swords and wizardry, and make your own setting. You can do better then this drivel.


If anyone feels they can, I'd urge them to do so! I certainly don't pretend that I'm the only person who could possibly have made an India-themed OSR book!  I'm just the only one that did.
But you know, if you were to actually write a game, rather than just use it for your own play, I'd suggest doing more than just the Mahabharata (do you even know the names of any other Indian epics? Maybe the Ramayana rings a bell?), and spend a couple of decades studying Indian religions and culture as well as mythology.  
Or then again, maybe not, because then you'll get idiots whose entire repertoire of Indian knowledge comes from curry  houses and bollywood movies trying to tell you there are no goblins in Indian myth.


RPGPundit
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you've played 'medieval fantasy' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

Molotov

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • M
  • Posts: 163
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« Reply #12 on: December 05, 2014, 05:54:39 AM »
Meh. I read, run (and review) everything from Fate to Holmes D&D. My name appears in the credits - twice - of an "rpg" (story game ... that's for Pundit ;) ) that Pundit's said awful things about (Other Worlds). I've also bought, read and run AoI and find it a fun and worthy read and play.

The review's a hack job with an agenda, and not a particularly good one. Folks are entitled their opinion, and that's mine.

RPGPundit

  • Administrator - The Final Boss of Internet Shitlords
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48855
    • http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« Reply #13 on: December 05, 2014, 06:20:49 AM »
Quote from: Molotov;802358
Meh. I read, run (and review) everything from Fate to Holmes D&D. My name appears in the credits - twice - of an "rpg" (story game ... that's for Pundit ;) ) that Pundit's said awful things about (Other Worlds). I've also bought, read and run AoI and find it a fun and worthy read and play.

The review's a hack job with an agenda, and not a particularly good one. Folks are entitled their opinion, and that's mine.


I appreciate that! And I'm very happy you found AoI worthwhile!
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you've played 'medieval fantasy' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

One Horse Town

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • O
  • Posts: 10203
(Trolling Masquerading as a Review) Arrows of Indra
« Reply #14 on: December 05, 2014, 06:37:43 AM »
Considering that he only posted it to fuck with you, 4 out of 10 is a pretty good score!