This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Author Topic: What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?  (Read 13218 times)

Just Another Snake Cult

  • White Trash Archmage
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #135 on: May 22, 2018, 08:11:52 PM »
People who whine about "Mother may I" and/or who see the GM as an enemy you need rules to "Protect" you from remind me of those Radical Feminists who think all sex is rape.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Christopher Brady

  • The Voice of Raisin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • C
  • Posts: 4733
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #136 on: May 22, 2018, 08:38:20 PM »
Quote from: Just Another Snake Cult;1040299
People who whine about "Mother may I" and/or who see the GM as an enemy you need rules to "Protect" you from remind me of those Radical Feminists who think all sex is rape.

The problem is that Amber is based on inter-player conflict, it's a game of political oneupsmanship, from the Auction for stats to the combat.  Mother May I on it's own isn't that bad, every RPG has it to every degree, but I don't like 'games' that rely on it.

And here's the thing, you're implying, but are completely mistaken, I'm usually the GM, I'm not the one competing against one, I personally object at the amount of work I'd have to do.  A die roll does two things, first, it helps simulate the random element of life that always happens, and takes a burden off my shoulders to help facilitate fun for the rest of the table.

Thing is, Amber is still a Storygame.
"And now, my friends, a Dragon's toast!  To life's little blessings:  wars, plagues and all forms of evil.  Their presence keeps us alert --- and their absence makes us grateful." -T.A. Barron[/SIZE]

RPGPundit

  • Administrator - The Final Boss of Internet Shitlords
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48855
    • http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #137 on: May 24, 2018, 05:15:01 AM »
Quote from: Christopher Brady;1040081
Amber is what Mage the Ascension turned into, really.  Both games rely completely on the GM's interpretation of the world and it's 'reality'.  I remember a quote from somewhere, I think it was tongue in cheek, that if a game doesn't have rules for falling damage, it's not a real RPG.  There are zero benchmarks in doing activities other than conflicts with each other or the 'Elder' Amberites, which include several different versions of each of them, because not even Zelazny knew which one was the 'right' version, in fact, the book even claims it on page 121 that 'Zelazny doesn't say', that they don't know what about the setting is correct or not.  The entire GM's section is all about 'what ifs' or 'maybes?'

It's all up to the GM to decide everything.  It's a Mother May I to the extreme, even the 'Good Stuff'/'Bad Stuff', which is nothing more than supposed luck, is completely up to the whims of the GM.  Hope he likes you, otherwise, he'll screw you.  The entire game is based around inter-player conflict too.


Pundy, I'm going to call you out, after rereading my copy of Amber.  You rail a lot about 'Storygamers' and 'Storygaming', and yet, this favourite game of yours is THE Storygame of the 90's.

In several points in the Amber core book, it speaks to making character stories, page 122 has 'Story Composition'.  In the combat section it has a small bit on Combat as Story Telling, page 81.  The entire book is a manual on how to do a Storygame as per your personal definition.

You cannot justify this, you'll no doubt try, but damn, this is a 'Story Game' as you justify your hatred.


Holy shit your ridiculous resentment of me is really taking you to new levels of retardation.

First, there were multiple versions of the Elders specifically to address the whole question of the Unreliable Narrator, something YOU WERE JUST CLAIMING THE GAME DIDN'T ADDRESS. Because you're a fucking ignoramus who never read the game.

Second, the choices are made by the GM at the beginning of the campaign. That's what a FUCKING TOOLBOX is.

Third, there is ZERO story-game element to Amber. You do not collaborate in "creating a story" with your players. The players do not have the power to rewrite the universe. In fact, you're here bitching like a little cunt about how in Amber the GM has absolute authority, while Storygames are notorious for removing all authority from a GM.

The only reason you're even mentioning storygame is because of your RPGpundit Deragement Syndrome, you gimp.

Please, by all means keep humiliating yourself by showing how you know fuck all about Amber and don't care to know, and this is all just your own personal attempt to hold out your little wiener in some ridiculous masculinity challenge you are incapable of winning.
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you've played 'medieval fantasy' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

Willie the Duck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • W
  • Posts: 1848
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #138 on: May 24, 2018, 07:07:58 AM »
I feel like I'm not going to get an answer (and maybe that's okay). Since I genuinely don't know the game, I'm pretty useless for a 'yes it is'/'no it isn't' shoving match.

But Pundy (or Brad, or Chris himself), Chris mentions, "page 122, it starts going about how a story built, with a section detailing a 'Beginning, Middle and End', then the Hook, Conflict, Character Development, Closure, Moral Resolution, all elements of a story." Is that correct? Mind you, I'm aware that the mention of storytelling does not mean that there's any actual storytelling element in the game or its mechanics. But if it is not a storytelling game (and if it is, can someone please point out how it is? All I can tell is that there may or may not be a bunch of elements related to inter-player conflict, Mother May I-ism, lack of random element, and lack of rules related to interacting with the world as a whole rather than other PCs or NPCS, all of which are interesting facets if they exist, but red herrings on the topic of storygaming), is there a reason that it was included in the game?

Brad

  • Semper Qvantvm Potes
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3630
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #139 on: May 24, 2018, 11:37:53 AM »
Quote from: Willie the Duck;1040441
I feel like I'm not going to get an answer (and maybe that's okay). Since I genuinely don't know the game, I'm pretty useless for a 'yes it is'/'no it isn't' shoving match.

But Pundy (or Brad, or Chris himself), Chris mentions, "page 122, it starts going about how a story built, with a section detailing a 'Beginning, Middle and End', then the Hook, Conflict, Character Development, Closure, Moral Resolution, all elements of a story." Is that correct? Mind you, I'm aware that the mention of storytelling does not mean that there's any actual storytelling element in the game or its mechanics. But if it is not a storytelling game (and if it is, can someone please point out how it is? All I can tell is that there may or may not be a bunch of elements related to inter-player conflict, Mother May I-ism, lack of random element, and lack of rules related to interacting with the world as a whole rather than other PCs or NPCS, all of which are interesting facets if they exist, but red herrings on the topic of storygaming), is there a reason that it was included in the game?

Pages 80-144 deal with "gamemaster mechanics". The section referred to on page 122 is taken out of context; it's no different than paged 5-6 of B1 Into the Unknown, "How to be an effective dungeonmaster." Literally the same exact advice.

If you read all of the Amber mechanics described in those 60+ pages, there's no way you'd think it's a storytelling game unless you're being purposefully dense.
It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.

DeadUematsu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • D
  • Posts: 1370
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #140 on: May 24, 2018, 12:12:32 PM »
One of the reasons why I wouldn't run Amber is that the RPG community is woefully deplete of adults.
 

Christopher Brady

  • The Voice of Raisin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • C
  • Posts: 4733
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #141 on: May 24, 2018, 02:33:41 PM »
Quote from: RPGPundit;1040433
Holy shit your ridiculous resentment of me is really taking you to new levels of retardation.

Dood, this is not personal.  I don't know you from Adam, I don't resent you.  Why would I?  I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about The Amber 'RPG'.

Quote from: RPGPundit;1040433
First, there were multiple versions of the Elders specifically to address the whole question of the Unreliable Narrator, something YOU WERE JUST CLAIMING THE GAME DIDN'T ADDRESS. Because you're a fucking ignoramus who never read the game.

No, it doesn't address, it just throws them at you, and offers vague suggestions, with no definite answers as to who these NPC's are/were.  It's like as if Blargle and Aleena of Red Box had six different stat blocks, covering all classes.  It's distracting and shows that the Author doesn't have much of either 1. a grip on the material or 2. the actual Creator of the setting is too lazy to define anything solidly.

Quote from: RPGPundit;1040433
Second, the choices are made by the GM at the beginning of the campaign. That's what a FUCKING TOOLBOX is.

Toolboxes have tools that are a single shape, like actual rules to help adjudicate, here it relies entirely on the GM's whim.  And worse, it's like having putty in the shape of a hammer, screwdrivers, and vague instructions on how to change them into something else.

It's worse than IKEA furniture instructions.  At least they give you an Allan Key.

Quote from: RPGPundit;1040433
Third, there is ZERO story-game element to Amber. You do not collaborate in "creating a story" with your players. The players do not have the power to rewrite the universe. In fact, you're here bitching like a little cunt about how in Amber the GM has absolute authority, while Storygames are notorious for removing all authority from a GM.

Is that you're meaning?  I don't know of any major games that do that.  Can you name one that does?

Quote from: RPGPundit;1040433
The only reason you're even mentioning storygame is because of your RPGpundit Deragement Syndrome, you gimp.

Insults don't help your case, Pundy.  Not entirely sure you're as confident in your argument.

Quote from: RPGPundit;1040433
Please, by all means keep humiliating yourself by showing how you know fuck all about Amber and don't care to know, and this is all just your own personal attempt to hold out your little wiener in some ridiculous masculinity challenge you are incapable of winning.

I've already made my point, you seem to be upset that I have a good enough point to start with ad hominems.

Quote from: Willie the Duck;1040441
I feel like I'm not going to get an answer (and maybe that's okay). Since I genuinely don't know the game, I'm pretty useless for a 'yes it is'/'no it isn't' shoving match.

But Pundy (or Brad, or Chris himself), Chris mentions, "page 122, it starts going about how a story built, with a section detailing a 'Beginning, Middle and End', then the Hook, Conflict, Character Development, Closure, Moral Resolution, all elements of a story." Is that correct? Mind you, I'm aware that the mention of storytelling does not mean that there's any actual storytelling element in the game or its mechanics. But if it is not a storytelling game (and if it is, can someone please point out how it is? All I can tell is that there may or may not be a bunch of elements related to inter-player conflict, Mother May I-ism, lack of random element, and lack of rules related to interacting with the world as a whole rather than other PCs or NPCS, all of which are interesting facets if they exist, but red herrings on the topic of storygaming), is there a reason that it was included in the game?

I assume it was included because Wujick included it because that's what he believed Amber 'adventures' should be structured.  You do not include something in a book with the intent of never being used, even AD&D and it's myriad of optional rules are accepted that they will be used by someone.

Quote from: DeadUematsu;1040472
One of the reasons why I wouldn't run Amber is that the RPG community is woefully deplete of adults.

Hence, why you need a randomizer agent to create something of an equalizer.

I make no claims to be 'mature' enough to use something like Amber.  In my experience, Amber is the game that a lot of elitist/pretentious 'role players' use to tell others 'they don't get gaming'.
« Last Edit: May 24, 2018, 02:36:42 PM by Christopher Brady »
"And now, my friends, a Dragon's toast!  To life's little blessings:  wars, plagues and all forms of evil.  Their presence keeps us alert --- and their absence makes us grateful." -T.A. Barron[/SIZE]

Willie the Duck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • W
  • Posts: 1848
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #142 on: May 24, 2018, 02:46:38 PM »
Quote from: Christopher Brady;1040483
I assume it was included because Wujick included it because that's what he believed Amber 'adventures' should be structured.  You do not include something in a book with the intent of never being used, even AD&D and it's myriad of optional rules are accepted that they will be used by someone.

Okay, but is that what you think makes Amber a Storygame? And if so, how?

Christopher Brady

  • The Voice of Raisin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • C
  • Posts: 4733
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #143 on: May 24, 2018, 02:51:29 PM »
Quote from: Willie the Duck;1040484
Okay, but is that what you think makes Amber a Storygame? And if so, how?

Well, going by Pundit's explanation of what he thinks is a "storygame", it's not.  I was misunderstanding.
"And now, my friends, a Dragon's toast!  To life's little blessings:  wars, plagues and all forms of evil.  Their presence keeps us alert --- and their absence makes us grateful." -T.A. Barron[/SIZE]

Willie the Duck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • W
  • Posts: 1848
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #144 on: May 24, 2018, 03:26:14 PM »
Quote from: Christopher Brady;1040485
Well, going by Pundit's explanation of what he thinks is a "storygame", it's not.  I was misunderstanding.

I...uh, well okay then. That settles that I guess.


And while I agree that Pundy went overly quickly to the insults, to no appreciable benefit, that does mean that it isn't the case that he's 'Not entirely sure you're as confident in your argument,' as he's apparently right within his own definitions of the terms, so he would have no reason to be unconfident.

And I'm not going to be sticking around for a who-has-the-right-vocab argument.

Hope this can just die as a pointless diversion.

ArrozConLeche

  • No Más
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1761
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #145 on: May 24, 2018, 05:42:07 PM »
No one will be surprised that I'd say Cyberpunk 2020, but I actually got to play AD&D 2nd Ed a lot more, and it was always fun.

Christopher Brady

  • The Voice of Raisin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • C
  • Posts: 4733
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #146 on: May 24, 2018, 06:02:02 PM »
Quote from: Willie the Duck;1040488
I...uh, well okay then. That settles that I guess.


And while I agree that Pundy went overly quickly to the insults, to no appreciable benefit, that does mean that it isn't the case that he's 'Not entirely sure you're as confident in your argument,' as he's apparently right within his own definitions of the terms, so he would have no reason to be unconfident.

And I'm not going to be sticking around for a who-has-the-right-vocab argument.

Hope this can just die as a pointless diversion.

Anytime someone has to make an attack on the person, rather than the argument, I've found that they're no longer confident in their own argument.

As for letting it go, I'm cool with.  I've said my piece on what game I like in the 90's a long time back.
"And now, my friends, a Dragon's toast!  To life's little blessings:  wars, plagues and all forms of evil.  Their presence keeps us alert --- and their absence makes us grateful." -T.A. Barron[/SIZE]

DeadUematsu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • D
  • Posts: 1370
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #147 on: May 24, 2018, 07:40:35 PM »
If we are allowed to continue this diversion, FATE has its origins in being used to run Amber... which makes a twisted sort of sense.
 

Christopher Brady

  • The Voice of Raisin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • C
  • Posts: 4733
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #148 on: May 25, 2018, 09:57:13 AM »
Quote from: DeadUematsu;1040515
If we are allowed to continue this diversion, FATE has its origins in being used to run Amber... which makes a twisted sort of sense.

FATE or Fudge, if I recall correctly, they both share a history?  (Honest question, I don't remember.)  And it would explain my dislike of FATE comes from, and why it's got a player vs. GM feel, even when it doesn't mean to.
"And now, my friends, a Dragon's toast!  To life's little blessings:  wars, plagues and all forms of evil.  Their presence keeps us alert --- and their absence makes us grateful." -T.A. Barron[/SIZE]

DeadUematsu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • D
  • Posts: 1370
What was Your Favorite 1990s Game?
« Reply #149 on: May 25, 2018, 04:31:03 PM »
Quote from: Christopher Brady;1040576
FATE or Fudge, if I recall correctly, they both share a history?  (Honest question, I don't remember.)  And it would explain my dislike of FATE comes from, and why it's got a player vs. GM feel, even when it doesn't mean to.

It was Fudge but the hack ultimately lead to Fate. I was always fascinated with Fudge. It was a pretty solid light and universal system and found Fate a little unnecessary. Having played Fate over the years, my stance on it has soured. I don't find it very adversarial. Rather it becomes about gaming the story which kinda kills things for me like cheating/metagaming.