SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Everquest Next and Amber Diceless

Started by tenbones, September 13, 2017, 04:20:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

tenbones

How the wheel turns.

We're all well informed about how MMO's influenced TTRPG's (mostly in bad ways). But developer notes dropped for the ill-fated Everquest Next game which promised some truly revolutionary ideas. Well a big part of that was pushing the StoryBrics system to make AI combat more "realistic" and dynamic based on who the AI was fighting. To my shock - at the center of this design idea was none other than Amber's Diceless system with the Warfare stat being the core design concept.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/jxzgb52360v04dl/EQN%20AI%20Proposal%20-%20RR.pdf?dl=0

I don't do any AI game development - but I think it's an important acknowledgement that most video-game players don't understand. The power of good TTRPG systems can, should, do influence their games more than they should influence TTRPG's. As AI gets better - many of the abstractions of our various TTRPG systems will be able to be modeled as intended. I think it's fantastic that they approached it this way, with AMBER no less!

What we shouldn't be doing it looking at videogames recapitulating TTRPG mechanics BACK into TTRPG's. That kind incestuous design makes for less RPG than boardgame on mecharoids.

Shawn Driscoll

People playing computer games by hand, where the GM emulates a game server, and players spam with their "I attack it!", is retarded as fuck.

Dumarest

Quote from: Shawn Driscoll;992078People playing computer games by hand, where the GM emulates a game server, and players spam with their "I attack it!", is retarded as fuck.

For once I agree with Shawn Driscoll. This date should be commemorated.

tenbones

Quote from: Shawn Driscoll;992078People playing computer games by hand, where the GM emulates a game server, and players spam with their "I attack it!", is retarded as fuck.

LOL. I say the same thing about many table-top games. =/=

Herne's Son

O k ow quite a few video game developers. Every single one of them got their start with, and still play TTRPGs. Not surprising that there's a TRRPG influence in so many video games.