SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

What is the Best WOTC Edition of D&D?

Started by Jam The MF, August 09, 2022, 11:53:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Philotomy Jurament

#30
Quote from: Eric Diaz on August 11, 2022, 10:13:32 AM
Well, the OC asked "If you were going to play a WOTC Edition, which one would it be?", so I am thinking OGL and derivative games do not count...

Good point. In that case, I'd probably choose 3.0 for a D&D-ish game, but I'd house-rule it to change or eliminate feats and probably some other misc. stuff. Or maybe 5e with a bunch of exclusions and house rules.  Either way I'd be house ruling a lot.

If D&D-ish wasn't a concern I might choose 4e. It's not at all the game I'd run when I want D&D, but if considered as its own separate thing it's a solid game system.
The problem is not that power corrupts, but that the corruptible are irresistibly drawn to the pursuit of power. Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.

Llew ap Hywel

Quote from: Jam The MF on August 09, 2022, 11:53:42 PM
If you were going to play a WOTC Edition, which one would it be?

I wouldn't. They're all shit.

Although I'd have given a Saga Edition five minutes.
Talk gaming or talk to someone else.

thedungeondelver

5e, probably.

It's dead simple.  Hell, I can run an AD&D character in a 5e game without changing a single thing.
THE DELVERS DUNGEON


Mcbobbo sums it up nicely.

Quote
Astrophysicists are reassessing Einsteinian relativity because the 28 billion l

Lord Dynel

Quote from: Leonidas on August 11, 2022, 01:40:58 PM
Quote from: Jam The MF on August 09, 2022, 11:53:42 PM
If you were going to play a WOTC Edition, which one would it be?

I wouldn't. They're all shit.

Although I'd have given a Saga Edition five minutes.

I still think about converting Saga Edition to a fantasy game (I know a few people tried, but I wasn't impressed).  If 4e would have been a copy of Saga, I might be still playing it.  I am still playing Saga, so there ya go...

Zelen

If I had to choose a specific edition of WOTC D&D to run a game with, I'd choose 5E.

However, this is a pretty poor endorsement. The only reason why most people here & elsewhere prefer 5E is because it simply has the fewest rules. When I run a game I can build off of the basic skeleton in a way that suits me more easily than I can with 3E or 4E.

zircher

Yeah, D20 Modern or Star Wars Saga Edition are only ones that I even own.  I never bothered with any of their D&D shit.
You can find my solo Tarot based rules for Amber on my home page.
http://www.tangent-zero.com

Aglondir

Quote from: Lord Dynel on August 14, 2022, 07:10:20 PM
I still think about converting Saga Edition to a fantasy game (I know a few people tried, but I wasn't impressed).  If 4e would have been a copy of Saga, I might be still playing it.  I am still playing Saga, so there ya go...

Lord Dynel,

I know there's Fantasy Concepts Campaign Resource, but I don't own it.

https://www.drivethrurpg.com/browse/pub/3066/Samardan-Press/subcategory/5350_5358/Fantasy-Concepts

I've also seen fan versions, but they weren't that great. The problem is that the Jedi does not convert well into a magic user (way too powerful) and they tried to make the Scoundrel a pirate (I guess because they both have ships?)

Shrieking Banshee

Saga is solid but it has the opposite issue of Rocket tag at higher levels.

The Spaniard

I'm not a fan of any of them, but core 5E I guess.

Palleon

5E free basic rules PDF.  Everything else is bloated nonsense.

Katowice

I just download the Basic Rules from their website for use in my 5E compatible games like Beowulf, Adventures in Middle-Earth and Ruins of Symbaroum.


Banjo Destructo

I think 3.5 is the one I'm most familiar with, it's probably my favorite.  I also like variations people have made to it, like E6, where characters get to "epic level" at level 6, and stop gaining Hit Dice and their power growth slows down after level 6.

Abraxus


Hzilong

Much as we rag on WotC, I do think 5e was actually a good game when it was in the first couple years. The errata and terrible new publications make it worse, but you can still find the older prints I'm pdf form. So 5e is probably their best edition.

3.5 was good, but I found it was not particularly smooth to use.

Finally, 4e is a good game. I stand by that. It is, however, not a good D&D game. If it had been marketed as a spinoff and 3.5 support continued, there probably would not have been the implosion we saw. Granted, it's probably a good thing that D&D as a brand collapsed for a while as it spawned pathfinder and allowed other games to get. Foothold in the market.
Resident lurking Chinaman