I think there should be a more tolerant attitude here on some sorts of games. This place should have been a place where one can talk about RPGs and not be censored for speaking one's mind.
I don't think anyone's censored, nor are "non-trad" rpgs put down as specific games, only vaguely and generally. If you talk breathlessly about your fun
Dogs in the Vineyard or
Polaris session, I'm pretty sure no-one's going to threadcrap.
I think there's a lot of
self-censoring going on. "I don't like your attitude to X, so I'm not going to talk about X" people say - to themselves, before they even post anything or actually discover what the attitude to X is.
Just talk about what you want to talk about. When it comes to talking generally about different kinds of rpgs, your "non-trad" rpgs get a lot of abuse, sure. But if you talk about some specific game, whether it's one you played or one you're developing, you'll be able to have a good discussion with no-one threadcrapping, I reckon.
Remember that the biggest shitstorms here have been about
people - "my GM/players are a pain", "you must be a fuckstick then", etc. I've yet to see a
Dogs in the Vineyard flamewar here.