This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Author Topic: Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)  (Read 2088 times)

TheShadow

  • Upstanding Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #15 on: September 25, 2013, 06:17:01 AM »
Started off with MERP, and liked the way it led to small-scale location-based adventures. XP per miles travelled fit well into The Hobbit style scenarios where every mile away from home was an adventure. Rolemaster went way beyond that into high fantasy but if I were to play again, focusing on a small location would be a good way to keep it accessible.
You can shake your fists at the sky. You can do a rain dance. You can ignore the clouds completely. But none of them move the clouds.

- Dave "The Inexorable" Noonan solicits community feedback before 4e's release

Exploderwizard

  • DESTROYER OF HOBBIES!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • E
  • Posts: 5026
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #16 on: September 25, 2013, 10:03:31 AM »
IMHO RM is too complex and involved to be as deadly as it is.

I don't mind the lethality in OD&D because I can generate another PC in 5 minutes and resume play.

Creating a RM character is major undertaking, and then regardless of skill, you can get crit killed anytime.

I can enjoy playing fragile characters, even playing in meat grinders, as long as chargen is quick and simple.
Quote from: JonWake
Gamers, as a whole, are much like primitive cavemen when confronted with a new game. Rather than 'oh, neat, what's this do?', the reaction is to decide if it's a sex hole, then hit it with a rock.

Quote from: Old Geezer;724252
At some point it seems like D&D is going to disappear up its own ass.

Quote from: Kyle Aaron;766997
In the randomness of the dice lies the seed for the great oak of creativity and fun. The great virtue of the dice is that they come without boxed text.

Kaiu Keiichi

  • Swine In Training
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 773
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #17 on: September 25, 2013, 10:12:48 AM »
Quote from: FaerieGodfather;693768
It's a glorious game-- one of my favorites-- but the amount of prep time necessary to run it is a little too cumbrous for me in my old age. I am working, however, on how to introduce the critical hit mechanics from RM into Fate, because I figure if I find the one other person in the target audience for that, my life will be complete.


As a narrative immersionist, I may be your one person audience. I've never seen the constructed fallacy that simulation and narrative must be opposed. Please keep us appraised on your work!
Rules and design matter
The players are in charge
Simulation is narrative
Storygames are RPGs

Kaiu Keiichi

  • Swine In Training
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 773
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #18 on: September 25, 2013, 10:14:15 AM »
Quote from: vytzka;693775
Well there are a lot of herbs and spells for fixing your shit, although they're respectively expensive and higher level. So it's more of a question of surviving until you can get some :D

As for making characters and playing, oh yeah. Every edition aside from possibly RMC is organized as a randomly sorted pile of information for an experienced player. It pretty much blows for newbies even though I was able to figure it out with some effort (starting with MERP helped).


I used to own the MERP core book. It was great, but I never found a chance to play it.
Rules and design matter
The players are in charge
Simulation is narrative
Storygames are RPGs

Saladman

  • Gamer
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 265
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #19 on: September 25, 2013, 12:16:00 PM »
I played in -and enjoyed!- an RMSS game years ago.  I never got past 3rd (?) level though, the game ended before I saw what a high level Rolemaster game was like.  Low level was explore, run!, fight only when you had to, sometimes die from it, loot when you won.  Not so very different from D&D, but it felt different at the time.

Play went surprisingly fast given the game's reputation, actually faster than my experience with D&D 3E (after leveling, and with tactical players) or 4E (ever).  But this was with a GM who knew the system, who had us photocopy our common weapon and critical charts so we weren't flipping through the book, and who I believe was only using the two generic maneuver charts (also copied), not looking up the specific ones except on special occasions.

When you do that, play and combat are just roll, add mod off your character sheet, look up result.  Which is, in principle, pretty fast and easy.  I suppose the critique is, when enough users aren't doing that to give you your reputation, you've got a presentation problem at the very least.

So I feel it's a very under-rated system in that respect.  Simultaneously, there are enough games out there its no longer as compelling an option for me.  Especially when it looks very much like Rolemaster influenced the DNA of 3rd edition D&D (and therefore Pathfinder, and even Castles and Crusades).  Between AD&D 2E and Rolemaster, I'll take Rolemaster.  When it's C&C or Savage Worlds or ACKS or 3.x/Pathfinder or any of 20 other games or Rolemaster, RM hasn't gotten high enough up the list to come out of storage.

Votan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • V
  • Posts: 638
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #20 on: September 25, 2013, 01:40:11 PM »
Quote from: vytzka;693775
Well there are a lot of herbs and spells for fixing your shit, although they're respectively expensive and higher level. So it's more of a question of surviving until you can get some :D


It also depends on just what happens to you.  One of the virtues of Rolemaster is the incredible diversity of spells.  One of the weaknesses is that spell descriptions are very short and often require judgment calls (healing spells are especially susceptible to this issue).  The same is true, to a lesser extent, with the critical tables -- how precisely some of the entries are read makes a surprising difference in terms of how lethal the game is with healers involved.

One Horse Town

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • O
  • Posts: 10203
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #21 on: September 25, 2013, 01:53:41 PM »
Rolemaster is not as complex as people make out. I will agree that chargen is a mite too complex for a system that is a bit more deadly than the norm, but i've had no problem running multiple campaigns from 1st level up to 20th.

If anything spell-use is a bit too hamstrung compared to say, d&d. Unless you want to risk exceptional spell failure, it takes more than 1 round to cast spells that are around your level. Once you're 6 levels higher than the spell being cast it takes a single round, so a 7th level spell user can cast a 1st level spell in 1 round.

Luckily, there are a plethora of spell-using classes to chose from, so your utility can be greater if you feel like it.

Every time i talk about it here makes me want to start a new game. Not sure if i can get one going for a while though.

Claudius

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1970
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #22 on: September 25, 2013, 04:09:43 PM »
Quote from: Kaiu Keiichi;693517
I was really impressed with how smoothly the game ran in play,


Quote from: Lawbag;693548
You must have been playing some other version of RM, as although I adore the RM/MERP system, Ive found it anything but smooth.

In my experience, Rolemaster runs very smoothly, provided the GM delegates  some of his tasks, like XP accounting, critical and attack charts, etc. If the GM tries to manage everything by himself, he'll get crazy!
Grając zaś w grę komputerową, być może zdarzyło się wam zapragnąć zejść z wyznaczonej przez autorów ścieżki i, miast zabić smoka i ożenić się z księżniczką, zabić księżniczkę i ożenić się ze smokiem.

Nihil sine magno labore vita dedit mortalibus.

And by your sword shall you live and serve thy brother, and it shall come to pass when you have dominion, you will break Jacob’s yoke from your neck.

Dios, que buen vasallo, si tuviese buen señor!

Claudius

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1970
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #23 on: September 25, 2013, 04:23:07 PM »
Quote from: One Horse Town;693963
If anything spell-use is a bit too hamstrung compared to say, d&d. Unless you want to risk exceptional spell failure, it takes more than 1 round to cast spells that are around your level. Once you're 6 levels higher than the spell being cast it takes a single round, so a 7th level spell user can cast a 1st level spell in 1 round.

This aspect of Rolemaster is rarely talked about in forums, but it's an essential part of its flavor, as much as criticals. When you need one or two rounds to prepare a spell, it's very easy to be interrupted by an enemy, which makes you very dependant on fighters. One of the best features of Rolemaster. And I say this as someone who has played magicians and sorcerers.

Besides, it's awesome, when you're playing a magician, to announce you're going to concentrate in order to cast a firebolt. :D
Grając zaś w grę komputerową, być może zdarzyło się wam zapragnąć zejść z wyznaczonej przez autorów ścieżki i, miast zabić smoka i ożenić się z księżniczką, zabić księżniczkę i ożenić się ze smokiem.

Nihil sine magno labore vita dedit mortalibus.

And by your sword shall you live and serve thy brother, and it shall come to pass when you have dominion, you will break Jacob’s yoke from your neck.

Dios, que buen vasallo, si tuviese buen señor!

APN

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 461
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #24 on: October 04, 2013, 05:24:32 PM »
We played MERP in a break from D&D/AD&D 1e when it first came out. The crit system really livened up our gaming sessions, but it is bloody lethal. You pretty much end up killing things without reducing their hit points by a massive amount from ordinary hits. The bleeding and dying and 3 rounds of intense agony will generally do it.

If the players are happy to rattle out new characters when the last ones buy the farm (and they will) I would absolutely recommend giving it a whirl in a generic fantasy style world with dungeon crawls and the usual stuff. The longest time we spent was writing out character sheets by hand, but that was in the early-mid eighties with a dot matrix printer if you were lucky, not an issue now.

We even ran a campaign where the bad guys turned good. Olog Hai player characters, all five of the group. The slaughter was unholy, and those guys could really kick ass from day one. A small bunch of Ologs rebelling at being the bad guy and taking the fight to the big bad fellas. Proper gore splattered bone smashing blood and thunder hack and slash play, and made a nice change from the usual creeping about, frightened of your own shadow 1st level 'red shirt' characters. It was different anyway.

Oops. Rolemaster. Can't remember which version we played - probably the first one. These days it's confusing to know which that version was (RM1? RMC?) but the general consensus was that MERP did everything RM did easier, faster and without the poring through the various companions and figuring out the errata with what was in the books. Spacemaster was even worse for that, and I really wanted to like/play that.

So yeah, I'd recommend MERP. Cheap to buy 2nd hand, gives you the basics and if you need more, get Spell law. If you really need more, pick a version of RM, but god knows which is the best one. We played MERP, tried RM, went back to MERP and had loads of fun.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2013, 05:29:33 PM by APN »

YourSwordisMine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 633
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #25 on: October 04, 2013, 05:32:47 PM »
D&D doesn't have an LFQW problem unless you remove Spell disruption...



I tried playing RM once, and it didn't go well. This was after several years playing MERP. MERP was much simpler and easier to play.

I would love it if someone would take the MERP system and strip out all the ME. I want a MERP OSR.
Quote from: Exploderwizard
Starting out as fully formed awesome and riding the awesome train across a flat plane to awesome town just doesn't feel like D&D. :)

Quote from: Exploderwizard
The interwebs are like Tahiti - its a magical place.

Akrasia

  • Old One
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3353
    • http://akraticwizardry.blogspot.com/
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #26 on: October 04, 2013, 09:55:39 PM »
Quote from: APN;696660
...MERP did everything RM did easier, faster and without the poring through the various companions and figuring out the errata with what was in the books...


I quite agree.  MERP was a great system, one that realized most of RM's virtues while avoiding many of its vices.  (That said, I did enjoy RM 2e back in the day, at least until the Companions became overwhelming.  But MERP is better overall IMO.)

One could always combine MERP with Arms Law (if one wanted more detailed combat) and/or Spell Law (if one wanted more spells).  A nice thing about such a combination is that it doesn't matter which version of AL and/or SL you use.
RPG Blog: Akratic Wizardry (covering Cthulhu Mythos RPGs, TSR/OSR D&D, Mythras (RuneQuest 6), Crypts & Things, etc., as well as fantasy fiction, films, and the like).
Contributor to: Crypts & Things (old school 'swords & sorcery'), Knockspell, and Fight On!

Akrasia

  • Old One
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3353
    • http://akraticwizardry.blogspot.com/
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #27 on: October 04, 2013, 09:57:48 PM »
Quote from: YourSwordisMine;696664
...
I would love it if someone would take the MERP system and strip out all the ME. I want a MERP OSR.


I too would be thrilled to see such a project.  (Alas, I have neither the time nor resources to do it myself.)

A few years ago Rolemaster Express (RMX) came close to matching MERP as a simplified, streamlined, and setting-less version of RM.  For some idiotic reason the 'new' ICE discontinued RMX. :mad:
RPG Blog: Akratic Wizardry (covering Cthulhu Mythos RPGs, TSR/OSR D&D, Mythras (RuneQuest 6), Crypts & Things, etc., as well as fantasy fiction, films, and the like).
Contributor to: Crypts & Things (old school 'swords & sorcery'), Knockspell, and Fight On!

Votan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • V
  • Posts: 638
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #28 on: October 05, 2013, 01:01:27 AM »
Quote from: Akrasia;696729
I too would be thrilled to see such a project.  (Alas, I have neither the time nor resources to do it myself.)

A few years ago Rolemaster Express (RMX) came close to matching MERP as a simplified, streamlined, and setting-less version of RM.  For some idiotic reason the 'new' ICE discontinued RMX. :mad:


Yeah, MERP was a very good level of introductory difficulty.  One of the odd things in the modern RPG market is how few games are really aimed at the beginning player.  MERP or RMX would make an excellent way to get new players used to the logic of Rolemaster.

David Johansen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • D
  • Posts: 6222
Tell me about Rolemaster (various editions)
« Reply #29 on: October 05, 2013, 09:52:02 AM »
I wrote a d10 version of Rolemaster called The Rolemaster's Apprentice.  The point of the thing was to show that the actual mechanics weren't complex by removing the double digit math.  I submitted it to ICE and they sat on it.  Eventually I posted a link to it in an on-line discussion and was threatened with legal action for doing so.  The people who saw it really liked it.

The current ICE hasn't done anything with it either.  Which leads me to believe Rasyr's claim that the real problem is with the current owner.

I'm not enough of an insider to speak with authority.  But I saw enough of the events that led up to the change in management to say that there was a heated power struggle for control of ICE a couple years back and the removal of RMX was a factor in that power struggle.

I think you'd find a lot of legal heat from ICE and Tolkien Enterprises* for trying to retro clone MERP.  The latter, in any case has lawyers that need to justify their salaries by protecting their IP and their employers do technically own MERP.

*not to be mistaken for the Tolkien Estate who don't really get much out of it either way at this point
Fantasy Adventure Comic, games, and more http://www.uncouthsavage.com