So, after the foreseeable backlash on the OGL, Wizards released this:
https://www.dndbeyond.com/posts/1423-an-update-on-the-open-game-license-oglMy head hurts too much for me to read it thoroughly plus English isn't my native language, but this is what I take out of it:
"First, we wanted the ability to prevent the use of D&D content from being included in hateful and discriminatory products." "The next OGL will contain the provisions that allow us to protect and cultivate the inclusive environment we are trying to build..."
-> Does this mean that, if we were to release products under this license, they *theoretically* can forcefeed our product that bio-essentialism nonsense (no fixed ability increases, no "races", ...)?
"And third, we wanted to ensure that the OGL is for the content creator, the homebrewer, the aspiring designer, our players, and the community—not major corporations to use for their own commercial and promotional purpose."
-> Can we interpret this as an attack on Paizo, Kobold Press, Green Ronin, ... ?