SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

So how good or bad is the new WFRP?

Started by RPGPundit, May 24, 2020, 09:26:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions

KingCheops

#15
May 28, 2020, 11:59:56 AM
Quote from: remial;1131578the thing that bugs me is Cubicle 7 had 3 different Warhammer RPGs and they all use different systems.

I want them to all use the same system so if I want to do a massive Hodge-podge setting, I can.  without having to sit with 3 rule books and write out conversion rules.

(granted the only reason I would do that would be to drive the grognard assholes at the local game store nuts, but still)

Are you including Soulbound in that group of 3 Warhammer games?  The proper Warhammer Fantasy ruleset is wildly inappropriate for the tone of Age of Sigmar.

lordmalachdrim

#16
May 28, 2020, 03:22:12 PM
Quote from: KingCheops;1131579Are you including Soulbound in that group of 3 Warhammer games?  The proper Warhammer Fantasy ruleset is wildly inappropriate for the tone of Age of Sigmar.

I a more accurate statement would be. Age of Sigmar is wildly inappropriate for the tone of anything Warhammer related.

KingCheops

#17
May 28, 2020, 07:34:07 PM
Quote from: lordmalachdrim;1131598I a more accurate statement would be. Age of Sigmar is wildly inappropriate for the tone of anything Warhammer related.

Lol

Yes it isn't everyone's cup of tea.

HappyDaze

#18
May 29, 2020, 06:40:03 AM
Quote from: lordmalachdrim;1131598I a more accurate statement would be. Age of Sigmar is wildly inappropriate for the tone of anything Warhammer related.

It's fine if you take it as its own thing and don't try to play WFRP with it. It is written from the viewpoint that the Old World is dead and gone (and it's core is literally being strip mined for materials to build the new army of Sigmar) and something else replaces. For anyone that ever complained that a new version of something was just buying a slightly different take on the old, this one shows the good and bad of recombining elements in sometimes radically different ways. Also, while I'm of mixed feelings on the AoS setting, but the Soulbound mechanics seem very tight.

The Exploited.

#19
May 29, 2020, 06:46:41 AM
There's an extra layer of complexity in 4e that I don't care for. I'll just stick to 2e which is the best implementation of the rules so far.
https://www.instagram.com/robnecronomicon/

\'Attack minded and dangerously so.\' - W. E. Fairbairn.

KingCheops

#20
May 30, 2020, 11:09:01 PM
Oh I'm a huge AoS fan.  I loved Warhammer but it was always kind of "meh" as a setting.  It had enough interesting elements to keep me coming back to it but I was eagerly anticipating Soulbound.  The novels are so much fun and I love the heroic, bat-poop crazy nature of the new settings.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2
User actions