This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

[D&D 4e Essentials] Is it for me?

Started by The Butcher, December 23, 2010, 09:29:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Benoist

Maybe it is too little to late, in that people are now defining their "gamer ID" on being pro or against 4e. I have seen people pick up Essentials and enjoy them with their kids (like Jim Skach, for instance). I saw in Essentials a specific game play I could actually do something with, as opposed to the original 4e. But it seems we're not really representative of any kind of major shift in the market in regards to 4e. People have either embraced the game or went on to play other games. Essentials is not the game changer some would have wanted it to be, I fear.

Benoist

#16
Quote from: Seanchai;428382You're mistaken. There was never a problem with the writing, presentation, flavor, et al. of 4e.
For many people there was. You do not understand that, because you, personally, did not have a problem with it, and still do not.

It's not about you. It's about people who DID have a problem with the game, whom you do not understand, still, to this very day.

RPGPundit

The cover is pretty nice.  The rest, on the inside, is still 4e, or at least marred by 4e mentalities of the game. Too complicated, too many powers, too much emphasis on detailed minis-based combat, too much concern about "balance" and character build, too much WoTC crap, in other words.

You know what would have been awesome? If they'd copied both the cover AND the inside of the old D&D basic set.

RPGpundit
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

Seanchai

Quote from: Benoist;428384For many people there was. You do not understand that, because you, personally, did not have a problem with it, and still do not.

You didn't read what I wrote. I wrote, basically, "There wasn't a problem with them," not "People didn't have a problem with them."

People have all kinds of "problems" with things that aren't actually problems. In this case, I think many people's problems were the result of the idea of a new edition, not the edition itself.

Hence my advice not to bother with Essentials.

Seanchai
"Thus tens of children were left holding the bag. And it was a bag bereft of both Hellscream and allowance money."

MySpace Profile
Facebook Profile

The Butcher

Shit, that is one confusing thread. :confused:

:D

Quote from: Benoist;428171I'd say have a look at Heroes of the Fallen Lands. Read through it, and make a decision from there.

Yeah, that's what I'll probably do.