This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.
The message boards have been upgraded. Please log in to your existing account by clicking here. It will ask twice, so that it can properly update your password and login information. If it has trouble recognizing your password, click the 'Forgot your password?' link to reset it with a new password sent to your email address on file.

Author Topic: Regarding the OSR goodness: Do you prefer the takes on OD&D, or B/X, or AD&D?  (Read 1430 times)

Razor 007

  • Razor 007
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1266
    • View Profile
Which one has inspired the best heritage within the OSR?
« Last Edit: September 11, 2020, 11:46:33 PM by Razor 007 »
I need you to roll a perception check.....

Steven Mitchell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • S
  • Posts: 2247
    • View Profile
I prefer B/X--specifically the Rules Compendium version.
No idea on the rest of your question.

Simlasa

  • Lemon Tart
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5828
    • View Profile
B/X for me as well.
AD&D was the first I played... but when I came back to being interested in D&D it was B/X and the OSR takes on it.

S'mon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11511
    • View Profile
Why not all?  :D


I love Swords & Wizardry, Labyrinth Lord & OSRIC about equally. Probably the OD&D based stuff has been the most innovative, eg White Star. But for "let's play", OSRIC as a reproduction of AD&D-as-played is perfect.
My 5e and Mini Six Primeval Thule games blog:
https://simonsprimevalthule.blogspot.com
My Forgotten Realms 4e & 5e games blog: https://frloudwater.blogspot.com

Arkansan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1172
    • View Profile
Personally I prefer the takes on OD&D, Jason Vey's Conan booklets being some of my favorite OSR materials. However it does seem like B/X really took off in the OSR in general.

Malfi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • M
  • Posts: 68
    • View Profile
At this point I am sold on Adnd, maybe using some houserules from Dragonsfoot, to fix certain things.

SavageSchemer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
    • View Profile
I prefer OD&D, but have played more B/X.
Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it.
Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good.
- Thomas Sowell (both quotes)

Chainsaw

  • Wandering the Wastelands
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Either OD&D or AD&D takes, depends on my mood.

Snowman0147

  • Now Even More Frosty
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2863
    • View Profile
I strongly prefer B/X.

jeff37923

  • Knight of Common Sense
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16824
    • View Profile
Which one has inspired the best heritage within the OSR?


I can't speak to that because the OSR has changed since it began. I can say that I've gotten some good mileage out of Basic Fantasy and Advanced Labyrinth Lord*.


*I've found that Players like ALL better than regular Labyrinth Lord, but I like regular LL over ALL as GM.


EDIT: I think that the above game lines carry on some traditions of AD&D and B/X D&D, but are hybrids of them which brings out a different (and I'd say) better gaming experience that what was.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2020, 12:35:15 PM by jeff37923 »

RandyB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • R
  • Posts: 868
    • View Profile
Re: Regarding the OSR goodness: Do you prefer the takes on OD&D, or B/X, or AD&D?
« Reply #10 on: September 12, 2020, 02:27:10 PM »
I am a huge ACKS fanboy, so B/X there. But my heart of hearts belongs to 1e AD&D. OSRIC works, but the text lacks the Gygaxian prose that so informed my youth.

It's no surprise that my burgeoning game is a 1e/OSRIC/ACKS mash-up...

Mishihari

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • M
  • Posts: 126
    • View Profile
Re: Regarding the OSR goodness: Do you prefer the takes on OD&D, or B/X, or AD&D?
« Reply #11 on: September 12, 2020, 06:21:36 PM »
Okay, so if I'm looking for an AD&D with better rules, what's my best bet?  (And don't say 2e)

LiferGamer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 231
  • babbling idiot
    • View Profile
    • Delcars Dungeon
Re: Regarding the OSR goodness: Do you prefer the takes on OD&D, or B/X, or AD&D?
« Reply #12 on: September 12, 2020, 06:44:43 PM »
OSRIC is nice and clean, easy to use.  The prior version of Havkmaster is a fun read, but clunky.
Your Forgotten Realms was my first The Last Jedi.

If the party is gonna die, they want to be riding and blasting/hacking away at a separate one of Tiamat's heads as she plummets towards earth with broken wings while Solars and Planars sing.

Philotomy Jurament

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1782
    • View Profile
    • http://www.philotomy.com
Re: Regarding the OSR goodness: Do you prefer the takes on OD&D, or B/X, or AD&D?
« Reply #13 on: September 12, 2020, 07:09:04 PM »
I'd have to say AD&D, as far as published "OSR" rules sets go. OSRIC is very solid. I also like Astonishing Swordsmen & Swordsmen of Hyperborea, although I like it more for the subclasses and setting than for the rules themselves. I always run games using the 1e books. But I sometimes draw on OSRIC or AS&SH supplements and modules. And if there are players that want a copy of the rules, I'm happy to point them towards the free OSRIC pdf.


I also like original D&D, of course, but again I favor using the original TSR rules and then modifying them to suit your game. That's the biggest strength of original D&D, in my opinion. Consequently, I don't draw on the original D&D clones much, although I'd be happy to use a S&W module (for example) in my original D&D game.


I think Lion & Dragon is pretty cool. I haven't run it as its own thing, but I've drawn on it as a resource for certain original D&D "mini campaigns" that I've run.



I guess that's my pattern: I don't really run "OSR" games, but I love being able to draw on OSR game supplements/adventures/etc. as resources for my 1e AD&D and original D&D games.



That rug really tied the room together, man.

jeff37923

  • Knight of Common Sense
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16824
    • View Profile
Re: Regarding the OSR goodness: Do you prefer the takes on OD&D, or B/X, or AD&D?
« Reply #14 on: September 12, 2020, 08:25:48 PM »
Okay, so if I'm looking for an AD&D with better rules, what's my best bet?  (And don't say 2e)


Give Advanced Labyrinth Lord a look. It is pretty good for a better but still compatable AD&D.