SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

[Poll] Stat Order in D&D

Started by J Arcane, August 10, 2013, 02:38:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

SionEwig

I always went with Str-Int-Wis-Con-Dex-Chr. Did this from original D&D up to 2nd ed.
 

Spellslinging Sellsword

I prefer them grouped physical and non-physical. The original ordering was based on what counts as prime requisites for the 3 base classes.

AteTheHeckUp

Never seemed to matter much to me, but in my formative D&Ding we made do with homemade character sheets.  Took years for me to realize that there was an official order, and I don't remember what that was.

KenHR

This might be a strange thought, but there's something almost dialectical about the original order of stats:

- A hero needs to be strong.

- Yeah, but he needs to be intelligent, too.

- Intelligence is nothing without wisdom and common sense.

- You can have all that, but if you're not quick, you're dead.

- Ah, but a hale and healthy hero can shrug off any blow.

- But a hero really isn't a hero if he isn't a leader of men!

I dunno, it struck me that way back when I was thinking a lot about stats for a homebrew I was writing back in the '90s.
For fuck\'s sake, these are games, people.

And no one gives a fuck about your ignore list.


Gompan
band - other music

languagegeek

I like the classic ordering for the same reason I like QWERTY keyboards over Dvorak keyboards. Sure the latter is more "logical" but QWERTY is ingrained and instinctual for me at this point.

Philotomy Jurament

I don't really care, but if I were writing down stats I'd use the classic order.
The problem is not that power corrupts, but that the corruptible are irresistibly drawn to the pursuit of power. Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.

Votan

Quote from: Philotomy Jurament;680003I don't really care, but if I were writing down stats I'd use the classic order.

Yes, that would be my position as well.

Kuroth

I like them written in a row rather than a column on a character sheet.  No other real preference.
Any comment I add to forum is from complete boredom.

Raven

I remember the original order but have them internalized as str, dex, con etc most likely because I've played more 2e than all other editions combined.

I'm a little offended at having to vote for 'd20' though. :p

talysman

Quote from: KenHR;679974This might be a strange thought, but there's something almost dialectical about the original order of stats:

- A hero needs to be strong.

- Yeah, but he needs to be intelligent, too.

- Intelligence is nothing without wisdom and common sense.

- You can have all that, but if you're not quick, you're dead.

- Ah, but a hale and healthy hero can shrug off any blow.

- But a hero really isn't a hero if he isn't a leader of men!

I dunno, it struck me that way back when I was thinking a lot about stats for a homebrew I was writing back in the '90s.

Of course, the original order swapped #4 and #5. I suspect they moved Dex ahead of Con after the thief became a core class, so that all the prime requisites were grouped together; that seems to be the rationale behind grouping Strength, Intelligence and Wisdom. Before the thief, the second triplet was general abilities of use to everyone, and I guess they figured the Con bonus was the most immediately useful of the abilities. Dex comes next, because of the ranged attack bonus, and Charisma, with its less immediate impact, comes last.

Benoist

Str, Int, Wis, Dex, Con, Cha.

It's a good sequence for rolling 3d6 (or 4d6 drop lowest) in order, because it goes through the primary classes, and at the same time alternates the types of stats instead of lumping them together in two blocks/sequences of rolls.

Raven

I dig the "This roll is for xxx" method that talysman mentioned.

noisms

I usually write them down in whatever order, but for some reason it seems wrong for STR not to be the first and CHA not to be last - probably to do with the two stats' relative importance to a 12-year-old just starting out with D&D.
Read my blog, Monsters and Manuals, for campaign ideas, opinionated ranting, and collected game-related miscellania.

Buy Yoon-Suin, a campaign toolbox for fantasy games, giving you the equipment necessary to run a sandbox campaign in your own Yoon-Suin - a region of high adventure shrouded in ancient mysteries, opium smoke, great luxury and opulent cruelty.

Starglyte

The "d20" order, because that is how I remember it from 2nd edition AD&D.

Kiero

While I'm playing something using the Classic order (and haven't changed it), the D20 order feels more natural and intuitive.
Currently running: Tyche\'s Favourites, a historical ACKS campaign set around Massalia in 300BC.

Our podcast site, In Sanity We Trust Productions.