SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Necros?

Started by Mishihari, January 26, 2021, 06:10:25 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mishihari

Things were a bit slow here for a few days so I went far down the page and read some of the threads from 2006.  Besides some familiar names (Cyberzombie and Colonel Hardisson and wow, you've been here a long time SHARK) I saw some really interesting stuff that I'd enjoy discussing.  Also, some folks posted things on the internet that are WRONG and THIS MUST NOT STAND!!! (joking)  What are the policies and community sentiments here on necroing ancient threads?

Chris24601

Quote from: Mishihari on January 26, 2021, 06:10:25 AM
Things were a bit slow here for a few days so I went far down the page and read some of the threads from 2006.  Besides some familiar names (Cyberzombie and Colonel Hardisson and wow, you've been here a long time SHARK) I saw some really interesting stuff that I'd enjoy discussing.  Also, some folks posted things on the internet that are WRONG and THIS MUST NOT STAND!!! (joking)  What are the policies and community sentiments here on necroing ancient threads?
I'm not Pundit, but given the general free speech policy of the boards, as long as what you're saying is on topic to the thread, I don't see why it'd be a problem. We're often discussing decades old games so frankly, skipping the rehash of old arguments by referencing a previous discussion feels like a time-saver rather than a waste of time.

That's my two cents anyway. Take it for what it's worth.

Steven Mitchell

What Chris said.  Plus, if you do want to take a topic in a new direction that perhaps is not on topic, you can always link the old discussion at the start of the new one.

Ghostmaker

I kinda like Steve's idea better. Start a new topic, but plug a link in to the prior thread. But it's Pundit's sandbox so I'd want him to be the final arbiter :)

Omega

Id rather just continue an old one so its all in one place rather than having to repeat everything over and over like we allready have to wo with someone makes a new thread on an old topic covered in one or even several older threads.

Two Crows

If I get a vote, I'd like to stick with the old threads rather than restate everything.

Seems more efficient.
If I stop replying, it either means I've lost interest in the topic or think further replies are pointless.  I don't need the last word, it's all yours.

Steven Mitchell

To be clear, I don't think there is anything special about a thread being old that should cause someone to post or not post in it.  I'd make the same decision to post in a thread or start a new one on a tangent even if the "old" thread was from yesterday, based on whether the thing I wanted to say was on-topic enough to go in it or not.