SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

The Basic Game...why the hell would anyone play it instead of Basic D&D?

Started by grubman, March 25, 2007, 11:34:54 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Casey777

Quote from: SettembriniI share the dislike for BFRPG on the grounds of being restricted to 20 levels. Due to this, one cannot just use old material/modules.

Gimme 36 Levels!

My understanding is that BFRPG emulates the earlier Moldavy/Cook B/X (1-14) Basic D&D not Mentzer BECMI/RC (1-36) Basic D&D. The books that came out for B/X (or for Holmes Basic for that matter) were reissued for BECMI with little to no change.

While I'm starting to really dig the idea of a comprehensive high level campaign with full rules support that CMI has I don't think there was all that much produced for those levels, esp. for MI.

Settembrini

QuoteI don't think there was all that much produced for those levels, esp. for MI.
I beg to differ. The whole Mystara Meta-Campaign is bound to end up in the highlevels. [http://www.mbertenshaw.plus.com/Mark/RPG/master.html
and keep in mind WOTI!]
And, as my Dragonsfoot lore check tells me, they[Mentzer] did adjust the bonus progression for 36 levels.
And that´s why I don´t dig BFRPG: the levels are not BECMI D&D levels, starting as early as 10th level.

I appreciate the effort of the maker, but i just can´t use it, though I´d really like to. It was so close, that´s why I´m unhappy with it.

@Solo: How´s that supposed to work? It´d screw your whole level progression. There´d be need for a paralell 36level edition, just confusing people, no?
If there can\'t be a TPK against the will of the players it\'s not an RPG.- Pierce Inverarity

Solomoriah

Quote from: Settembrini@Solo: How´s that supposed to work? It´d screw your whole level progression. There´d be need for a paralell 36level edition, just confusing people, no?
You'd have to create new tables for all four classes... thief abilities, saving throws, attack bonuses, and spell progressions.  You'd need additional higher-level spells, but there is at least one person working on filling those in.

There would be no confusion; alternate rules are published as articles on the Basic Fantasy website, then eventually will be collected (when enough pages of articles are available) as the Olde Dungeoneer's Almanack.  For free in PDF, at cost on Lulu.com... eventually.  Not enough pages of "finished" articles yet.

BX was my "coverage target;"  I wanted to ensure that older materials in the Basic and Expert product lines could be adapted very simply.  Frankly, CMI wasn't part of my target... I don't even own those rules, and never did.  But again, Basic Fantasy RPG is a collaborative project.
 

Settembrini

QuoteFrankly, CMI wasn't part of my target... I don't even own those rules, and never did. But again, Basic Fantasy RPG is a collaborative project.

Which is totally cool with me. But I´m a BECMI person ;).

Again, Kudos to your efforts!
Must have been quite some work.
If there can\'t be a TPK against the will of the players it\'s not an RPG.- Pierce Inverarity

jdrakeh

Quote from: SolomoriahThere would be no confusion; alternate rules are published as articles on the Basic Fantasy website, then eventually will be collected (when enough pages of articles are available) as the Olde Dungeoneer's Almanack.  For free in PDF, at cost on Lulu.com... eventually.  Not enough pages of "finished" articles yet.

Very cool. Here's hoping that interest/output doesn't wane before this happens.