This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Multi-classing vs Dual Classing

Started by Silverlion, March 18, 2012, 05:25:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3
User actions

beeber

#30
March 29, 2012, 01:50:27 PM
for the OP, if you want the multi-/dual-class thing, i think you have it right, it would be better the other way around, IMO.

personally i like the 3.x way best, though.  as long as you could come up with appropriate in-game rationale, switch classes however you want to, as long as you meet any requirements, of course.

Marleycat

#31
March 29, 2012, 02:18:26 PM
Quote from: beeber;524670for the OP, if you want the multi-/dual-class thing, i think you have it right, it would be better the other way around, IMO.

personally i like the 3.x way best, though.  as long as you could come up with appropriate in-game rationale, switch classes however you want to, as long as you meet any requirements, of course.

As long as your caster level is your total character level I'm fine with 3e style multiclassing. Dual Classing is just stupid unless it's a 1e Bard which doesn't follow the actual rules really or if it's 4e style multiclassing.
Don\'t mess with cats we kill wizards in one blow.;)
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3
User actions