SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Marvel Super Heroes RPG

Started by Kaz, July 27, 2011, 09:05:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Kaz

Let's keep the superhero theme going!

I didn't want to derail this thread about supers RPGs, but I had some questions about a game in particular.

The first RPG I ever owned was the Marvel Super Heroes Basic Set by TSR (otherwise called FASERIP, I believe). I begged for it and my parents obliged. I loved everything about it but didn't really understand it (I was a little young for it and had no experience with RPGs yet).

I have read through it before and have some idea of how the system works, but there were some things I thought were wonky (like how no matter how good you rolled, if your skill/power was less than an opponent's Toughness, you were wasting your time, but I am probably misremembering that). I never played it, but I do own it, so I would like to hear other people's experience with the game.

In the aforementioned thread, TristramEvans mentioned he used it for other settings. Has anyone else done this? How does it work for Supers action?

Also, what is the difference between the Basic Set and Advanced Set? Wikipedia claims the two systems are identical, so is it just the peripherals that differ? Is there anything in the Advanced Set that makes the game more complete?
"Tony wrecks in the race because he forgot to plug his chest piece thing in. Look, I\'m as guilty as any for letting my cell phone die because I forget to plug it in before I go to bed. And while my phone is an important tool for my daily life, it is not a life-saving device that KEEPS MY HEART FROM EXPLODING. Fuck, Tony. Get your shit together, pal."
Booze, Boobs and Robot Boots: The Tony Stark Saga.

VectorSigma

You want the Advanced Set unless you're introducing the game to younger non-roleplayers.  There are fan-written updates (an 'Expert' edition, for example), but I'm not familiar with the differences there.

FASERIP is a great system, and you can do anything with it.  I think it holds up at street level and at the cosmic end.  This game was doing 'genre emulation via clever rules' before I even knew what such a thing was.

I don't think you're misremembering the "I can't hurt this guy" effect (Aunt May can't hurt Galactus), but I think you may be misremembering it as more of an issue than it is in the rules.

I've probably had more fun-units with FASERIP than with any other single game out there, over the years.  The whole thing is pretty much designed for winging it.

The entire line is up at classicmarvelforever.com and worth checking out.
Wampus Country - Whimsical tales on the fantasy frontier

"Describing Erik Jensen\'s Wampus Country setting is difficult"  -- Grognardia

"Well worth reading."  -- Steve Winter

"...seriously nifty stuff..." -- Bruce Baugh

"[Erik is] the Carrot-Top of role-playing games." -- Jared Sorensen, who probably meant it as an insult, but screw that guy.

"Next con I\'m playing in Wampus."  -- Harley Stroh

Silverlion

The Advanced set has a few more options, I don't recall the rules for building special vehicles or bases being in either Basic Set, but I don't have them to reference on hand.

I've run games of numerous sorts with MSH, fantasy, superheroes, pulp, I've even run an espionage game using it.

In general the basic mechanics hold up very very well. There are things that I did differently in my superhero game, but that is coming with hindsight on what other games did right or wrong. I spend money to have my last set of Advanced MSH books bound in hardcover for good reason. I still use them.
High Valor REVISED: A fantasy Dark Age RPG. Available NOW!
Hearts & Souls 2E Coming in 2019

Novastar

Quote from: VectorSigma;470495I don't think you're misremembering the "I can't hurt this guy" effect (Aunt May can't hurt Galactus), but I think you may be misremembering it as more of an issue than it is in the rules.
Yes and no.
There are Martial Arts Talents that allow you to stun or slam an opponent, even if the attack isn't >= to your opponents Endurance, and another Martial Art Talent, that let's you stun or slam an opponent, even if your attack didn't pass Body Armor (and I think Force Fields).

It let's talented guys like Cap get a lucky hit on Hulk.

Quote from: Silverlion;470508The Advanced set has a few more options, I don't recall the rules for building special vehicles or bases being in either Basic Set, but I don't have them to reference on hand.
I believe bases and vehicles were in the Avengers Assemble box set, but I'd need to check...
Quote from: dragoner;776244Mechanical character builds remind me of something like picking the shoe in monopoly, it isn\'t what I play rpg\'s for.

Soylent Green

I "discovered" MSH only recently. I had the "Basic Revisited" from back when it first came out never actually did anything with it. As you said, it seemed kind of wonky.

When I did actually get round to run it, it was sensational. From the very first session my players were saying things like "and to think we could have been playing this all along".
New! Cyberblues City - like cyberpunk, only more mellow. Free, fully illustrated roleplaying game based on the Fudge system
Bounty Hunters of the Atomic Wastelands, a post-apocalyptic western game based on Fate. It\'s simple, it\'s free and it\'s in colour!

Silverlion

Quote from: Novastar;470518I believe bases and vehicles were in the Avengers Assemble box set, but I'd need to check...



They're also in the Advanced Set. Among other things. Lots of good resources for the game. From Realms of Magic, Avengers, X-men, and Spider-man boxed sets and books, and so on and so forth. Often multiple versions (Example X-men had Children of the Atom, X-men boxed set, X-forces boxed set, and a few modules, including the Day of Future Past series of modules.)

Damage comes from strength or powers you can damage someone even if they have a higher Endurance than your strength, you just can't stun or slam them easily. However Body Armor and Force Fields will stop you pretty much cold, but talents help overcome that, or changing types of attacks. Never forget, power stunts, charges, talents, and environmental effects can change the play field so to speak. So you can't damage someone in body armor, bury them in rubble heavier than they can lift, or hit them with energy attacks, or drop them in water by grappling them, and so on. They encouraged thinking around the problem, something too few games do (instead of overwhelming them with more force.)
High Valor REVISED: A fantasy Dark Age RPG. Available NOW!
Hearts & Souls 2E Coming in 2019

Novastar

That would be one of my three gripes with the system:

1) It doesn't model low-power characters as well; want to play The Phantom, or The Green Hornet, or other fairly normal, albiet heroic characters? Get ready to burn thru a lot of Karma, just to be effective.

2) Body Armor and Force Field are too good. Even at low levels, they'll make you bulletproof, where only superpowers can hurt you.

3) Dodging is a fool's game, especially if you have one of the above.

EDIT: Now, it's still one of my favorite Superhero games, don't get me wrong. You just need to be aware of it's limitations.
Quote from: dragoner;776244Mechanical character builds remind me of something like picking the shoe in monopoly, it isn\'t what I play rpg\'s for.

jgants

Quote from: Novastar;470594That would be one of my three gripes with the system:

1) It doesn't model low-power characters as well; want to play The Phantom, or The Green Hornet, or other fairly normal, albiet heroic characters? Get ready to burn thru a lot of Karma, just to be effective.

2) Body Armor and Force Field are too good. Even at low levels, they'll make you bulletproof, where only superpowers can hurt you.

3) Dodging is a fool's game, especially if you have one of the above.

EDIT: Now, it's still one of my favorite Superhero games, don't get me wrong. You just need to be aware of it's limitations.

I share those exact same three issues.  For lower-power, street level supers, I'd rather use Palladium's Heroes Unlimited combined with TMNT / Ninjas and Superspies.  It does gritty punching and kicking style supers better.

But for high-powered supers, the FASERIP system is perfect.  The karma system works excellent when you use it, the game moves fast, and the real-world equivalents to all the numbers (something a great many supers lack) means you can quickly stat things up and make rulings on the fly.

Oddly, I've hated pretty much every other set of supers rules I've ever seen.
Now Prepping: One-shot adventures for Coriolis, RuneQuest (classic), Numenera, 7th Sea 2nd edition, and Adventures in Middle-Earth.

Recently Ended: Palladium Fantasy - Warlords of the Wastelands: A fantasy campaign beginning in the Baalgor Wastelands, where characters emerge from the oppressive kingdom of the giants. Read about it here.

Silverlion

Quote from: Novastar;470594That would be one of my three gripes with the system:.


There are simple ways to resolve those. Some with house rules. The game didn't ever get a 2E Advanced set which is a shame. I usually leave the rules as is these days, but I've experimented with tons and tons of house rules since I discovered the game.
High Valor REVISED: A fantasy Dark Age RPG. Available NOW!
Hearts & Souls 2E Coming in 2019

Kaz

How do you work around the force field, armor problems? Give them some kind of "health" stat? Make them harder to come by in game?

Just sigh and deal with it?
"Tony wrecks in the race because he forgot to plug his chest piece thing in. Look, I\'m as guilty as any for letting my cell phone die because I forget to plug it in before I go to bed. And while my phone is an important tool for my daily life, it is not a life-saving device that KEEPS MY HEART FROM EXPLODING. Fuck, Tony. Get your shit together, pal."
Booze, Boobs and Robot Boots: The Tony Stark Saga.

Silverlion

Quote from: Kaz;470638How do you work around the force field, armor problems? Give them some kind of "health" stat? Make them harder to come by in game?

Just sigh and deal with it?


I usually smile and let players find a way around it. Since usually I GM. Especially since I use the core Advanced rules so each one is weaker against different attacks (Body Armor is 20 points less effective against energy attacks)

There is an optional rule I've tried a few times.

A Green hit does nominal damage and is deflected by defenses.

A Yellow results is a better hit and is deflected by defenses, but requires a roll to see if the Forcefield is knocked down.

A red result knocks a force field down, but doesn't do damage through the shield. It might thus knock out the target by feedback.  Body armor can't fall, therefore the attack gets +1 CS damage on a red result.

That means that places where its close its a chance do damage anyway through the effects. Or to set it up in a forcefields case to let allies help take him or her down.

If its significantly higher than any of the PCs can do in damage, that's a GMing side problem, not a rules problem. You need to give the PC's a chance. Although, sometimes this is a case of solving around the issue. (Tricks, traps, special gear and so on.)  The game isn't just about who can wail on someone to win--sometimes its about creative solutions to stopping a foe. (I've had a foe talked down, one buried in not dry cement then frozen, and so on.)
High Valor REVISED: A fantasy Dark Age RPG. Available NOW!
Hearts & Souls 2E Coming in 2019

TristramEvans

Quote from: Kaz;470638How do you work around the force field, armor problems? Give them some kind of "health" stat? Make them harder to come by in game?

Just sigh and deal with it?


For me the commonly raised forcefield & armour issues are a feature of the system, not a bug. In comics, there is a strong and prevalent use of archetypes and this lends to a level of niche protection , especially in team books. The Hulk is the strong guy or brick. If something needs lifting, he can do it, if an enemy is strong, Hulk gets madder and stronger, etc. The same goes for characters who are armoured (Iron Man) or have forcefields (Invisible Woman). It's extraordinary circumstances and takes an extraordinarily powerful foe for either Iron Man's armour to get pierced, or for Sue's Forcefield to fail to protect her from an attack. Forcefields, however, are pretty rare in the MU, so I would not allow more than one player in a team to have forcefield and if they did, it would be "their thing" (i.e. major power). Forcefields provide their own limitations on characters in that they cannot (except for certain cosmic-level characters, or world-conquerors like Doom) attack and keep up a forcfield at the same time. They are basically substituting their character's ability to affect in-game events to prevent their character from harm for the panel.

As for armour, it's either one of the character's powers, meaning they are very hard to physically hurt like The Hulk or The Juggernaut, or their thing is a suit of armour like Tony Stark and Co. Body armour, as equipment, does not provide a great deal of protection: The Punisher's Kevlar armour, for example, only provides Good protection; heavy armour like Dragonskin (the IRL kind, not actual Dragon skin) is only about Excellent protection, meaning if a givewn character has even a little bit of superhuman strength or a decently-rated form of attack, it's not going to be that hard to get past.

In the comics, if Spidey goes up against the Juggernaut, it would be suicidal for him to stand there and try to trade blows. Ditto Doom. He lures him into a pool of cement, or tricks him to stepping out onto ice, or lures into the water and drops a power line on him, etc.

If I send characters up against a villain with high armour, it's going to be deliberate, rare, and mainly because half the fun of the system is the methods it provides to come up with creative solutions. Maybe a character is n't strong enough to hit their opponent and cause damage, but if they can score a Slam result, they can knock the foe into the side of a building, which will cause damage equal to the wall's MS. And maybe the PC isn't strong enough to get a slam result with their fists, but if they use a traffic-light post to swing at the villain, the opponent's Endurance is compared to the MS of the weapon rather than the character's strength.

In the end, though, a simple "fix" is=

Green Result = -1 Damage
Yellow Result = Normal damage
Red Result = +1 Damage
Natural 100 = Roll the dice again and add the result to the overall damage.

daniel_ream

The thing to remember about MSH is that it models the comics much, much better than other superhero RPGs.  Defenses like Force Field and Resistance and Body Armor are almost always Force Field/Resistance/Armor vs. a very specific thing.  It's not like a  lot of other superhero RPGs where a defense stat defends against everything.  For any given defense superpower, it's highly likely that there will be a player in the group with some kind of power the defense doesn't block.

Sidebar: My biggest problem with MSH has always been the Universal Table.  It just takes too bloody long to resolve things with it.
D&D is becoming Self-Referential.  It is no longer Setting Referential, where it takes references outside of itself. It is becoming like Ouroboros in its self-gleaning for tropes, no longer attached, let alone needing outside context.
~ Opaopajr

jhkim

Quote from: daniel_ream;470929Sidebar: My biggest problem with MSH has always been the Universal Table.  It just takes too bloody long to resolve things with it.
You can closely approximate the Universal Table with a 1d20 roll and a second critical check die (which there are a couple options for).  

Rank Name : d20 Target Number

Shift 0  :  14
Feeble  :  13
Poor  :  12
Typical  :  11
Good  :  10
Excellent  :  9
Remarkable  :  8
Incredible  :  7
Amazing  :  6
Monstrous  :  5
Unearthly  :  4
Shift X  :  3
Class 1000  :  2

* If you match the d20 target number, the result is Green.
* If you match the d20 target number by 6 or more, the result is Yellow.
* If you match the d20 target number by 6 and get a crit check, the result is Red.  

The easiest crit check would be to roll a 1d6 and if you get a 6, it's a crit.  That's reasonably close.  

A very close approximation would be to have a custom die, like a d12 with faces 16, 12, 8, 4, and eight 1s.   If the crit die beats your target, you get a crit check.

daniel_ream

Quote from: jhkim;470942You can closely approximate the Universal Table with a 1d20 roll and a second critical check die (which there are a couple options for).

Oh, you can exactly duplicate the Universal Table by reverse engineering the formula for the ranges.  That's what Mayfair did for Chill! to avoid getting sued.  I find that figuring ranges on the fly takes even longer than just looking it up on a table for my groups.

We have a strong bias for very, very fast dice mechanics.  We like rolling dice; we do not like taking more time to figure out what the dice meant than it took to roll them.  So far D6 Legend and ORE are our go-to choices.
D&D is becoming Self-Referential.  It is no longer Setting Referential, where it takes references outside of itself. It is becoming like Ouroboros in its self-gleaning for tropes, no longer attached, let alone needing outside context.
~ Opaopajr